From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Feb 17 21:00:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8661D14DF4F3 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A01388F92 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C585C14DF4F0; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADFE14DF4EF for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E8388F87 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C2DDA73D for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1HL0UrP077753 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1HL0UbY077752 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201902172100.x1HL0UbY077752@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:30 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 21:00:32 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 233952 | jme NICs non functional after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrad 9 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Feb 17 17:00:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF7014D2DD1 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C515E7584E for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8624E14D2DCC; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BEB14D2DCA for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1060C7584A for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E2B1841B for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1HH0DLZ059528 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1HH0Ddj059523 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 131876] [socket] FD leak by receiving SCM_RIGHTS by recvmsg with small control message buffer Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:00:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D131876 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #16 from Mark Johnston --- (In reply to Peter Holm from comment #14) This was fixed by r343784, which has been merged to the affected branches. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Feb 18 00:41:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18E014E8875 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450206A66C for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0137E14E8872; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40C614E8871 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818B26A668 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB207CAB0 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1I0f2JR038508 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1I0f2Zo038507 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235787] ixgbe no carrier problem - TX(7) desc avail = 2048, pidx = 0 Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 00:41:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235787 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |IntelNetworking --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Feb 18 15:50:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9383D14DF72C for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:50:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 953186D271 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from QB1PR01MB3537.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.89.15) by QB1PR01MB3636.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.84.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1622.16; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:50:14 +0000 Received: from QB1PR01MB3537.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::609b:1ecd:c908:d44c]) by QB1PR01MB3537.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::609b:1ecd:c908:d44c%6]) with mapi id 15.20.1622.018; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:50:14 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: FreeBSD Net Subject: correct IP# for NFS kernel upcall to userland daemon Thread-Topic: correct IP# for NFS kernel upcall to userland daemon Thread-Index: AQHUx6BfIzCkM5w4JEKb3VotlufxJw== Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:50:14 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3591010c-72e1-4f31-13b6-08d695b8c59f x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600110)(711020)(4605104)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:QB1PR01MB3636; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: QB1PR01MB3636: x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: =?iso-8859-1?Q?1; QB1PR01MB3636; 23:Pl6u7uqDES6KO07unbBtdhrjctIMdbPhIu99kkJ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?od13aDyibFyCAml5oIh1Rq6ovvqHfgjmYf0gWUltFjEqfSMj8qFvMqAwho?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?1fLRxt4IoCvWEXUBTbCfwPeh2yZ5q6Ryj8K8nDvvN+zIELMUuo24lH0iGV?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?JyHFErSMk5a+AFP+1ku5zjvpD81sKVJDBMyw3UasopITxgjxQEwp/+Xd2c?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?nKZpym2FT/LWtGaZMofyPWGsEN443dwj9kmCVnWYwnmsq2KPs+HV7Yp5GQ?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?q4TBOmYWzxSoB6pw3QBl7gX724kMBxW7XIDmiTNacT+QuZ43bmeiWsbqf4?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ik8Ujunz2e2WYqLf6f11oi+y+iNgZC9YIMgDf4MWp1thaqN00WMRVvmcrS?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?WmIjfIOHiXlZTBInjK9pe085P/GUTEpRPdGlvwsom2FCYbuaYNuCZIPWHu?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?zTXwHcFSRSLoe7LNd/i5pESNGOjOHtw23WHk9n56zMT38gL+9Hmk6puMqr?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?3s/6Zq1SdaicL1falpfRdRo1WUZI7m1Cqns4hPpm9+/nV0MtK3IUbCybbI?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?yeNBzY765EosVq9XwZd+9M26fptnsph54h2qXLJrSjFUgu0TtIzBYUEhAD?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?WoT0xpsjaCs4JjcvaGclupDyW2upBExgU9e+ZPkyc392DdDOnDzndULBNv?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?G++0aBuZ4slsPmjZxOZU+9Rdll45I5mtUTexpjwxqpj7xz4DhK2++EFCAR?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?iD6GTWJxwQa23yyXNqsF16VNcvyBuNaE63Dp5shs2vr9bSpMBF6H3Haw/B?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?O2D9RH0tB2O7OhPLS05gJtIgL95KDCaTMrMFWaFKl/4kcRV8RCbFV5pyek?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?4hG4P98pqTrbr5dPLMuntyPnbSV+6seuaj+HjKeROFZV0Jdgl3lU/grpk/?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?MiIJxOPtbsClNvgrakY3x5XB3aO5in4M8sTaU9W9nkXVrbGyakx6suI/ae?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?dzX0hMb5Z5+aLaXek372mMHg9JUl2ZNwCgH1+X0/2SFdr+TgPSKXdT+8YR?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?lNWDGBAfLEpG3B43Y0SGQ=3D=3D?= x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-forefront-prvs: 09525C61DB x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(136003)(366004)(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(376002)(51874003)(199004)(189003)(105586002)(106356001)(6916009)(97736004)(33656002)(7696005)(5660300002)(68736007)(74316002)(8936002)(786003)(316002)(14454004)(81166006)(9686003)(25786009)(478600001)(6436002)(99286004)(486006)(55016002)(305945005)(53936002)(46003)(186003)(81156014)(71190400001)(86362001)(6506007)(71200400001)(2906002)(102836004)(8676002)(256004)(476003)(74482002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:QB1PR01MB3636; H:QB1PR01MB3537.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: uoguelph.ca does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: yzdMbzSZD+KumzXNdmxJXRn9HjH0lRyPEWrUu/IHa1e0XZ5W/9VpSMrouyP3Z7o/RaAOSdD3B+ra62DPQcFEdXIoQhLTisEUy5cexUVdaSLR7sAbmRv0L7TTMfXNNF9439Y5eq1zMPtPHzy47AS4bRsCd9ZsDZoCOZ44UKgGT5Jz9HdZKOrnz63mx2K+utnRMicv1L8pQ1YF/2gXVBUbNDHQcWgeXoUH4Qh9s6jyKzZDVR3NdcvPu0YC+wYlECD4fx7AkjqtXmCvBK/0POdt/bbG1GYGvz+mGXZf0Sk/OfCJV8TJhDa5kQsYoF/m+O+EW7IDXc++GdKK+1zxZMZmM6bPE6C/VghhoCYQJffakM5VnhBdRNzlijdxy8zyYT11VkZ1DBh8DfzxuCJC8JDMg9gzUrM1OftYHkrPV3YG8cY= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3591010c-72e1-4f31-13b6-08d695b8c59f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Feb 2019 15:50:14.0451 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: QB1PR01MB3636 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 953186D271 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 40.107.67.84 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-1.08)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.01), asn: 8075(-2.31), country: US(-0.07)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx2.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com,mx1.hc184-76.ca.iphmx.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.75)[-0.746,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[84.67.107.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:50:17 -0000 Hi, I have been in a recent discussion about what the correct IP address to use= for an upcall from the kernel to the NFS daemon nfsuserd (which maps between uids<->usernames and gids<->group names). The code uses UDP for the upcall (I once committed a patch changing that to an AF_LOCAL socket, but it broke certain sites where the directory the sock= et was being created in was NFS mounted). Currently the code uses a hardwired "127.0.0.1". Rodney Grimes feels that it would be better to do a name lookup on "localho= st" to get the address to use. In this case, I am concerned that the daemon will not be able to start up u= nder conditions where the DNS service isn't yet functional. (This problem can mo= stly be avoided by specifying "localhost" in /etc/hosts and configuring the syst= em to use that file before DNS, but I still don't like having this dependency on = DNS for the daemon starting up.) Note that the upcall will work for any IP# that refers to the local machine= and it does not need to be the one specified for "localhost" in the DNS. So, do you think I should do a lookup for "localhost" at daemon startup or = use a hardwired "127.0.0.1/::1"? Thanks in advance for any comments, rick From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Feb 18 16:05:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D2614E0866 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812F56E48E for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x1IG5TLi005916; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:05:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x1IG5T3I005915; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:05:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201902181605.x1IG5T3I005915@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: correct IP# for NFS kernel upcall to userland daemon In-Reply-To: To: Rick Macklem Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 08:05:29 -0800 (PST) CC: FreeBSD Net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 812F56E48E X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.22 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.89)[0.888,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.30)[-0.301,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.76)[0.760,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.01)[ip: (0.02), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.01), asn: 13868(-0.01), country: US(-0.07)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 16:05:32 -0000 > Hi, > > I have been in a recent discussion about what the correct IP address to use for > an upcall from the kernel to the NFS daemon nfsuserd (which maps between > uids<->usernames and gids<->group names). > > The code uses UDP for the upcall (I once committed a patch changing that to > an AF_LOCAL socket, but it broke certain sites where the directory the socket > was being created in was NFS mounted). > > Currently the code uses a hardwired "127.0.0.1". > Rodney Grimes feels that it would be better to do a name lookup on "localhost" > to get the address to use. > > In this case, I am concerned that the daemon will not be able to start up under > conditions where the DNS service isn't yet functional. (This problem can mostly > be avoided by specifying "localhost" in /etc/hosts and configuring the system to > use that file before DNS, but I still don't like having this dependency on DNS for > the daemon starting up.) > Note that the upcall will work for any IP# that refers to the local machine and it > does not need to be the one specified for "localhost" in the DNS. > > So, do you think I should do a lookup for "localhost" at daemon startup or use > a hardwired "127.0.0.1/::1"? > > Thanks in advance for any comments, rick Note that my main issue with this is hardcoding of a value in the kernel that can not be changed, thus if I either have no lo0 or have configured lo0 to be something other than 127.0.0.1 this hard coded use by the kernel of 127.0.0.1 would fail and there would be no way around it short of a recompile. I see a few other hard coded localhost values in the kernel and minimally these should be garbage collected into #define LOCALHOST 0x7f000001 and much beter would be to put these into a tunable, and finally best of all would be to find ways to not be depending on "optional lo0 && lo0 == 7f000001" in the kernel or userland code. I do believe that the some of the test software used for CI is also having similiar issues, and suspect that hard coding these values in places is eventually going to lead to testability issues. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 12:37:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF79A14EFB53 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@disroot.org) Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2886585780 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@disroot.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789F2290F7 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:36:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bu8SNAy4i-bU for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:36:54 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Point-to-point using GRE over IPv6 -> not possible with a single /128 address on the server? DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1550579814; bh=qVY647S6C2hFUNePgEeFVqnpqF5yWpAJ357EpglS8/4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=i0eRc//UTrPJEGXRAU2+kxNGCvFbLFhFxhDPMJXCAbB4ofR5J3yaj7WkvKMs17RqC Zs8+niTAJ4l6+vCrvjuHSuhVpgdZH09wep8mPJ9xAj1rBfAIrxKUjspeR3z3aYKvnX 2jiYAOyuEA1kioGYET7gtzIISldOeR07BIW29flRocqknuk2jHZKERoLjZ4EMkTjg6 tqPUTCEFy0X6mW8DmZBxUZQc+Bv1y/NtpxY2L9oZG59WxcnVOqSEBxM9nLHUygb3N5 AIoObLdm7Q0nE7djtneAibvNN57xx7SgGRXJ9GIP6MmAJ29yVL2q1/ScFyyfSyECUi Lkzx0CHtfFX3w== To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <95d8e3ea-af36-4d14-f280-908f92a96515@disroot.org> From: "Peter G." Message-ID: <9ab1a9b1-e1e3-9f48-2c3e-35454bcd6e77@disroot.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:36:49 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <95d8e3ea-af36-4d14-f280-908f92a96515@disroot.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2886585780 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=i0eRc//U; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@disroot.org designates 178.21.23.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@disroot.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.79 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[disroot.org:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[disroot.org:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[disroot.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[139.23.21.178.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.82)[-0.819,0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[disroot.org,none]; IP_SCORE(-0.46)[asn: 50673(-2.34), country: NL(0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50673, ipnet:178.21.23.0/24, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 12:37:05 -0000 On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote: > Now the GRE tunnel > >> ifconfig gre6 create >> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6 > #ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > > Why is this not possible? Isn't the logic behind it the same as with > IPv4? If not, why not? > > Does this mean it is not possible to have a point-to-point using IPv6 on > a machine with only a single /128 address? Is this a stupid question, or something of the sort? Because I truly don't understand why this wouldn't work. Thanks. PG From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 13:07:06 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4631114F0C54 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DDC686CE4 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id j19so16556025ljg.5 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 05:07:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=fPenjl954ck2GYCvY7ELXONmWgDirxIitgkjdz+mXTQ=; b=VK6z1oe2m/tHfrJGtJ8wDQeRr1emlb/9VQ/bfqUsVpL987bUndr8phwbDo7IaJ5Gx6 nbb2wc9V5+qjddHy3fBtU3OyxmIC2GeHOeu/brQFkBUCdJuKvVcV0vPd3h8RPDxo2Th1 m2MsGABRK4SFnb9qQFI3aUtWi41KVFNz8IvonEdnBvz77lKKN7yMdmdzQHRUL+rSbp8E ASH3NxQLdB2FuSKO4PUbvfrIF/llygFj3ONntwOuRhUpz7giTzN29P0dpRUp58MbvMl4 HcYwVZkZHgz4WMGd8fIc3LNEukcK9nqvixs8ZrF7WuPTEf6WpdlF8sK5QcUGhOGXxTGY DtOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=fPenjl954ck2GYCvY7ELXONmWgDirxIitgkjdz+mXTQ=; b=jjDFweR7CVva5G62LeghKfNR3O53ZBmSG6/15Eqk6BrQBUmgbWl4lGR3fHJgM9NmYm JYARqy1Lnt9Ge9yRaA1d2Z4WoXpLVj5CSi3ffA496Ys/X1IuZ33HZKWd+lYRMRDTLXHd Mxg1JQxkjf4XfT7r+JlYz+29d3pGUR1dULY6UVGXz5S4LjUpYEG6O6z0YYaII5Hwvvtg MIn2FKtFyR3AzDKjEs0lJOpTm2l3TCnFh7NA89bUQZgPTf2CqhU1Q3mdMbAS3nk7fuL0 9h0cTLuOGNkFe+2GVFu08a8DWes0zgZ91nc79ReewmqULieYnViiZovuqFOaxO8WW0QU Ca6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAua5XKtOL9f4htQWJQm43UOTO36iUr7I30FToFDBg45SLKvO28oK c1bqmfOUoum0U125GYibzC6HK6D6QySReekBq9w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYcJiGaflC5xpDulTNr0nNEk8MY1pdNbHKUH5j5Mm42ehA/9vsHLNRdnMp+fvgNmMiaaJoNUTWtfmfX+6JXkwo= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9e55:: with SMTP id g21-v6mr17320911ljk.139.1550581623422; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 05:07:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <95d8e3ea-af36-4d14-f280-908f92a96515@disroot.org> <9ab1a9b1-e1e3-9f48-2c3e-35454bcd6e77@disroot.org> In-Reply-To: <9ab1a9b1-e1e3-9f48-2c3e-35454bcd6e77@disroot.org> From: Andreas Nilsson Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 14:06:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Point-to-point using GRE over IPv6 -> not possible with a single /128 address on the server? To: "Peter G." Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1DDC686CE4 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=VK6z1oe2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andrnils@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=andrnils@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.59 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.88)[-0.879,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.70)[ip: (-9.19), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.27), asn: 15169(-1.99), country: US(-0.07)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 13:07:06 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:38 PM Peter G. wrote: > On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote: > > Now the GRE tunnel > > > >> ifconfig gre6 create > >> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6 > > #ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > > > > Why is this not possible? Isn't the logic behind it the same as with > > IPv4? If not, why not? > > > > Does this mean it is not possible to have a point-to-point using IPv6 on > > a machine with only a single /128 address? > > Is this a stupid question, or something of the sort? Because I truly > don't understand why this wouldn't work. Thanks. > > PG > > I have not used gre with ipv6, so I cannot really be of any help. However for ipv4 you specify a netmask while setting up the interface, whereas you do not while setting up the ipv6. I also notice that you list fc02:e::200 for "other end" but in the commands you have fc:02:e::200 which I guess is just typo. Does ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 work? Or the whole thing ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc02:e::200 tunnel fc01:e::100 fc02:e::200 prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 16:37:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F2814F53FA for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@disroot.org) Received: from knopi.disroot.org (knopi.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D82868D770 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@disroot.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D05291EC; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:37:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at disroot.org Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXsYOpJryB2C; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:37:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Point-to-point using GRE over IPv6 -> not possible with a single /128 address on the server? DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1550594256; bh=9P4tDHcj5TEKt6RaU/f45oMtaYDT3ThDCr2tCZbq99I=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=JC/MgRJme/XBsFMStcH/p2EQ6AfcJiMowBpnwAUMGImEswth8a7PXO6FjJVbVqoM4 YZZKNgLokmzU7gSvHCnCPiQYJPLYMZG1UJHtcYpcHAROetkqugXvLsq/He9T7NtIzR 4HjO2Pfi3iwh4iv+a2y+rK9Otn1qPQKLoM1mTWpuSJ8pSX2OkWTIHqVp3NuXMKSo8Y nDMCNFj/QumwLdv9d3B9uNc/v1yBOFvLDLm9BaIJNteHWTm8qiB8rTxzOFY1aQbg50 M/1k1ZtGxPqJlwTg1PKX2IEDR16TWi19ltdzlsc1c7NjvdEdRylR1ViHeMUSx0AhBu plFlWt0x/UGzw== To: andrnils@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <95d8e3ea-af36-4d14-f280-908f92a96515@disroot.org> <9ab1a9b1-e1e3-9f48-2c3e-35454bcd6e77@disroot.org> From: "Peter G." Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 17:37:31 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D82868D770 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=disroot.org header.s=mail header.b=JC/MgRJm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=disroot.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@disroot.org designates 178.21.23.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@disroot.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[disroot.org:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[disroot.org:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: disroot.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[139.23.21.178.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.950,0]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[disroot.org,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50673, ipnet:178.21.23.0/24, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.64)[ip: (-7.35), ipnet: 178.21.23.0/24(-3.67), asn: 50673(-2.22), country: NL(0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:37:42 -0000 On 19/02/2019 14:06, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:38 PM Peter G. wrote: > >> On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote: >>> Now the GRE tunnel >>> >>>> ifconfig gre6 create >>>> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6 >>> #ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > I have not used gre with ipv6, so I cannot really be of any help. However > for ipv4 you specify a netmask while setting up the interface, whereas you > do not while setting up the ipv6. I also notice that you list fc02:e::200 > for "other end" but in the commands you have fc:02:e::200 which I guess is > just typo. Does > > ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 > > work? Or the whole thing > > ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc02:e::200 tunnel fc01:e::100 fc02:e::200 > prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 Thanks for answering. The "full" syntax including tunnel definition also generates the same error, and ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 seems to be equivalent to ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6 that is, specifying no prefixlen implies "prefixlen 128". Also tried that. There's seems to be a quirk how IPv6 is handled. If a particular IPv6 address is already set on the physical interface, using that particular address for a GRE definition (i.e. "fc01:e::100" in this case, so single /128), always generates: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists This is what confuses me. Using IPv4 this way is not an issue. A /32 address can be set on an interface and the same address can be used for a GRE link. That's what tunnelfib/FIB is for, to separate routing for GRE. And this is what *does not work with IPv6* and I don't understand why. Seems to me the server needs to have a whole IPv6 range, and then an address from that range can be allocated to create/maintain GRE links, so this can't work with a /128 address available only. The problem is that this particular server I need this on, only has a single /128 address allocated to it. _The bottom line:_ I don't understand why an already allocated /128 address can't be used for a GRE link with its own separate FIB. This is not logical. PG From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 18:23:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522F414F7AE3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D10B6ACEF for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 03C8814F7AD2; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5DC614F7AD1 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A2C6ACA4 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BFFA38F8 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1JIN9Gs048612 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1JIN9gT048603 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235699] Kernel panics when setting IP address if net.link.ether.inet.garp_rexmit_count=2 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235699 --- Comment #5 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kp Date: Tue Feb 19 18:22:57 UTC 2019 New revision: 344282 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344282 Log: MFC r344061: garp: Fix vnet related panic for gratuitous arp Gratuitous ARP packets are sent from a timer, which means we don't have a vnet context set. As a result we panic trying to send the packet. Set the vnet context based on the interface associated with the interface address. To reproduce: sysctl net.link.ether.inet.garp_rexmit_count=3D2 ifconfig vtnet1 10.0.0.1/24 up PR: 235699 Reviewed by: vangyzen@ Changes: _U stable/11/ stable/11/sys/netinet/if_ether.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 18:23:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B61E14F7AE0 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE3A6ACEC for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E5D4314F7AD0; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47A014F7ACE for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 280F76AC99 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBB338F3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1JIN7Ij047487 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1JIN6JY047480 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235699] Kernel panics when setting IP address if net.link.ether.inet.garp_rexmit_count=2 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:23:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235699 --- Comment #4 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: kp Date: Tue Feb 19 18:22:56 UTC 2019 New revision: 344281 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344281 Log: MFC r344061: garp: Fix vnet related panic for gratuitous arp Gratuitous ARP packets are sent from a timer, which means we don't have a vnet context set. As a result we panic trying to send the packet. Set the vnet context based on the interface associated with the interface address. To reproduce: sysctl net.link.ether.inet.garp_rexmit_count=3D2 ifconfig vtnet1 10.0.0.1/24 up PR: 235699 Reviewed by: vangyzen@ Changes: _U stable/12/ stable/12/sys/netinet/if_ether.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 18:29:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED4214F8452 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E156B735 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 48A5314F8451; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C3814F8450 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9DA16B72F for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3983903 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1JITJxY081354 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1JITJjF081353 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235704] [net] [patch] tun(4) can't be destroyed on a VNET jail if it's renamed Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, vimage X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:29:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235704 --- Comment #4 from Kristof Provost --- I've proposed a slightly different patch in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19= 248 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Feb 19 20:40:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7583514D7703 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F1E72837 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C516714D7702; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C5814D7701 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100D97282D for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21FC04CC8 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1JKekKI014723 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1JKekU4014722 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219428] em network driver broken in current Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsdbug@patpro.net X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 20:40:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219428 patpro changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsdbug@patpro.net --- Comment #17 from patpro --- Hi, I'm experiencing this bug on: FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p3 GENERIC amd64 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220T CPU @ 2.80GHz (2793.72-MHz K8-class CPU) em0: port 0xf080-0xf09f mem 0xf7e00000-0xf7e1ffff,0xf7e39000-0xf7e39fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 em1: port 0xe000-0xe01f mem 0xf7c00000-0xf7c1ffff,0xf7c20000-0xf7c23fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci3 em1: attach_pre capping queues at 2 Current cap: 0x460b em1: using 1024 tx descriptors and 1024 rx descriptors em1: msix_init qsets capped at 2 em1: pxm cpus: 2 queue msgs: 4 admincnt: 1 em1: using 2 rx queues 2 tx queues=20 em1: Using MSIX interrupts with 3 vectors em1: allocated for 2 tx_queues em1: allocated for 2 rx_queues em1: Ethernet address: 70:54:d2:45:71:41 em1: netmap queues/slots: TX 2/1024, RX 2/1024 em1: TX(1) desc avail =3D 41, pidx =3D 179 em1: link state changed to DOWN em1: TX(1) desc avail =3D 1024, pidx =3D 0 em1: TX(1) desc avail =3D 1024, pidx =3D 0 em1: TX(1) desc avail =3D 1024, pidx =3D 0 ... It's only fixed by a reboot. How can I know if the fixes mentioned here are present in 12.0-RELEASE-p3 o= r if I'll have to wait for p4 or more ? thanks --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 02:25:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D10914E22B0 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91718767C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8F10D14E22AF; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF1D14E22AE for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F5A987678 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345EC7F84 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1K2PSh3078813 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1K2PS4n078811 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235699] Kernel panics when setting IP address if net.link.ether.inet.garp_rexmit_count=2 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: panic, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11+ mfc-stable12+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: flagtypes.name assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:25:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235699 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |mfc-stable11+, | |mfc-stable12+ Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |kp@freebsd.org CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 10:01:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE0414ED595 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247497017D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D424514ED58E; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12F514ED58D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A85170173 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB3E4C2D6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1KA13w3083787 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1KA137N083783 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:03 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 170244] ping(8): useless/uninformative error message Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: avos@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc short_desc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:01:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D170244 Andriy Voskoboinyk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |avos@freebsd.org Summary|ping(1): |ping(8): |useless/uninformative error |useless/uninformative error |message |message Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 10:04:12 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E1D14ED934 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E657052C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrnils@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id q12so17150624lfm.0 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:04:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M7HijMh7Jbr4OoqDJW06DFnOq6gl9VFOBjy3GHHGcno=; b=LCkUmE1QpZb/FvfhSJ9klLXJXvK4AYVE57TpwFOru2ASyliAM9PouoyAT6q+A23AKe CwH7b66mYvepSnooS0Rzbejrd3c1r/ZnQ/OmWOHhxFjuS2CmcTzK2gfs71aKamLyQ9fr ui/N1zs6hSbRb59Ed3MyIL8FYJJ/M7YemC5ur/L2Hz5ZbK1lAjgyBoC5/zZzqUqQWjUa xc1MHNwoVo58vB5MPLjQ1YujZ6Gm0l2MSKzvykKQnbOWbypohGHpyUaHeYpKteG1yRw2 x9EmzBXOnEWrmzcsttbMp22WAZEu+VpjdwXkInq60NOLqqSvV3Q/HEHAp+7bA3hsdiOY /4sw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M7HijMh7Jbr4OoqDJW06DFnOq6gl9VFOBjy3GHHGcno=; b=EWW0Y51fRrMnIBUeDp+Yx2XFStIKZoQGyr15z5QROW6wMbgpQ+CMsL4TmES9qQtc6+ zwtA9CJACCbR1RuH2YvYqMXNn3IME7HlPhO8kwCnEdYFdf15UsiQ6gd8b7rTlqxeoG/d H9virpAkEpRgjuUq79bhK4Nhm8Tl1lT2yJOOuXUTas7ldGB3u2buZJMXCbNg3y6CjULX cPi1dSL2gjUXrZ/IjAFMBODhUoH9zeB2pTBJVg3v0ZBW7zP+qGleERcueE3fAB2V5kC7 +OoIjtQOEIHZ8+OaAAs6+310kKmFCL6vCPNTtZ1bRRVMatfLZ6XOb12zCKg8UnCRda+U Mrcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaFvA1g+xXxj9/u1QguQhJ7WsQiewaVIPenDQlevhbXcCZj5rRA pSJ1WR26UuM/1KRTuzr0dXdxHIlWYHxLxtF5A14= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYLvBJuRB8Cmr9JYNcvdzDLANQ4Mbu1vavQXiiJsGZVgDvMZVqXf+jtWD4h0kpRMADx56TVafTd8jtUlzgp2tA= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ae0a:: with SMTP id f10mr19257781lfc.1.1550657049313; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:04:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <95d8e3ea-af36-4d14-f280-908f92a96515@disroot.org> <9ab1a9b1-e1e3-9f48-2c3e-35454bcd6e77@disroot.org> In-Reply-To: From: Andreas Nilsson Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:03:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Point-to-point using GRE over IPv6 -> not possible with a single /128 address on the server? To: "Peter G." Cc: FreeBSD Net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 01E657052C X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LCkUmE1Q; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of andrnils@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::12e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=andrnils@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.94 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.198,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.73)[ip: (-9.32), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.27), asn: 15169(-1.99), country: US(-0.07)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:04:12 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 5:37 PM Peter G. wrote: > On 19/02/2019 14:06, Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 1:38 PM Peter G. wrote: > > > >> On 15/02/2019 17:49, Peter G. wrote: > >>> Now the GRE tunnel > >>> > >>>> ifconfig gre6 create > >>>> ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6 > >>> #ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > > > I have not used gre with ipv6, so I cannot really be of any help. However > > for ipv4 you specify a netmask while setting up the interface, whereas > you > > do not while setting up the ipv6. I also notice that you list fc02:e::200 > > for "other end" but in the commands you have fc:02:e::200 which I guess > is > > just typo. Does > > > > ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 > > > > work? Or the whole thing > > > > ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc02:e::200 tunnel fc01:e::100 > fc02:e::200 > > prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 > > Thanks for answering. The "full" syntax including tunnel definition also > generates the same error, and > > ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 prefixlen 128 tunnelfib 6 > > seems to be equivalent to > > ifconfig gre6 inet6 fc01:e::100 fc:02:e::200 tunnelfib 6 > > that is, specifying no prefixlen implies "prefixlen 128". Also tried that. > > There's seems to be a quirk how IPv6 is handled. If a particular IPv6 > address is already set on the physical interface, using that particular > address for a GRE definition (i.e. "fc01:e::100" in this case, so single > /128), always generates: > > ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): File exists > > This is what confuses me. Using IPv4 this way is not an issue. A /32 > address can be set on an interface and the same address can be used for > a GRE link. That's what tunnelfib/FIB is for, to separate routing for GRE. > > And this is what *does not work with IPv6* and I don't understand why. > > Seems to me the server needs to have a whole IPv6 range, and then an > address from that range can be allocated to create/maintain GRE links, > so this can't work with a /128 address available only. > > The problem is that this particular server I need this on, only has a > single /128 address allocated to it. > > _The bottom line:_ I don't understand why an already allocated /128 > address can't be used for a GRE link with its own separate FIB. This is > not logical. > > PG > I did some experimenting yesterday, and it seems to be missbehaving yes. Seems routes shows up in wrong fib and don't go away when the gre interface is destroyed. I also had a few kernel panics, so the whole fibs with ipv6 seems a bit wonky. I think you might want to submit a bug report. Best regards Andreas From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 12:14:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B7114F2608 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F55753A9 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0B24514F2607; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF2614F2606 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B08E753A6 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AED4ED73C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1KCEA8r072860 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1KCEA8C072849 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235704] [net] [patch] tun(4) can't be destroyed on a VNET jail if it's renamed Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, vimage X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: genneko217@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:14:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235704 --- Comment #5 from genneko217@gmail.com --- Thank you for working on this issue. I've briefly tested the patch and confirmed the reported issue was solved with it. I also confirmed that it changed the way unit numbers are assigned to if_tu= n. While if_tun's unit numbers are assigned sequentially across a host and all jails on it before the patch, it's now assigned independently so that vnet jails and the host can have interfaces with the same name. But now I began to wonder how the interfaces with the same name, say tun0, are related to /dev/tun0 on the system. When I did a quick testing with the following commands, the fourth command removed tun0 interface from the host and also deleted /dev/tun0 while tun0 interface on the vnet jail "test" is still there. Then the fifth command caused a kernel panic at destroy_devl in sys/kern/kern_conf.c. # Assume there's no if_tun on the system. jail -c -n test vnet persist ifconfig tun create jexec test ifconfig tun create ifconfig tun0 destroy jexec test ifconfig tun0 destroy --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 12:55:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CF514F3311 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A275876741 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5F72D14F3310; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C98714F330F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9BB47673C for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34BB7DD08 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1KCtXdX010885 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1KCtXb0010884 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235704] [net] [patch] tun(4) can't be destroyed on a VNET jail if it's renamed Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, vimage X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: kp@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:55:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235704 --- Comment #6 from Kristof Provost --- Thanks. You're right, the unit numbers are used to find the device node (or vice versa), so they need to be system-unique. I'll take a look at what we can do about that. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 16:49:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD31014F8E50 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430278834B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F120714F8E4F; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECC614F8E4E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B62388346 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACF70FEE1 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1KGnmAa008737 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1KGnmpN008736 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 170244] ping(8): useless/uninformative error message Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 16:49:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D170244 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Rodney W. Grimes --- Could you run the failing ping with truss so we can see what syscall is returning the error and perhaps figure out why this is. truss ping -c 1 10.11.6.1 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 17:39:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216E14FA78F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janet.lane@tarantplus.com) Received: from mail.smartraytech.com (mail.smartraytech.com [172.107.178.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FD2B8AAB3 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janet.lane@tarantplus.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smartraytech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD92F34013711 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:39:22 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tarantplus.com; h=content-language:x-mailer:content-type:content-type :mime-version:message-id:date:date:subject:subject:in-reply-to :references:from:from; s=default; t=1550684361; x=1552498762; bh=rNoO+laeqjNteGS0WVWXg4NdIloFX8YQ0vYUw5aVbCk=; b=I0tN+BneYF/z m9kOzuATVQIYVLN7YVvcOEbaF+8HiQiW3WlsvHiKMe74ctRghWjR5e58xUOl5d+G 5HEFUtAxirvdHHyBcxBK3OLtAgfHdy+8n9TiLjBELnu6xnCq12k7bFKh/n7NGS5q IiQS2Dx74ZdUsdy+LiGAbEtq+VeuLF43EdrZhimchrrpK3dpexks3Cz77xaxiWAx oC4BSoQ97Er9KwceH8zCs9xRkltVhwcOkbGISLbBigu2r4xbD97hD4P3jmf+4gJX Ds1Wl5EVbnDP7cvgboTXSF4yMQRBmHU/Vn8ZBp3SwtUk4HBiUIgwDkTXWI0MMDyt Lk1xra9x2g== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at localhost Received: from mail.smartraytech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hBo9ABNSNHWQ for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:39:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from adminPC (unknown [223.186.199.0]) (Authenticated sender: janet.lane@tarantplus.com) by mail.smartraytech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 55B7C34012F17 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:39:19 -0500 (EST) From: "Janet Lane" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Molecular Medicine Tri-Conference 2019-Mailing-List-for_for Freebsd Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:09:19 +0530 Message-ID: <030901d4c943$364aa380$a2dfea80$@tarantplus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdTFWJJ5veNW6c5XRKaXBRx6DAofygD6qI1Q Content-Language: en-us X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2FD2B8AAB3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tarantplus.com header.s=default header.b=I0tN+Bne; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tarantplus.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of janet.lane@tarantplus.com designates 172.107.178.37 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=janet.lane@tarantplus.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.16 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tarantplus.com:s=default]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-0.10)[asn: 40676(-0.45), country: US(-0.07)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tarantplus.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tarantplus.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.tarantplus.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.05)[-0.051,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40676, ipnet:172.107.178.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[0.199.186.223.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:39:34 -0000 Hi, Attendees-list of 26th International Molecular Medicine Tri-Conference-2019 is available-for-purchase with Contact name, Job Title, Email-address, Phone number, Company name and Mailing Address etc.... Let me know if you'd be interested in hearing more about it. Thanks, Janet Lane Marketing Executive If you don't want to include yourself in our mailing list, please reply with "No Thanks" From: Janet Lane [mailto:janet.lane@tarantplus.com] Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 11:32 PM To: 'freebsd-net@freebsd.org' Subject: Molecular Medicine Tri-Conference 2019-Mailing-List-for_for Freebsd Hi, Attendees-list of 26th International Molecular Medicine Tri-Conference-2019 is available-for-purchase with Contact name, Job Title, Email-address, Phone number, Company name and Mailing Address etc.... Let me know if you'd be interested in hearing more about it. Thanks, Janet Lane Marketing Executive If you don't want to include yourself in our mailing list, please reply with "No Thanks" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 20:53:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8289E14DB990 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BC66DF0F for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9D9FF14DB98F; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C37514DB98E for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from mail.monkeybrains.net (mail.monkeybrains.net [208.69.40.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B349D6DF0B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from [10.2.86.68] (public.monkeybrains.net [208.69.41.107] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.monkeybrains.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1KKbdDe006877 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:37:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=monkeybrains.net; s=dkim; t=1550695060; bh=VpEZwkTRNfgINuSp94145l525zaYp/FWOUbe07CKMrg=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=lDR9bSUaFKSPc3ZWBdZrUaIi0OGUWttmsRltGSNJ+iE89EIyQ/yLnbApKxgUs5K7d m0QyO624t8XraeJ+dkja1lWqeRM5EhvDo3a0EOeOISUsVcFtLFTnlji5sabAUB+mrP 0Ec/QscHF6CDklcRUYQ5NXcSZKHLLR625Tqvia4k= X-Authentication-Warning: mail.monkeybrains.net: Host public.monkeybrains.net [208.69.41.107] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.2.86.68] To: net@FreeBSD.org From: BulkMailForRudy Subject: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET? Message-ID: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:37:39 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.2 at mail.monkeybrains.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B349D6DF0B X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=monkeybrains.net header.s=dkim header.b=lDR9bSUa; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=monkeybrains.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of crapsh@monkeybrains.net designates 208.69.40.19 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=crapsh@monkeybrains.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[monkeybrains.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[monkeybrains.net,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.harsh.monkeybrains.net]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[19.40.69.208.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:32329, ipnet:208.69.40.0/22, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.943,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[monkeybrains.net:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[monkeybrains.net.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.01)[country: US(-0.07)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.06)[0.064,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:53:14 -0000 Dear FreeBSD-net, PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? (tcpdump in the jail shows no PADI packets) Right now, I have netgraph cranking out ncX devices for the PPPoE clients, and I'd like to stuff that mess in a jail so I can run ifconfig on the host and not see a mess. Another question, Can netgraph create interaces inside jails to solve this problem. Signed, Networking Neat Freak From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Feb 20 21:13:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19E914DC8B9 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B916EF2D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 060EE14DC8B6; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87D414DC8B2 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD5E6EF2B for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1KLDOuu054447 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:13:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: crapsh@monkeybrains.net Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1KLDNsd056951 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:13:23 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET? To: BulkMailForRudy , net@FreeBSD.org References: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:13:16 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5BD5E6EF2B X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.995,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:13:37 -0000 21.02.2019 3:37, BulkMailForRudy wrote: > Dear FreeBSD-net, > > PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... > > I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). > > Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? (tcpdump in the jail shows no PADI packets) > > Right now, I have netgraph cranking out ncX devices for the PPPoE clients, and I'd like to stuff that mess in a jail so I can run ifconfig on the host and not see a mess. You do not need jail to limit output of ifconfig. Each network interface in FreeBSD can belong to one or more interface groups. First add all your interfaces except of ng* to some new interface group with ifconfig(8), then use: alias ifconfig='/sbin/ifconfig -g groupname' Or create new short alias ifc='/sbin/ifconfig -g groupname' for short output. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Feb 21 07:23:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F9F14FAAEC for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@zagrebin.ru) Received: from mail.zagrebin.ru (mail.zagrebin.ru [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:30e::1:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07FCC93A54 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@zagrebin.ru) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zagrebin.ru ; s=mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JWwhwTJIIgeA0AraKmlH/e35jcATcTmkza17I9nQ+SI=; b=f9U7sxCACK5fhhJPgrc5RhSIHF SK8rDC2m9rZ+UnP3cofdW9+tMN/jkQqlqL3ETJiUuHXeNlHJ6KQficRJ0P9Ehr/eme6aYrfAea13G 6JjCbiOQjwgZTkMiKXcP/8ynYXaY3+ZmPC9/xUTnhRnPreoVQtrOU/wxkKh7g6wnmK2ASn0+P75NF 5anhRHMwuPZdyVWcaq57p3iUCV9jcGqv7WPDw2FB2vVuel2MLfxAAkDVIJ38PO+kfYCku2pbYp1Qc 5Cc5bYVj9fJ7ydtVwjWcMo8DSO36kHnvJNlARxTE7t54l0ydayW0wX0veYgRzGuFnODZ9Pgo31sLM uAp6nSOg==; Received: from [2001:470:1f15:30e::2] (helo=vm2.home.zagrebin.ru) by mail.zagrebin.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1gwihe-00037G-LK for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:23:30 +0300 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 10:23:29 +0300 From: Alexander Zagrebin To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET? Message-ID: <20190221102329.6d587ca6@vm2.home.zagrebin.ru> In-Reply-To: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> References: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 07:23:35 -0000 Ð’ Wed, 20 Feb 2019 12:37:39 -0800 BulkMailForRudy пишет: > PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... > > I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail > doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). > > Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? > (tcpdump in the jail shows no PADI packets) To pass PPPoE packets via bridge you have to set the kernel variable net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip to 0 (`sysctl net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip=0`)... -- Alexander Zagrebin From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Feb 21 08:22:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B671314FC7D1 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D64A95B3A for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id x1L8M8qm051408; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:22:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.44.250] ([217.29.44.250]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id x1L8M8LM036281; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:22:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET? From: "Patrick M. Hausen" In-Reply-To: <20190221102329.6d587ca6@vm2.home.zagrebin.ru> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:22:08 +0100 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> <20190221102329.6d587ca6@vm2.home.zagrebin.ru> To: Alexander Zagrebin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3D64A95B3A X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.95 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.948,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 08:22:16 -0000 Hi all, > Am 21.02.2019 um 08:23 schrieb Alexander Zagrebin : > To pass PPPoE packets via bridge you have to set the kernel variable > net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip to 0 (`sysctl > net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip=3D0`)=E2=80=A6 Doesn=E2=80=99t this apply only if you have some kind of packet filter = active on the bridge IF? If this also applies with no filtering at all, the name of the sysctl is = at least a bit misleading ;-) Thanks for clarifying. Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Feb 21 19:41:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8574214EDDD3 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033488A61C for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B468214EDDC1; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C9D14EDDBF for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from mail.monkeybrains.net (mail.monkeybrains.net [208.69.40.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.monkeybrains.net", Issuer "AlphaSSL CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 021898A60E for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from [10.2.86.68] (public.monkeybrains.net [208.69.41.107] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.monkeybrains.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1LJfUJM030842 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:41:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=monkeybrains.net; s=dkim; t=1550778091; bh=kec0UroiGg0reZ32Wss0Nm2SarM18Vb1JhBkJowchbI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=k5Z8JHxAYJd8mA13BW1oyn7L9/G4DvFKf6LN6jdDDiIBDaqTxQ8oethNpw7GsoK/E I/fxnM3j1uRYlve5w9fDWnfUhvUqr2Ie5ROtCUM8LELLFRPYExDLFz3H0QRIrXiIpl EhES9bSbRWHUU7Wo9vAKP0cq2FQnYwXSkavMG9lw= X-Authentication-Warning: mail.monkeybrains.net: Host public.monkeybrains.net [208.69.41.107] (may be forged) claimed to be [10.2.86.68] Subject: Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET? To: Eugene Grosbein , net@FreeBSD.org References: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> From: BulkMailForRudy Message-ID: <39485ab4-483c-72db-bd99-51f7f797fcef@monkeybrains.net> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:41:30 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.100.2 at mail.monkeybrains.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 021898A60E X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.993,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 19:41:34 -0000 On 2/20/19 1:13 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 21.02.2019 3:37, BulkMailForRudy wrote: > >> Dear FreeBSD-net, >> >> PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... >> >> I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). >> >> Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? (tcpdump in the jail shows no PADI packets) >> >> Right now, I have netgraph cranking out ncX devices for the PPPoE clients, and I'd like to stuff that mess in a jail so I can run ifconfig on the host and not see a mess. > You do not need jail to limit output of ifconfig. > Each network interface in FreeBSD can belong to one or more interface groups. > First add all your interfaces except of ng* to some new interface group with ifconfig(8), then use: > > alias ifconfig='/sbin/ifconfig -g groupname' > > Or create new short alias ifc='/sbin/ifconfig -g groupname' > for short output. That's neat,  "ifconfig -g epair" shows all my epairs.   My primary question, if anyone knows:  Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? My goal is to run the PPPoE service inside a jail. Rudy From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Feb 21 22:22:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA32714F3955 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744116A3E5 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3217414F3954; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F97514F3953 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99D086A3E2 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5D0B1EC for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1LMMk65094819 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1LMMkP0094818 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235920] ifconfig: unable to create another interface after renaming the previous one with the same name Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: avos@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:22:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235920 Andriy Voskoboinyk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Feb 21 22:57:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC58214F4DDD for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B526C0FD for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3B76814F4DDA; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290E214F4DD9 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6616C0F8 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9EE681 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1LMvolG058395 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1LMvoro058394 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:57:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |patch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Feb 21 23:12:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4DA14F5B0A for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D063C6CD96 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 93AA414F5B05; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815C114F5B04 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B79C6CD94 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 520F6975 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1LNCvvl027530 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1LNCvru027529 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235918] with more than 1 vlan, ix0 gets 'No carrier.' ixgbe_driver_version[] = "4.0.1-k" Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 23:12:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235918 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |IntelNetworking Summary|FreeBSD 12.0. ix0 No |with more than 1 vlan, ix0 |carrier. |gets 'No carrier.' |ixgbe_driver_version[] =3D |ixgbe_driver_version[] = =3D |"4.0.1-k" |"4.0.1-k" Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 00:30:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97B514F8565 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397586FAE3 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EBB7B14F855C; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DC614F855B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F9B66FADF for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A837813CF for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M0UQLC006363 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M0UQlV006362 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 00:30:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Rodney W. Grimes --- (In reply to Loganaden Velvindron from comment #0) Who are "some people", as I believe it would require either an IANA or IETF action to move these addresses from the EXPERIMENTAL status, and change the status of these addresses per RFC 6890 as invalid source addresses. If "some people" are the IANA or IETF, can you point to a draft RFC? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 01:52:19 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E5A14FA658 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A32F71F6B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4A76E14FA654; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D0314FA653 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C75CD71F63 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3AD320B9 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M1qGVS006954 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M1qGhw006953 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:52:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer --- Regardless of whether or not using class E addresses is canonical, we half-= ass it today. If they're non-canonical, we should *not* allow them to be assigned to interfaces. If they are, we shouldn't filter ICMP. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 01:58:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F9214FA865 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5300672116 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0C78714FA863; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF19C14FA861 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8946F72113 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE4BC20CD for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M1w23e012381 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M1w2vQ012379 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a Class-E address Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:02 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:58:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer --- Note that there are two other Class E checks, at least referencing the same macro name, that should probably be turned off at the same time as the icmp check (if turning off the check is the right thing to do): ipfw/nat64: nat64_check_ip4() netinet/in: in_canforward() --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 02:11:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B5614FAE2E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6837269E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E26A014FAE2D; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02E614FAE2C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DCC77269A for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB3EE2276 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M2BgJk094562 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M2BglX094558 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned a 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:11:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|FreeBSD does not reply to |FreeBSD does not reply to |ICMP requests when assigned |ICMP requests when assigned |a Class-E address |a 240.0.0.0/8 --- Comment #4 from Rodney W. Grimes --- The name class E was abolished in 2002 when RFC3330 designated 240/4 as reserved and referenced rfc1700, which is STD 2, that reference appears to = be for the 255.255.255.255 limited broadcast address. I have removed the obsolete name "class E" from the title of this bug and u= sed the current "240/4" designtation. (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #2) I do not have a serious problem with this patch, but would like to know we = are not just doing this at someones request without further reasons than "someo= ne is playing with it." --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 02:14:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7A014FAF8C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2ED72A4B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2B07214FAF88; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D3414FAF87 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EC272A45 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E67A123AA for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M2E9Ti032049 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M2E9Nx032045 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:14:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|FreeBSD does not reply to |FreeBSD does not reply to |ICMP requests when assigned |ICMP requests when assigned |a 240.0.0.0/8 |an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 02:27:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB77714FB814 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8301873365 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 470B214FB813; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C5614FB812 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEB217335E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AFE0251E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M2RkMD023752 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M2RkHY023749 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:46 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:46 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: logan@cyberstorm.mu X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:27:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #5 from Loganaden Velvindron --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #3) Yes, I'm also working on the 2 other areas. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 02:41:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C7A14FBEF8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B4173BDB for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EE86214FBEF5; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD26414FBEF4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B65473BD6 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B471F27C2 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M2exlt014989 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:40:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M2exiP014984 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:40:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:40:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: logan@cyberstorm.mu X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 02:41:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #6 from Loganaden Velvindron --- (In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #4) There is a scheduled talk about this effort at netdev: https://netdevconf.org/0x13/session.html?talk-ipv4-unicast-expansions Linux has already accepted a patch to allow assignment of 240.0.0.0/4: https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg540240.html OpenWRT (major third party firmware) has accepted a similar patch: https://git.openwrt.org/?p=3Dproject/netifd.git;a=3Dcommit;h=3Dcd089c52de96= e47cf99410f66701e04e24155b9a A new ID will be submitted to the IETF soon.=20 Please note that there were some attempts in the past in the IETF already: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuller-240space-02 At the time it was perceived that ipv6 would take over faster. However, the adoption of ipv6 has been slower than expected.=20 See this thread also: https://www.mail-archive.com/cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net/msg05838.h= tml --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 04:08:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8876714FE4A8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058E177EB8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:08:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BA06014FE4A7; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9767514FE4A6 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d12:604::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20F5077EB7 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1M47svZ068731 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 05:07:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: crapsh@monkeybrains.net Received: from [10.58.0.4] ([10.58.0.4]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1M47stw073633 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:07:54 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Running PPPoE server in jail, possible with VNET? To: BulkMailForRudy , net@FreeBSD.org References: <6cf02349-678b-9c18-83b0-dda95d70ed80@monkeybrains.net> <39485ab4-483c-72db-bd99-51f7f797fcef@monkeybrains.net> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <17fe369d-a4a0-35c1-9146-58a5aabe52ff@grosbein.net> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:07:47 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <39485ab4-483c-72db-bd99-51f7f797fcef@monkeybrains.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 20F5077EB7 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.976,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:08:03 -0000 22.02.2019 2:41, BulkMailForRudy wrote: > > On 2/20/19 1:13 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 21.02.2019 3:37, BulkMailForRudy wrote: >> >>> Dear FreeBSD-net, >>> >>> PPPoE has some broadcast ethernet frames... >>> >>> I have epair0a on my bridge and epair0b in the jail, but the jail doesn't get any PADI (PPPoE packets destinged to ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff). >>> >>> Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? (tcpdump in the jail shows no PADI packets) >>> >>> Right now, I have netgraph cranking out ncX devices for the PPPoE clients, and I'd like to stuff that mess in a jail so I can run ifconfig on the host and not see a mess. >> You do not need jail to limit output of ifconfig. >> Each network interface in FreeBSD can belong to one or more interface groups. >> First add all your interfaces except of ng* to some new interface group with ifconfig(8), then use: >> >> alias ifconfig='/sbin/ifconfig -g groupname' >> >> Or create new short alias ifc='/sbin/ifconfig -g groupname' >> for short output. > > That's neat, "ifconfig -g epair" shows all my epairs. My primary question, if anyone knows: > > Is there a way to have bridge pass broadcast ethernet frames? > > My goal is to run the PPPoE service inside a jail. I have not tried running PPPoE service inside a jail and a would not recommend that, but I did run PPPoE client running inside VirtualBox Windows guest using tap(4) for bridged networking when tap(4) was bridged with host's vlan(4) interface using if_bridge(4) and PPPoE ran in both directions just fine to establish and run a session. You need to read bridge(4) manual page, section PACKET FILTERING and disable all kinds of filtering using sysctls documented there. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 04:31:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B4314FF1A3 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC02680C79 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7019B14FF1A2; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B33B14FF1A1 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7AEA80C74 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 081C439E8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M4VlJQ024497 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M4VlnZ024488 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:31:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #7 from Rodney W. Grimes --- (In reply to Loganaden Velvindron from comment #6) >Linux has already accepted a patch to allow assignment of 240.0.0.0/4: >https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg540240.html This patch appears to fix very ancient code that still treated this as part of the multicast space. The patches also add use of language (ClassE) that was obsoleted 16 years ago.=20=20 https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg539064.html is the correct reference to the message with the patch in it. >OpenWRT (major third party firmware) has accepted a similar patch: This is inline with what your asking for here. >A new ID will be submitted to the IETF soon. A new ID for what? Do you mean removing this from IANA reserved? >Please note that there were some attempts in the past in the IETF already: >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fuller-240space-02 A 2007 attempt by Cisco, have you considered contact them about moving forw= ard with that draft? As it stands today the RFC say this is an invalid source address, so we sho= uld continue to respect those standards in a standard released product, however= I would not have a problem with #ifdef FOO_EXPERMINTAL disabling these restrictions, or a sysctl that did it. There are some much larger obsticles to getting this working on the interne= t at a larger scale, in that there are far too many firewalls that filter this range, and getting it out of them is going to take a long time. That time = wont even start until they are reclassed by IANA with an update to RFC6890 and y= ou would probably best get that done as it is the long lead show stopper to th= is idea. Getting FreeBSD, Linux and such fixed is pointless if people are goi= ng to continue to firewall this range. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 08:28:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D1514E0604 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB79B89509 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7E76014E0602; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A67614E0601 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEDA89505 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30AD55C3F for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1M8SLwd055539 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1M8SL85055537 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235920] ifconfig: unable to create another interface after renaming the previous one with the same name Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: phk@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 08:28:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235920 Poul-Henning Kamp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phk@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Poul-Henning Kamp --- I don't think this has anything to do with the UNR(9) code, it seems to be = only a matter of how interface names are managed. I have always assumed myself that naming an interface was an aliasing opera= tion and that the interface retained its underlying "system-given" name - if not= hing else in the sense that dev_printf() would still emit that name on the conso= le. Apart from those observations I have nothing further to add, and will take myself of the cc list. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 10:31:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFA814E57BC for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:31:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B1148DE9D for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id x1MAVQub075551 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:31:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.44.250] ([217.29.44.250]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id x1MAVQY6090075 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:31:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Performance issues with VNET/bridge/VLAN Message-Id: <9B0EC546-38E6-424E-9CC9-93F4C58B296F@punkt.de> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:31:26 +0100 To: FreeBSD Net X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2B1148DE9D X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hausen@punkt.de designates 217.29.33.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hausen@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailin.pluspunkthosting.de,mailin.pluspunkthosting.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.954,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.33.29.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.54)[ipnet: 217.29.32.0/20(-1.51), asn: 16188(-1.21), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:31:41 -0000 Hi all, please have a look at these two network setups: ------- separate interfaces -------=20 ifconfig_ixl0=3D"up" ifconfig_ixl1=3D"up" cloned_interfaces=3D"bridge0 bridge1" ifconfig_bridge0_name=3D"inet0" ifconfig_inet0=3D"addm ixl0 up" ifconfig_inet0_alias0=3D"inet ww.xx.yy.zz/24" ifconfig_inet0_ipv6=3D"inet6 2a00:b580:8000:11:dead:beef:dead:beef/64 = auto_linklocal" ifconfig_bridge1_name=3D"mgmt0" ifconfig_mgmt0=3D"addm ixl1 up" ifconfig_mgmt0_alias0=3D"inet 10.x.y.z/16" ifconfig_mgmt0_ipv6=3D"inet6 auto_linklocal" -----------------------------------=20 and ------- trunk port w/ VLANs -------=20 ifconfig_ixl0=3D"up" cloned_interfaces=3D"vlan7 vlan11 bridge0 bridge1" ifconfig_vlan7=3D"up vlan 7 vlandev ixl0" ifconfig_vlan11=3D"up vlan 11 vlandev ixl0" ifconfig_bridge0_name=3D"inet0" ifconfig_inet0=3D"addm vlan11 up" ifconfig_inet0_alias0=3D"inet ww.xx.yy.zz/24" ifconfig_inet0_ipv6=3D"inet6 2a00:b580:8000:11:dead:beef:dead:beef/64 = auto_linklocal" ifconfig_bridge1_name=3D"mgmt0" ifconfig_mgmt0=3D"addm vlan7 up" ifconfig_mgmt0_alias0=3D"inet 10.x.y.z/16" ifconfig_mgmt0_ipv6=3D"inet6 auto_linklocal" -----------------------------------=20 If the switches at the other end are configured correctly, they should = work precisely the same, right? In the second case both networks share the = bandwidth, but the management network is mostly idle and only used for monitoring = and nightly backups. The machine is an iocage jail host, all jails with VNET. The problem is: network performance in the jails (not on the host!) is = abysmal with the second setup. Not consistently so, everything *seems* to work but e.g. a customer complained that checking out a project from github happend at 15k/s =E2=80=A6 that=E2=80=99s when we started to = investigate. After not finding anything fundamentally wrong we checked the = differences between individual hosts and the only essential one was the network = setup as shown above. So early this morning i rewired the host, got rid of the VLANs - presto, github fast now. *Any* idea what might be going on here? We use VNET all the same on all = the hosts and it is still labelled =E2=80=9Eexperimental", yes. But all the = parts that make up the different setups - bridge(4), vlan(4) - have been in FreeBSD for ages. I=E2=80=99m just combining features orthogonally like every = good sysadmin ;-) If someone is willing to do some investigation, I think I can provide a = test system and remote access =E2=80=A6 Systems are running 11.2p3 at the moment. To be patched to 11.2p9 next Tuesday. Kind regards, Patric --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 14:57:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ABE14EE857 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09D46FD9E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5A23914EE856; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B4F14EE855 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D54826FD9D for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15F6E94D8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MEvC2E021129 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1MEvCWk021128 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235787] ixgbe no carrier problem - TX(7) desc avail = 2048, pidx = 0 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: piotr.pietruszewski@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:57:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235787 Piotr Pietruszewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |piotr.pietruszewski@intel.c | |om --- Comment #1 from Piotr Pietruszewski --- (In reply to Ozkan KIRIK from comment #0) We have trouble reproducing this bug in our environment. Could you please provide information specified below? 1. What type of traffic is predominant (UDP/TCP)? 2. Is the same amount of traffic going out and back in or is it only outgoi= ng traffic? 3. What is your port configuration (dump from ifconfig will be helpful)? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 16:09:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4071114F1C73 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olgeni@olgeni.com) Received: from hub.olgeni.com (hub.olgeni.com [31.171.246.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481A5735D0 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olgeni@olgeni.com) Received: from [192.168.0.80] (unknown [82.84.91.88]) by hub.olgeni.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A90FD7916 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:09:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:09:46 +0100 (CET) From: Giacomo Olgeni X-X-Sender: olgeni@macbook.local To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: IPFW NAT in VNET jail Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01) X-OpenPGP-KeyID: 0x90B7A98E6450AE47 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 7133 AB4D DFC8 0A0D F891 B0D2 90B7 A98E 6450 AE47 X-OpenPGP-URL: http://hub.olgeni.com/~olgeni/pgp/olgeni@olgeni.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 481A5735D0 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of olgeni@olgeni.com designates 31.171.246.156 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=olgeni@olgeni.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.62 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.767,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.964,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[olgeni.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.31)[0.315,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[hub.olgeni.com]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: CH(0.03)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50837, ipnet:31.171.244.0/22, country:CH]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:09:57 -0000 Hi, I have been playing around with IPFW and in-kernel NAT in a VNET jail, in order to implement NAT before IPsec. The IPsec part is provided by a different VNET jail that seems to be working fine. Problem is, I could not get NAT working in any way so far. And just to be sure, I already disabled anything related to checksum offloading from all the physical network cards (txcsum, rxcsum, tso, etc.). My routing is from epair1b (192.168.3.0/24) to epair0b (10.64.23.34, using 10.64.23.33 as gw). I can see that NAT is kind of doing what is expected, but then something weird happens. I run "telnet 10.101.214.155 80" (to reach the remote IPsec subnet) from 192.168.3.9; connection goes through 192.168.3.223 (the gateway jail, never mind my temporary addresses), and from there it goes out through NAT to the IPsec jail. tcpdump on the NAT jail (outbound interface epair0b) shows this: 17:00:04.330364 IP (tos 0x10, ttl 63, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 60) 10.64.23.34.56647 > 10.101.214.155.http: Flags [S], cksum 0x4112 (correct), seq 3633527062, win 65535, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 6,sackOK,TS val 1310639916 ecr 0], length 0 17:00:04.349254 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 59, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 56) 10.101.214.155.http > 10.64.23.34.56647: Flags [S.], cksum 0xede4 (correct), seq 619471197, ack 3633527063, win 4344, options [mss 1360,sackOK,TS val 91081438 ecr 1310639916], length 0 17:00:04.349464 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 40) 10.64.23.34.58666 > 10.101.214.155.http: Flags [R], cksum 0xb658 (correct), seq 3633527063, win 0, length 0 So, I'm get the right SYN/ACK to the right port, but then a RST is sent from an unrelated port, and the connection starts retransmitting the SYN. I have "nat 1 config log if epair0b", and "ipfw show" lists the following rules: 00100 0 0 nat 1 ip from any to any recv epair0b 00200 74 4080 nat 1 ip from any to any xmit epair0b 00300 0 0 check-state :default 00400 6 360 allow tcp from any to any out xmit epair0b setup keep-state :default 00500 0 0 allow udp from any to any out xmit epair0b setup 65535 113149 11125118 allow ip from any to any I'm running with one_pass=1. If I set one_pass=0 the only change is that rule 400 is hit by packets going out from NAT, but the result doesn't change. I added rule 100 to see if I had any match from the incoming SYN/ACK, but the counter is always 0. Rule 300 has 0 packets too (even with one_pass=0), so it's not clear to me whether the SYN/ACK is actually being seen by the firewall or if the RST is coming from somewhere else. I tried to run dwatch from the jail host and got this: # sudo dwatch -X tcp | grep 10.64.23.34 INFO Sourcing tcp profile [found in /usr/libexec/dwatch] INFO Watching 'tcp:::accept-established, [...]' 2019 Feb 22 17:00:04 0.0 intr[12]: 10.64.23.34:56647 <- 10.101.214.155:80 34 bytes 2019 Feb 22 17:00:04 0.0 intr[12]: 10.64.23.34:56647 X- 10.101.214.155:80 2019 Feb 22 17:00:04 0.0 intr[12]: 10.64.23.34:56647 -> 10.101.214.155:80 19 bytes The events look the same but there's no port 58666 anywhere here, which is where the RST comes from. My naive interpretation would be that NAT has nowhere to map the SYN/ACK for some reason, possibly because rule 100 is never hit? But that wouldn't explain the odd port number. I'm a bit out of ideas short of not using a VNET jail and trying to do everything from a bhyve VM, so any suggestion/interpretation is welcome :) From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 16:22:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9833914F26A0 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229E37459E for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D574A14F269D; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA3E14F269C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 387927459B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 692F0A1D2 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MGMg5n064027 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1MGMgXi064025 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.taht@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:22:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Dave Taht changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave.taht@gmail.com --- Comment #8 from Dave Taht --- (In reply to Rodney W. Grimes from comment #7) To clarify a few things...=20 The last major attempt at making 240/4 "real" happened in the 2008-2010 timeframe - bsd and linux gained the ability to assign and route it around = then (and osx had it in the first place). The IETF conflated "making it work" wi= th "how they should be used" and after the CGN address space was defined suppo= rt died out there. There was consensus then about making them unicast, I think, from talking to all the participants in the debate. Linux had one teeny patch dropped on the floor back then which allowed assignment from the ifconfig sysctl still used by busybox (otherwise the netlink based tools like iproute had no restrictions), so it had otherwise = been able to assign/route/ping for all this time. So we just fixed that (and obsoleted IN_EXPERIMENTAL entirely) in linux 4.20 and backported it to open= wrt. There's other patches outstanding across other tools in the ipv4-cleanup gi= thub repo. So... the minor bug regarding using this space on freebsd was this single l= ine check for icmp, and I don't think removing that needs a sysctl or ifdef. assignment and routing already work.=20 I agree that after kernel support lands that the next bigger barriers are firewalls, bcp38, and other devices on the path... and the ietf. Knocking o= ut the ping issue is just one small step along the way. Lastly, it's far from a lone dev at pushing this stuff forward again, howev= er we totally don't mind just accumulating more patches in our repo until more visibility and consensus is achieved. That said... one line patch... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 16:27:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322C414F2824 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:27:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32065746DA for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:27:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DFBF114F2822; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD54B14F2821 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F21ED746D8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545EBA1D8 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MGQvus068078 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1MGQv88068077 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:26:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: dave.taht@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 16:27:01 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #9 from Dave Taht --- (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #2) >Regardless of whether or not using class E addresses is canonical, we half= -ass it >today. +1 >If they're non-canonical, we should *not* allow them to be assigned to int= erfaces. -1 >If they are, we shouldn't filter ICMP. +1. :) Thx for also spotting the other areas that needed to be addressed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 17:03:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A0714F3953; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:302:1100::e:1def]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAE6C75CB0; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from wmx1.enfer-du-nord.net (www.mer-waases.lan [10.2.2.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 445d2d5KYzz1BsT; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:03:21 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:03:21 +0100 From: Michael Grimm To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance issues with VNET/bridge/VLAN In-Reply-To: <9B0EC546-38E6-424E-9CC9-93F4C58B296F@punkt.de> References: <9B0EC546-38E6-424E-9CC9-93F4C58B296F@punkt.de> Message-ID: <355c746ae7ec884407299e2649283cfc@ellael.org> X-Sender: trashcan@ellael.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.mer-waases.lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:03:33 -0000 Am 2019-02-22 11:31, schrieb Patrick M. Hausen: [x-posted to freebsd-jail@freebsd.org] > The machine is an iocage jail host, all jails with VNET. > > The problem is: network performance in the jails (not on the host!) is > abysmal > with the second setup. Not consistently so, everything *seems* to work > but e.g. a customer complained that checking out a project from github > happend at 15k/s … that’s when we started to investigate. [...] > *Any* idea what might be going on here? We use VNET all the same on all > the > hosts and it is still labelled „experimental", yes. But all the parts > that > make up the different setups - bridge(4), vlan(4) - have been in > FreeBSD > for ages. I’m just combining features orthogonally like every good > sysadmin ;-) > > If someone is willing to do some investigation, I think I can provide a > test > system and remote access … This sounds familiar to me, please have a look at the following two threads: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2019-February/003684.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2017-December/049470.html If your hosts run on cloud infrastructure odds are that the mentioned settings will work in your case. Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 17:32:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C0114F467A for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FC976EB4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 588CC14F4678; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3102D14F4676 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082C676EB0; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x1MHWfxE026356; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:32:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x1MHWf7v026355; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:32:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201902221732.x1MHWf7v026355@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: 240/4 In-Reply-To: To: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:32:41 -0800 (PST) CC: cem@freebsd.org, rgrimes@freebsd.org, Loganaden Velvindron , net@freebsd.org, wollman@freebsd.org Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 082C676EB0 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.38 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[rgrimes@freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.41)[0.411,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.01), asn: 13868(-0.01), country: US(-0.07)]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.52)[0.516,0]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.58)[0.575,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:32:46 -0000 > Taking this off list This thread would be better served on net@freebsd.org, what do you think cem? After getting to the end of this I decided I am going to add net@freebsd.org, and wollman@freebsd.org just in case he is not on that list. To those first seeing any of this, it is a thread that kinda started in a PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235927 you may wish to read that before repling here. > there is a internet draft cooking in the ipv4-cleanup repository on > github. At the moment the history section is well worth reading, but > we may end up splitting it into separate drafts and don't currently > plan to submit it at the march ietf, but to gauge response at > netdevconf and then on the hallway track at the ietf. Thats good, as far as getting the process moving forward. > The last attempt to open up 240/4 died in bickering over how they > would be used rather than making them work, And I suspect what caused that has probably not changed, hence my hesitation on immeditate action. > so we've been patching > everything, testing with a couple testbeds, identifying what else is > broken, and planning a public experiment to take place over the next > 2-3 years. We've had more than a few convos at high levels at icann, > tacit support from folk like vint and so forth (see relevant > discussion on the internet history mailing list), etc. Also good. > Also what we're up to overall is actually a great deal more ambitious > ("a moonshot"). based on my experience on my prior rfcs (like > rfc8290), navigating ietf processes is somewhat easier with lots of > running code to point to. The moonshot on 240/0 would be getting Microsoft to fix there stuff. The OSS arena is trivial once a draft exists. I have backed off more than anything because there is infact, though maybe old, a draft submitted by Cisco. > Actually I regard fixing "zeroth" networking > and making sure https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3021 works in more > places as the best short term focus of the project - 240/4 is a > lightning rod for some people, but fixing 0/8 finally (john gilmore > fixed that in 1985 and is kind of bugged about it now), and > reallocating formerly reserved multicast spaces as unicast are also on > that long term agenda. > > (for the record, fixing 0/8 is merely changing the is_zeronet macro - > change that to 0 and 0/8 works. Should have been fixed when bsd 4.2 > finally retired damn it) One of the problems with fixing any of 240/4 or 0/8 is that these address are almost always used in foolishly crafted DDOS attacks so are heavily filtered as both source and destination addresses. > It's only been 10 years since 240/4 sort of started to work. I do > think that this time around with enough support from the open source > community we can make a dent in things in under 5; it would be great > to have a few freebsd folk along for the ride. I have sent a private email to Garratt Wollman asking him to take a look at the PR. If your concerned about my relactance to just go commit the 1 liner, do not let that worry you too much. We do need to do due dillegence, and for me the only real remaing question is does this in any way cause FreeBSD to be out of conformance with either host requirements or router requirements, or FIPS or other standards, as we do have downstreams who have strict requirements in these areas. > Dave T?ht > CTO, TekLibre, LLC > http://www.teklibre.com > Tel: 1-831-205-9740 -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 17:59:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9169E14F4F75 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2315F77B39 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DABE814F4F73; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C815F14F4F70 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6179177B38 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355DCAECC for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MHxBAO079384 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1MHxBvU079383 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:59:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|12.0-RELEASE |CURRENT --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 18:10:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC42B14F53D5 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEAA801E4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F249E14F53D4; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF4414F53D3 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77E24801D9 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB9C2B06B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MIAdKT031732 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1MIAd1R031722 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235927] FreeBSD does not reply to ICMP requests when assigned an ip in 240.0.0.0/8 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:10:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235927 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Dave Taht from comment #9) > (In reply to Conrad Meyer from comment #2) > >If they're non-canonical, we should *not* allow them to be assigned to i= nterfaces. >=20 > -1 Help me understand the disagreement :-). I guess I should clarify =E2=80= =94 in the absence of one or more enabled sysctl(s) permitting use of reserved address space, my conclusion is that we shouldn't allow reserved IP ranges to be assigned/routed. Especially when we do not support them in other parts of = the stack which will silently fail (ICMP, ipfw, forwarding; maybe others). Maybe my suggestion is overstepping the intentions of the IPv4 RFC; it has = been a long time since I looked at it, and class E wasn't my focus at the time. Any way, if you want to elaborate on that, I'd love to learn more. Thank y= ou. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 18:33:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F18614F62A4 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olgeni@olgeni.com) Received: from hub.olgeni.com (hub.olgeni.com [31.171.246.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382588144C for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:33:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olgeni@olgeni.com) Received: from [192.168.0.80] (unknown [82.84.91.88]) by hub.olgeni.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5ED8CD7916 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:33:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:33:04 +0100 (CET) From: Giacomo Olgeni X-X-Sender: olgeni@macbook.local To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFW NAT in VNET jail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01) X-OpenPGP-KeyID: 0x90B7A98E6450AE47 X-OpenPGP-Fingerprint: 7133 AB4D DFC8 0A0D F891 B0D2 90B7 A98E 6450 AE47 X-OpenPGP-URL: http://hub.olgeni.com/~olgeni/pgp/olgeni@olgeni.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 382588144C X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of olgeni@olgeni.com designates 31.171.246.156 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=olgeni@olgeni.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.792,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[olgeni.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.29)[0.292,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: hub.olgeni.com]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: CH(0.03)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50837, ipnet:31.171.244.0/22, country:CH]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:33:08 -0000 On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, Giacomo Olgeni wrote: > 00100 0 0 nat 1 ip from any to any recv epair0b > 00200 74 4080 nat 1 ip from any to any xmit epair0b > 00300 0 0 check-state :default > 00400 6 360 allow tcp from any to any out xmit epair0b setup keep-state :default > 00500 0 0 allow udp from any to any out xmit epair0b setup > 65535 113149 11125118 allow ip from any to any More testing with a know good configuration, that I got by setting a few things in rc.conf. On the VNET jail, which doesn't work, I have: rc.conf ======= defaultrouter="10.64.23.33" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_nat_enable="YES" firewall_nat_interface="epair0b" firewall_type="open" Rules ===== 00050 18 860 nat 123 ip4 from any to any via epair0b 00100 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00400 0 0 deny ip from any to ::1 00500 0 0 deny ip from ::1 to any 00600 1 76 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16 00700 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 00800 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 00900 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any icmp6types 1 01000 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any icmp6types 2,135,136 65000 175 16234 allow ip from any to any 65535 15 1209 allow ip from any to any On a bhyve VM, same host, same bridge(4) interface, I have... rc.conf ======= defaultrouter="10.64.23.33" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_nat_enable="YES" firewall_nat_interface="vtnet1" firewall_type="open" ifconfig_vtnet0="inet 192.168.3.202/24" ifconfig_vtnet1="inet 10.64.23.34/28" Rules ===== 00050 10 839 nat 123 ip4 from any to any via vtnet1 00100 64 6304 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00400 0 0 deny ip from any to ::1 00500 0 0 deny ip from ::1 to any 00600 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16 00700 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10 00800 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16 00900 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any icmp6types 1 01000 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any icmp6types 2,135,136 65000 34 2767 allow ip from any to any 65535 0 0 allow ip from any to any And the NAT works correctly. So, there's apparently something going on with in-kernel NAT and VNET, but I don't have the faintest clue where to look... Problem not solved but cheated around :) From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 18:46:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB7314F6875 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27D981D20 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7159A14F6874; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED3D14F6873 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E3B81D1B for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26DA5B630 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1MIkGrx009072 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1MIkGhf009071 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235787] ixgbe no carrier problem - TX(7) desc avail = 2048, pidx = 0 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ozkan.kirik@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:46:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235787 --- Comment #2 from Ozkan KIRIK --- Hello, Type of traffic is mixed both tcp and udp. Traffic is generated using WARP17 (github.com/Juniper/warp17) tool. Configuration is req size 1000byte and response size 65535byte both UDP and TCP traffic. |--------| |-------| | port0|-----<-----|ix0 | ix0: RX ~2Gbps TX ~10Gbps |WARP Box| |FreeBSD| | port1|----->-----|ix1 | ix1: RX ~10Gbps TX ~2Gbps |________| |_______| # ifconfig ix0: flags=3D8c03 metric 0 mtu 1500 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3De53cbb ether 0c:c4:7a:c7:67:6a inet6 fe80::1%ix0 prefixlen 128 tentative scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 groups: lanlar media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier nd6 options=3D21 ix1: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3De53fbb ether 0c:c4:7a:c7:67:6b inet6 fe80::1%ix1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x2 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 groups: wanlar media: Ethernet autoselect (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 igb0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3De527bb ether 0c:c4:7a:c7:62:ba inet6 fe80::1%igb0 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x3 inet 10.2.2.46 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.2.2.255 groups: wanlar media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 igb1: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 =20=20=20=20=20=20=20 options=3De507bb ether 0c:c4:7a:c7:62:bb inet6 fe80::1%igb1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x4 inet 192.168.3.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.3.255 groups: lanlar media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D680003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 inet 127.0.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff groups: lo dmzler nd6 options=3D21 enc0: flags=3D0<> metric 0 mtu 1536 groups: enc nd6 options=3D29 pflog0: flags=3D0<> metric 0 mtu 33160 groups: pflog pfsync0: flags=3D0<> metric 0 mtu 1500 syncpeer: 0.0.0.0 maxupd: 128 defer: off groups: pfsync disc0: flags=3D8048 metric 0 mtu 65532 groups: disc nd6 options=3D29 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 18:48:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D3C14F6984; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:48:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D597281E1B; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id x1MImcGc082412; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:48:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.46.121] ([217.29.46.121]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id x1MImcVN006457; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:48:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) From: "Patrick M. Hausen" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: Performance issues with VNET/bridge/VLAN Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 19:48:37 +0100 References: <9B0EC546-38E6-424E-9CC9-93F4C58B296F@punkt.de> <355c746ae7ec884407299e2649283cfc@ellael.org> To: FreeBSD Net , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <355c746ae7ec884407299e2649283cfc@ellael.org> Message-Id: <8ABA2B5F-6A94-4907-B623-6B7E9BC83CB3@punkt.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D597281E1B X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.95 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.951,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 18:48:41 -0000 Hi! > Am 22.02.2019 um 18:03 schrieb Michael Grimm : >=20 > Am 2019-02-22 11:31, schrieb Patrick M. Hausen: >=20 > [x-posted to freebsd-jail@freebsd.org] >=20 >> The machine is an iocage jail host, all jails with VNET. >> The problem is: network performance in the jails (not on the host!) = is abysmal >> with the second setup. Not consistently so, everything *seems* to = work >> but e.g. a customer complained that checking out a project from = github >> happend at 15k/s =E2=80=A6 that=E2=80=99s when we started to = investigate. >=20 > [...] >=20 >> *Any* idea what might be going on here? We use VNET all the same on = all the >> hosts and it is still labelled =E2=80=9Eexperimental", yes. But all = the parts that >> make up the different setups - bridge(4), vlan(4) - have been in = FreeBSD >> for ages. I=E2=80=99m just combining features orthogonally like every = good sysadmin ;-) >> If someone is willing to do some investigation, I think I can provide = a test >> system and remote access =E2=80=A6 >=20 > This sounds familiar to me, please have a look at the following two = threads: >=20 > = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2019-February/003684.html= > = https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2017-December/049470.html >=20 > If your hosts run on cloud infrastructure odds are that the mentioned = settings will work in your case. Bare metal. We *provide* cloud infrastructure by the means of jails and = VNET. See this URL for the shameless marketing plug [tm] ;-) Or my talk at = EuroBSDCon 2017 in Paris. https://infrastructure.punkt.de/de/produkte/proserver.html And no PF, no NAT, no IPFW - just the setup I showed in my first mail and of course epair(4) interfaces added to the bridge by iocage =E2=80=A6 We happened to have a handful of servers without enough free uplink = ports in the respective racks and thought we could get away cheaply using = trunks and VLANs. But I=E2=80=99ll fiddle with LRO nonetheless and report if that changes = anything. Thanks Patrick --=20 punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Kaiserallee 13a Tel.: 0721 9109-0 Fax: -100 76133 Karlsruhe info@punkt.de http://punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Gf: Juergen Egeling From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Feb 22 20:43:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC5714FA983 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.taht@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D1187D75 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.taht@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AA09A14FA982; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826FC14FA981 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.taht@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168B987D71; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.taht@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id s1so4071510qte.5; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:43:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=weUNEO3HqfEct3ozr35lr1DIUVLP6kp6fM3qWN3DyUc=; b=sGbyJCowVLWtToDwt2PAHs/gs5kloWRQYt8Cgs8MSkqTk8x1ASvPJkUij3BTTz/uj9 zjDWgfyJ+47i/5Kqvq2Y44Oiiba/0Wl7S/BeD2x4ndmxcnzkbI6f+I/RxQXM15h3G495 YR4Y2nPlw48yLw4lu+73XBEQYdsKa5DH4fAc12CnQ5oFFK96CL7pktPmtKQMqLYH1lmn lFp5DJZMwzVWay7HYq5m321gmFvJwqIDPNeXFlku7Vc4wo0jbbUf27Vqfd6lnwdQ6Bf3 gNdglZ5bokIE1C9GhBJXFeScQeRN9ijII3ouAVEiORZfwJ1Ggjw7AF1wVGfFdz3Dc6OU JL4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=weUNEO3HqfEct3ozr35lr1DIUVLP6kp6fM3qWN3DyUc=; b=OFB9+6xDUp1mz5VjsDMUaasT3Eg+SbBig85bJ7K9Tgsxd91g5NJ7IahwpMdQ5Jlz6y fhdqyJCWMX8dTcGkxdMzhDDbiALRZzflT+qIhZv+1PTUT/6Rn6+qbmWMieDFglRerjur OQtc1omt09aiYaAq4LDM7/4iXPyYsxZHtiGveCC7on4YvDDLVi8HaYE13EPeTu0JXt5J RWIabeQfVdJfocn/sPIM3IwJ29msKPYzEuQ8d7l+mVbwzHqexdb30ciNizoR8/i/MuV8 rDFa2TKv3UwdBFqQts6IdcLm/bwUNKuLlE1yS/YUhuqbEht597N273LS9zTJAC/hCiQy EqIw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYXz9CkuTrRHSXrBLDwzbL+iq3IdJr52lD4NxKfTmufuqJYwWxF OEqoZAyqKGxzxQItKvGdAS6QZBjQfVCiQpMlnV26BdIb X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZDrYEAjvN2Gr080xgHm2gn2OyspZlW+kWzCRN2O4GBqP8X9edcdv4kDCq7uwFahZiuL3ipv1kR4hF8k0oYvsw= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2d85:: with SMTP id p5mr4797650qta.136.1550868197687; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:43:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201902221732.x1MHWf7v026355@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <201902221732.x1MHWf7v026355@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 12:43:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 240/4 To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: cem@freebsd.org, Loganaden Velvindron , net@freebsd.org, wollman@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 168B987D71 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.92 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.919,0]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 20:43:21 -0000 list: I'm focused on technical feasibility only at the moment and getting ready for a "moonshot" talk at netdevconf march 21st , and I'd while I'd dearly appreciate folk trying some "interesting" patches and providing feedback (https://github.com/dtaht/ipv4-cleanup/tree/master/patches ) am totally not prepared to talk about operational or deployment issues for a while. We have a FAQ partially written... I'm painfully aware of most of the arguments... (I kind of expect those issues to dominate the conversations, and I'd rather just patch and test things for a while, and get more people to think deeply about the technical issues with *running code* at hand) yesterday... logan got ahold of our abstract ( https://netdevconf.org/0x13/session.html?talk-ipv4-unicast-expansions ) and a few hours later, figured out how to apply the ideas to the freebsd codebase and tested them, then submitted this first patch.... That's *awesome*! but I fear the headline 240/4 thing will obscure the other things like cleaning up and compressing ipv4 allocations a little bit better (like zeroth networking, and so on) in all the codebases in the world, that we're also attempting. Of interest perhaps, are the threads on the internet history mailing list. http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/internet-history/2019-February/thread.html From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 11:58:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1D215128DE for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E2887562 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E352C15128DD; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07F215128DA for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627928755F for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D0214EC7 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1NBwKwj072824 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1NBwKAQ072823 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:20 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235700] oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with emulex 10gbe nic Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: thorion3006@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 11:58:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235700 --- Comment #2 from Sajeev Ramasamy --- (In reply to Ryan Moeller from comment #1) Hey, sorry for the late reply. Thanks for your patch, but that line is no longer present in the new file. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 10:59:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA621510E60 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B9B85A88 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5A5D11510E5C; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E421510E5A for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC09A85A86 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A0A814636 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1NAxH97023163 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1NAxHEZ023162 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235959] DSACK not working Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tuexen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:59:20 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235959 Michael Tuexen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |tuexen@freebsd.org CC| |net@FreeBSD.org, | |tuexen@freebsd.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 19:45:06 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71721503140 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB166CBFE for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 03256150313E; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3484150313D for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA126CBFA for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B039D192F5 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x1NJj4e1068818 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x1NJj4wW068817 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 235700] oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with emulex 10gbe nic Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ryan@freqlabs.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 19:45:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D235700 Ryan Moeller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #202047|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Ryan Moeller --- Created attachment 202296 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D202296&action= =3Dedit Bounds check array accesses in oce driver My machine is operational again. Here is the actual patch that applies to H= EAD. The same idea applies to 12 and 11 as well, though maybe on different line numbers. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Feb 23 22:56:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F57315079AD; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (mx2.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:401:2100::5:8a0e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D908272969; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from [IPv6:2003:e9:7f29:ac01:c583:48db:f286:7fe3] (p200300E97F29AC01C58348DBF2867FE3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:e9:7f29:ac01:c583:48db:f286:7fe3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 446Nq73fZxzFRn; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:56:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net From: Michael Grimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: Performance issues with VNET/bridge/VLAN Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:56:00 +0100 References: <9B0EC546-38E6-424E-9CC9-93F4C58B296F@punkt.de> <355c746ae7ec884407299e2649283cfc@ellael.org> <8ABA2B5F-6A94-4907-B623-6B7E9BC83CB3@punkt.de> To: FreeBSD Net , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8ABA2B5F-6A94-4907-B623-6B7E9BC83CB3@punkt.de> Message-Id: <79A4C471-FCDF-4C2D-BBEF-6512F3AF608F@ellael.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.kaan-bock.lan X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 22:56:16 -0000 Hi On 22. Feb 2019, at 19:48, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > epair(4) interfaces added to the bridge These are my number one suspects when it comes to performance loss = within a VNET jail compared to the host system.=20 > But I=E2=80=99ll fiddle with LRO nonetheless and report if that = changes anything. I'm interested to learn if bare metal might behave comparable to cloud = infrastructure or not? Regards, Michael=