From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Sep 22 06:11:26 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2A7F5E9B for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46bcXZ51XJz4PKN for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AC2BAF5E92; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEEDF5E91 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46bcXZ46Nbz4PKM for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F08222BF for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8M6BQQ5065115 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8M6BQCw065108 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 06:11:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240685 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |patch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Sep 22 08:31:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32976F9A26 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46bgfT4wn1z4Vb7 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A91A0F9A0D; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E4DF9A0C for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46bgfT42JWz4Vb5 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA2723CE7 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8M8Vj43057309 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8M8VjDd057308 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 08:31:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240685 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eugen@freebsd.org --- Comment #2 from Eugene Grosbein --- Can you provide some practical use case for the node? And pass manual page through spell checker, please. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Sep 22 14:52:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D005124299 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46br5Q1gPzz3N1N; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8MEpjAj091006 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail-d.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:51:55 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=allbsd.org; s=20190220; t=1569163927; bh=vUHB4tl5991L6cAJBl0i9os3Rlmu7hSbPUXRQaqL04Q=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=dh94cMq/2kzC4AAOp6h0sKGFZXG4ZC+0PedjrAreEkxayrRv7BHzoRBJw7Oljuj4b JeXmQQXjyoYfLkZj7TdI3atLpN4VVwWgefkmchk3KdH0LD1o1/x7o/yNQMpOsAtBfQ JyAXvEUPexSiEV+SEtj1iWEXybQRWxhdWwZEcQYs= Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8MEpd5A053115 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:51:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x8MEpcZB053110; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:51:39 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:50:47 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190922.235047.562191741306834004.hrs@allbsd.org> To: akgupt3@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Link flap for setting ether/MAC address From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Sep_22_23_50_47_2019_632)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:52:07 +0900 (JST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46br5Q1gPzz3N1N X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=allbsd.org header.s=20190220 header.b=dh94cMq/; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hrs@allbsd.org designates 2001:2f0:104:e001::41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hrs@allbsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[allbsd.org:s=20190220]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[allbsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[allbsd.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7514, ipnet:2001:2f0::/32, country:JP]; IP_SCORE(-2.21)[ip: (-9.12), ipnet: 2001:2f0::/32(-4.24), asn: 7514(2.32), country: JP(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 14:52:11 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Sep_22_23_50_47_2019_632)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Anish wrote in : ak> Hi all, ak> Got a very basic question, why physical link is flapped when we set the ak> address ak> ak> # dmesg -c ak> # ifconfig ix1 ether 70:6d:15:1f:12:72 ak> ..wait.. ak> # dmesg ak> ix1: link state changed to DOWN ak> ix1: link state changed to UP ak> # ak> ak> is this a bug or expected behavior? We could update our MAC in next ARP ak> request without link flap or some other system like switch etc expect the ak> link flap to update ARP. Is this the behavior for other systems? I think this depends on the driver. Some drivers reset the NIC when the MAC address is changed mostly because it is an easy way to re-configure the multicast filtering rules or the other settings which must be updated for the new MAC address. It causes a link flap. For upper layers above the NIC driver, you are correct. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Sep_22_23_50_47_2019_632)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMcEABMKAC0WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXYeKRw8caHJzQGFsbGJz ZC5vcmcACgkQ27B9xm8fc3+yZAII89E4Kh/Q7hEOPIZt0xgjtnCsG9cxrcHGLRjE bJ3Jo/z1EgBdqpj7TWzgQdhnOm75oaI5bNphJNmtJlBdEjVjd6ICCOiGEUUvRapX VrH7nRJg7TNMF0KFZd4nM9P9TioMSQfzo0S/eIK6TT8O+bG3iibNdNBlfosVmC1Y mEUOE7cDElOs =pY5S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Sep_22_23_50_47_2019_632)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Sep 22 21:00:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC7112C53E for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46c0Gy59nCz4FHd for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9968E12C533; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9913312C531 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46c0Gw6w8Sz4FGx for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1FA6469D for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8ML0u9r096396 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8ML0u3U096389 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909222100.x8ML0u3U096389@kenobi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:56 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 21:00:59 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 221146 | [ixgbe] Problem with second laggport In Progress | 235700 | oce(4) driver causes fatal trap 12 on boot with e New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 213410 | [carp] service netif restart causes hang only whe Open | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc Open | 194485 | Userland cannot add IPv6 prefix routes Open | 200319 | Bridge+CARP crashes/freezes Open | 202510 | [CARP] advertisements sourced from CARP IP cause Open | 222273 | igb(4): Kernel panic (fatal trap 12) due to netwo Open | 225438 | panic in6_unlink_ifa() due to race Open | 225792 | ECMP is broken since tryforward() Open | 227720 | Kernel panic in ppp server Open | 236888 | ppp daemon: Allow MTU to be overridden for PPPoE Open | 236983 | bnxt(4) VLAN not operational unless explicit "ifc Open | 237072 | netgraph(4): performance issue [on HardenedBSD]? Open | 237391 | route get returns no result for network addresses Open | 237840 | Removed dummynet dependency on ipfw Open | 238324 | Add XG-C100C/AQtion AQC107 10GbE NIC driver Open | 240530 | netgraph/ng_source: Allow ng_source to inject int 20 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 06:39:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321D0E85C6 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vm.finance2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cF6J2xHHz4cRC for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vm.finance2@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id u8so9433224iom.5 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:39:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7gb+4XQkMeSV2QCG1t6bQFdEth2/MCvbhOUrESmOb6M=; b=SPhryQBHLa5VoUd9GVc7gqQXo/ApZGaC5lKWePvpcfLXdT3kESpLS7dOUhuJ5hEIAk IrVFkZ5u1jYjzr22Bw3PG21ZRb3lsxI/EqzxwHhkUPiJkA31FRyLBTyTpi2F+lKRIkst RqVHCNwHqtQA5hQhzXVZ994BlytU0U0z2IdZRXb91FUuwIPj5aRDYcA25TZIE2V46Q7U lTTxTmaLGsQCTEpSct6oaW+8GaZLXel4rbwtjW3fSkHl403XlVQtRZW504T1hwCInAU8 2YUFE+ftnLIjEnAxRLTQyv4rlyUW723PLCZqZINePsT1uZvRT0RX2G83oaxczlUdqnEK EHNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7gb+4XQkMeSV2QCG1t6bQFdEth2/MCvbhOUrESmOb6M=; b=IiC8cfoZO/2RqPLGNlQOkrok46mZvhnsPIEoeefcWDoBOtsvecD1Ja07ydV4wy2J1o WPCOgxiwXOdhic9oONcf0Ehco2PhVZm9zLN5EUTcpfruANS3liMIhSFvOFbja9VGxBM6 3ot+gcGmgORMiII/t3Yie763lEWdMACJw4Rcc1jsS+7GeB0NbALK7gkqLEtshs5rGLtf xV0jJUQopAIbliY/tQ8aJJEgDmc3c3xWc2L4hSW+RqcCKuxXGN01TdzZuUgDNWZmlzCg xuC1BIKNC0bjMec4oyXntSrLmHy1NnkP+a4Xtkz2eQOqncuskH5PE7+qrCMryULzTf+K IXag== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdKPm3f+wfr8djdgkaMWYJrl7l6kFESbDQ9gGJb1i+G1g1hyXt Vz6NDJwV0JVnfw/ohG0GbA2wj1ZFs/ipBVIfQw4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw9wmQiQgoSz0qTUoG0W7RN8xpbEtYYeGS+aIZa8gPMNOXKuS6gl5Sh9PRkhLimmJXfAsG0x336B2TPvMiPyXY= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7a42:: with SMTP id k2mr9642940iop.303.1569220759159; Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:39:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: vm finance Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2019 23:39:07 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BBR patch on latest src, build failed. To: hshh Cc: freebsd-net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46cF6J2xHHz4cRC X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=SPhryQBH; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vmfinance2@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vmfinance2@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-5.71), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.64), asn: 15169(-2.20), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:21 -0000 I have successfully built BBR after checking out latest codebase. I'm also on svn revision: 352483... Did you follow the steps I have outlined in previous emails on this topic? I had to manually create a few sub-directories/copy things etc. Pls check emails on this last week. On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM hshh wrote: > Hi all, > > I patched D21582.id62213.diff to latest head src that revision 352587, > kernel build failed. > > According to previous mail, I can build the kernel successfully with > revision 352483. > > OS is 13.0-CURRENT amd64. > > Kernel config file, > > include GENERIC-NODEBUG > ident hshh > makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=1 > options TCPHPTS > options RATELIMIT > > The error log, > > --- tcp_bbr.ko.full --- > ld -m elf_x86_64_fbsd -d -warn-common --build-id=sha1 -d -warn-common > --build-id=sha1 -d -warn-common --build-id=sha1 -d -warn-common > --build-id=sha1 -r -d -o tcp_bbr.ko.full bbr.o sack_filter.o > rack_bbr_common.o bbr.o sack_filter.o rack_bbr_common.o bbr.o sack_filter.o > rack_bbr_common.o bbr.o sack_filter.o rack_bbr_common.o > ld: error: duplicate symbol: __tcp_bbr > >>> defined at bbr.c > >>> bbr.o:(__tcp_bbr) > >>> defined at bbr.c > >>> bbr.o:(.data+0x8) > .... Some messages similar above. > -- > @hshh > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 08:56:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC31ED1B0 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cJ8t1j0mz3GCn for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 38968ED1AF; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3859DED1AE for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cJ8t0k6Sz3GCk for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEBAC7C6 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8N8ujJu066892 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8N8uj2t066891 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 08:56:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240685 --- Comment #3 from lutz@donnerhacke.de --- This node is part of an A10-NSP development. See https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Sachgebiete/Teleko= mmunikation/Unternehmen_Institutionen/Breitband/NGA_NGN/NGA-Forum/aktuelled= okumente/L2_BSA_II_TechSpezifikation_V10.pdf?__blob=3DpublicationFile&v=3D2 Carrier networks tend to stack three or more tags for internal purposes and therefore hiding the service tags deep inside of the stack. When decomposing such an access network frame, the processing order is typically reversed: F= irst distinguish by service, than by other means. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 09:34:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C3BEE3E7 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cK006zCNz3JGw for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ED961EE3E6; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5A5EE3E5 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cK0062crz3JGt for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B322ACEFE for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8N9Y8ok062604 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8N9Y8Fn062603 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240685 --- Comment #4 from lutz@donnerhacke.de --- Created attachment 207732 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D207732&action= =3Dedit Updated patch for share/man/man4/ng_vlan_rotate.4 I'm sorry for my errors in the man page. This is an updated version. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 09:34:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5901EE49F for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cK0r4Qcsz3JM0 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 97D8CEE49E; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A00EE49C for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cK0r3SvDz3JLx for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCB5CF02 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8N9YqHE063606 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8N9YqKP063605 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240685] netgraph/ng_vlan_rotate: IEEE 802.1ad VLAN manipulation netgraph node type (new type) Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.ispatch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 09:34:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240685 lutz@donnerhacke.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #207625|0 |1 is patch| | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 13:34:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC826F4F19 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunreal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cQJm6SH1z424p for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hunreal@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id u22so11868121qkk.11 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:34:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JfJX3jALkW8SLLq+AbduNpF3eN0iHcbzZ0l4tYv23qc=; b=Ngp/9ljR8sKAwgaUcupnqKT8d7mnwJfMz1EA9QHBNQhKTOY7Tb2sWXtKh9ATzc9Kv3 BxywNr5Ynbk+AxQvjUQfbWOVPBWU7PPtIEWrYkGTfSLER6g3x/XEmPCehZR4AwLn97vQ H992XQyKJx6U4ZMXZKcmaaMKJ05OuJJccYuL9FNYNuhI96H0FVBKeNzpeUbLvbbl7ALq JShK2i4VXt4CJjaLwS3B5WbsodPzeTiq6GK2Y9CTRLScbmVxk4f8I4ZneR5qPRLPVGle FIwsHwCzpz0qU/ZciSgOBPOlM/gQpTCHCPyx1QuvMwqNJEeQSoi7p3Skn9Vz0esBz1Gb 9PsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JfJX3jALkW8SLLq+AbduNpF3eN0iHcbzZ0l4tYv23qc=; b=RqjO2+8Ti1K4IxaGzvppJTxRkObCk+vJURs/bLG7QzMc8ol2dkH6xRJkfZguOVbNnM 2f1/cHt6mrsS/Y3DoOqsTsts4uS/j9KsWUZio5dqOR8eeQqTUwsfIm8k4m2JNh/C8yPS vHKdaFl9KPFeCO3pvXC6eVmBicjUj7Na2t0H5FmFWkFKxXNSkTMqIqmH4IZebJ7mrh73 wojjIAYphG8lEF2Vk/jTl6E79fWkVjqYS3/GA6zH/pOSItXMtUlIuRiFCZsCMS3JBH+O 4oTMMZGTaUs4dSiJqyCieYHXW9shZyFxToL6gQ6nCX/Ppn/Dj/H5W4kWVmb4Cy8lEETC /Kuw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwIBW0YEUGDF1QfWcgo1U0K/uw9a9jIQpZMFn9IUOkK59qfL9m FKm2o12NITcTxXymIBNqjDDjdfCEheGrwSOlGg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzzu5R90sROPyi7rHMbQbRB95vZ08HfBCyFjXo9GjHeDFaCtBvoSV7iqY4Geyo1jy3heRjWtYh3r7dIWIqdQts= X-Received: by 2002:a37:4049:: with SMTP id n70mr17815059qka.326.1569245639694; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:33:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: hshh Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:33:23 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BBR patch on latest src, build failed. To: vm finance Cc: freebsd-net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46cQJm6SH1z424p X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Ngp/9ljR; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hunreal@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::733 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hunreal@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.32), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.64), asn: 15169(-2.20), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.7.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:34:01 -0000 Yes, I saw your email. As my post, I can build the kernel successfully with revision 352483. But can not build with latest src. On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 2:39 PM vm finance wrote: > I have successfully built BBR after checking out latest codebase. > I'm also on svn revision: 352483... > > Did you follow the steps I have outlined in previous emails on this topic? > I had to manually create a few sub-directories/copy things etc. Pls check > emails > on this last week. > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 4:01 PM hshh wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I patched D21582.id62213.diff to latest head src that revision 352587, >> kernel build failed. >> >> According to previous mail, I can build the kernel successfully with >> revision 352483. >> >> OS is 13.0-CURRENT amd64. >> >> Kernel config file, >> >> include GENERIC-NODEBUG >> ident hshh >> makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=1 >> options TCPHPTS >> options RATELIMIT >> >> The error log, >> >> --- tcp_bbr.ko.full --- >> ld -m elf_x86_64_fbsd -d -warn-common --build-id=sha1 -d -warn-common >> --build-id=sha1 -d -warn-common --build-id=sha1 -d -warn-common >> --build-id=sha1 -r -d -o tcp_bbr.ko.full bbr.o sack_filter.o >> rack_bbr_common.o bbr.o sack_filter.o rack_bbr_common.o bbr.o >> sack_filter.o >> rack_bbr_common.o bbr.o sack_filter.o rack_bbr_common.o >> ld: error: duplicate symbol: __tcp_bbr >> >>> defined at bbr.c >> >>> bbr.o:(__tcp_bbr) >> >>> defined at bbr.c >> >>> bbr.o:(.data+0x8) >> .... Some messages similar above. >> -- >> @hshh >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > -- @hshh From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 14:24:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B90F62DF for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cRRX5V5Hz44pF for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BC6DFF62DE; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC38CF62DC for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cRRX4cmnz44pD for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 820F8182B8 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8NEOuP9056724 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8NEOuGL056723 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:24:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233952 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |markj@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 14:29:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CB2F646D for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cRXT6jdCz453F for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E4938F6467; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4589F6465 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cRXT5nBxz453D for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9197182C6 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8NETDwK062381 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8NETDtU062380 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:29:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233952 --- Comment #19 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Mon Sep 23 14:29:05 UTC 2019 New revision: 352625 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352625 Log: Revert r316820. Despite appearing correct, r316820 breaks packet rx/tx for jme(4) interfaces. With 12.1 approaching, let's just revert the commit for now. PR: 233952 Tested by: Armin Gruner MFC after: 3 days Changes: head/sys/dev/jme/if_jme.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 14:33:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43389F676D for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cRdk1684z45PK for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 25F7BF676C; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BF9F676B for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cRdk06kFz45PH for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE1B1847F for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8NEXjig080661 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8NEXjAf080660 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:33:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233952 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |240700 --- Comment #20 from Kubilay Kocak --- Add to 12.1-RELEASE blockers given comment 19 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240700 [Bug 240700] [META] FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE blockers --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 18:12:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B34CFBA75 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cXV12GRKz4Kk9 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4DAC2FBA74; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6D9FBA73 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cXV11MXsz4Kk8 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127D21AC42 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8NICOqh033389 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8NICObC033381 for net@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: krzysztof.galazka@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 18:12:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236724 Krzysztof Galazka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krzysztof.galazka@intel.com --- Comment #10 from Krzysztof Galazka --- Should be fixed with this patch: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21769 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Sep 23 20:50:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7E9FFA88 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oldbout@aliyun.com) Received: from out30-93.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-93.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cc0r6hbGz4WRL for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:50:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oldbout@aliyun.com) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.5494085|-1; CH=blue; DM=||false|; FP=0|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04394; MF=oldbout@aliyun.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=1; RT=1; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0TdEfou6_1569271844; Received: from oldbout(mailfrom:oldbout@aliyun.com fp:SMTPD_---0TdEfou6_1569271844) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:50:45 +0800 From: "oldbout@aliyun.com" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5Luj56CU57yl?= To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 04:51:57 +0800 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46cc0r6hbGz4WRL X-Spamd-Bar: +++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.83 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[aliyun.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:115.124.30.0/24]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[aliyun.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[aliyun.com,quarantine]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[aliyun.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:37963, ipnet:115.124.24.0/21, country:CN]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[aliyun.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.42)[-0.416,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[aliyun.com:s=s1024]; FROM_DN_EQ_ADDR(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.35)[-0.353,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 115.124.24.0/21(-1.80), asn: 37963(-2.08), country: CN(0.02)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[93.30.124.115.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:50:54 -0000 a2ZwMTExOOiWhw0K From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 03:41:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF59CF6651 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cn6t5W9bz3xrL for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BD275F6650; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF0AF664F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cn6t4cj2z3xrK for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 829C8215B8 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8O3fgbn089226 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8O3fgVn089225 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239118] iflib: Panic in ether_output_frame on ESXi Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords short_desc see_also flagtypes.name bug_status cc assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:41:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239118 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|iflib, panic |crash Summary|in ESXi: Panic in |iflib: Panic in |ether_output_frame |ether_output_frame on ESXi See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 058 | |76 Flags| |mfc-stable12? Status|In Progress |Open CC| |virtualization@FreeBSD.org Assignee|virtualization@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #17 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: - Set to more appropriate default Assignee, keep virtualization CC'd - Needs a (real) Assignee to be In Progress Once committed to head and merged, please set maintainer-approval on the attachment to ? re@f.o for an explicit approval request --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 05:42:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFDDF9895 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 05:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f44.google.com (mail-lf1-f44.google.com [209.85.167.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cqpm36MDz43SS for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 05:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id q11so387180lfc.11 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 22:42:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=lxv8y2aKDo19Nh665R3EjlpGyvYHWfuzUb9KQTuLVd8=; b=GZ/r9O+NPRSNPUQBkN7bVop/DtxOaAbXX0PCPR2TJ10sma6XxCVF/N2cH9YHJDCL18 izoEah2Hg98y6hSEG8fddfZNCPK3rH3gbq3ElL6UXExjKN4SZ5CJtnHjQmA4DJ571/9n pAYh9yATVinXqcMdAexGg0pcyhgUUiB1MQqyeRREaBYk5BJ/jzGkkhVH0eIvakj/2oEI Rgu0MQvG7fq7GxfJpR9Q2dt3TIHt9fIDahofbAH9IhktCwirVmL/FmTLrgK856sxlGh8 OplyIHf7Z/L9gs8L7n9fOrUZSuMKko6FdK9x+B7KWjxT0NYfkSLgZFyPgq9eHpX9x05I XSHA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQcF+Iu03iRg/M0omUe9UUOVQiCA1F9qNGGoXbK/AGHBWyVXSM I2b7xRgCDvd04AcTmkW1PQJI3W92 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwnIuVTkRgcmnxokdRRJZ6tNYXZRQ4hJlSnuzpL+2U9t+iSP5jT5M18kfkcWlYJt8WNXYSdsA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:da01:: with SMTP id r1mr749809lfg.150.1569303773870; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 22:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n3sm204955lfl.62.2019.09.23.22.42.52 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 22:42:53 -0700 (PDT) To: freebsd-net From: Andriy Gapon Subject: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABtB5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz6JAlQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryLkCDQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAYkCPAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:42:51 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46cqpm36MDz43SS X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.22 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17:c]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.151.72.93.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.990,0]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-1.23)[ip: (-0.62), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.30), asn: 15169(-2.20), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[44.167.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[44.167.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 05:42:57 -0000 It seems that the userland component of ipfw/dummynet uses int for the bandwidth represented in bit/s. Also, int is used for passing that value from the userland to the kernel. What would be the best way to extend this? Just use a larger type? Or maybe add another field to try to preserve KBI backward compatibility? Thank you. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 06:29:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F76FA5D8 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x929.google.com (mail-ua1-x929.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::929]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46crqv6WsVz45Fm for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x929.google.com with SMTP id j5so181674uak.12 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 23:28:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RO5BaGI96+aj1j+1hJEHKmbK+0skD7JBlOcZq6GQqTM=; b=EDaODFPyJMqas4Uzwg16U9XC7gc+oNKbhWoAQapUZP3NjN/KtdZtcZ/tSm65VQZ5oc JLL2p92FeD04O5kHqkwxkTklS2GiISNbDDp98evf6ewn9Vu5YKEw5U6judNS81d7GWqz APhk8kc84V8fTCMLG9KMiTrX2JXoGMKUIS6or7Ow2CasjqARZZ4nC0lox6iBkqYHuuz4 wkf8L/LF1Xpg6vffu6I50NV3SYfKPCcEgE6fGIL5uHKQejSpSwdyQkRhHgyxC3iIXMkO fprLudjXy9RK/QY2A88jhrnWXtW/9HaR6coxXuWQnOkWDev3BDng7qiw0Z20/Ukyh9zm ipsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RO5BaGI96+aj1j+1hJEHKmbK+0skD7JBlOcZq6GQqTM=; b=LgqA+LKZlSBGl0+FLWovZkCmdCYXrsMN4J6OrpCfoNawUjgABmTwR7W6IeHyVQ8XHP 3U99P6PSjCx+1GmxWIob42P5MstBndVi3Z+k5wlKKZinYL8q4BsFOy7LWBAQRarvfnbL nqkfuPeA3JIoSylxsLaF9Cfx7mI4lgn3EdKoed8jXFQ2GtuhfQfFvjgGYA+PbbjnbnzY U7HAPNr7joQDEoJJAVUt821JOHNk7uC8B+ncVbOpmy9uY1oaNBg6Qqx4ayPqrPSMQkOd Zthhlqc5uV+TQQ+Zd3V/E9qf63PX0c3ondODolQ/ZmHJvimvJYvgnQXVlWytlaOMbMIg GL2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLiRTtkgzduJ89ssNuTdSIqcNitqiEtPCtIjDwwK4kC/eiob97 v2SJQmUXS0MdaQ25k2b7nRTfvugWwbFubdVPqR9xfuFe X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwAb9vffzJTQJh/Ej8oKC6nqAMSLTN58vAkOC8MVXIaz2AZooXjrNrLy3yzs0z5cKTHiePcYZZgJOjg5M8Pnmg= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:77ce:: with SMTP id y14mr647595uar.96.1569306538528; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 23:28:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Mihir Luthra Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:58:47 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? To: freebsd-net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46crqv6WsVz45Fm X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EDaODFPy; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of luthramihir708@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::929 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luthramihir708@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.66), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.63), asn: 15169(-2.20), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[9.2.9.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:29:00 -0000 Hi everyone, Just as mentioned in [1], rpc.statd is not ipv6 clean. Although I have been through the code, and didn't found any issues until now. The code conditionally checks for ipv6/ipv4 everywhere and uses ipv6 compatible functions. As per one old commit [2], seems rpc.statd was already made to function correctly with ipv6. I searched bugzilla(thinking someone may have reported something similar, giving rise to the project), but didn't see anything similar for rpc.statd and ipv6 support. I wanted to ask if someone could share the issues they encountered while using rpc.statd with ipv6? [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/SummerOfCodeIdeas#IPv6_Userland_Cleanup [2] https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/83a53d0868085db818fddd8cb38eecc0c39cad8d#diff-b87e28a1a8ec4fe947f72996127f8f40 Kind Regards, Mihir From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 09:05:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E18FE629 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46cwJR3qgvz4DNM for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81A76FE628; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816E4FE627 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46cwJR2x1Jz4DNL for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4858324F1F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8O95RSB077271 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8O95RvL077265 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: krzysztof.galazka@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 09:05:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 --- Comment #13 from Krzysztof Galazka --- The watchdog message is cased by an issue in the iflib framework. The queue hang detection code does not check the state of the interface. We are worki= ng on a fix in this review: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21712 And this patch: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21769 should fix a problem with em/igb not reporting current link state. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 11:28:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17F2122FB0 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46czTX4KNMz4Ln6 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 946B9122FAF; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943AD122FAE for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46czTX3RcJz4Ln4 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 569872686A for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OBSWdT063597 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OBSWO3063596 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to flagtypes.name keywords short_desc bug_severity bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:28:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org Flags| |mfc-stable11?, | |mfc-stable12? Keywords| |needs-qa Summary|netgraph/ng_bridge: |netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace |Unlimited limit of links |NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with | |auto-incrementing | |(Unlimited) links Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People Status|New |Open CC| |net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- Could this be made into a run-time tunable (sysctl), at least as a simplification while auto-incrementing design is worked on/reviewed ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 11:44:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69AC123512 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46czr75tGxz4MTX for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C9C3A123511; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98A6123510 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46czr7501pz4MTV for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA9F26BF2 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OBidfw006398 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OBidWS006397 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Some People |Affects Many People See Also| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D21712, | |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D21769, | |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D18545, | |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 367 | |24 --- Comment #14 from Kubilay Kocak --- (In reply to Krzysztof Galazka from comment #13) If this needs to / should make it into 12.1-RELEASE, please add bug 240700 = to this issues Blocks: field In doing so, it may also be worth adding re@ to the reviews for their appro= val to merge to releng/12.1 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 11:44:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6826212353F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46czrC0MDXz4MVk for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 09D5412353E; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099AF12353D for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46czrB4KgXz4MVX for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791E626C00 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OBigmY006508 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OBigci006507 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 11:44:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236724 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 392 | |40 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 12:13:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC682124C51 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d0Tz496Hz4PGt for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8EEB3124C50; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB76124C4F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d0Tz3Flqz4PGs for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534A52717B for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OCDxOU055192 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OCDxUC055185 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:13:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 --- Comment #2 from lutz@donnerhacke.de --- The idea is to replace the whole array by hook private storage. This will remove the need for any limit control. Should I provide a summary patch as replacement? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 14:30:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB163127EF6 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d3WM52fbz4Wfr for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AB4CB127EF5; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB12C127EF4 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d3WM43vdz4Wfp for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C0A095E for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OEUNQ8060184 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OEUNTD060183 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.ispatch Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:30:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 lutz@donnerhacke.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #207757|0 |1 is patch| | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 15:59:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4CA12995A for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d5Tc49VRz4bdm; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8OFwkCP031456 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:58:50 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: avg@FreeBSD.org Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OFwjcI060086; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:58:45 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-net References: From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5D8A3D35.5050303@grosbein.net> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:58:45 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.7 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: * date * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46d5Tc49VRz4bdm X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.68 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-1.59)[ip: (-4.15), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.03), asn: 24940(-1.78), country: DE(-0.01)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:59:01 -0000 On 24.09.2019 12:42, Andriy Gapon wrote: > It seems that the userland component of ipfw/dummynet uses int for the bandwidth > represented in bit/s. Also, int is used for passing that value from the > userland to the kernel. > > What would be the best way to extend this? > Just use a larger type? > Or maybe add another field to try to preserve KBI backward compatibility? > > Thank you. AFAIK, we never had any public ABI or stable KBI interface announced to userland or in-kernel consumers and had no consumers of dummynet other than ipfw(8) binary. Just increase type. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 17:07:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C526212B8A7 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d70k4C5sz3DJ7 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9029B12B8A6; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEB312B8A5 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d70k364Qz3DJ6 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED202684 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OH7Y7K058190 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OH7YTq058189 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239704] ixgbe(4): Only one queue (of eight) enabled on 12.0-RELEASE (ProLiant DL380 Gen10) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:07:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239704 --- Comment #7 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: erj Date: Tue Sep 24 17:06:33 UTC 2019 New revision: 352656 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352656 Log: ix, ixv: Read msix_bar from device configuration Instead of predicting the MSI-X bar index based on the device's MAC type, read it from the device's PCI configuration instead. PR: 239704 Submitted by: Piotr Pietruszewski Reviewed by: erj@ MFC after: 3 days Sponsored by: Intel Corporation Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21547 Changes: head/sys/dev/ixgbe/if_ix.c head/sys/dev/ixgbe/if_ixv.c head/sys/dev/ixgbe/ixgbe.h --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 17:22:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429B812C0E5 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d7KT16ysz3FKt for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 267E812C0E3; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2645912C0E2 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d7KT0Clqz3FKs for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E026E29EB for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OHM44h001012 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OHM4EH001011 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:22:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 Harald Schmalzbauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Closed |In Progress Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- --- Comment #4 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- Initially, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 descr= ibes a different issue and I'd like to keep that separate, although John Delano ad= ded comment #3, where he mentions the same link state issue. But the proposed f= ix indicates this is an independent issue! The proposed phabriactor patch in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240#c13 (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21769) doens't fix the problem. There's progress though: After once marking the interface down and up again, the link state correctly changes from there on. But right after loading the kernel module, link state still doesn't change when physical connection was lost (repeatedly won't change, unless you manually down/up). Tested with 12.1-beta1, D21769+D21712 and i210, i350, 82576 (all hw.mac.type igb ) and 82574L (em) - consistently the same behaviour. Thanks, -Harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 17:24:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDD612C25B for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d7Ng0Xwcz3Fc4 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 119D612C25A; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1164E12C259 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d7Nf6mlZz3Fc3 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBB6E2A29 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OHOorw033110 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OHOogF033074 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:24:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 --- Comment #15 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to Krzysztof Galazka from comment #13) Thanks four your D21769 fix. Unfortunately it doesn't solve the link-state-change-issue. Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 I described why I re-opened the ticket as a separate report. Thanks, -harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 17:30:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C8612C433 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d7WY0mhSz3Fvt for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1879D12C431; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183E212C430 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d7WX6zpmz3Fvs for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D462A2A82 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OHUm0H026599 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OHUmpx026598 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240610] iflib: Panic with INVARIANTS: general protection fault when kldunload'ing (12.1-pre-QA) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:30:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240610 --- Comment #1 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- Is https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21711 supposed to address this issue? Guess= so, will test. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 18:20:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E132012D8FF for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d8cY4rjtz3KtQ for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A37A512D8F8; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A306712D8F5 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d8cY3QwDz3KtN for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58CC533D6 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OIKDlb022481 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OIKD9h022470 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240610] iflib: Panic with INVARIANTS: general protection fault when kldunload'ing (12.1-pre-QA) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:20:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240610 --- Comment #2 from Eric Joyner --- Yeah, it looks like it. Sorry, the original review didn't have the PR number, but it did fix a prob= lem we were encountering internally at Intel. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 18:30:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32FE12DE0F for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d8rp4Nlbz3LQ2 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9682E12DE0E; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963F712DE0D for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d8rp3SDhz3LQ0 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BC3376E for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OIUoJl072692 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OIUoSl072691 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240610] iflib: Panic with INVARIANTS: general protection fault when kldunload'ing (12.1-pre-QA) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:30:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240610 --- Comment #3 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to Eric Joyner from comment #2) Thanks, meanwhile I can confirm that https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352655 fixes the issue for me on 12.1-BETA1. I'd like to take the chance and point to https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240609 This seems to be a major issue, although not affecting non-debug kernels, s= o I don't add bug 240700 as blocker. Should I? Do you take over this report and close after MFC+MFSing? Thanks, -harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 18:39:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B51E12E1EF for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46d92h0R6Kz3M8B for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0D10012E1EE; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCB812E1ED for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46d92g6dLJz3M89 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C85C73932 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OIdNNT097633 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OIdNkL097632 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240610] iflib: Panic with INVARIANTS: general protection fault when kldunload'ing (12.1-pre-QA) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:23 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:39:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240610 Eric Joyner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |erj@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Eric Joyner --- Yeah. I'll MFC the fix after a bit and then close it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 20:43:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF14F0EA7 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dCnq4Ftfz40KM for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 92094F0EA5; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D09F0EA4 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dCnq3HWzz40KL for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D485199 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OKhRJt029531 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OKhRFS029530 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: webmaster@rgcwireless.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:43:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 --- Comment #16 from John Delano --- Odd, I applied this (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21769) manually, recompil= ed the kernel and it seems to have fixed the state change and the buffer warni= ngs. I also have https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18545 applied as well. I have not installed https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21712 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 22:19:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E1FF36DB for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dFwl5zW8z46g6; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x8OMJP9N013499; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:19:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x8OMJP3P013498; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:19:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? In-Reply-To: <5D8A3D35.5050303@grosbein.net> To: Eugene Grosbein Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:19:25 -0700 (PDT) CC: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dFwl5zW8z46g6 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net has no SPF policy when checking 69.59.192.140) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.64 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(0.04)[ip: (0.15), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.07), asn: 13868(0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.91)[0.914,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.78)[0.783,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:19:36 -0000 > On 24.09.2019 12:42, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > It seems that the userland component of ipfw/dummynet uses int for the bandwidth > > represented in bit/s. Also, int is used for passing that value from the > > userland to the kernel. > > > > What would be the best way to extend this? > > Just use a larger type? > > Or maybe add another field to try to preserve KBI backward compatibility? > > > > Thank you. > > AFAIK, we never had any public ABI or stable KBI interface announced to userland or in-kernel consumers > and had no consumers of dummynet other than ipfw(8) binary. Just increase type. Any attempt to mfc this would break KABI/userland and that is never a good thing to do. It may not be a public ABI, but it is an ABI, and stability of that and backwards compatibility are always a good thing to strive for. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 22:32:12 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC6EF3DBE for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dGCJ4mfrz47MW for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A3B89F3DBD; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37E9F3DBC for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dGCJ3smvz47MV for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 684C66570 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8OMWCfP007845 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8OMWCRE007844 for net@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:09 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:32:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 Rodney W. Grimes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rgrimes@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #17 from Rodney W. Grimes --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #14) > If this needs to / should make it into 12.1-RELEASE, please add bug 24070= 0 to this issues Blocks: field I conncur, this is the correct thing to do. > In doing so, it may also be worth adding re@ to the reviews for their app= roval > to merge to releng/12.1 Please do not add re@ to bug reports for the purpose of merge requesting, t= here is an official process in place that says ONCE you have committed a fix to = head and merged to stable you need to send an email request. Involving RE@ at t= he bug state is too early, only once an agreed fix has been committed, and mer= ged back to the appropriate branch if needed possible with out authroization is completed should RE@ be involved, they simply do not have the time to read through a bug being evolved and dealt with. Regards, Rod (former RE@ member) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Sep 24 23:58:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F5AF5994 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dJ7F4Jl4z4BPB; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:58:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8ONwFAD036936 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail-d.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:26 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=allbsd.org; s=20190220; t=1569369516; bh=gve9tqPR9gJykbYcqZXpTG7Nches2ohXuojuDg3C/uU=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=KKT6LB6y2VWqEqyNl5Kz/JqWJ951A/qdE+unCpONUUXXbsTf2/gOnTuQJcCgzsbVe NKudOcPqwp5m+MopwurgrU5c0TpgYChlpzJtE6sll7PJhxf9hJv4qTzG3PAdv7FUS1 tU6bXrMxWIuZ07wpTRbHKFj/K9+WF3CWS7yB8FbI= Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8ONwAdD012189 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x8ONw9or012186; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:57:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> To: luthramihir708@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 08:58:36 +0900 (JST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dJ7F4Jl4z4BPB X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=allbsd.org header.s=20190220 header.b=KKT6LB6y; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hrs@allbsd.org designates 2001:2f0:104:e001::41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hrs@allbsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[allbsd.org:s=20190220]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[allbsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[allbsd.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7514, ipnet:2001:2f0::/32, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.21)[ip: (-9.10), ipnet: 2001:2f0::/32(-4.23), asn: 7514(2.30), country: JP(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 23:58:54 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mihir Luthra wrote in : lu> Hi everyone, lu> lu> Just as mentioned in [1], rpc.statd is not ipv6 clean. lu> lu> Although I have been through the code, and didn't found any issues until lu> now. The code conditionally checks for ipv6/ipv4 everywhere and uses ipv6 lu> compatible functions. lu> lu> As per one old commit [2], seems rpc.statd was already made to function lu> correctly with ipv6. lu> lu> I searched bugzilla(thinking someone may have reported something similar, lu> giving rise to the project), but didn't see anything similar for rpc.statd lu> and ipv6 support. lu> lu> I wanted to ask if someone could share the issues they encountered while lu> using rpc.statd with ipv6? I think the project page has wrong information regarding rpc.statd. Although it is not clean from the viewpoint of transport independent, it works with IPv6. There are more userland utilities which do not support IPv6---rwhod, yp*, etc. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMkEABMKAC0WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXYqtgQ8caHJzQGFsbGJz ZC5vcmcACgkQ27B9xm8fc39aRwIJARHvh7TElUGHz+jvjQwH2wmHN6RpSDunsFt5 5TtYomI7y0qzSB2jTV7BoviUOJ4LcTgkJN9Wo1Pf9xvPQ10O3H19AgkBOxIPbrRr 1t5nwCvSQoRA4ZaI+kuz4VGgAiWzP1jVKoCGOffm8GWvk4ObYcSPplDzjDGzecGk ETacoKZ39jC7HGs= =tN6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Wed_Sep_25_08_57_53_2019_551)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 07:21:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB71FCEC8 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dTyB595Bz4VbF for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AF191FCEC7; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED6BFCEC6 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dTyB4DmSz4VbD for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759C9C4D9 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8P7LcBR071898 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8P7LcmX071891 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 --- Comment #5 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to John Delano from comment #16) in Bug 239240 Thanks for your details. Besides the link state issue and the initial issue reported in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 we a= re referring a third issue/fix with your latest comment =E2=80=93 the first-pa= cket completion issue. Since you mention that you didn't apply the proposed fix for the real 240658 issue, I use this bug report for my comment, which describes one of the iss= ues you addressed and to which your feedback corresponds better. Regarding the 1st-packet-fix: Thanks to the very detailed commit log in r343369 from erj@, he explains why r343369 replaces r341156, r340310 and r341156. This new fix (r343369) was MFCd in 344097 by marius, back in february. How/why do you apply https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18545? Regarding the topic (and link-state-fix https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21769): I cannot reproduce this odd 1st-linkdetection-failure in my ESXi passthrough environment! But I intentionally took the plain iron and packed all intel = NICs I have into it, to do the test without any hypervisor/passthrough in betwee= n. I did the test twice, since it seemed very odd to me too: After cold-start booting from ISO with latest 12.1-BETA1 with https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2= 1769 applied, the link state still reports the last state/speed before unpluggin= g, and does not catch the line drop, which changes when I once bring the inter= face down/up. In this scenario, rc(8) hasn't configured the NICs! Mabye that's the difference to your setup. Will see to find time in the evening to further isolate the special conditi= on. Thanks, -harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 07:21:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3E8FCEFF for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dTyW2G85z4VgC for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4D7D5FCEFA; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E0DFCEF9 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dTyV3mV9z4Vg4 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E301C4F1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8P7LsdW074525 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8P7Lsi7074524 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:21:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 Harald Schmalzbauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 392 | |40 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 07:25:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B2EFD260 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dV2L0QDrz4VsY for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0B295FD25D; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B6AFD25B for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dV2K6WwLz4VsS for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3114C54E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8P7PDlP009579 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8P7PDP4009558 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:25:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 --- Comment #18 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to John Delano from comment #16) Since the issue/fix (https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21712 , queue-detection) = of this topic wasn't involved in your latest test, please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658#c5 for further discussion. Thanks, -harry --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 09:16:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA6512128B for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dXVQ1X6Tz4cTq; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:16:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8P9G7ji076662 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:16:08 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8P9G60M069440; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:16:06 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: "Rodney W. Grimes" References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Cc: freebsd-net , Andriy Gapon From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:16:06 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.7 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: * date * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dXVQ1X6Tz4cTq X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.67 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.58)[ip: (-4.08), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.03), asn: 24940(-1.78), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:16:15 -0000 On 25.09.2019 05:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: >> AFAIK, we never had any public ABI or stable KBI interface announced to userland or in-kernel consumers >> and had no consumers of dummynet other than ipfw(8) binary. Just increase type. > > Any attempt to mfc this would break KABI/userland and that is never > a good thing to do. It may not be a public ABI, but it is an ABI, > and stability of that and backwards compatibility are always a good > thing to strive for. Agreed. So, no MFC for this. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 09:28:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1514D121664 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dXmb6sQSz4dQF for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E9A02121663; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96A0121662 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dXmb5wPMz4dQD for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB79DA74 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8P9SVOi099535 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8P9SV4O099534 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: snow@teardrop.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:28:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236724 --- Comment #11 from James Snow --- D21769 appears to fix this for me. Thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 10:27:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5715012263C for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhay@meraka.org.za) Received: from marge.meraka.csir.co.za (marge.meraka.csir.co.za [IPv6:2001:4200:7000:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dZ4g3856z3CQG for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:27:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhay@meraka.org.za) Received: from marge.meraka.csir.co.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marge.meraka.csir.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7737E7906 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:27:26 +0200 (SAST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at meraka.org.za Received: from marge.meraka.csir.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by marge.meraka.csir.co.za (marge.meraka.csir.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OD_cbmtbnF1K for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:27:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by marge.meraka.csir.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:27:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id r3so6110626wrj.6 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 03:27:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXfuCoriMNuBw4Ag+IRQDMPLV1nDdVS3cc6pDmgX1zL8BrZCZFa 2FiLrnoZyvByDjCwko19JqRevIaM6YPPZAQEiC2I8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzEOBBRWWhDjX5Crou61cuqrtwdqdAB4AQ0LtFibG939MgIrdgT+JA8M9DHyxU8SRXnvWJ+VpqJX8c835fsHvo= X-Received: by 2002:adf:ce86:: with SMTP id r6mr8598158wrn.57.1569407242090; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 03:27:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> From: John Hay Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:27:10 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-net , Andriy Gapon X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dZ4g3856z3CQG X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jhay@meraka.org.za designates 2001:4200:7000:3::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jhay@meraka.org.za X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:4200:7000:3::1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[meraka.org.za]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.0.0.2.4.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.11.2]; IP_SCORE(-0.37)[asn: 2018(-1.84), country: ZA(0.00)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2018, ipnet:2001:4200:7000::/48, country:ZA]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:27:32 -0000 On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:16, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 25.09.2019 05:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >> AFAIK, we never had any public ABI or stable KBI interface announced to > userland or in-kernel consumers > >> and had no consumers of dummynet other than ipfw(8) binary. Just > increase type. > > > > Any attempt to mfc this would break KABI/userland and that is never > > a good thing to do. It may not be a public ABI, but it is an ABI, > > and stability of that and backwards compatibility are always a good > > thing to strive for. > > Agreed. So, no MFC for this. > Will this break upgrades with freebsd-update? On a major upgrade, it will first install the new kernel and require a reboot before you run freebsd-update again to install the rest. Regards John From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 10:57:12 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94C11234C3 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dZkw4HjFz3FjZ for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9335F1234C2; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EF41234C1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dZkw3Hkmz3FjY for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A66EA59 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PAvC8d035437 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PAvCWn035436 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:57:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Open Assignee|koobs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org Keywords| |needs-qa --- Comment #6 from Kubilay Kocak --- Reset assignee after re-open --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 11:04:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A0812377A for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-f194.google.com (mail-lj1-f194.google.com [209.85.208.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dZvm4h7dz3G5V for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agapon@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f194.google.com with SMTP id m7so5191521lji.2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 04:04:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MGjB35ZK9upzNSdMzw72WWI1c22w9lEk4kISjq6gljo=; b=YAK0Tw8vaG7wBQbU9y2iCcfHbLQ87kHqnjGQT64QFeIXQQgvDQ9CS84P6vC3SXflMz cZOuQtJ7X4hHSTSeHyuZGWcMtzKrOZwLne6Pux36d/W+lY4MTUVHOZgaW6HdpYMyjlKx AUU9swhT9H1dBLt2tAZrQf6/yMF/s4Vz7xuIdKWXT3WTEdzjS2TMpmluq9VQyU93zlH2 vDE536JCdlYWbEv1Cp2g4BXf+1ryIOKdOf3UyS5uywlEjU1Ru5zntRIky6EFMktC9eQc qEXiG61CU26u6KCLqLSoimlnHp8nbn9LO7sFcbhqQkJ4sCmuSd7/NuyzuYDHcfAGQs3X DO+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIhY1YKKB5oep60u3s6y4OQ3PUTTK1qMHT6LuJ0pWx98+3xms5 76N4s+OlezyfPEmk4I9egdlC09Vl X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyE9FsEpBMJ6zfMZ0OOQHpmBus7Nd/ZbKwVL6StDisS0LemdL7rRh3LysdharITg690RzNsZg== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8054:: with SMTP id p20mr2597479ljg.36.1569409489864; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 04:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.88] (east.meadow.volia.net. [93.72.151.96]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m18sm1082492lfb.73.2019.09.25.04.04.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 04:04:48 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: John Hay , Eugene Grosbein Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-net References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> From: Andriy Gapon Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=avg@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFm4LIgBEADNB/3lT7f15UKeQ52xCFQx/GqHkSxEdVyLFZTmY3KyNPQGBtyvVyBfprJ7 mAeXZWfhat6cKNRAGZcL5EmewdQuUfQfBdYmKjbw3a9GFDsDNuhDA2QwFt8BmkiVMRYyvI7l N0eVzszWCUgdc3qqM6qqcgBaqsVmJluwpvwp4ZBXmch5BgDDDb1MPO8AZ2QZfIQmplkj8Y6Z AiNMknkmgaekIINSJX8IzRzKD5WwMsin70psE8dpL/iBsA2cpJGzWMObVTtCxeDKlBCNqM1i gTXta1ukdUT7JgLEFZk9ceYQQMJJtUwzWu1UHfZn0Fs29HTqawfWPSZVbulbrnu5q55R4PlQ /xURkWQUTyDpqUvb4JK371zhepXiXDwrrpnyyZABm3SFLkk2bHlheeKU6Yql4pcmSVym1AS4 dV8y0oHAfdlSCF6tpOPf2+K9nW1CFA8b/tw4oJBTtfZ1kxXOMdyZU5fiG7xb1qDgpQKgHUX8 7Rd2T1UVLVeuhYlXNw2F+a2ucY+cMoqz3LtpksUiBppJhw099gEXehcN2JbUZ2TueJdt1FdS ztnZmsHUXLxrRBtGwqnFL7GSd6snpGIKuuL305iaOGODbb9c7ne1JqBbkw1wh8ci6vvwGlzx rexzimRaBzJxlkjNfMx8WpCvYebGMydNoeEtkWldtjTNVsUAtQARAQABtB5BbmRyaXkgR2Fw b24gPGF2Z0BGcmVlQlNELm9yZz6JAlQEEwEIAD4WIQS+LEO7ngQnXA4Bjr538m7TUc1yjwUC WbgsiAIbIwUJBaOagAULCQgHAgYVCAkKCwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgAAKCRB38m7TUc1yj+JAEACV l9AK/nOWAt/9cufV2fRj0hdOqB1aCshtSrwHk/exXsDa4/FkmegxXQGY+3GWX3deIyesbVRL rYdtdK0dqJyT1SBqXK1h3/at9rxr9GQA6KWOxTjUFURsU7ok/6SIlm8uLRPNKO+yq0GDjgaO LzN+xykuBA0FlhQAXJnpZLcVfPJdWv7sSHGedL5ln8P8rxR+XnmsA5TUaaPcbhTB+mG+iKFj GghASDSfGqLWFPBlX/fpXikBDZ1gvOr8nyMY9nXhgfXpq3B6QCRYKPy58ChrZ5weeJZ29b7/ QdEO8NFNWHjSD9meiLdWQaqo9Y7uUxN3wySc/YUZxtS0bhAd8zJdNPsJYG8sXgKjeBQMVGuT eCAJFEYJqbwWvIXMfVWop4+O4xB+z2YE3jAbG/9tB/GSnQdVSj3G8MS80iLS58frnt+RSEw/ psahrfh0dh6SFHttE049xYiC+cM8J27Aaf0i9RflyITq57NuJm+AHJoU9SQUkIF0nc6lfA+o JRiyRlHZHKoRQkIg4aiKaZSWjQYRl5Txl0IZUP1dSWMX4s3XTMurC/pnja45dge/4ESOtJ9R 8XuIWg45Oq6MeIWdjKddGhRj3OohsltKgkEU3eLKYtB6qRTQypHHUawCXz88uYt5e3w4V16H lCpSTZV/EVHnNe45FVBlvK7k7HFfDDkryLkCDQRZuCyIARAAlq0slcsVboY/+IUJdcbEiJRW be9HKVz4SUchq0z9MZPX/0dcnvz/gkyYA+OuM78dNS7Mbby5dTvOqfpLJfCuhaNYOhlE0wY+ 1T6Tf1f4c/uA3U/YiadukQ3+6TJuYGAdRZD5EqYFIkreARTVWg87N9g0fT9BEqLw9lJtEGDY EWUE7L++B8o4uu3LQFEYxcrb4K/WKmgtmFcm77s0IKDrfcX4doV92QTIpLiRxcOmCC/OCYuO jB1oaaqXQzZrCutXRK0L5XN1Y1PYjIrEzHMIXmCDlLYnpFkK+itlXwlE2ZQxkfMruCWdQXye syl2fynAe8hvp7Mms9qU2r2K9EcJiR5N1t1C2/kTKNUhcRv7Yd/vwusK7BqJbhlng5ZgRx0m WxdntU/JLEntz3QBsBsWM9Y9wf2V4tLv6/DuDBta781RsCB/UrU2zNuOEkSixlUiHxw1dccI 6CVlaWkkJBxmHX22GdDFrcjvwMNIbbyfQLuBq6IOh8nvu9vuItup7qemDG3Ms6TVwA7BD3j+ 3fGprtyW8Fd/RR2bW2+LWkMrqHffAr6Y6V3h5kd2G9Q8ZWpEJk+LG6Mk3fhZhmCnHhDu6CwN MeUvxXDVO+fqc3JjFm5OxhmfVeJKrbCEUJyM8ESWLoNHLqjywdZga4Q7P12g8DUQ1mRxYg/L HgZY3zfKOqcAEQEAAYkCPAQYAQgAJhYhBL4sQ7ueBCdcDgGOvnfybtNRzXKPBQJZuCyIAhsM BQkFo5qAAAoJEHfybtNRzXKPBVwQAKfFy9P7N3OsLDMB56A4Kf+ZT+d5cIx0Yiaf4n6w7m3i ImHHHk9FIetI4Xe54a2IXh4Bq5UkAGY0667eIs+Z1Ea6I2i27Sdo7DxGwq09Qnm/Y65ADvXs 3aBvokCcm7FsM1wky395m8xUos1681oV5oxgqeRI8/76qy0hD9WR65UW+HQgZRIcIjSel9vR XDaD2HLGPTTGr7u4v00UeTMs6qvPsa2PJagogrKY8RXdFtXvweQFz78NbXhluwix2Tb9ETPk LIpDrtzV73CaE2aqBG/KrboXT2C67BgFtnk7T7Y7iKq4/XvEdDWscz2wws91BOXuMMd4c/c4 OmGW9m3RBLufFrOag1q5yUS9QbFfyqL6dftJP3Zq/xe+mr7sbWbhPVCQFrH3r26mpmy841ym dwQnNcsbIGiBASBSKksOvIDYKa2Wy8htPmWFTEOPRpFXdGQ27awcjjnB42nngyCK5ukZDHi6 w0qK5DNQQCkiweevCIC6wc3p67jl1EMFY5+z+zdTPb3h7LeVnGqW0qBQl99vVFgzLxchKcl0 R/paSFgwqXCZhAKMuUHncJuynDOP7z5LirUeFI8qsBAJi1rXpQoLJTVcW72swZ42IdPiboqx NbTMiNOiE36GqMcTPfKylCbF45JNX4nF9ElM0E+Y8gi4cizJYBRr2FBJgay0b9Cp Message-ID: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:04:47 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dZvm4h7dz3G5V X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of agapon@gmail.com designates 209.85.208.194 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=agapon@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.18 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[96.151.72.93.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[avg@FreeBSD.org,agapon@gmail.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[194.208.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.18)[ip: (-0.34), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.30), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[194.208.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 11:04:54 -0000 On 25/09/2019 13:27, John Hay wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:16, Eugene Grosbein > wrote: > > On 25.09.2019 05:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >> AFAIK, we never had any public ABI or stable KBI interface announced to > userland or in-kernel consumers > >> and had no consumers of dummynet other than ipfw(8) binary. Just increase > type. > > > > Any attempt to mfc this would break KABI/userland and that is never > > a good thing to do.  It may not be a public ABI, but it is an ABI, > > and stability of that and backwards compatibility are always a good > > thing to strive for. > > Agreed. So, no MFC for this. > > > Will this break upgrades with freebsd-update? On a major upgrade, it will first > install the new kernel and require a reboot before you run freebsd-update again > to install the rest. I am also concerned about this. But isn't the procedure is to reboot to single-user mode? Then, the access to the console is required and rc scripts, including firewall configuration, are not run anyway. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 13:23:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D448E126FEC for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46ddzg5FKtz3NwB for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B3F76126FEB; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BD3126FEA for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ddzg4M8rz3Nw8 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 791A118578 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PDNRbe039124 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PDNRF4039117 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: webmaster@rgcwireless.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:23:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 --- Comment #19 from John Delano --- (In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #18) I did apply https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21712 to have a complete fix, but = the problem seemed solved before applying that fix. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 13:32:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5D412749A for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dfB54GwXz3Pk5 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 92296127499; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EC7127498 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dfB536nBz3Pk2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7BC18738 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PDWTAi072080 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PDWTQu072079 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: webmaster@rgcwireless.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:32:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 John Delano changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |webmaster@rgcwireless.com --- Comment #7 from John Delano --- (In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #5) https://reviews.freebsd.org/D18545 is listed in comment #6 in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240. Since it was su= pposed to fix the problem, I applied the patch. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 13:48:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6617127A15 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward104j.mail.yandex.net (forward104j.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801:2::107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dfX95YgMz3QZV; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward101q.mail.yandex.net (forward101q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:4b:0:640:4012:bb98]) by forward104j.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 077B04A1E14; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:48:05 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mxback12q.mail.yandex.net (mxback12q.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0e:1b3:0:640:3818:d096]) by forward101q.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0153DCF40007; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:48:05 +0300 (MSK) Received: from vla3-2bcfd5e94671.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla3-2bcfd5e94671.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c15:350f:0:640:2bcf:d5e9]) by mxback12q.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id TxkkpCnONK-m4l4coLl; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:48:04 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1569419284; bh=1Ah/1amKL+A0iYvWSu6/D39hykiYTrKHUhYRyPSoE4o=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=JDKr1AK8XQ6B6SVIKS/NX0yQysX4FBJS8KSr4YHg0r5H3kfTTBWiZh/Q3Vg6RMLkS mJmUHcoEwlG1kyHico9iEP4BK29ZDUTuesgEePCmTYQ1IWk2VAMF1qY6F41Ck7XBMg N32VlNLYK+gFogyl0gITTQVd7skWIsnmSpvO/orc= Received: by vla3-2bcfd5e94671.qloud-c.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id IJpLgDSyQo-m4s4GIRv; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:48:04 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-net References: From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Openpgp: id=E6591E1B41DA1516F0C9BC0001C5EA0410C8A17A Autocrypt: addr=bu7cher@yandex.ru; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBEwBF1kBCADB9sXFhBEUy8qQ4X63Y8eBatYMHGEFWN9ypS5lI3RE6qQW2EYbxNk7qUC5 21YIIS1mMFVBEfvR7J9uc7yaYgFCEb6Sce1RSO4ULN2mRKGHP3/Sl0ijZEjWHV91hY1YTHEF ZW/0GYinDf56sYpDDehaBF5wkWIo1+QK5nmj3vl0DIDCMNd7QEiWpyLVwECgLX2eOAXByT8B bCqVhJGcG6iFP7/B9Ll6uX5gb8thM9LM+ibwErDBVDGiOgvfxqidab7fdkh893IBCXa82H9N CNwnEtcgzh+BSKK5BgvPohFMgRwjti37TSxwLu63QejRGbZWSz3OK3jMOoF63tCgn7FvABEB AAG0JUFuZHJleSBWLiBFbHN1a292IDxidTdjaGVyQHlhbmRleC5ydT6JATgEEwECACIFAkwB F1kCGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6qmYIAI6ekfm1VA4T vqankI1ISE6ku4jV7UlpIQlEbE7/8n3Zd6teJ+pGOQhN5qk8QE7utdPdbktAzi+x7LIJVzUw 4TywZLXGrkP7VKYkfg6oyCGyzITghefQeJtr2TN4hYCkzPWpylkue8MtmqfZv/6royqwTbN+ +E09FQNvTgRUYJYTeQ1qOsxNRycwvw3dr2rOfuxShbzaHBB1pBIjGrMg8fC5pd65ACH5zuFV A0CoTNGMDrEZSfBkTW604UUHFFXeCoC3dwDZRKOWJ3GmMXns65Ai5YkA63BSHEE1Qle3VBhd cG1w0CB5FBV3pB27UVnf0jEbysrDqW4qN7XMRFSWNAy5AQ0ETAEXWQEIAJ2p6l9LBoqdH/0J PEFDY2t2gTvAuzz+8zs3R03dFuHcNbOwjvWCG0aOmVpAzkRa8egn5JB4sZaFUtKPYJEQ1Iu+ LUBwgvtXf4vWpzC67zs2dDuiW4LamH5p6xkTD61aHR7mCB3bg2TUjrDWn2Jt44cvoYxj3dz4 S49U1rc9ZPgD5axCNv45j72tggWlZvpefThP7xT1OlNTUqye2gAwQravXpZkl5JG4eOqJVIU X316iE3qso0iXRUtO7OseBf0PiVmk+wCahdreHOeOxK5jMhYkPKVn7z1sZiB7W2H2TojbmcK HZC22sz7Z/H36Lhg1+/RCnGzdEcjGc8oFHXHCxUAEQEAAYkBHwQYAQIACQUCTAEXWQIbDAAK CRABxeoEEMihegkYCAC3ivGYNe2taNm/4Nx5GPdzuaAJGKWksV+w9mo7dQvU+NmI2az5w8vw 98OmX7G0OV9snxMW+6cyNqBrVFTu33VVNzz9pnqNCHxGvj5dL5ltP160JV2zw2bUwJBYsgYQ WfyJJIM7l3gv5ZS3DGqaGIm9gOK1ANxfrR5PgPzvI9VxDhlr2juEVMZYAqPLEJe+SSxbwLoz BcFCNdDAyXcaAzXsx/E02YWm1hIWNRxanAe7Vlg7OL+gvLpdtrYCMg28PNqKNyrQ87LQ49O9 50IIZDOtNFeR0FGucjcLPdS9PiEqCoH7/waJxWp6ydJ+g4OYRBYNM0EmMgy1N85JJrV1mi5i Message-ID: <9126bcb5-8a67-7157-c420-db34f0522708@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:46:57 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Zdk8sDghNkT95qyS1Npc3rAYQeMZ3RDfa" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dfX95YgMz3QZV X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yandex.ru header.s=mail header.b=JDKr1AK8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yandex.ru; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bu7cher@yandex.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:801:2::107 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bu7cher@yandex.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.20 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0::/52]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yandex.ru:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yandex.ru,none]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[7.0.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.0.1.0.8.0.0.0.0.0.8.b.6.0.2.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yandex.ru:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[yandex.ru.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.30), ipnet: 2a02:6b8::/32(-4.66), asn: 13238(-3.73), country: RU(0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:48:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Zdk8sDghNkT95qyS1Npc3rAYQeMZ3RDfa Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="3FxBSEBfLHcVIWK97Tmr3ldkljizco0rO"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" To: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-net Message-ID: <9126bcb5-8a67-7157-c420-db34f0522708@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? References: In-Reply-To: --3FxBSEBfLHcVIWK97Tmr3ldkljizco0rO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24.09.2019 08:42, Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > It seems that the userland component of ipfw/dummynet uses int for the = bandwidth > represented in bit/s. Also, int is used for passing that value from th= e > userland to the kernel. >=20 > What would be the best way to extend this? > Just use a larger type? > Or maybe add another field to try to preserve KBI backward compatibilit= y? There is yet another problem, that you need to keep in mind. Some people may use old ipfw(8) binaries inside jails, that can be executed on modern host system. So, if you will break KBI, then such jails will stop work. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --3FxBSEBfLHcVIWK97Tmr3ldkljizco0rO-- --Zdk8sDghNkT95qyS1Npc3rAYQeMZ3RDfa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE5lkeG0HaFRbwybwAAcXqBBDIoXoFAl2Lb9IACgkQAcXqBBDI oXrK7gf9HKkLuzmn6uHqDA4S0YoqPZXD4/NTH09Q5RLLeXBhUto+ECREwrT+BqQ8 8NMlQTNzaVi+TqwbiTy8PSK3UUzaUzXUTI/dpYf128jYegS+U3NbkweAHt+v0BLV JJw9oT0UG8/uyaHczrsEd+NalEN6NFPmK/0YbkFAu5S03I5AdEdVCewcCFYP9hcj kk40jffBJpe9bGeYq+Siy+w2oXeeW7BSchJ71GgRA1jRAoqLfK9J5tHE5Ne+mY8x AfXDRTD0/eBBGvlIysBHSJatPHWB4ngD3u5PBeMtemPRcObPSkuCoESGu+TyQu5b wgBx6bNtG4PmUgyxTdAtpQof8jFgMw== =y8cz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Zdk8sDghNkT95qyS1Npc3rAYQeMZ3RDfa-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 13:51:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1771D127B00 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dfbr1rclz3QrL; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8PDpFX9080965 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:51:15 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: jhay@meraka.org.za Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PDpEeA072216; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:51:14 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: John Hay References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , freebsd-net , Andriy Gapon From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5D8B70D2.3040706@grosbein.net> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:51:14 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.7 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: * date * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dfbr1rclz3QrL X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.66 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.57)[ip: (-4.01), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.03), asn: 24940(-1.78), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:51:22 -0000 On 25.09.2019 17:27, John Hay wrote: > > > On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 11:16, Eugene Grosbein > wrote: > > On 25.09.2019 05:19, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > >> AFAIK, we never had any public ABI or stable KBI interface announced to userland or in-kernel consumers > >> and had no consumers of dummynet other than ipfw(8) binary. Just increase type. > > > > Any attempt to mfc this would break KABI/userland and that is never > > a good thing to do. It may not be a public ABI, but it is an ABI, > > and stability of that and backwards compatibility are always a good > > thing to strive for. > > Agreed. So, no MFC for this. > > > Will this break upgrades with freebsd-update? On a major upgrade, it will first install the new kernel and require a reboot before you run freebsd-update again to install the rest. So it will run without dummynet pipes (traffic shaping) configured meantime. Is it big deal? From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 13:54:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2848D127D8C for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward105p.mail.yandex.net (forward105p.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dfgm6yFTz3R3T; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from mxback7o.mail.yandex.net (mxback7o.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a2d::21]) by forward105p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DBB204D41720; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:54:41 +0300 (MSK) Received: from myt6-4bc43443fff3.qloud-c.yandex.net (myt6-4bc43443fff3.qloud-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c12:25a9:0:640:4bc4:3443]) by mxback7o.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id 73GWHjHWeW-seIKXVrd; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:54:41 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1569419681; bh=3O0FpjkA2sjWgQ1hsa9ZggyNrm+bpforeLDw40WN/H8=; h=In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Cc:Date:References:Message-ID; b=GSnYVKfFoJqIAPJiCJcz6PpDQw7f5B0JtyDiQyF0ev/nMf8zqgQgA1P1DRzV0Usvm 7YNAgAiuYqHDmm64O9jado47W0aqxuCxT4Qhr+6y5hkBvGL1E7QeOhJkj5W2mEOohA qksMu26XltxdWS32RHQEx4fTFufJDplrdJzN/Daw= Received: by myt6-4bc43443fff3.qloud-c.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id jIqXUxrQ2t-sepq7rID; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:54:40 +0300 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client certificate not present) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: Eugene Grosbein , John Hay Cc: freebsd-net , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Andriy Gapon References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> <5D8B70D2.3040706@grosbein.net> From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Openpgp: id=E6591E1B41DA1516F0C9BC0001C5EA0410C8A17A Autocrypt: addr=bu7cher@yandex.ru; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBEwBF1kBCADB9sXFhBEUy8qQ4X63Y8eBatYMHGEFWN9ypS5lI3RE6qQW2EYbxNk7qUC5 21YIIS1mMFVBEfvR7J9uc7yaYgFCEb6Sce1RSO4ULN2mRKGHP3/Sl0ijZEjWHV91hY1YTHEF ZW/0GYinDf56sYpDDehaBF5wkWIo1+QK5nmj3vl0DIDCMNd7QEiWpyLVwECgLX2eOAXByT8B bCqVhJGcG6iFP7/B9Ll6uX5gb8thM9LM+ibwErDBVDGiOgvfxqidab7fdkh893IBCXa82H9N CNwnEtcgzh+BSKK5BgvPohFMgRwjti37TSxwLu63QejRGbZWSz3OK3jMOoF63tCgn7FvABEB AAG0JUFuZHJleSBWLiBFbHN1a292IDxidTdjaGVyQHlhbmRleC5ydT6JATgEEwECACIFAkwB F1kCGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6qmYIAI6ekfm1VA4T vqankI1ISE6ku4jV7UlpIQlEbE7/8n3Zd6teJ+pGOQhN5qk8QE7utdPdbktAzi+x7LIJVzUw 4TywZLXGrkP7VKYkfg6oyCGyzITghefQeJtr2TN4hYCkzPWpylkue8MtmqfZv/6royqwTbN+ +E09FQNvTgRUYJYTeQ1qOsxNRycwvw3dr2rOfuxShbzaHBB1pBIjGrMg8fC5pd65ACH5zuFV A0CoTNGMDrEZSfBkTW604UUHFFXeCoC3dwDZRKOWJ3GmMXns65Ai5YkA63BSHEE1Qle3VBhd cG1w0CB5FBV3pB27UVnf0jEbysrDqW4qN7XMRFSWNAy5AQ0ETAEXWQEIAJ2p6l9LBoqdH/0J PEFDY2t2gTvAuzz+8zs3R03dFuHcNbOwjvWCG0aOmVpAzkRa8egn5JB4sZaFUtKPYJEQ1Iu+ LUBwgvtXf4vWpzC67zs2dDuiW4LamH5p6xkTD61aHR7mCB3bg2TUjrDWn2Jt44cvoYxj3dz4 S49U1rc9ZPgD5axCNv45j72tggWlZvpefThP7xT1OlNTUqye2gAwQravXpZkl5JG4eOqJVIU X316iE3qso0iXRUtO7OseBf0PiVmk+wCahdreHOeOxK5jMhYkPKVn7z1sZiB7W2H2TojbmcK HZC22sz7Z/H36Lhg1+/RCnGzdEcjGc8oFHXHCxUAEQEAAYkBHwQYAQIACQUCTAEXWQIbDAAK CRABxeoEEMihegkYCAC3ivGYNe2taNm/4Nx5GPdzuaAJGKWksV+w9mo7dQvU+NmI2az5w8vw 98OmX7G0OV9snxMW+6cyNqBrVFTu33VVNzz9pnqNCHxGvj5dL5ltP160JV2zw2bUwJBYsgYQ WfyJJIM7l3gv5ZS3DGqaGIm9gOK1ANxfrR5PgPzvI9VxDhlr2juEVMZYAqPLEJe+SSxbwLoz BcFCNdDAyXcaAzXsx/E02YWm1hIWNRxanAe7Vlg7OL+gvLpdtrYCMg28PNqKNyrQ87LQ49O9 50IIZDOtNFeR0FGucjcLPdS9PiEqCoH7/waJxWp6ydJ+g4OYRBYNM0EmMgy1N85JJrV1mi5i Message-ID: <0260d101-4558-abd2-aace-13df2a610bb8@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:53:34 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5D8B70D2.3040706@grosbein.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VeXgG5UdFyTXBRj0QRANYBtCQMERlWRvE" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dfgm6yFTz3R3T X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=yandex.ru header.s=mail header.b=GSnYVKfF; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=yandex.ru; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of bu7cher@yandex.ru designates 2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b7:108 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bu7cher@yandex.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.20 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a02:6b8:0:1000::/52:c]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yandex.ru:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yandex.ru,none]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.54), ipnet: 2a02:6b8::/32(-4.66), asn: 13238(-3.73), country: RU(0.01)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yandex.ru]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13238, ipnet:2a02:6b8::/32, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[8.0.1.0.7.b.8.0.0.0.0.0.1.4.7.2.2.7.4.1.0.0.0.0.8.b.6.0.2.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yandex.ru:s=mail]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[yandex.ru.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:54:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VeXgG5UdFyTXBRj0QRANYBtCQMERlWRvE Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="xLUoy27xRQi8nJRs9eQaG85wRI2fa6i0A"; protected-headers="v1" From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" To: Eugene Grosbein , John Hay Cc: freebsd-net , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <0260d101-4558-abd2-aace-13df2a610bb8@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> <5D8B70D2.3040706@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <5D8B70D2.3040706@grosbein.net> --xLUoy27xRQi8nJRs9eQaG85wRI2fa6i0A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 25.09.2019 16:51, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> Will this break upgrades with freebsd-update? On a major upgrade, >> it will first install the new kernel and require a reboot before >> you run freebsd-update again to install the rest. >=20 > So it will run without dummynet pipes (traffic shaping) configured > meantime. Is it big deal? Note, that if you have ipfw rule with pipe, that does not exist, all matched traffic will be dropped. :-) --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --xLUoy27xRQi8nJRs9eQaG85wRI2fa6i0A-- --VeXgG5UdFyTXBRj0QRANYBtCQMERlWRvE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/ iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE5lkeG0HaFRbwybwAAcXqBBDIoXoFAl2LcV4ACgkQAcXqBBDI oXo42gf/SHDMdza7FI37Ch/rAPrkfvj3qCoiX97Hiv3uyxfclNG9fZArFEgwexBm lHufiF8hbr42o/9v477agJVvk6X7GiNOeuIstqEnNnb70HZHJ9u+7SDqu2i8meoP GcF0C03t3GTdd5PBuN0/DEzBDPnpC77qsGnW8+nWA97yJDUHgJb358OYE3O+Q7HJ uEBYkOIpVWJfKB7ZgF51Ng740EQuJ048nDwCpgwR01rVRZsgWptuG2HB6Q9cm4h0 xL2MEoF/krifIII4rHg7s8L6iA7eV3LmiCVpTyc0rbERKdpgjxREXdyDRR7/Yzww QXPhePDzcM2anNk1sE2X+LlZYrlv+Q== =4xOv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VeXgG5UdFyTXBRj0QRANYBtCQMERlWRvE-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 14:09:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8E81282BD for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com (mail-io1-f65.google.com [209.85.166.65]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dg1K3Fppz3wqv; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id c25so14124854iot.12; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:09:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q811NGNFNQ0jhBRbZ4EH6j4fiOcwGvc0Bn/QClsWfN0=; b=pCVRlnh+Swld95B5UJzNOFDbQ/TScoXmKP9rG0ajaSvUjgVRbh4UNxtgR0sBjVur5k FRFwEBZ3e6RP6Si2qHjnwE7QJvnNH+kLDQvi3Zwfa+UE+3TYdFFQ9t4DuuxWCsa4ho3f ma/LdG2favG3yrqbdP/l/yvkFAYHZ3VrjXMmqtege0lVEVEQllThTHsjME0IT+kvt3lG 4rRLc4///Cf8BFwvg0EM3X0ZTF7mXiVLxVlrAcvXoMG7oBiXt+kGzk8A9V7VS8iykePH 0fbtuZk8V6ZILLGf9oNsZfps0JDjuSpiV1SPESlrKVIVMhKnfP2KH3GTrfIQM2nv/RCT 0BwA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUFZlqbW/2SXFf6w74J4AWcSnJWf0VG3GQLecRJUUaUvn3bCfTl p5eETJfSaQZineU6saZIQQJc77I8a24tn7nl86V14g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyOlNt1ya/CV1P4Krba28htc+1oyEmARCVX7mBAOjaS6yoUcBC6hpUEStv7HzseYdkBbpT3umcysiZ8doqY79E= X-Received: by 2002:a02:65cd:: with SMTP id u196mr5410154jab.3.1569420595874; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:09:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Luigi Rizzo Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:09:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: Andriy Gapon Cc: freebsd-net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dg1K3Fppz3wqv X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rizzounipi@gmail.com designates 209.85.166.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rizzounipi@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[unipi.it]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-1.18)[ip: (-0.35), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.30), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[65.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rizzo@iet.unipi.it,rizzounipi@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[65.166.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rizzo@iet.unipi.it,rizzounipi@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:09:58 -0000 On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:43 PM Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > It seems that the userland component of ipfw/dummynet uses int for the bandwidth > represented in bit/s. Also, int is used for passing that value from the > userland to the kernel. > > What would be the best way to extend this? > Just use a larger type? > Or maybe add another field to try to preserve KBI backward compatibility? As others have commented changing the ABI is a no-go. However the command structure can be extended: - define a new type, say DN_LINK64, and a new struct dn_link64 with a 64-bit bw field; - modify the kernel to accept the new type in addition to DN_LINK to set link speed, and reply with DN_LINK64 for links whose bandwidth cannot be represented on 31 bits (these must come from a userland that understands the new format, so it is reasonable to reply to queries with those) - modify the ipfw libraries to, likewise, understand DN_LINK64 on queries, and issue DN_LINK64 when bw requests do not fit on 31 bits (on failure). An alternate, hack-ish approach would be to encode high speeds with coarse granularity, say speed 0x7fnnnnnn with n = 0.. 0xffffe representing speed in Mbits/s (so that would give you up to 16 Pbit/s) and reserve 0x7fffffff for the pre-existing "2Gbit/s - 1" to avoid breaking former userland that may pick that value. cheers luigi that uses an extended field size for length. One thing that could be done is _extend_ the ABI > > Thank you. > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2 Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 14:43:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D431292B1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dglp5DN0z40FK for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B36381292B0; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32911292AF for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dglp4MKgz40FJ for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795FD193A6 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PEhII6060525 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PEhIq8060524 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 --- Comment #8 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to John Delano from comment #7) To what FreeBSD version did you apply D18545 from comment #6 of the queue-detection-issue bug report? As expected, it's not applicable to 12.1 for me and should also fail on all other versions newer than stable/12 from february: patch -C -p1 -i D18545.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: head/sys/dev/e1000/em_txrx.c |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |--- head/sys/dev/e1000/em_txrx.c |+++ head/sys/dev/e1000/em_txrx.c -------------------------- Patching file sys/dev/e1000/em_txrx.c using Plan A... Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n Apply anyway? [n] y Hunk #1 failed at 457. 1 out of 1 hunks failed while patching sys/dev/e1000/em_txrx.c : : : -------------------------- |Index: head/sys/dev/ixl/ixl_txrx.c |=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D |--- head/sys/dev/ixl/ixl_txrx.c |+++ head/sys/dev/ixl/ixl_txrx.c -------------------------- Patching file sys/dev/ixl/ixl_txrx.c using Plan A... Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] n Apply anyway? [n] y Hunk #1 failed at 515. Hunk #2 failed at 788. Hunk #3 failed at 805. 3 out of 3 hunks failed while patching sys/dev/ixl/ixl_txrx.c done --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 14:43:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C685D129346 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dgmV4yf7z40L2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AA2EC129345; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F52129344 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dgmV42jsz40L1 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F517193AC for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PEhsDD061275 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PEhs2c061274 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:43:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 --- Comment #9 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- Update: The link-state-change issue doesn't affect _configured_ interfaces, so the = fix in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21769 is most likely perfectly valid. I guess the remaining issue is by design. As long as the interface was never configured, state change only works once= in one direction -> recorded as active. If I have the interface configured before or afterwards, connection change/= loss will be recognized. But not for unconfigured interfaces. So the issue has no production influencing effects. It's might just caus confusion on systems with (cold) standby interfaces, since the admin might assume there's a link active and searches all switches unsuccessfully for t= hat link=E2=80=A6 During this test I saw that assigning an IP address to an already link-established em(4) or igb(4) interface, causes loss/interruption of the establisehd ethernet link. Don't know if this is desired=E2=80=A6 Guess these facts are related and as long as the internal steps configuring= a em/igb(4) (or probably iflib generic?) NIC stay as they are, it won't be possible to catch the link state loss with unconfigured/cold-stanby interfa= ces, right? Thanks, -Harry(In reply to John Delano from comment #7) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 14:46:43 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D53129553 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dgql0TZpz40ZV; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:46:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8PEkcZr083898 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:46:39 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: bu7cher@yandex.ru Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PEkcSu072735; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:46:38 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" , John Hay References: <201909242219.x8OMJP3P013498@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <5D8B3056.1020904@grosbein.net> <5D8B70D2.3040706@grosbein.net> <0260d101-4558-abd2-aace-13df2a610bb8@yandex.ru> Cc: freebsd-net , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Andriy Gapon From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <5D8B7DCE.2040604@grosbein.net> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:46:38 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0260d101-4558-abd2-aace-13df2a610bb8@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.7 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: * date * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dgql0TZpz40ZV X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=permerror (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of eugen@grosbein.net uses mechanism not recognized by this client) smtp.mailfrom=eugen@grosbein.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.65 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[grosbein.net]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_PERMFAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[yandex.ru]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.55)[ip: (-3.94), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.03), asn: 24940(-1.78), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:46:43 -0000 On 25.09.2019 20:53, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 25.09.2019 16:51, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >>> Will this break upgrades with freebsd-update? On a major upgrade, >>> it will first install the new kernel and require a reboot before >>> you run freebsd-update again to install the rest. >> >> So it will run without dummynet pipes (traffic shaping) configured >> meantime. Is it big deal? > > Note, that if you have ipfw rule with pipe, that does not exist, all > matched traffic will be dropped. :-) Nice catch. Maybe we should introduce new sysctl kern.features.dummynet64 knob for new kernels only but teach /sbin/ipfw for all supported branches to check it. So /sbin/ipfw would refuse to process any dummynet-related rules if knob is present and the binary has no 64-bit dummynet support. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 14:51:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EA41296B7 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com (mail-qt1-x830.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dgwt4g08z40ln for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:51:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id u22so6875064qtq.13 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:51:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Dya3QaDO70RO3uHUs8qP3qww7GWcMG6LfbmOl8xKv7A=; b=RDAvvUg0zNo2e6ehAqxXHhFf6W+bIOHKCw8h/99ZQyPOfosLWR+7WQd2bJXepdgHvc MW2F9kg2mtw5GhiVCUn6ooLpsMrVlSjL15JfgZyZ90ojpQznw8C5nZ1jgF7IYmVbJ5sr mF2pJdSv0RsVrt7smIzu0nJ4ydBbeQJQ0eDbNrC4Zb/OqW4Kse2aaOoK29n3yZCvKAvs cDqsmaN9cWa/cb0Etwy3uu3sslqWlUscqlR3BWjBhZDM1L4U+xii2mxDneG/4rhoM+9q 2f38IrD1OLfvBOsfbw9BdX6R0WD7iyxUx/h08B0smt8sLCHmcmzo/NhjApdDUnzPbFsa 7pxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=Dya3QaDO70RO3uHUs8qP3qww7GWcMG6LfbmOl8xKv7A=; b=JFPhavgeKAQn57SuPrai4dSzuAB1BEsOi8QfKy5tyK0AsONM46FM2oK+IuA61+xGn5 yAO43vudnpNGJHRTn/qih/i79982wgBtvODS7MoHJXtXZ78rF+pestMVcYmkNQOen6a1 PNIYWB5KQKOqxLPtuT6WS8D1YRefogefoJAhbGpNpEAIctEgk7E2WU83a1+CxTa0ObJ0 Xf15B7ju1nUd8rzAHDguRCpC1o0cQuiLh7v1a4gWY9lFRo36Zfib6Z/9roWAh43wH/YX WST/fmEjQgHgOHVB0R0LgSaxuZydv6ehC0/KGMR9xvnyrGDOI/3v2SI1OYrQRHdOuypI dz/g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUkGdvHTcZB1ikJgJi3Q2TUfiKgL+4hTiPxjCBy0sq/aIjMDWy0 XbMiWD4+VbN2goDqBFhZ/2UNYuMgDCIIYYIdWFZIC4qF6lLKxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyIDwpHJv1TaCxaU+zbn0UvWMMh1ewth7wui5shJiaQjdnR85raVFEgtuHoxnolQapLB4qUNDFpBdLYdISNqA0= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:eda2:: with SMTP id h2mr7592268qvr.190.1569423068402; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:51:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Michael Sierchio Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:50:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dummynet: bandwidth is limited to 2 Gbit/s ? To: freebsd-net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dgwt4g08z40ln X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=RDAvvUg0; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com has no SPF policy when checking 2607:f8b0:4864:20::830) smtp.mailfrom=kudzu@tenebras.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.14 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tenebras.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.84)[ip: (-9.35), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.61), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tenebras-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:51:11 -0000 On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 7:10 AM Luigi Rizzo wrote: > ... > An alternate, hack-ish approach would be to encode high speeds with > coarse granularity, > say speed 0x7fnnnnnn with n =3D 0.. 0xffffe representing speed in > Mbits/s (so that would give > you up to 16 Pbit/s) and reserve 0x7fffffff for the pre-existing > "2Gbit/s - 1" to avoid breaking > former userland that may pick that value. That actually sounds like a good approach, hackish or no. --=20 "Well," Brahm=C4=81 said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is = no wiser, but an intelligent person requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mah=C4=81bh=C4=81rata From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 16:08:06 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694A212B72C for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46djdf29w0z45YW for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 490D112B72B; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D4212B72A for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46djdf1Dcgz45YV for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABB41A211 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PG85Jb066354 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PG85DL066353 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: webmaster@rgcwireless.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 16:08:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 --- Comment #10 from John Delano --- (In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #8) Installed on Release 12.0 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 17:23:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF9212DB1F for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vm.finance2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dlJ411PVz4CJP for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vm.finance2@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id n197so745390iod.9 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:22:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EdyBDPPDKGGsMwM/E99344gPoV9v5vcHrFY/wd6hHoY=; b=Jl6RxHtgWU39bmULxAxiEx56UH5f6IEyoX2RfNM6sLhaTZbik2dXddF/IaclAE3g6y rD4naqH9cTVD0GwgWPwLu4n7DCNtL20gUQEohRmaCNHD3WVH3qhuREIFMYk3sykkDCVF UpBk+keLCbuAr4hsICNeX1I+wBB2tLMHk3eTXcX4VHJ6xaNgVYGabw2Sw9BGOPzKhM8B p1NagSIMfTZ3qmVYb7ROmpqySXVYcxNlqEVTJN++ABwVuA6yTHa7Nw1vATwEHNj+nqCw suuS/3bsAxbt9QNi+YQT3P3abX83RqwB06SHndHLdUl4ChVK2U3S6rz9IhRvh80N6SpE V4gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EdyBDPPDKGGsMwM/E99344gPoV9v5vcHrFY/wd6hHoY=; b=tQ4aauG7y56/3SPphStPaG5YfjD28jwb7jYx/ly45pJWwEj8HNsJ1lVlJw9kFvIo7X WMHoEylOC129s3YVbhjhrAOLyH5PhMvPsMgBq8AGAxvPqm+BSwL0xYWHkYyJ8iDo4bYc Ggg9wKg1Kv0ks0GiuOU8PyDzTQ+5jKHVwaUY3EtgIlbtk9yV/T7Q0kpiySYSXgfkTfSx 0u4meBU2HcMILpK3sBaT5K6lGdhR68n0Cw5DIIajPc0kFQ1TrZrNTonn0GkP7p+9osyV /9hClBA3uhdwFr3l2Y7vtATqIS3IPPDSpD9/NEiaWg5SavN62K+xYzwvAP1Ylmfr1+OV NlaA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVqVvxWochjqTM7rNDGkSKospHN1H004NpsvCo6+pIiFb8wvYFp jVYAZL2meUPgAHFBpFNjAOR6S2T7Els7DHs9hlE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8jAkQhzaYrvIqQSSaWCTaw0uubrDVR8q6qRfjJxpgGFdKX8g71W09SAZ2dgqKq7s/1EuyE6cYCrp662WpRag= X-Received: by 2002:a02:ac82:: with SMTP id x2mr6344727jan.18.1569432178374; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:22:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201909091232.x89CWl4b047025@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <27AD43DA-3237-490A-B3A6-C1792F9674E5@netflix.com> <5B630235-ABC7-4122-9082-F59BCCCDE14A@netflix.com> <84C20AED-44B1-4673-A29E-1A6FA61D8F27@netflix.com> <98E195A0-AFE2-4182-BE90-493E76A0DB1C@netflix.com> <9F3B0B5B-EF6A-42E1-99B8-9644DD0B39AB@netflix.com> <8474687C-8E5D-45F0-A3DE-0BF62ED2D28B@netflix.com> In-Reply-To: From: vm finance Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:22:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BBR patches? To: Michael Tuexen Cc: Randall Stewart , freebsd-net , Jamie Landeg-Jones , Ryan Stone X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dlJ411PVz4CJP X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Jl6RxHtg; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vmfinance2@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vmfinance2@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-4.40), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.61), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:23:01 -0000 Hi Randall, Michael, I'm trying to run some tests between FreeBSD BBR VM and another CentOS VM but don't see BBR performing well. FreeBSD (iperf -c) is transmitting to CentOS (iperf -s) Enable BBR ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr) =3D> 213Mb/s [loaded tcp_bbr using "kldload tcp_bbr.ko"] Enable FreeBSD ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd) =3D> 271Mb/s Questions: 1. Is there a way to track BBR internals on a running system? 2. Is "sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" sufficient to turn B= BR on? Any pointers highly appreciated. Thanks a lot! On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:42 AM Michael Tuexen < michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > > On 20. Sep 2019, at 06:52, vm finance wrote: > > > > Ok - kernel booted, I loaded the module and it loaded successfully > (kldstat shows tcp_bbr). > > > > So if I want to compare results between bbr and default cc algo, I just > need to load/unload the bbr module - correct? > > Or is there another way to achieve that? > One option is that your test application supports choosing the TCP stack > and you compare "freebsd" with "bbr". > One tools which supports this is uperf and here is an example how to > select the (not existing anymore) > stack called "fastack"): > https://github.com/uperf/uperf/blob/master/workloads/tcp-freebsd-change-s= tack.xml > > The other possibility is that you set your default TCP stack before > running your test app. You can so this > by executing > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr > or > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd > Then you test application can be TCP stack agnostic. > > Best regards > Michael > > > > > Please let me know. > > > > Thanks for all your help. > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:26 AM vm finance > wrote: > > finally ;) I was able to build it after manually extracting Makefile > contents from patch. > > rebooting now ;) > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:12 PM Randall Stewart wrote= : > > There should have been some in the patch. Tomorrow I can send you a tar > of the modules/tcp/bbr Dir. > > > > It=E2=80=99s similar to the rack setup if you can=E2=80=99t wait and wa= nt to be > adventurous > > > > R > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:31 PM, vm finance wrote: > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > I already have tcp_bbr.h and bbr.c at ~sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/ > > > > However, there is no "bbr" under sys/modules/tcp/. I created this > directory manually. > > Question: > > Which Makefile do I need to copy/move under sys/modules/tcp/bbr? > > I see there are Makefile and Makefile.org under ~modules/tcp... > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp # ls -R > > Makefile Makefile.orig bbr rack tcpmd5 > > ./bbr: > > > > ./rack: > > Makefile > > > > ./tcpmd5: > > Makefile > > > > Please let me know. > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > Ahh.. Look in your directory. > > > > You did not create the sub=E2=80=99dirs or put rack.c or bbr.c into the= right > places > > > > When you load the patch (which was updated Sept 17th and should be > different slightly) > > you will end up dropping a Makefile and bbr.c and tcp_bbr.h into the > local dir since > > for what every reason patch cannot figure out how to place it. > > > > You must move > > > > bbr.c/tcp_bbr.h to -> sys/netinet/tcp_stacks > > > > You must create > > > > sys/modules/tcp/bbr > > > > and > > > > place the make file under there (just like rack=E2=80=99s). > > > > Do that and I think you will finally have it.. not sure why patch is no= t > able to > > put the new files in the right places :0 > > > > R > > > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:42 AM, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > Hello Randall, > > > > > > I just retried it with headvm config that you had shared but still se= e > error while doing > > > "make cleandepend" > > > > > > Any pointers highly appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd65/compile/headvm # make cleandepend > > > [...snip...] > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D> sysvipc/sysvshm (obj) > > > > /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sys= vshm > created for /usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysvshm > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp (obj) > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp/bbr (obj) > > > cd: /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr: No such file or directory > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > > > Stop. > > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop. > > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop. > > > make: stopped in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm # > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM vm finance > wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > I applied the patch available at: > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582?id=3D62213 > > > NOTE: This raw patch seems to be exactly the same as the one I > downloaded on Sep10...hope I'm not missing anything here... > > > > > > I clicked on "download raw diff" and saved it to bbr_patch.diff file > on my local machine > > > Step 1: Apply PATCH: > > > cd /usr/src/sys > > > patch < bbr_patch.diff > > > Patch was applied successfully - no errors seen there. > > > > > > Step 2: Update kernel config: > > > cp /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL > > > Added three options to MYKERNEL (per ur email - I have also attached > the compile MYKERNEL file) > > > cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL > > > make cleandepend > > > =3D>This fails due to missing "bbr" under /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/ > > > [pls find the attached log file for exact error] > > > > > > make depend > > > =3D> This also fails due to missing "/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr" > > > > > > STEP 3: > > > cd /usr/src/ > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL > > > This also fails due to prior errors in Step 2. > > > > > > Please find MYKERNEL config file + error logs. > > > > > > Many many thanks for taking time to help me through this! > > > > > > PS: I did a make buildkernel without any KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL, and tha= t > successfully finished. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > You can look in the config I sent.. but here is what > > > I have added to enable BBR and Rack to be built > > > ***** > > > makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=3D1 > > > options TCPHPTS > > > options RATELIMIT > > > ****** > > > > > > So you should > > > 1) Apply the current patch in phabricator > > > 2) edit your config and add the above three lines > > > 3) go to the src dir and type > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dmyconf > > > > > > That should build and get you a kernel that will include bbr and rack= . > You will > > > need to, after it boots up type > > > > > > kldload tcp_bbr > > > > > > or > > > > > > kldload tcp_rack > > > > > > To get the modules loaded > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 2:31 PM, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, Michael, > > > > > > > > Build is done successfully. I would appreciate if you could share > config changes needed for BBR. > > > > > > > > My svn revision is: 352483 > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.full export_syms | > xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.full > > > > objcopy --only-keep-debug zlib.ko.full zlib.ko.debug > > > > objcopy --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=3Dzlib.ko.debug > zlib.ko.full zlib.ko > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Sep 18 21:08:31 UTC > 2019 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> Kernel(s) GENERIC built in 1972 seconds, ncpu: 4 > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > Vishal. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM vm finance > wrote: > > > > I'm using amd64. I'd get back as soon as base build is complete. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:09 AM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > To get bbr running you will need to change your kernel config. > > > > > > > > Are you building i386 or amd64? > > > > > > > > After you have successfully did > > > > > > > > 1) buildworld > > > > 2) buildkernel > > > > 3) installkernel > > > > > > > > (you can look in UPDATING for instructions .. though the file is > long :D) > > > > > > > > successfully let me know.. and then I will give you the tweaks you > need to add > > > > to the kerneconf. > > > > > > > > It won=E2=80=99t take as long to build because at that point you ca= n add in > the > > > > NO_CLEAN NO_CLEANDIR options as well since you will have built > everything > > > > the first time > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 7:06 AM, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > BTW, if you think I should be making any changes in configs, > please do let me know. > > > > > My goal is to build a freebsd image with BBR patches on x86 VM. > > > > > Nothing fancy. > > > > > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:03 AM vm finance > wrote: > > > > > Thanks Randall, Michael, > > > > > > > > > > I did "svn svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src" > > > > > and now doing "make buildworld buildkernel" > > > > > [I didn't change anything in configs - just whatever are the > defaults] > > > > > > > > > > I would update as soon as its done. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again! > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > One other note.. I notice his kernel conf he sent does not have > > > > > the right things to get BBR even to attempt to build. > > > > > > > > > > I would suggest using that config for the first steps.. then he > must add > > > > > the additional tcp stacks and the hpts in order to get bbr/rack > and any other > > > > > extra stack=E2=80=A6. > > > > > > > > > > But I would suggest to build with his current config first and > once he has > > > > > that in place and building > > > > > > > > > > a) apply the patch > > > > > b) add the extra kernel options > > > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:50 AM, Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats great idea Michael. > > > > > > > > > > > > From the look fo the build log I was sent, his blow-up has > nothing to do > > > > > > with the patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > He should probably > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Check out a fresh version of head. > > > > > > 2) Follow the instructions in UPDATING to get a clean build. > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildworld > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make installkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > > > > > > > ** do the reboot and merge master ** > > > > > > > > > > > > Then after that he could > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Apply the current patch in the review > > > > > > 4) do build that > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf -DNO_CLEAN > -DNO_CLEANDIR > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make install kernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf > > > > > > > > > > > > And he should have it all working :) > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done multiple builds with the latest head from yesterday > both with and without > > > > > > the extra stacks and hpts.. and I can=E2=80=99t get a build fai= lure.. > this would verify he can > > > > > > at least build head.. > > > > > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Michael Tuexen < > michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > > >>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 08:19, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> correcting a typo: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src > > > > > >>> current revision: 352434 > > > > > >> I suggest to build/install head first without any patches. > After that has worked, > > > > > >> apply the patches you are interested in. That way it is easy t= o > separate generic > > > > > >> build issues and issue specific to a patch. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Best regards > > > > > >> Michael > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>>> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. Pulle= d > it using > > > > > >>>> yesterday: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try that. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> There have been several patches pre-this one that provide > > > > > >>>> the infrastructure to support BBR. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will *not* > compile it. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of this > work.. so if you > > > > > >>>> want > > > > > >>>> to run BBR you need to run Head > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:26 PM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I ha= d > applied the > > > > > >>>> one you published Sep-10. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Following is what I have done: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> 2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> 3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src* > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> cd /usr/src; > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make buildworld buildkernel > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> [this is where make fails when patch is applied] > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I could try to build with your latest patch - please send me > a pointer. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks for your help! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:33 PM Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Looking at your make file log I can=E2=80=99t really tell wh= at you > are doing. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up=E2=80=A6 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Are you cross compiling? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I have done the old fashioned kernel make > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> i.e. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> cd src/sys/amd64/config > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> config headvm > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> cd ../compile/headvm > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I have done > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> cd src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dheadvm > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> And even > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> to make sure that the build works without bbr. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I attach my headvm config.. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> What exactly are you building and how? kernel config too > please? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> looking > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I was at 352408.. let me update and try it > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Hmm > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Did you get the patch I updated too this am? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and had > no issue.. > > > > > >>>> there was > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> an issue with KTLS before the update though. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I don=E2=80=99t recognize what you have below there though= =E2=80=A6 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. > Following is SVN > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep > 2019) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo vdisk.llo > dev_net.llo > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o > sack_filter.o > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h > opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:41 PM vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. > Following is SVN > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I have also attached the entire build log...snippet is below > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep > 2019) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo vdisk.llo > dev_net.llo > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o > sack_filter.o > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h > opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:27 PM Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux patches > do not have > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing pacing > into bbr. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is more > accurate than > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> either fq or the internal pacer :) > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks Randall. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the kernel. > Would update on > > > > > >>>> how it goes. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under > FreeBSD is > > > > > >>>> compensated here? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a must-have? > Is that > > > > > >>>> functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions highly > appreciated? > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> You should be able to compile it against the current head. I > re-doing that > > > > > >>>> now (had an > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a backup). > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and > without BBR on > > > > > >>>> whatever > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> was that rev.. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Looking in the commit logs that would have been around 35219= 1 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Hope that helps > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks for releasing BBR patch: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this is > based on? I > > > > > >>>> would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't find > this info in > > > > > >>>> the released patch. > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot! > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone < > rysto32@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > Randall Stewart > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > Randall Stewart > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 18:51:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A763B12FB11 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dnGZ41WJz4KY7 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8991512FB0F; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8958A12FB0E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dnGZ36ycz4KY5 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAE71C02C for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PIpohe001275 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PIpoMh001274 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:48 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ncrogers@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:51:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236724 --- Comment #12 from ncrogers@gmail.com --- (In reply to Krzysztof Galazka from comment #10) D21769 fixes this for me as well. Thank you! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 19:02:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A336912FE85 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:02:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dnWD5jd8z4L4X; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:02:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2f.google.com with SMTP id d3so4600721vsr.1; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:02:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RuUX3qFIrgLkmMxY9HWAAUtQqnLJv5j7BnKmbnl0W0o=; b=Hca374ma6sim+T39GssJm8X1vr2gS+D/XF2WZGYkZ8P18fbumD0f2skqc9ZKwdF7oD dTI0stIiwR2B5Y6sFxjWbAWgBnlvMidFMnOawE4zVP8CLfqZVMJ5lOZstyq+FMOQ1UWp Ks+AaQcVgQZjZ10qVVN1RtcNRau+/Jx9vKWiYblHoZ7q2Ow9SJtKemrrwHLoNXhd7THK ymq7e2wDE9Br0tLPvISHz37ucwoR96XbpvLOi2eR+ndidL2PUaL/dtswKI3njt1Ibdts nVaBAorg6d/ivGQ8Tdeo0y6mPmM28jxzlTjEyCrOoiSJuWFadkJMDFOFFfhPTuR5RfJ+ zvXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RuUX3qFIrgLkmMxY9HWAAUtQqnLJv5j7BnKmbnl0W0o=; b=Hxl7pglanZO4ASRoDTUdgM7QfKe9hP70UeI/fp6+74mdke0HmZWthFcb8HgUEWL0cr nmHWhg1K9cJ6J2qGq0CyClrMeLaX53NNVVDEmCwwflNSrQrk6G0i4zw6/x0V6gSndKtc zedfR27VPGQWqY+XcHwM8beUcNEXl/iDsWm92gz/eiFN08VSGGmi2ideHpMeugpBpN7d Uxgl/SaEfcAtGJtzyoZWR5M3Oo1+75do8hx/Gmr9Ss+05oH/VvBrpbL9IWl7F/2DJ6kQ +n62e89znsjA+mc9NE+6EhTxhjNaoGxnOF6RFmzh0Inq6KKPdo36NdlRxYlMfRlfY/F1 cuEA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5RruT6zn1aywGdVFEwKH7fnDNOYCTgZ/rgs3K6QWqW6QZz7+Y yJSZhJOR5mCNQOOVxanr0CFGsxnlZRGgxGvqLHFSFqQgtBs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwz8+PEXF/yona53UwEGyn/owiGZHT4alTYDHqPhmlZDFuTA/9JClvQ91TwMuKTm2ot9O4Mx2zRVdxkA1s0TZo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f74a:: with SMTP id w10mr6113477vso.187.1569438167449; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 12:02:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> From: Mihir Luthra Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:32:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? To: Hiroki Sato Cc: freebsd-net , hrs@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dnWD5jd8z4L4X X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Hca374ma; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of luthramihir708@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luthramihir708@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.62), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.61), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:02:49 -0000 > > > I think the project page has wrong information regarding rpc.statd. > Although it is not clean from the viewpoint of transport independent, > it works with IPv6. > > I see, in file.c/procs.c , clnt_create() calls are hardcoded to "udp". Code in `statd.c` is handled correctly for tcp/udp/tcp6/udp6? .Did I get your point correctly? Also, going through man page of clnt_create, it states usage for only tcp/udp and not udp6/tcp6. > There are more userland utilities which do not support IPv6---rwhod, > yp*, etc. > > Thank you for the tip. I am a bit stuck with rpc.statd so it would be a good idea to work on them until then. Kind Regards, Mihir From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 19:41:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2D6130705 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dpMd02zMz4MsL for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F3C5E130704; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38B8130703 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dpMc6DLnz4MsJ for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B946D1CA2A for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PJfGCr034576 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PJfGmw034575 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239216] Problem with ix(4) driver on systems with two Intel X520 cards Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: product version component Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:41:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239216 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Ports & Packages |Base System Version|Latest |CURRENT Component|Individual Port(s) |kern --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 19:54:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F7A131010 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dpfR397sz4PdQ for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6C9BD13100C; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C68113100B for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dpfR2JtWz4PdP for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3442C1CC8E for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PJs7Zh071418 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PJs77E071417 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240818] igb drivers: vlanhwfilter feature generate link UP/DOWN for each new vlan created Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: olivier@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:54:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240818 Olivier Cochard changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 20:41:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BAE132503 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@netflix.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dqj02fbkz4Tsh for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@netflix.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id w10so130212plq.5 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:41:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=RD5+Re6HxbT5U311PxjXrbHj3HrpcxVNIrAFkY+3glY=; b=n88D1Z58hE0V/G5Wje6FohsVWdWGe3gDLDI202sfo3ArPz7jaaq5i3xzvMxHMcwYen 6vGhLOf1X8L2dTgjRpeacjr+J/5MjWkFDlR93PKFLwAq80ozITdbehUdYDClAZLLZq93 az4yp0gaykWu40rZfGb0Z+MBRkz2uyp3VMHRfHngNLhVhib/pxITIbjJ9/J4EgOD9fdn TjqAmwzUa9dygl8gY2w/2Of4ha9A5VjIp0g0TXQLav/GeKV1ewPqB6kce4khaadvOkhT yl6HFIyN+kFgFWE2WMkvUTWHpzuW2ycHVoHAxiFRL8CX807QMuFTdW0ADJrrI7sZTjWm DEyA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJoM8BXp6H7ZNPSYIvzINHzLMMstOgr0WPdjad9ybK/PmQUGHU TP3ED0VIRdCOHfzDP64prveQyA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx1VXZjz9z6b3tl2BWKvM0z75lRhWp2Afl/yEWn8xiLdNKz6UUDxs4bKo/hAn9FYp6bv3Av+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9001:: with SMTP id a1mr11579826plp.148.1569444081898; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:41:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb10:7021:1::eb2d? ([2607:fb10:7021:1::eb2d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a18sm411334pgm.25.2019.09.25.13.41.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:41:20 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: BBR patches? From: Randall Stewart In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 13:41:18 -0700 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_T=C3=BCxen?= , freebsd-net , Jamie Landeg-Jones , Ryan Stone Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> References: <201909091232.x89CWl4b047025@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <27AD43DA-3237-490A-B3A6-C1792F9674E5@netflix.com> <5B630235-ABC7-4122-9082-F59BCCCDE14A@netflix.com> <84C20AED-44B1-4673-A29E-1A6FA61D8F27@netflix.com> <98E195A0-AFE2-4182-BE90-493E76A0DB1C@netflix.com> <9F3B0B5B-EF6A-42E1-99B8-9644DD0B39AB@netflix.com> <8474687C-8E5D-45F0-A3DE-0BF62ED2D28B@netflix.com> To: vm finance X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dqj02fbkz4Tsh X-Spamd-Bar: -------------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-14.37 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netflix.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netflix.com,reject]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netflix.com:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; WHITELIST_DMARC(-7.00)[netflix.com:D:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.87)[ip: (-9.53), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.61), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[netflix.com:d:+,netflix.com:s:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:41:25 -0000 > On Sep 25, 2019, at 10:22 AM, vm finance = wrote: >=20 > Hi Randall, Michael, >=20 > I'm trying to run some tests between FreeBSD BBR VM and another CentOS = VM but don't see BBR performing well. FreeBSD (iperf -c) is transmitting = to CentOS (iperf -s) >=20 > Enable BBR ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr) =3D> = 213Mb/s > [loaded tcp_bbr using "kldload tcp_bbr.ko"] >=20 > Enable FreeBSD ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd) = =3D> 271Mb/s >=20 > Questions: > 1. Is there a way to track BBR internals on a running system? Yes, there is a tcp logging function that can be used to turn on things. = The other relevant question in this are: 1) What is the RTT=20 2) Do you know your bottleneck router buffer size 3) What are the rwnd=E2=80=99s in play here. There are known issues with BBR when it faces a high BDP (lots of = buffers), new-reno or cubic will do better.=20 One other thing is if you are running from a web browser (like we do at = NF) then simply setting default sysctl works but you have to restart the web browser if = its running. If its just a simpler=20 set sysctl start-perf=20 Then that should work. > 2. Is "sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" sufficient to = turn BBR on? >=20 See above. While the iperf is running you can do sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_available and you should see a count by bbr showing its being used. R > Any pointers highly appreciated. >=20 > Thanks a lot! >=20 > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:42 AM Michael Tuexen = wrote: > > On 20. Sep 2019, at 06:52, vm finance wrote: > >=20 > > Ok - kernel booted, I loaded the module and it loaded successfully = (kldstat shows tcp_bbr). > >=20 > > So if I want to compare results between bbr and default cc algo, I = just need to load/unload the bbr module - correct? > > Or is there another way to achieve that? > One option is that your test application supports choosing the TCP = stack and you compare "freebsd" with "bbr". > One tools which supports this is uperf and here is an example how to = select the (not existing anymore) > stack called "fastack"): = https://github.com/uperf/uperf/blob/master/workloads/tcp-freebsd-change-st= ack.xml >=20 > The other possibility is that you set your default TCP stack before = running your test app. You can so this > by executing > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr > or > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd > Then you test application can be TCP stack agnostic. >=20 > Best regards > Michael >=20 > >=20 > > Please let me know. > >=20 > > Thanks for all your help. > >=20 > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:26 AM vm finance = wrote: > > finally ;) I was able to build it after manually extracting Makefile = contents from patch. > > rebooting now ;) > >=20 > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:12 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > There should have been some in the patch. Tomorrow I can send you a = tar of the modules/tcp/bbr Dir.=20 > >=20 > > It=E2=80=99s similar to the rack setup if you can=E2=80=99t wait and = want to be adventurous=20 > >=20 > > R > >=20 > > Sent from my iPhone > >=20 > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: > >=20 > > Hi Randall, > >=20 > > I already have tcp_bbr.h and bbr.c at ~sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/ > >=20 > > However, there is no "bbr" under sys/modules/tcp/. I created this = directory manually. > > Question: > > Which Makefile do I need to copy/move under sys/modules/tcp/bbr?=20 > > I see there are Makefile and Makefile.org under ~modules/tcp... > >=20 > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp # ls -R > > Makefile Makefile.orig bbr rack = tcpmd5 > > ./bbr: > >=20 > > ./rack: > > Makefile > >=20 > > ./tcpmd5: > > Makefile > >=20 > > Please let me know. > >=20 > > Thanks for your help! > >=20 > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > Ahh.. Look in your directory. > >=20 > > You did not create the sub=E2=80=99dirs or put rack.c or bbr.c into = the right places > >=20 > > When you load the patch (which was updated Sept 17th and should be = different slightly) > > you will end up dropping a Makefile and bbr.c and tcp_bbr.h into the = local dir since > > for what every reason patch cannot figure out how to place it. > >=20 > > You must move=20 > >=20 > > bbr.c/tcp_bbr.h to -> sys/netinet/tcp_stacks > >=20 > > You must create > >=20 > > sys/modules/tcp/bbr > >=20 > > and=20 > >=20 > > place the make file under there (just like rack=E2=80=99s). > >=20 > > Do that and I think you will finally have it.. not sure why patch is = not able to > > put the new files in the right places :0 > >=20 > > R > >=20 > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:42 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > >=20 > > > Hello Randall, > > >=20 > > > I just retried it with headvm config that you had shared but still = see error while doing > > > "make cleandepend" > > >=20 > > > Any pointers highly appreciated. > > >=20 > > > Thanks > > >=20 > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd65/compile/headvm # make cleandepend=20= > > > [...snip...] > > >=20 > > > =3D=3D=3D> sysvipc/sysvshm (obj) > > > = /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysv= shm created for /usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysvshm > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp (obj) > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp/bbr (obj) > > > cd: /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr: No such file or directory > > > *** Error code 2 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp > > > *** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules > > > *** Error code 1 > > >=20 > > > Stop. > > > make: stopped in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm #=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > Hi Randall, > > >=20 > > > I applied the patch available at:=20 > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582?id=3D62213 > > > NOTE: This raw patch seems to be exactly the same as the one I = downloaded on Sep10...hope I'm not missing anything here... > > >=20 > > > I clicked on "download raw diff" and saved it to bbr_patch.diff = file on my local machine > > > Step 1: Apply PATCH: > > > cd /usr/src/sys > > > patch < bbr_patch.diff > > > Patch was applied successfully - no errors seen there. > > >=20 > > > Step 2: Update kernel config: > > > cp /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC = /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL=20 > > > Added three options to MYKERNEL (per ur email - I have also = attached the compile MYKERNEL file) > > > cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL > > > make cleandepend > > > =3D>This fails due to missing "bbr" under = /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/ > > > [pls find the attached log file for exact error] > > >=20 > > > make depend > > > =3D> This also fails due to missing "/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr" > > >=20 > > > STEP 3: > > > cd /usr/src/ > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL > > > This also fails due to prior errors in Step 2. > > >=20 > > > Please find MYKERNEL config file + error logs. > > >=20 > > > Many many thanks for taking time to help me through this! > > >=20 > > > PS: I did a make buildkernel without any KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL, and = that successfully finished. > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > You can look in the config I sent.. but here is what > > > I have added to enable BBR and Rack to be built > > > ***** > > > makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=3D1 > > > options TCPHPTS=20 > > > options RATELIMIT > > > ****** > > >=20 > > > So you should > > > 1) Apply the current patch in phabricator > > > 2) edit your config and add the above three lines > > > 3) go to the src dir and type > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dmyconf > > >=20 > > > That should build and get you a kernel that will include bbr and = rack. You will > > > need to, after it boots up type > > >=20 > > > kldload tcp_bbr > > >=20 > > > or > > >=20 > > > kldload tcp_rack > > >=20 > > > To get the modules loaded > > >=20 > > > R > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 2:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Hi Randall, Michael, > > > >=20 > > > > Build is done successfully. I would appreciate if you could = share config changes needed for BBR. > > > >=20 > > > > My svn revision is: 352483 > > > >=20 > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.full export_syms = | xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.full > > > > objcopy --only-keep-debug zlib.ko.full zlib.ko.debug > > > > objcopy --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=3Dzlib.ko.debug = zlib.ko.full zlib.ko > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Sep 18 21:08:31 = UTC 2019 > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >>> Kernel(s) GENERIC built in 1972 seconds, ncpu: 4 > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > >=20 > > > > Thank you > > > > Vishal. > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > I'm using amd64. I'd get back as soon as base build is complete. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks! > > > >=20 > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:09 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > To get bbr running you will need to change your kernel config. > > > >=20 > > > > Are you building i386 or amd64? > > > >=20 > > > > After you have successfully did=20 > > > >=20 > > > > 1) buildworld > > > > 2) buildkernel > > > > 3) installkernel > > > >=20 > > > > (you can look in UPDATING for instructions .. though the file is = long :D) > > > >=20 > > > > successfully let me know.. and then I will give you the tweaks = you need to add > > > > to the kerneconf. > > > >=20 > > > > It won=E2=80=99t take as long to build because at that point you = can add in the > > > > NO_CLEAN NO_CLEANDIR options as well since you will have built = everything > > > > the first time > > > >=20 > > > > R > > > >=20 > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 7:06 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > >=20 > > > > > BTW, if you think I should be making any changes in configs, = please do let me know. > > > > > My goal is to build a freebsd image with BBR patches on x86 = VM.=20 > > > > > Nothing fancy. > > > > >=20 > > > > > thanks! > > > > >=20 > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:03 AM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > Thanks Randall, Michael, > > > > >=20 > > > > > I did "svn svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src" > > > > > and now doing "make buildworld buildkernel"=20 > > > > > [I didn't change anything in configs - just whatever are the = defaults] > > > > >=20 > > > > > I would update as soon as its done. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks again! > > > > >=20 > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > One other note.. I notice his kernel conf he sent does not = have > > > > > the right things to get BBR even to attempt to build. > > > > >=20 > > > > > I would suggest using that config for the first steps.. then = he must add > > > > > the additional tcp stacks and the hpts in order to get = bbr/rack and any other > > > > > extra stack=E2=80=A6.=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > But I would suggest to build with his current config first and = once he has > > > > > that in place and building > > > > >=20 > > > > > a) apply the patch > > > > > b) add the extra kernel options > > > > >=20 > > > > > R > > > > >=20 > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:50 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thats great idea Michael. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > =46rom the look fo the build log I was sent, his blow-up has = nothing to do > > > > > > with the patches. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > He should probably > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > 1) Check out a fresh version of head. > > > > > > 2) Follow the instructions in UPDATING to get a clean build. > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildworld > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make installkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > ** do the reboot and merge master ** > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Then after that he could > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > 3) Apply the current patch in the review > > > > > > 4) do build that > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf = -DNO_CLEAN -DNO_CLEANDIR > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make install kernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > And he should have it all working :) > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I have done multiple builds with the latest head from = yesterday both with and without > > > > > > the extra stacks and hpts.. and I can=E2=80=99t get a build = failure.. this would verify he can > > > > > > at least build head.. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > R > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Michael Tuexen = wrote: > > > > > >>=20 > > > > > >>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 08:19, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > >>> correcting a typo: > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src > > > > > >>> current revision: 352434 > > > > > >> I suggest to build/install head first without any patches. = After that has worked, > > > > > >> apply the patches you are interested in. That way it is = easy to separate generic > > > > > >> build issues and issue specific to a patch. > > > > > >>=20 > > > > > >> Best regards > > > > > >> Michael > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. = Pulled it using > > > > > >>>> yesterday: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try = that. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> There have been several patches pre-this one that provide > > > > > >>>> the infrastructure to support BBR. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will *not* = compile it. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of this = work.. so if you > > > > > >>>> want > > > > > >>>> to run BBR you need to run Head > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:26 PM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I = had applied the > > > > > >>>> one you published Sep-10. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Following is what I have done: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> 2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> 3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src* > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> cd /usr/src; > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make buildworld buildkernel > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> [this is where make fails when patch is applied] > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I could try to build with your latest patch - please send = me a pointer. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks for your help! > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:33 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Looking at your make file log I can=E2=80=99t really tell = what you are doing. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up=E2=80=A6 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Are you cross compiling? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I have done the old fashioned kernel make > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> i.e. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> cd src/sys/amd64/config > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> config headvm > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> cd ../compile/headvm > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I have done > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> cd src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dheadvm > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> And even > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> to make sure that the build works without bbr. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I attach my headvm config.. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> What exactly are you building and how? kernel config too = please? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> looking > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I was at 352408.. let me update and try it > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Hmm > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Did you get the patch I updated too this am? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and = had no issue.. > > > > > >>>> there was > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> an issue with KTLS before the update though. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I don=E2=80=99t recognize what you have below there = though=E2=80=A6 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. = Following is SVN > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep = 2019) > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo = vdisk.llo dev_net.llo > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld = bbr.o sack_filter.o > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:41 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. = Following is SVN > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I have also attached the entire build log...snippet is = below > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep = 2019) > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo = vdisk.llo dev_net.llo > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld = bbr.o sack_filter.o > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:27 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux = patches do not have > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing = pacing into bbr. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is = more accurate than > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> either fq or the internal pacer :) > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks Randall. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the = kernel. Would update on > > > > > >>>> how it goes. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under = FreeBSD is > > > > > >>>> compensated here? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a = must-have? Is that > > > > > >>>> functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions highly = appreciated? > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> You should be able to compile it against the current = head. I re-doing that > > > > > >>>> now (had an > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a = backup). > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and = without BBR on > > > > > >>>> whatever > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> was that rev.. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Looking in the commit logs that would have been around = 352191 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Hope that helps > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks for releasing BBR patch: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this = is based on? I > > > > > >>>> would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't = find this info in > > > > > >>>> the released patch. > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot! > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone = wrote: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > ------ > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > ------ > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > ------ > > > Randall Stewart > > > rrs@netflix.com > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > >=20 > > ------ > > Randall Stewart > > rrs@netflix.com > >=20 > >=20 > >=20 >=20 ------ Randall Stewart rrs@netflix.com From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 20:48:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15D2132D65 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:48:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dqsL22rmz4XXw; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:48:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8PKmBUV080710 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail-d.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:48:22 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=allbsd.org; s=20190220; t=1569444510; bh=5PKUg44HmXNF7xyXRVlhzUnJ4H3zyltxsB8iIEIDLOM=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=lWesD7QivCUkf2yQ/hu+/53DUzmpvec+b7W/lJ6lJ9Xrp5Rj2d8VaxkkyhjyQdmet enK21WVsNDvnAkE5UMB6pVYRdOmxDgrjStvNCThzLYpQ/soMjKD7npAfHqj/SAfknd mquaoJ8K7QInLbA2uVQaflM9D7w714NAtn/2SNdo= Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8PKm5pY035023 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:48:06 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x8PKm4aJ035019; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:48:05 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:46:03 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> To: luthramihir708@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Thu_Sep_26_05_46_03_2019_274)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:48:30 +0900 (JST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46dqsL22rmz4XXw X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=allbsd.org header.s=20190220 header.b=lWesD7Qi; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hrs@allbsd.org designates 2001:2f0:104:e001::41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hrs@allbsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[allbsd.org:s=20190220]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[allbsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[allbsd.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7514, ipnet:2001:2f0::/32, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.21)[ip: (-9.07), ipnet: 2001:2f0::/32(-4.22), asn: 7514(2.28), country: JP(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:48:42 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Sep_26_05_46_03_2019_274)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mihir Luthra wrote in : lu> > I think the project page has wrong information regarding rpc.statd. lu> > Although it is not clean from the viewpoint of transport independent, lu> > it works with IPv6. lu> > lu> > lu> I see, in file.c/procs.c , clnt_create() calls are hardcoded to "udp". Code lu> in `statd.c` is handled correctly for tcp/udp/tcp6/udp6? .Did I get your lu> point correctly? lu> Also, going through man page of clnt_create, it states usage for only lu> tcp/udp and not udp6/tcp6. I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a class of transport protocol, not address family. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Sep_26_05_46_03_2019_274)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMgEABMKAC0WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXYvSCw8caHJzQGFsbGJz ZC5vcmcACgkQ27B9xm8fc3/3owIJAa3r+tH+6qN0j6f28A9oAAEHclN0NsSvZmx6 e0oc+ppLV2bcyjI49trt6lBEbZr3pJ3oM24bZ48NtNn5yN7xi0GxAgin7Xzd/+Ji +wDWGrE41jmMBmZ8tOYDUj1A6LtYYM89HfvxfICzEpks6Q19/c2Y82t+pGVwavzr Miz7pdDwl4Nl6w== =KQPS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_Sep_26_05_46_03_2019_274)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 21:23:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B060F133A58 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from drew.franken.de (drew.ipv6.franken.de [IPv6:2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.franken.de", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46drdy6kT1z4Zlw for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:23:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de) Received: from [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:ac80:6b31:226a:6919] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:8109:1140:c3d:ac80:6b31:226a:6919]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by drew.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E941072106C12; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:23:46 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: BBR patches? From: Michael Tuexen In-Reply-To: <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:23:46 +0200 Cc: vm finance , freebsd-net , Jamie Landeg-Jones , Ryan Stone Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5B730D8C-D0CB-4CCF-94F2-E70A09BA8188@lurchi.franken.de> References: <201909091232.x89CWl4b047025@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <27AD43DA-3237-490A-B3A6-C1792F9674E5@netflix.com> <5B630235-ABC7-4122-9082-F59BCCCDE14A@netflix.com> <84C20AED-44B1-4673-A29E-1A6FA61D8F27@netflix.com> <98E195A0-AFE2-4182-BE90-493E76A0DB1C@netflix.com> <9F3B0B5B-EF6A-42E1-99B8-9644DD0B39AB@netflix.com> <8474687C-8E5D-45F0-A3DE-0BF62ED2D28B@netflix.com> <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> To: Randall Stewart X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail-n.franken.de X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46drdy6kT1z4Zlw X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de has no SPF policy when checking 2001:638:a02:a001:20e:cff:fe4a:feaa) smtp.mailfrom=michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.57 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.53)[ip: (-5.07), ipnet: 2001:638::/32(2.34), asn: 680(0.07), country: DE(-0.01)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[franken.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.82)[-0.820,0]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.38)[-0.378,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[a.a.e.f.a.4.e.f.f.f.c.0.e.0.2.0.1.0.0.a.2.0.a.0.8.3.6.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:680, ipnet:2001:638::/32, country:DE]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:23:51 -0000 > On 25. Sep 2019, at 22:41, Randall Stewart wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Sep 25, 2019, at 10:22 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>=20 >> Hi Randall, Michael, >>=20 >> I'm trying to run some tests between FreeBSD BBR VM and another = CentOS VM but don't see BBR performing well. FreeBSD (iperf -c) is = transmitting to CentOS (iperf -s) >>=20 >> Enable BBR ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr) =3D> = 213Mb/s >> [loaded tcp_bbr using "kldload tcp_bbr.ko"] >>=20 >> Enable FreeBSD ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd) = =3D> 271Mb/s >>=20 >> Questions: >> 1. Is there a way to track BBR internals on a running system? >=20 > Yes, there is a tcp logging function that can be used to turn on = things. The other > relevant question in this are: >=20 > 1) What is the RTT=20 > 2) Do you know your bottleneck router buffer size > 3) What are the rwnd=E2=80=99s in play here. >=20 > There are known issues with BBR when it faces a high BDP (lots of = buffers), new-reno > or cubic will do better.=20 >=20 > One other thing is if you are running from a web browser (like we do = at NF) then simply > setting default sysctl works but you have to restart the web browser = if its running. >=20 > If its just a simpler=20 >=20 > set sysctl > start-perf=20 >=20 > Then that should work. >=20 >=20 >> 2. Is "sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" sufficient to = turn BBR on? >>=20 >=20 >=20 > See above. While the iperf is running you can do >=20 > sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_available >=20 > and you should see a count by bbr showing its being used. .. and doing such measurements with VMs adds another set of variables... = I would do such measurements in non VM setups. Except you really want to study the = impact of running in VMs. But I think this is not what you want... Best regards Michael >=20 > R >=20 >> Any pointers highly appreciated. >>=20 >> Thanks a lot! >>=20 >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:42 AM Michael Tuexen = wrote: >>> On 20. Sep 2019, at 06:52, vm finance wrote: >>>=20 >>> Ok - kernel booted, I loaded the module and it loaded successfully = (kldstat shows tcp_bbr). >>>=20 >>> So if I want to compare results between bbr and default cc algo, I = just need to load/unload the bbr module - correct? >>> Or is there another way to achieve that? >> One option is that your test application supports choosing the TCP = stack and you compare "freebsd" with "bbr". >> One tools which supports this is uperf and here is an example how to = select the (not existing anymore) >> stack called "fastack"): = https://github.com/uperf/uperf/blob/master/workloads/tcp-freebsd-change-st= ack.xml >>=20 >> The other possibility is that you set your default TCP stack before = running your test app. You can so this >> by executing >> sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr >> or >> sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd >> Then you test application can be TCP stack agnostic. >>=20 >> Best regards >> Michael >>=20 >>>=20 >>> Please let me know. >>>=20 >>> Thanks for all your help. >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:26 AM vm finance = wrote: >>> finally ;) I was able to build it after manually extracting Makefile = contents from patch. >>> rebooting now ;) >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:12 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>> There should have been some in the patch. Tomorrow I can send you a = tar of the modules/tcp/bbr Dir.=20 >>>=20 >>> It=E2=80=99s similar to the rack setup if you can=E2=80=99t wait and = want to be adventurous=20 >>>=20 >>> R >>>=20 >>> Sent from my iPhone >>>=20 >>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi Randall, >>>=20 >>> I already have tcp_bbr.h and bbr.c at ~sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/ >>>=20 >>> However, there is no "bbr" under sys/modules/tcp/. I created this = directory manually. >>> Question: >>> Which Makefile do I need to copy/move under sys/modules/tcp/bbr?=20 >>> I see there are Makefile and Makefile.org under ~modules/tcp... >>>=20 >>> root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp # ls -R >>> Makefile Makefile.orig bbr rack = tcpmd5 >>> ./bbr: >>>=20 >>> ./rack: >>> Makefile >>>=20 >>> ./tcpmd5: >>> Makefile >>>=20 >>> Please let me know. >>>=20 >>> Thanks for your help! >>>=20 >>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>> Ahh.. Look in your directory. >>>=20 >>> You did not create the sub=E2=80=99dirs or put rack.c or bbr.c into = the right places >>>=20 >>> When you load the patch (which was updated Sept 17th and should be = different slightly) >>> you will end up dropping a Makefile and bbr.c and tcp_bbr.h into the = local dir since >>> for what every reason patch cannot figure out how to place it. >>>=20 >>> You must move=20 >>>=20 >>> bbr.c/tcp_bbr.h to -> sys/netinet/tcp_stacks >>>=20 >>> You must create >>>=20 >>> sys/modules/tcp/bbr >>>=20 >>> and=20 >>>=20 >>> place the make file under there (just like rack=E2=80=99s). >>>=20 >>> Do that and I think you will finally have it.. not sure why patch is = not able to >>> put the new files in the right places :0 >>>=20 >>> R >>>=20 >>>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:42 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Hello Randall, >>>>=20 >>>> I just retried it with headvm config that you had shared but still = see error while doing >>>> "make cleandepend" >>>>=20 >>>> Any pointers highly appreciated. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks >>>>=20 >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd65/compile/headvm # make cleandepend=20= >>>> [...snip...] >>>>=20 >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sysvipc/sysvshm (obj) >>>> = /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysv= shm created for /usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysvshm >>>> =3D=3D=3D> tcp (obj) >>>> =3D=3D=3D> tcp/bbr (obj) >>>> cd: /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr: No such file or directory >>>> *** Error code 2 >>>>=20 >>>> Stop. >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>=20 >>>> Stop. >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules >>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>=20 >>>> Stop. >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm #=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>> Hi Randall, >>>>=20 >>>> I applied the patch available at:=20 >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582?id=3D62213 >>>> NOTE: This raw patch seems to be exactly the same as the one I = downloaded on Sep10...hope I'm not missing anything here... >>>>=20 >>>> I clicked on "download raw diff" and saved it to bbr_patch.diff = file on my local machine >>>> Step 1: Apply PATCH: >>>> cd /usr/src/sys >>>> patch < bbr_patch.diff >>>> Patch was applied successfully - no errors seen there. >>>>=20 >>>> Step 2: Update kernel config: >>>> cp /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL=20= >>>> Added three options to MYKERNEL (per ur email - I have also = attached the compile MYKERNEL file) >>>> cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL >>>> make cleandepend >>>> =3D>This fails due to missing "bbr" under /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/ >>>> [pls find the attached log file for exact error] >>>>=20 >>>> make depend >>>> =3D> This also fails due to missing "/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr" >>>>=20 >>>> STEP 3: >>>> cd /usr/src/ >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL >>>> This also fails due to prior errors in Step 2. >>>>=20 >>>> Please find MYKERNEL config file + error logs. >>>>=20 >>>> Many many thanks for taking time to help me through this! >>>>=20 >>>> PS: I did a make buildkernel without any KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL, and = that successfully finished. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>> You can look in the config I sent.. but here is what >>>> I have added to enable BBR and Rack to be built >>>> ***** >>>> makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=3D1 >>>> options TCPHPTS=20 >>>> options RATELIMIT >>>> ****** >>>>=20 >>>> So you should >>>> 1) Apply the current patch in phabricator >>>> 2) edit your config and add the above three lines >>>> 3) go to the src dir and type >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dmyconf >>>>=20 >>>> That should build and get you a kernel that will include bbr and = rack. You will >>>> need to, after it boots up type >>>>=20 >>>> kldload tcp_bbr >>>>=20 >>>> or >>>>=20 >>>> kldload tcp_rack >>>>=20 >>>> To get the modules loaded >>>>=20 >>>> R >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 2:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hi Randall, Michael, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Build is done successfully. I would appreciate if you could share = config changes needed for BBR. >>>>>=20 >>>>> My svn revision is: 352483 >>>>>=20 >>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>> awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.full export_syms | = xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.full >>>>> objcopy --only-keep-debug zlib.ko.full zlib.ko.debug >>>>> objcopy --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=3Dzlib.ko.debug = zlib.ko.full zlib.ko >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Sep 18 21:08:31 UTC = 2019 >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> Kernel(s) GENERIC built in 1972 seconds, ncpu: 4 >>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thank you >>>>> Vishal. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>> I'm using amd64. I'd get back as soon as base build is complete. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks! >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:09 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>> To get bbr running you will need to change your kernel config. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Are you building i386 or amd64? >>>>>=20 >>>>> After you have successfully did=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> 1) buildworld >>>>> 2) buildkernel >>>>> 3) installkernel >>>>>=20 >>>>> (you can look in UPDATING for instructions .. though the file is = long :D) >>>>>=20 >>>>> successfully let me know.. and then I will give you the tweaks you = need to add >>>>> to the kerneconf. >>>>>=20 >>>>> It won=E2=80=99t take as long to build because at that point you = can add in the >>>>> NO_CLEAN NO_CLEANDIR options as well since you will have built = everything >>>>> the first time >>>>>=20 >>>>> R >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 7:06 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> BTW, if you think I should be making any changes in configs, = please do let me know. >>>>>> My goal is to build a freebsd image with BBR patches on x86 VM.=20= >>>>>> Nothing fancy. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> thanks! >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:03 AM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>> Thanks Randall, Michael, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I did "svn svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src" >>>>>> and now doing "make buildworld buildkernel"=20 >>>>>> [I didn't change anything in configs - just whatever are the = defaults] >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I would update as soon as its done. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks again! >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>> One other note.. I notice his kernel conf he sent does not have >>>>>> the right things to get BBR even to attempt to build. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> I would suggest using that config for the first steps.. then he = must add >>>>>> the additional tcp stacks and the hpts in order to get bbr/rack = and any other >>>>>> extra stack=E2=80=A6.=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> But I would suggest to build with his current config first and = once he has >>>>>> that in place and building >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> a) apply the patch >>>>>> b) add the extra kernel options >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> R >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:50 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Thats great idea Michael. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> =46rom the look fo the build log I was sent, his blow-up has = nothing to do >>>>>>> with the patches. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> He should probably >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> 1) Check out a fresh version of head. >>>>>>> 2) Follow the instructions in UPDATING to get a clean build. >>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make buildworld >>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf >>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make installkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> ** do the reboot and merge master ** >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Then after that he could >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> 3) Apply the current patch in the review >>>>>>> 4) do build that >>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf -DNO_CLEAN = -DNO_CLEANDIR >>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make install kernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> And he should have it all working :) >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I have done multiple builds with the latest head from yesterday = both with and without >>>>>>> the extra stacks and hpts.. and I can=E2=80=99t get a build = failure.. this would verify he can >>>>>>> at least build head.. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> R >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Michael Tuexen = wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 08:19, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> correcting a typo: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src >>>>>>>>> current revision: 352434 >>>>>>>> I suggest to build/install head first without any patches. = After that has worked, >>>>>>>> apply the patches you are interested in. That way it is easy to = separate generic >>>>>>>> build issues and issue specific to a patch. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. Pulled = it using >>>>>>>>>> yesterday: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try that. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> There have been several patches pre-this one that provide >>>>>>>>>> the infrastructure to support BBR. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will *not* = compile it. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of this = work.. so if you >>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>> to run BBR you need to run Head >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:26 PM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I had = applied the >>>>>>>>>> one you published Sep-10. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Following is what I have done: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> 2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> 3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src* >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> cd /usr/src; >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make buildworld buildkernel >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> [this is where make fails when patch is applied] >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I could try to build with your latest patch - please send me = a pointer. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:33 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Looking at your make file log I can=E2=80=99t really tell = what you are doing. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up=E2=80=A6 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Are you cross compiling? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I have done the old fashioned kernel make >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> i.e. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> cd src/sys/amd64/config >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> config headvm >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> cd ../compile/headvm >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I have done >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> cd src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dheadvm >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> And even >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> to make sure that the build works without bbr. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I attach my headvm config.. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> What exactly are you building and how? kernel config too = please? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> looking >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I was at 352408.. let me update and try it >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Hmm >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Did you get the patch I updated too this am? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and had = no issue.. >>>>>>>>>> there was >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> an issue with KTLS before the update though. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I don=E2=80=99t recognize what you have below there though=E2=80= =A6 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Got it - thank you! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. = Following is SVN >>>>>>>>>> info + make error mesg. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> #svnlite revision >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Path: . >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Relative URL: ^/head >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Revision: 352436 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Node Kind: directory >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Schedule: normal >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Author: jah >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep = 2019) >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------- snip >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo vdisk.llo = dev_net.llo >>>>>>>>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o = sack_filter.o >>>>>>>>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h >>>>>>>>>> opt_kern_tls.h >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rm: x86: is a directory >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:41 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Got it - thank you! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. = Following is SVN >>>>>>>>>> info + make error mesg. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I have also attached the entire build log...snippet is below >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> #svnlite revision >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Path: . >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Relative URL: ^/head >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Revision: 352436 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Node Kind: directory >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Schedule: normal >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Author: jah >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep = 2019) >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------- snip >>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo vdisk.llo = dev_net.llo >>>>>>>>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o = sack_filter.o >>>>>>>>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h >>>>>>>>>> opt_kern_tls.h >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rm: x86: is a directory >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> make: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:27 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux patches = do not have >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing pacing = into bbr. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is more = accurate than >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> either fq or the internal pacer :) >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Randall. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the kernel. = Would update on >>>>>>>>>> how it goes. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under = FreeBSD is >>>>>>>>>> compensated here? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a must-have? = Is that >>>>>>>>>> functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions highly = appreciated? >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> You should be able to compile it against the current head. I = re-doing that >>>>>>>>>> now (had an >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a backup). >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and = without BBR on >>>>>>>>>> whatever >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> was that rev.. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Looking in the commit logs that would have been around 352191 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for releasing BBR patch: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this is = based on? I >>>>>>>>>> would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't find = this info in >>>>>>>>>> the released patch. >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> ------ >>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> ------ >>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> ------ >>>> Randall Stewart >>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> ------ >>> Randall Stewart >>> rrs@netflix.com >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20 > ------ > Randall Stewart > rrs@netflix.com >=20 >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 21:28:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7776F133D1F for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:28:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@netflix.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46drl936h6z4b2S for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@netflix.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id q12so236552pff.9 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:28:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=FZdO0UeU2LMXz8XOXVXCj3RbgqW0KIgJSaUiQeP9C58=; b=FSM7EY6d0CKsrEegzRCVhnPNGOH5Y7+bmzRsZ1VWlRlNNZItfJR+7oLufoY/0HyjgA +p3SHck7HzT9jBkmLOgWvaDstZnyB+qfUE5eAB7EnaCtRrrmZNUuvC5IBPA7EBo2wBSo 6jbINuM1s3Rc/x6sbzrxHRV4XC05qEa7RMUP903G4byJjgKETddOUOtRyOtKO7ax8xyN Z/DvjtEIVMmEKLY+CKL5qQi9qs+SF32XWi/vUjGeV1nuv+3bJlYQ+Veme3mjZMbtk1mE aT7ESssSYJucDJyNurcNwDOJcHQpLz+viFiDzaP37KKPliQEXt6v+d0QKbrYoGhtWt8S xBtg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUy5232sODSsmQ69QCKTCi7IBVK+8/FK+JAOmC9ZNjNoWo/6qH nqgVp433N3kqu17sYYJzWYx5mw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw20n4RRPyjWbX4nlNJb4UV6BbEpY7Cs07C+MhxtqtX0F7jY8aJUIOwa6e48TWuKw/6+uw+xQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:505:: with SMTP id 5mr1378182pgf.297.1569446898845; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb10:7021:1::eb2d? ([2607:fb10:7021:1::eb2d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm24644pjn.24.2019.09.25.14.28.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: BBR patches? From: Randall Stewart In-Reply-To: <5B730D8C-D0CB-4CCF-94F2-E70A09BA8188@lurchi.franken.de> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:28:16 -0700 Cc: vm finance , freebsd-net , Jamie Landeg-Jones , Ryan Stone Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201909091232.x89CWl4b047025@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <27AD43DA-3237-490A-B3A6-C1792F9674E5@netflix.com> <5B630235-ABC7-4122-9082-F59BCCCDE14A@netflix.com> <84C20AED-44B1-4673-A29E-1A6FA61D8F27@netflix.com> <98E195A0-AFE2-4182-BE90-493E76A0DB1C@netflix.com> <9F3B0B5B-EF6A-42E1-99B8-9644DD0B39AB@netflix.com> <8474687C-8E5D-45F0-A3DE-0BF62ED2D28B@netflix.com> <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> <5B730D8C-D0CB-4CCF-94F2-E70A09BA8188@lurchi.franken.de> To: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_T=C3=BCxen?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46drl936h6z4b2S X-Spamd-Bar: -------------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-14.31 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netflix.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netflix.com,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netflix.com:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; WHITELIST_DMARC(-7.00)[netflix.com:D:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.81)[ip: (-9.20), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.61), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[netflix.com:d:+,netflix.com:s:+]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:28:22 -0000 Hmm yeah I missed that.. VM=E2=80=99s do not work well when intricate timing = is involved.. which it is in HPTS at least. I would definitely think about opening up rwnd=E2=80=99s as well I know = google mentioned this in there work with BBR (rwnd=E2=80=99s were too small both send and recv) R > On Sep 25, 2019, at 2:23 PM, Michael Tuexen = wrote: >=20 >> On 25. Sep 2019, at 22:41, Randall Stewart wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Sep 25, 2019, at 10:22 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>=20 >>> Hi Randall, Michael, >>>=20 >>> I'm trying to run some tests between FreeBSD BBR VM and another = CentOS VM but don't see BBR performing well. FreeBSD (iperf -c) is = transmitting to CentOS (iperf -s) >>>=20 >>> Enable BBR ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr) =3D> = 213Mb/s >>> [loaded tcp_bbr using "kldload tcp_bbr.ko"] >>>=20 >>> Enable FreeBSD ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd) = =3D> 271Mb/s >>>=20 >>> Questions: >>> 1. Is there a way to track BBR internals on a running system? >>=20 >> Yes, there is a tcp logging function that can be used to turn on = things. The other >> relevant question in this are: >>=20 >> 1) What is the RTT=20 >> 2) Do you know your bottleneck router buffer size >> 3) What are the rwnd=E2=80=99s in play here. >>=20 >> There are known issues with BBR when it faces a high BDP (lots of = buffers), new-reno >> or cubic will do better.=20 >>=20 >> One other thing is if you are running from a web browser (like we do = at NF) then simply >> setting default sysctl works but you have to restart the web browser = if its running. >>=20 >> If its just a simpler=20 >>=20 >> set sysctl >> start-perf=20 >>=20 >> Then that should work. >>=20 >>=20 >>> 2. Is "sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" sufficient to = turn BBR on? >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> See above. While the iperf is running you can do >>=20 >> sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_available >>=20 >> and you should see a count by bbr showing its being used. > .. and doing such measurements with VMs adds another set of = variables... I would do such > measurements in non VM setups. Except you really want to study the = impact of running in > VMs. But I think this is not what you want... >=20 > Best regards > Michael >>=20 >> R >>=20 >>> Any pointers highly appreciated. >>>=20 >>> Thanks a lot! >>>=20 >>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:42 AM Michael Tuexen = wrote: >>>> On 20. Sep 2019, at 06:52, vm finance = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Ok - kernel booted, I loaded the module and it loaded successfully = (kldstat shows tcp_bbr). >>>>=20 >>>> So if I want to compare results between bbr and default cc algo, I = just need to load/unload the bbr module - correct? >>>> Or is there another way to achieve that? >>> One option is that your test application supports choosing the TCP = stack and you compare "freebsd" with "bbr". >>> One tools which supports this is uperf and here is an example how to = select the (not existing anymore) >>> stack called "fastack"): = https://github.com/uperf/uperf/blob/master/workloads/tcp-freebsd-change-st= ack.xml >>>=20 >>> The other possibility is that you set your default TCP stack before = running your test app. You can so this >>> by executing >>> sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr >>> or >>> sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd >>> Then you test application can be TCP stack agnostic. >>>=20 >>> Best regards >>> Michael >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Please let me know. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks for all your help. >>>>=20 >>>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:26 AM vm finance = wrote: >>>> finally ;) I was able to build it after manually extracting = Makefile contents from patch. >>>> rebooting now ;) >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:12 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>> There should have been some in the patch. Tomorrow I can send you a = tar of the modules/tcp/bbr Dir.=20 >>>>=20 >>>> It=E2=80=99s similar to the rack setup if you can=E2=80=99t wait = and want to be adventurous=20 >>>>=20 >>>> R >>>>=20 >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>=20 >>>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> Hi Randall, >>>>=20 >>>> I already have tcp_bbr.h and bbr.c at ~sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/ >>>>=20 >>>> However, there is no "bbr" under sys/modules/tcp/. I created this = directory manually. >>>> Question: >>>> Which Makefile do I need to copy/move under sys/modules/tcp/bbr?=20 >>>> I see there are Makefile and Makefile.org under ~modules/tcp... >>>>=20 >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp # ls -R >>>> Makefile Makefile.orig bbr rack = tcpmd5 >>>> ./bbr: >>>>=20 >>>> ./rack: >>>> Makefile >>>>=20 >>>> ./tcpmd5: >>>> Makefile >>>>=20 >>>> Please let me know. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks for your help! >>>>=20 >>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>> Ahh.. Look in your directory. >>>>=20 >>>> You did not create the sub=E2=80=99dirs or put rack.c or bbr.c into = the right places >>>>=20 >>>> When you load the patch (which was updated Sept 17th and should be = different slightly) >>>> you will end up dropping a Makefile and bbr.c and tcp_bbr.h into = the local dir since >>>> for what every reason patch cannot figure out how to place it. >>>>=20 >>>> You must move=20 >>>>=20 >>>> bbr.c/tcp_bbr.h to -> sys/netinet/tcp_stacks >>>>=20 >>>> You must create >>>>=20 >>>> sys/modules/tcp/bbr >>>>=20 >>>> and=20 >>>>=20 >>>> place the make file under there (just like rack=E2=80=99s). >>>>=20 >>>> Do that and I think you will finally have it.. not sure why patch = is not able to >>>> put the new files in the right places :0 >>>>=20 >>>> R >>>>=20 >>>>> On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:42 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> Hello Randall, >>>>>=20 >>>>> I just retried it with headvm config that you had shared but still = see error while doing >>>>> "make cleandepend" >>>>>=20 >>>>> Any pointers highly appreciated. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks >>>>>=20 >>>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd65/compile/headvm # make cleandepend=20= >>>>> [...snip...] >>>>>=20 >>>>> =3D=3D=3D> sysvipc/sysvshm (obj) >>>>> = /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysv= shm created for /usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysvshm >>>>> =3D=3D=3D> tcp (obj) >>>>> =3D=3D=3D> tcp/bbr (obj) >>>>> cd: /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr: No such file or directory >>>>> *** Error code 2 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Stop. >>>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp >>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Stop. >>>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules >>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>=20 >>>>> Stop. >>>>> make: stopped in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm >>>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm #=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>=20 >>>>> I applied the patch available at:=20 >>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582?id=3D62213 >>>>> NOTE: This raw patch seems to be exactly the same as the one I = downloaded on Sep10...hope I'm not missing anything here... >>>>>=20 >>>>> I clicked on "download raw diff" and saved it to bbr_patch.diff = file on my local machine >>>>> Step 1: Apply PATCH: >>>>> cd /usr/src/sys >>>>> patch < bbr_patch.diff >>>>> Patch was applied successfully - no errors seen there. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Step 2: Update kernel config: >>>>> cp /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC = /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL=20 >>>>> Added three options to MYKERNEL (per ur email - I have also = attached the compile MYKERNEL file) >>>>> cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL >>>>> make cleandepend >>>>> =3D>This fails due to missing "bbr" under = /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/ >>>>> [pls find the attached log file for exact error] >>>>>=20 >>>>> make depend >>>>> =3D> This also fails due to missing "/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr" >>>>>=20 >>>>> STEP 3: >>>>> cd /usr/src/ >>>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL >>>>> This also fails due to prior errors in Step 2. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Please find MYKERNEL config file + error logs. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Many many thanks for taking time to help me through this! >>>>>=20 >>>>> PS: I did a make buildkernel without any KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL, and = that successfully finished. >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>> You can look in the config I sent.. but here is what >>>>> I have added to enable BBR and Rack to be built >>>>> ***** >>>>> makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=3D1 >>>>> options TCPHPTS=20 >>>>> options RATELIMIT >>>>> ****** >>>>>=20 >>>>> So you should >>>>> 1) Apply the current patch in phabricator >>>>> 2) edit your config and add the above three lines >>>>> 3) go to the src dir and type >>>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dmyconf >>>>>=20 >>>>> That should build and get you a kernel that will include bbr and = rack. You will >>>>> need to, after it boots up type >>>>>=20 >>>>> kldload tcp_bbr >>>>>=20 >>>>> or >>>>>=20 >>>>> kldload tcp_rack >>>>>=20 >>>>> To get the modules loaded >>>>>=20 >>>>> R >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 2:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hi Randall, Michael, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Build is done successfully. I would appreciate if you could share = config changes needed for BBR. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> My svn revision is: 352483 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>> awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.full export_syms = | xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.full >>>>>> objcopy --only-keep-debug zlib.ko.full zlib.ko.debug >>>>>> objcopy --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=3Dzlib.ko.debug = zlib.ko.full zlib.ko >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Sep 18 21:08:31 UTC = 2019 >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> Kernel(s) GENERIC built in 1972 seconds, ncpu: 4 >>>>>> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> Vishal. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>> I'm using amd64. I'd get back as soon as base build is complete. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:09 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>> To get bbr running you will need to change your kernel config. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Are you building i386 or amd64? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> After you have successfully did=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> 1) buildworld >>>>>> 2) buildkernel >>>>>> 3) installkernel >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> (you can look in UPDATING for instructions .. though the file is = long :D) >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> successfully let me know.. and then I will give you the tweaks = you need to add >>>>>> to the kerneconf. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> It won=E2=80=99t take as long to build because at that point you = can add in the >>>>>> NO_CLEAN NO_CLEANDIR options as well since you will have built = everything >>>>>> the first time >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> R >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 7:06 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> BTW, if you think I should be making any changes in configs, = please do let me know. >>>>>>> My goal is to build a freebsd image with BBR patches on x86 VM.=20= >>>>>>> Nothing fancy. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> thanks! >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:03 AM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks Randall, Michael, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I did "svn svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src" >>>>>>> and now doing "make buildworld buildkernel"=20 >>>>>>> [I didn't change anything in configs - just whatever are the = defaults] >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I would update as soon as its done. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Thanks again! >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>> One other note.. I notice his kernel conf he sent does not have >>>>>>> the right things to get BBR even to attempt to build. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I would suggest using that config for the first steps.. then he = must add >>>>>>> the additional tcp stacks and the hpts in order to get bbr/rack = and any other >>>>>>> extra stack=E2=80=A6.=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> But I would suggest to build with his current config first and = once he has >>>>>>> that in place and building >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> a) apply the patch >>>>>>> b) add the extra kernel options >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> R >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:50 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thats great idea Michael. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> =46rom the look fo the build log I was sent, his blow-up has = nothing to do >>>>>>>> with the patches. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> He should probably >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> 1) Check out a fresh version of head. >>>>>>>> 2) Follow the instructions in UPDATING to get a clean build. >>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make buildworld >>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf >>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make installkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> ** do the reboot and merge master ** >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Then after that he could >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> 3) Apply the current patch in the review >>>>>>>> 4) do build that >>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf -DNO_CLEAN = -DNO_CLEANDIR >>>>>>>> =E2=80=94 make install kernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> And he should have it all working :) >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> I have done multiple builds with the latest head from yesterday = both with and without >>>>>>>> the extra stacks and hpts.. and I can=E2=80=99t get a build = failure.. this would verify he can >>>>>>>> at least build head.. >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Michael Tuexen = wrote: >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 08:19, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> correcting a typo: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src >>>>>>>>>> current revision: 352434 >>>>>>>>> I suggest to build/install head first without any patches. = After that has worked, >>>>>>>>> apply the patches you are interested in. That way it is easy = to separate generic >>>>>>>>> build issues and issue specific to a patch. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>>> Michael >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> Thank you! >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. = Pulled it using >>>>>>>>>>> yesterday: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try that. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> There have been several patches pre-this one that provide >>>>>>>>>>> the infrastructure to support BBR. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will *not* = compile it. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of this = work.. so if you >>>>>>>>>>> want >>>>>>>>>>> to run BBR you need to run Head >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:26 PM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I = had applied the >>>>>>>>>>> one you published Sep-10. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Following is what I have done: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> 2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> 3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src* >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> cd /usr/src; >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make buildworld buildkernel >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> [this is where make fails when patch is applied] >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I could try to build with your latest patch - please send me = a pointer. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your help! >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:33 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Looking at your make file log I can=E2=80=99t really tell = what you are doing. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up=E2=80=A6 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Are you cross compiling? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I have done the old fashioned kernel make >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> i.e. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> cd src/sys/amd64/config >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> config headvm >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> cd ../compile/headvm >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I have done >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> cd src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dheadvm >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> And even >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> to make sure that the build works without bbr. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I attach my headvm config.. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> What exactly are you building and how? kernel config too = please? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> looking >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I was at 352408.. let me update and try it >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Hmm >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Did you get the patch I updated too this am? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and had = no issue.. >>>>>>>>>>> there was >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> an issue with KTLS before the update though. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I don=E2=80=99t recognize what you have below there = though=E2=80=A6 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Got it - thank you! >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. = Following is SVN >>>>>>>>>>> info + make error mesg. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> #svnlite revision >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Path: . >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Relative URL: ^/head >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Revision: 352436 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Node Kind: directory >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Schedule: normal >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Author: jah >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep = 2019) >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------- snip >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo vdisk.llo = dev_net.llo >>>>>>>>>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o = sack_filter.o >>>>>>>>>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h >>>>>>>>>>> opt_kern_tls.h >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rm: x86: is a directory >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:41 PM vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Got it - thank you! >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. = Following is SVN >>>>>>>>>>> info + make error mesg. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I have also attached the entire build log...snippet is below >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> #svnlite revision >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Path: . >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Relative URL: ^/head >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Revision: 352436 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Node Kind: directory >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Schedule: normal >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Author: jah >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep = 2019) >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------- snip >>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo vdisk.llo = dev_net.llo >>>>>>>>>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o = sack_filter.o >>>>>>>>>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h >>>>>>>>>>> opt_kern_tls.h >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rm: x86: is a directory >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> *** Error code 1 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Stop. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> make: stopped in /usr/src >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:27 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux patches = do not have >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing pacing = into bbr. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is more = accurate than >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> either fq or the internal pacer :) >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Randall. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the kernel. = Would update on >>>>>>>>>>> how it goes. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under = FreeBSD is >>>>>>>>>>> compensated here? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a must-have? = Is that >>>>>>>>>>> functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions highly = appreciated? >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> You should be able to compile it against the current head. I = re-doing that >>>>>>>>>>> now (had an >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a backup). >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and = without BBR on >>>>>>>>>>> whatever >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> was that rev.. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Looking in the commit logs that would have been around = 352191 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> R >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Randall, >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for releasing BBR patch: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this is = based on? I >>>>>>>>>>> would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't find = this info in >>>>>>>>>>> the released patch. >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot! >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone = wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> ------ >>>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> ------ >>>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> ------ >>>>> Randall Stewart >>>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> ------ >>>> Randall Stewart >>>> rrs@netflix.com >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> ------ >> Randall Stewart >> rrs@netflix.com ------ Randall Stewart rrs@netflix.com From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Sep 25 23:04:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA3F135DAD for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dtst1NDTz4gcB for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2D589135DAC; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1A5135DAB for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dtst0TbDz4gc8 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53A51EF43 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8PN4HRl074983 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8PN4Hll074980 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211106] [net][fib][loopback][route] loopback route added only to interface fib, even if net.add_addr_allfibs = 1 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: fullermd@over-yonder.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 23:04:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211106 fullermd@over-yonder.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fullermd@over-yonder.net --- Comment #1 from fullermd@over-yonder.net --- I just ran into this as well on stable/12. My best workaround is ${ipfw} add 10 fwd ::1 ip6 from me to me which does seem to work fine, though it's a little gross. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 01:27:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE169F05D1 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46dy344DLBz4p5K for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 91118F05C6; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DB0F05C5 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46dy343GmKz4p5J for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54538208AD for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q1RSSn080901 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q1RSdv080900 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240825] Vlan interfaces does not work on lagg from em0, em1 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 01:27:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240825 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 03:10:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE34F53C6 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vm.finance2@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f0Kz0FzGz3C5W for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vm.finance2@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id z19so2677122ior.0 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:10:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=592Q/VeISRBlAaeDWtEKZMSmAQa6b+t45ZdB5SHLJJo=; b=DTLmp0qi06rtlEv/+6ckVF+CD27vBgqDp6Yy9XAUoEZqCKGMrM6AVNEA74/F2lAOAr XrxWF2cAB6TWmMTAgRqY6312op6tmF9KjDpi6QwMPxONN+89jp7hRJb+OTn7aJh9ccoB FGOI56rnQYiTlAQbrutPANGwtspJUgWz3LBYwIWFZJCgT+DnuU1t112MODjVsoGi3qqs 1ET0378WOGehC3aCAvrSKQiQX9+OT9xnUM86lMrEv3tj6Kr5vYpq8aKIUY5qJbh+4Bq1 4+0TZxg29yi+ZpxgzfgB6OnbVGEUlRKSTrLpo13D3TcFxj5k/UmKol9zlefqLtxCuGDm iwYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=592Q/VeISRBlAaeDWtEKZMSmAQa6b+t45ZdB5SHLJJo=; b=Gjm8NCP0cd8TT/d3HnpXv0hW1ACaTY3JnSdPOOkNh/QWsIZpei+IW1NEWo9PNSKeEy i+QaXGhpQtfsYiGTeA5HlDdqVZxPWGk3B/ZchaCkan/Rv7YQGy+gIOO9SOG6OGBQP4/Z PxyW3yTHFFV8h8LHIVgUT0oDaJaMpp6H0sMWpniuH2/2mA3CX/0o1pdqCx/dLCClwSnB OuNzCok/I7Dxv8ntoXYJWAZ+huSSQaVzhJJ341RskOHKeX/zsnAXwSmRXogrPVBmhHvc qLEfAha3KRQykG6Q9PwBN1eDFYlv4kCikpj4xRynV2iGwTOqkIdBWBjpqniBnSp2Oy6w UM/g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUvdQkLhk98YfFY9ukelQ+3wvksMhf0Fy/CepZP6XDicTh9aLVh V3jwzQoqnyH+3jt8D5qvxXG3QlG2nAnmHRbz6XI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdj8W78qr6/YQF8cTthU9OzfgCDJlRQUK0g1qmQNlNPaE+80OUwqFSoRBHHGZ8SIo4S0xJqR/mOrXqbq2VY90= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:7a42:: with SMTP id k2mr1351903iop.303.1569467429398; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:10:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201909091232.x89CWl4b047025@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <27AD43DA-3237-490A-B3A6-C1792F9674E5@netflix.com> <5B630235-ABC7-4122-9082-F59BCCCDE14A@netflix.com> <84C20AED-44B1-4673-A29E-1A6FA61D8F27@netflix.com> <98E195A0-AFE2-4182-BE90-493E76A0DB1C@netflix.com> <9F3B0B5B-EF6A-42E1-99B8-9644DD0B39AB@netflix.com> <8474687C-8E5D-45F0-A3DE-0BF62ED2D28B@netflix.com> <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> In-Reply-To: <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> From: vm finance Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:10:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BBR patches? To: Randall Stewart Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_T=C3=BCxen?= , freebsd-net , Jamie Landeg-Jones , Ryan Stone X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46f0Kz0FzGz3C5W X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=DTLmp0qi; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vmfinance2@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vmfinance2@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-6.22), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.60), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:10:32 -0000 Hello Randall, #1: How do I turn on just TCP logging so I can dump more BBR stats and share? I'm new to freebsd so unable to find a way to enable this quickly. Sorry for this dump question. #2. I enabled sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" and see its i= n use while iperf test is running: net.inet.tcp.functions_available: Stack D Alias PCB coun= t freebsd freebsd 51 bbr * bbr 1 I would share the data on #1 as soon as I get debug logs on..pls share some pointers on how to turn TCP logging on. Many thanks! On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:41 PM Randall Stewart wrote: > > > > On Sep 25, 2019, at 10:22 AM, vm finance wrote: > > > > Hi Randall, Michael, > > > > I'm trying to run some tests between FreeBSD BBR VM and another CentOS > VM but don't see BBR performing well. FreeBSD (iperf -c) is transmitting = to > CentOS (iperf -s) > > > > Enable BBR ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr) =3D> 213M= b/s > > [loaded tcp_bbr using "kldload tcp_bbr.ko"] > > > > Enable FreeBSD ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd) = =3D> > 271Mb/s > > > > Questions: > > 1. Is there a way to track BBR internals on a running system? > > Yes, there is a tcp logging function that can be used to turn on things. > The other > relevant question in this are: > > 1) What is the RTT > 2) Do you know your bottleneck router buffer size > 3) What are the rwnd=E2=80=99s in play here. > > There are known issues with BBR when it faces a high BDP (lots of > buffers), new-reno > or cubic will do better. > > One other thing is if you are running from a web browser (like we do at > NF) then simply > setting default sysctl works but you have to restart the web browser if > its running. > > If its just a simpler > > set sysctl > start-perf > > Then that should work. > > > > 2. Is "sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" sufficient to tu= rn > BBR on? > > > > > See above. While the iperf is running you can do > > sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_available > > and you should see a count by bbr showing its being used. > > R > > > Any pointers highly appreciated. > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:42 AM Michael Tuexen < > michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > > > On 20. Sep 2019, at 06:52, vm finance wrote: > > > > > > Ok - kernel booted, I loaded the module and it loaded successfully > (kldstat shows tcp_bbr). > > > > > > So if I want to compare results between bbr and default cc algo, I > just need to load/unload the bbr module - correct? > > > Or is there another way to achieve that? > > One option is that your test application supports choosing the TCP stac= k > and you compare "freebsd" with "bbr". > > One tools which supports this is uperf and here is an example how to > select the (not existing anymore) > > stack called "fastack"): > https://github.com/uperf/uperf/blob/master/workloads/tcp-freebsd-change-s= tack.xml > > > > The other possibility is that you set your default TCP stack before > running your test app. You can so this > > by executing > > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr > > or > > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd > > Then you test application can be TCP stack agnostic. > > > > Best regards > > Michael > > > > > > > > Please let me know. > > > > > > Thanks for all your help. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:26 AM vm finance > wrote: > > > finally ;) I was able to build it after manually extracting Makefile > contents from patch. > > > rebooting now ;) > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:12 PM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > There should have been some in the patch. Tomorrow I can send you a > tar of the modules/tcp/bbr Dir. > > > > > > It=E2=80=99s similar to the rack setup if you can=E2=80=99t wait and = want to be > adventurous > > > > > > R > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:31 PM, vm finance wrote= : > > > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > I already have tcp_bbr.h and bbr.c at ~sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/ > > > > > > However, there is no "bbr" under sys/modules/tcp/. I created this > directory manually. > > > Question: > > > Which Makefile do I need to copy/move under sys/modules/tcp/bbr? > > > I see there are Makefile and Makefile.org under ~modules/tcp... > > > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp # ls -R > > > Makefile Makefile.orig bbr rack tcpmd= 5 > > > ./bbr: > > > > > > ./rack: > > > Makefile > > > > > > ./tcpmd5: > > > Makefile > > > > > > Please let me know. > > > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > Ahh.. Look in your directory. > > > > > > You did not create the sub=E2=80=99dirs or put rack.c or bbr.c into t= he right > places > > > > > > When you load the patch (which was updated Sept 17th and should be > different slightly) > > > you will end up dropping a Makefile and bbr.c and tcp_bbr.h into the > local dir since > > > for what every reason patch cannot figure out how to place it. > > > > > > You must move > > > > > > bbr.c/tcp_bbr.h to -> sys/netinet/tcp_stacks > > > > > > You must create > > > > > > sys/modules/tcp/bbr > > > > > > and > > > > > > place the make file under there (just like rack=E2=80=99s). > > > > > > Do that and I think you will finally have it.. not sure why patch is > not able to > > > put the new files in the right places :0 > > > > > > R > > > > > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:42 AM, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Randall, > > > > > > > > I just retried it with headvm config that you had shared but still > see error while doing > > > > "make cleandepend" > > > > > > > > Any pointers highly appreciated. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd65/compile/headvm # make cleandepend > > > > [...snip...] > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D> sysvipc/sysvshm (obj) > > > > > /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sys= vshm > created for /usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysvshm > > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp (obj) > > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp/bbr (obj) > > > > cd: /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr: No such file or directory > > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > > > Stop. > > > > make: stopped in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm # > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM vm finance > wrote: > > > > Hi Randall, > > > > > > > > I applied the patch available at: > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582?id=3D62213 > > > > NOTE: This raw patch seems to be exactly the same as the one I > downloaded on Sep10...hope I'm not missing anything here... > > > > > > > > I clicked on "download raw diff" and saved it to bbr_patch.diff fil= e > on my local machine > > > > Step 1: Apply PATCH: > > > > cd /usr/src/sys > > > > patch < bbr_patch.diff > > > > Patch was applied successfully - no errors seen there. > > > > > > > > Step 2: Update kernel config: > > > > cp /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL > > > > Added three options to MYKERNEL (per ur email - I have also attache= d > the compile MYKERNEL file) > > > > cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL > > > > make cleandepend > > > > =3D>This fails due to missing "bbr" under /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/ > > > > [pls find the attached log file for exact error] > > > > > > > > make depend > > > > =3D> This also fails due to missing "/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr" > > > > > > > > STEP 3: > > > > cd /usr/src/ > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL > > > > This also fails due to prior errors in Step 2. > > > > > > > > Please find MYKERNEL config file + error logs. > > > > > > > > Many many thanks for taking time to help me through this! > > > > > > > > PS: I did a make buildkernel without any KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL, and t= hat > successfully finished. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > You can look in the config I sent.. but here is what > > > > I have added to enable BBR and Rack to be built > > > > ***** > > > > makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=3D1 > > > > options TCPHPTS > > > > options RATELIMIT > > > > ****** > > > > > > > > So you should > > > > 1) Apply the current patch in phabricator > > > > 2) edit your config and add the above three lines > > > > 3) go to the src dir and type > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dmyconf > > > > > > > > That should build and get you a kernel that will include bbr and > rack. You will > > > > need to, after it boots up type > > > > > > > > kldload tcp_bbr > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > kldload tcp_rack > > > > > > > > To get the modules loaded > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 2:31 PM, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Randall, Michael, > > > > > > > > > > Build is done successfully. I would appreciate if you could share > config changes needed for BBR. > > > > > > > > > > My svn revision is: 352483 > > > > > > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.full export_syms = | > xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.full > > > > > objcopy --only-keep-debug zlib.ko.full zlib.ko.debug > > > > > objcopy --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=3Dzlib.ko.debug > zlib.ko.full zlib.ko > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Sep 18 21:08:31 UTC > 2019 > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>> Kernel(s) GENERIC built in 1972 seconds, ncpu: 4 > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > Vishal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM vm finance > wrote: > > > > > I'm using amd64. I'd get back as soon as base build is complete. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:09 AM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > To get bbr running you will need to change your kernel config. > > > > > > > > > > Are you building i386 or amd64? > > > > > > > > > > After you have successfully did > > > > > > > > > > 1) buildworld > > > > > 2) buildkernel > > > > > 3) installkernel > > > > > > > > > > (you can look in UPDATING for instructions .. though the file is > long :D) > > > > > > > > > > successfully let me know.. and then I will give you the tweaks yo= u > need to add > > > > > to the kerneconf. > > > > > > > > > > It won=E2=80=99t take as long to build because at that point you = can add > in the > > > > > NO_CLEAN NO_CLEANDIR options as well since you will have built > everything > > > > > the first time > > > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 7:06 AM, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW, if you think I should be making any changes in configs, > please do let me know. > > > > > > My goal is to build a freebsd image with BBR patches on x86 VM. > > > > > > Nothing fancy. > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:03 AM vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Randall, Michael, > > > > > > > > > > > > I did "svn svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src" > > > > > > and now doing "make buildworld buildkernel" > > > > > > [I didn't change anything in configs - just whatever are the > defaults] > > > > > > > > > > > > I would update as soon as its done. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks again! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > > One other note.. I notice his kernel conf he sent does not have > > > > > > the right things to get BBR even to attempt to build. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would suggest using that config for the first steps.. then he > must add > > > > > > the additional tcp stacks and the hpts in order to get bbr/rack > and any other > > > > > > extra stack=E2=80=A6. > > > > > > > > > > > > But I would suggest to build with his current config first and > once he has > > > > > > that in place and building > > > > > > > > > > > > a) apply the patch > > > > > > b) add the extra kernel options > > > > > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:50 AM, Randall Stewart > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats great idea Michael. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From the look fo the build log I was sent, his blow-up has > nothing to do > > > > > > > with the patches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He should probably > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Check out a fresh version of head. > > > > > > > 2) Follow the instructions in UPDATING to get a clean build. > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildworld > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make installkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** do the reboot and merge master ** > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then after that he could > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Apply the current patch in the review > > > > > > > 4) do build that > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf -DNO_CLE= AN > -DNO_CLEANDIR > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make install kernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And he should have it all working :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have done multiple builds with the latest head from > yesterday both with and without > > > > > > > the extra stacks and hpts.. and I can=E2=80=99t get a build f= ailure.. > this would verify he can > > > > > > > at least build head.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > R > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Michael Tuexen < > michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 08:19, vm finance > wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> correcting a typo: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src > > > > > > >>> current revision: 352434 > > > > > > >> I suggest to build/install head first without any patches. > After that has worked, > > > > > > >> apply the patches you are interested in. That way it is easy > to separate generic > > > > > > >> build issues and issue specific to a patch. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Best regards > > > > > > >> Michael > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>>> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. > Pulled it using > > > > > > >>>> yesterday: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try that= . > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> There have been several patches pre-this one that provide > > > > > > >>>> the infrastructure to support BBR. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will *not* > compile it. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of this > work.. so if you > > > > > > >>>> want > > > > > > >>>> to run BBR you need to run Head > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:26 PM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. I > had applied the > > > > > > >>>> one you published Sep-10. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Following is what I have done: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> 2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> 3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src* > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> cd /usr/src; > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make buildworld buildkernel > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> [this is where make fails when patch is applied] > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I could try to build with your latest patch - please send > me a pointer. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks for your help! > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:33 PM Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Looking at your make file log I can=E2=80=99t really tell = what you > are doing. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up=E2=80=A6 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Are you cross compiling? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I have done the old fashioned kernel make > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> i.e. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> cd src/sys/amd64/config > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> config headvm > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> cd ../compile/headvm > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I have done > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> cd src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dheadvm > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> And even > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> to make sure that the build works without bbr. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I attach my headvm config.. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> What exactly are you building and how? kernel config too > please? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> looking > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I was at 352408.. let me update and try it > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Hmm > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Did you get the patch I updated too this am? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and ha= d > no issue.. > > > > > > >>>> there was > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> an issue with KTLS before the update though. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I don=E2=80=99t recognize what you have below there though= =E2=80=A6 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. > Following is SVN > > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep > 2019) > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo > vdisk.llo dev_net.llo > > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o > sack_filter.o > > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h > opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:41 PM vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an error. > Following is SVN > > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I have also attached the entire build log...snippet is bel= ow > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 Sep > 2019) > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo > vdisk.llo dev_net.llo > > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld bbr.o > sack_filter.o > > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h > opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:27 PM Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux patche= s > do not have > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing pacing > into bbr. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is > more accurate than > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> either fq or the internal pacer :) > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks Randall. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the kernel. > Would update on > > > > > > >>>> how it goes. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq under > FreeBSD is > > > > > > >>>> compensated here? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a must-have= ? > Is that > > > > > > >>>> functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions highly > appreciated? > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart < > rrs@netflix.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> You should be able to compile it against the current head. > I re-doing that > > > > > > >>>> now (had an > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a backup)= . > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with and > without BBR on > > > > > > >>>> whatever > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> was that rev.. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Looking in the commit logs that would have been around > 352191 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Hope that helps > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance < > vm.finance2@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks for releasing BBR patch: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag this i= s > based on? I > > > > > > >>>> would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't fin= d > this info in > > > > > > >>>> the released patch. > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot! > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone < > rysto32@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > Randall Stewart > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > Randall Stewart > rrs@netflix.com > > > > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 03:16:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7100F5C07 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@netflix.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f0Sh5Vqvz3CdJ for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@netflix.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id u12so386562pls.12 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8P2mjQpKulmWJEzQ7yIAmxVZb6Zna1+WCGD1iNa9vVo=; b=KqH24x1pJm5LFw1W+hGv+nGQcHs3fPYwGzZhHzahU4HoqI4SI82gpKJIpvX73JJpwn qpUD7UcbxG4zyzhPz+0YwD1kA4DSFdJ1zmMZi61SD2c5KM5ueSRPGnpuM8CC2oC27vi6 2Kb7MJ2RDWPGINovo0Ew3kYVSAhE/rLol3PEbNlKnRsXBQSuiRviaZlAJ7Hs6VBdBbd9 b8wSMky0Hxfx2nnfLQ4/H90ywBu9rkG5QKsBlDm94yRoBKl6y3yfp/j8SY1/k/bqw8w6 KBsL0qHYZ3J/rnE+vERIOVhSM5fm2OEnVtfh/DrYePBYMPbanF11/5R1E2OpoapuFkvV 7ivA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVrwNkTIllUxYKILUeFNSw2Cmu1K6puPJREb51gTtyph1QKtTZo Q8UqyDTwU2ZFzHpVkqgt+NDUoKnaveg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyhyAjYcv9gX7hWRUzew9P9Q8iTz7uaT4JwAHHvTCDYkesj/J/nh2652gMdueg9BPHp1E6huw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bc43:: with SMTP id t3mr1525119plz.264.1569467778682; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb10:7021:1::eb2d? ([2607:fb10:7021:1::eb2d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r21sm452263pgm.78.2019.09.25.20.16.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: BBR patches? From: Randall Stewart In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:16:15 -0700 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_T=C3=BCxen?= , freebsd-net , Jamie Landeg-Jones , Ryan Stone Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0238452A-1010-4A8E-AC2A-2B87D2F7481E@netflix.com> References: <201909091232.x89CWl4b047025@donotpassgo.dyslexicfish.net> <27AD43DA-3237-490A-B3A6-C1792F9674E5@netflix.com> <5B630235-ABC7-4122-9082-F59BCCCDE14A@netflix.com> <84C20AED-44B1-4673-A29E-1A6FA61D8F27@netflix.com> <98E195A0-AFE2-4182-BE90-493E76A0DB1C@netflix.com> <9F3B0B5B-EF6A-42E1-99B8-9644DD0B39AB@netflix.com> <8474687C-8E5D-45F0-A3DE-0BF62ED2D28B@netflix.com> <79E10B99-7BD2-4D37-B1B3-49FB13923058@netflix.com> To: vm finance X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46f0Sh5Vqvz3CdJ X-Spamd-Bar: -------------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-14.32 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netflix.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netflix.com,reject]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netflix.com:s=google]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; WHITELIST_DMARC(-7.00)[netflix.com:D:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.82)[ip: (-9.29), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.60), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; WHITELIST_SPF_DKIM(-3.00)[netflix.com:d:+,netflix.com:s:+]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:16:21 -0000 I will have to send you a program that you can compile.. it uses the TCP = logging device to pull data.. I will send you details just to you tomorrow (getting late here for me) R > On Sep 25, 2019, at 8:10 PM, vm finance wrote: >=20 > Hello Randall, >=20 > #1: How do I turn on just TCP logging so I can dump more BBR stats and = share? > I'm new to freebsd so unable to find a way to enable this quickly. = Sorry for this dump question. >=20 > #2. I enabled sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" and see = its in use while iperf test is running: > net.inet.tcp.functions_available:=20 > Stack D Alias PCB = count > freebsd freebsd 51 > bbr * bbr 1 >=20 > I would share the data on #1 as soon as I get debug logs on..pls share = some pointers on how to turn TCP logging on. >=20 > Many thanks! >=20 > On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 1:41 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: >=20 >=20 > > On Sep 25, 2019, at 10:22 AM, vm finance = wrote: > >=20 > > Hi Randall, Michael, > >=20 > > I'm trying to run some tests between FreeBSD BBR VM and another = CentOS VM but don't see BBR performing well. FreeBSD (iperf -c) is = transmitting to CentOS (iperf -s) > >=20 > > Enable BBR ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr) =3D> = 213Mb/s > > [loaded tcp_bbr using "kldload tcp_bbr.ko"] > >=20 > > Enable FreeBSD ( sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd) = =3D> 271Mb/s > >=20 > > Questions: > > 1. Is there a way to track BBR internals on a running system? >=20 > Yes, there is a tcp logging function that can be used to turn on = things. The other > relevant question in this are: >=20 > 1) What is the RTT=20 > 2) Do you know your bottleneck router buffer size > 3) What are the rwnd=E2=80=99s in play here. >=20 > There are known issues with BBR when it faces a high BDP (lots of = buffers), new-reno > or cubic will do better.=20 >=20 > One other thing is if you are running from a web browser (like we do = at NF) then simply > setting default sysctl works but you have to restart the web browser = if its running. >=20 > If its just a simpler=20 >=20 > set sysctl > start-perf=20 >=20 > Then that should work. >=20 >=20 > > 2. Is "sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr" sufficient to = turn BBR on? > >=20 >=20 >=20 > See above. While the iperf is running you can do >=20 > sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_available >=20 > and you should see a count by bbr showing its being used. >=20 > R >=20 > > Any pointers highly appreciated. > >=20 > > Thanks a lot! > >=20 > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 2:42 AM Michael Tuexen = wrote: > > > On 20. Sep 2019, at 06:52, vm finance = wrote: > > >=20 > > > Ok - kernel booted, I loaded the module and it loaded successfully = (kldstat shows tcp_bbr). > > >=20 > > > So if I want to compare results between bbr and default cc algo, I = just need to load/unload the bbr module - correct? > > > Or is there another way to achieve that? > > One option is that your test application supports choosing the TCP = stack and you compare "freebsd" with "bbr". > > One tools which supports this is uperf and here is an example how to = select the (not existing anymore) > > stack called "fastack"): = https://github.com/uperf/uperf/blob/master/workloads/tcp-freebsd-change-st= ack.xml > >=20 > > The other possibility is that you set your default TCP stack before = running your test app. You can so this > > by executing > > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dbbr > > or > > sudo sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.functions_default=3Dfreebsd > > Then you test application can be TCP stack agnostic. > >=20 > > Best regards > > Michael > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Please let me know. > > >=20 > > > Thanks for all your help. > > >=20 > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 4:26 AM vm finance = wrote: > > > finally ;) I was able to build it after manually extracting = Makefile contents from patch. > > > rebooting now ;) > > >=20 > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 8:12 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > There should have been some in the patch. Tomorrow I can send you = a tar of the modules/tcp/bbr Dir.=20 > > >=20 > > > It=E2=80=99s similar to the rack setup if you can=E2=80=99t wait = and want to be adventurous=20 > > >=20 > > > R > > >=20 > > > Sent from my iPhone > > >=20 > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 7:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: > > >=20 > > > Hi Randall, > > >=20 > > > I already have tcp_bbr.h and bbr.c at ~sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/ > > >=20 > > > However, there is no "bbr" under sys/modules/tcp/. I created this = directory manually. > > > Question: > > > Which Makefile do I need to copy/move under sys/modules/tcp/bbr?=20= > > > I see there are Makefile and Makefile.org under ~modules/tcp... > > >=20 > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp # ls -R > > > Makefile Makefile.orig bbr rack = tcpmd5 > > > ./bbr: > > >=20 > > > ./rack: > > > Makefile > > >=20 > > > ./tcpmd5: > > > Makefile > > >=20 > > > Please let me know. > > >=20 > > > Thanks for your help! > > >=20 > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 11:05 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > Ahh.. Look in your directory. > > >=20 > > > You did not create the sub=E2=80=99dirs or put rack.c or bbr.c = into the right places > > >=20 > > > When you load the patch (which was updated Sept 17th and should be = different slightly) > > > you will end up dropping a Makefile and bbr.c and tcp_bbr.h into = the local dir since > > > for what every reason patch cannot figure out how to place it. > > >=20 > > > You must move=20 > > >=20 > > > bbr.c/tcp_bbr.h to -> sys/netinet/tcp_stacks > > >=20 > > > You must create > > >=20 > > > sys/modules/tcp/bbr > > >=20 > > > and=20 > > >=20 > > > place the make file under there (just like rack=E2=80=99s). > > >=20 > > > Do that and I think you will finally have it.. not sure why patch = is not able to > > > put the new files in the right places :0 > > >=20 > > > R > > >=20 > > > > On Sep 19, 2019, at 10:42 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > >=20 > > > > Hello Randall, > > > >=20 > > > > I just retried it with headvm config that you had shared but = still see error while doing > > > > "make cleandepend" > > > >=20 > > > > Any pointers highly appreciated. > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks > > > >=20 > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd65/compile/headvm # make = cleandepend=20 > > > > [...snip...] > > > >=20 > > > > =3D=3D=3D> sysvipc/sysvshm (obj) > > > > = /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm/modules/usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysv= shm created for /usr/src/sys/modules/sysvipc/sysvshm > > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp (obj) > > > > =3D=3D=3D> tcp/bbr (obj) > > > > cd: /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr: No such file or directory > > > > *** Error code 2 > > > >=20 > > > > Stop. > > > > make[2]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > >=20 > > > > Stop. > > > > make[1]: stopped in /usr/src/sys/modules > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > >=20 > > > > Stop. > > > > make: stopped in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm > > > > root@osboxes:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/headvm #=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 11:08 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > Hi Randall, > > > >=20 > > > > I applied the patch available at:=20 > > > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582?id=3D62213 > > > > NOTE: This raw patch seems to be exactly the same as the one I = downloaded on Sep10...hope I'm not missing anything here... > > > >=20 > > > > I clicked on "download raw diff" and saved it to bbr_patch.diff = file on my local machine > > > > Step 1: Apply PATCH: > > > > cd /usr/src/sys > > > > patch < bbr_patch.diff > > > > Patch was applied successfully - no errors seen there. > > > >=20 > > > > Step 2: Update kernel config: > > > > cp /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC = /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/MYKERNEL=20 > > > > Added three options to MYKERNEL (per ur email - I have also = attached the compile MYKERNEL file) > > > > cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/MYKERNEL > > > > make cleandepend > > > > =3D>This fails due to missing "bbr" under = /usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/ > > > > [pls find the attached log file for exact error] > > > >=20 > > > > make depend > > > > =3D> This also fails due to missing = "/usr/src/sys/modules/tcp/bbr" > > > >=20 > > > > STEP 3: > > > > cd /usr/src/ > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL > > > > This also fails due to prior errors in Step 2. > > > >=20 > > > > Please find MYKERNEL config file + error logs. > > > >=20 > > > > Many many thanks for taking time to help me through this! > > > >=20 > > > > PS: I did a make buildkernel without any KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL, = and that successfully finished. > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 12:19 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > You can look in the config I sent.. but here is what > > > > I have added to enable BBR and Rack to be built > > > > ***** > > > > makeoptions WITH_EXTRA_TCP_STACKS=3D1 > > > > options TCPHPTS=20 > > > > options RATELIMIT > > > > ****** > > > >=20 > > > > So you should > > > > 1) Apply the current patch in phabricator > > > > 2) edit your config and add the above three lines > > > > 3) go to the src dir and type > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dmyconf > > > >=20 > > > > That should build and get you a kernel that will include bbr and = rack. You will > > > > need to, after it boots up type > > > >=20 > > > > kldload tcp_bbr > > > >=20 > > > > or > > > >=20 > > > > kldload tcp_rack > > > >=20 > > > > To get the modules loaded > > > >=20 > > > > R > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 2:31 PM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > >=20 > > > > > Hi Randall, Michael, > > > > >=20 > > > > > Build is done successfully. I would appreciate if you could = share config changes needed for BBR. > > > > >=20 > > > > > My svn revision is: 352483 > > > > >=20 > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > > awk -f /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.ko.full = export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.ko.full > > > > > objcopy --only-keep-debug zlib.ko.full zlib.ko.debug > > > > > objcopy --strip-debug --add-gnu-debuglink=3Dzlib.ko.debug = zlib.ko.full zlib.ko > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Sep 18 21:08:31 = UTC 2019 > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > >>> Kernel(s) GENERIC built in 1972 seconds, ncpu: 4 > > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thank you > > > > > Vishal. > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 3:34 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > I'm using amd64. I'd get back as soon as base build is = complete. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Thanks! > > > > >=20 > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:09 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > To get bbr running you will need to change your kernel config. > > > > >=20 > > > > > Are you building i386 or amd64? > > > > >=20 > > > > > After you have successfully did=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > 1) buildworld > > > > > 2) buildkernel > > > > > 3) installkernel > > > > >=20 > > > > > (you can look in UPDATING for instructions .. though the file = is long :D) > > > > >=20 > > > > > successfully let me know.. and then I will give you the tweaks = you need to add > > > > > to the kerneconf. > > > > >=20 > > > > > It won=E2=80=99t take as long to build because at that point = you can add in the > > > > > NO_CLEAN NO_CLEANDIR options as well since you will have built = everything > > > > > the first time > > > > >=20 > > > > > R > > > > >=20 > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 7:06 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > BTW, if you think I should be making any changes in configs, = please do let me know. > > > > > > My goal is to build a freebsd image with BBR patches on x86 = VM.=20 > > > > > > Nothing fancy. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 7:03 AM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Randall, Michael, > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I did "svn svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src" > > > > > > and now doing "make buildworld buildkernel"=20 > > > > > > [I didn't change anything in configs - just whatever are the = defaults] > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I would update as soon as its done. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks again! > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > One other note.. I notice his kernel conf he sent does not = have > > > > > > the right things to get BBR even to attempt to build. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I would suggest using that config for the first steps.. then = he must add > > > > > > the additional tcp stacks and the hpts in order to get = bbr/rack and any other > > > > > > extra stack=E2=80=A6.=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > But I would suggest to build with his current config first = and once he has > > > > > > that in place and building > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > a) apply the patch > > > > > > b) add the extra kernel options > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > R > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:50 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Thats great idea Michael. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > =46rom the look fo the build log I was sent, his blow-up = has nothing to do > > > > > > > with the patches. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > He should probably > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > 1) Check out a fresh version of head. > > > > > > > 2) Follow the instructions in UPDATING to get a clean = build. > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildworld > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make installkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis-conf > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > ** do the reboot and merge master ** > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > Then after that he could > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > 3) Apply the current patch in the review > > > > > > > 4) do build that > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf = -DNO_CLEAN -DNO_CLEANDIR > > > > > > > =E2=80=94 make install kernel KERNCONF=3Dhis_conf > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > And he should have it all working :) > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > I have done multiple builds with the latest head from = yesterday both with and without > > > > > > > the extra stacks and hpts.. and I can=E2=80=99t get a = build failure.. this would verify he can > > > > > > > at least build head.. > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > R > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >> On Sep 18, 2019, at 12:10 AM, Michael Tuexen = wrote: > > > > > > >>=20 > > > > > > >>> On 18. Sep 2019, at 08:19, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > > >>> correcting a typo: > > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > > >>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src > > > > > > >>> current revision: 352434 > > > > > > >> I suggest to build/install head first without any = patches. After that has worked, > > > > > > >> apply the patches you are interested in. That way it is = easy to separate generic > > > > > > >> build issues and issue specific to a patch. > > > > > > >>=20 > > > > > > >> Best regards > > > > > > >> Michael > > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > > >>> Thank you! > > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > > >>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:11 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Actually I am on head already as mentioned previously. = Pulled it using > > > > > > >>>> yesterday: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /use/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> If you could pls let me know the new patch, I can try = that. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On 18-Sep-2019, at 8:56 AM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> There have been several patches pre-this one that = provide > > > > > > >>>> the infrastructure to support BBR. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Release 12.0 will *not* have these patches and will = *not* compile it. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I have no intention at this point in doing a MFC of = this work.. so if you > > > > > > >>>> want > > > > > > >>>> to run BBR you need to run Head > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 7:26 PM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Could you please provide a pointer to the latest patch. = I had applied the > > > > > > >>>> one you published Sep-10. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Following is what I have done: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> 1. Picked FreeBSD 12.0 RELEASE VM from osboxes.org > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> 2. Got VM up under VMPlayer on x86 laptop > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> 3. Checked out latest codebase from freebsd repo: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head /usr/src* > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> cd /usr/src; > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make buildworld buildkernel > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> [this is where make fails when patch is applied] > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I could try to build with your latest patch - please = send me a pointer. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks for your help! > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 1:33 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Looking at your make file log I can=E2=80=99t really = tell what you are doing. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Its not the BBR or Rack code that is blowing up=E2=80=A6 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Are you cross compiling? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I have done the old fashioned kernel make > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> i.e. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> cd src/sys/amd64/config > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> config headvm > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> cd ../compile/headvm > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make cleandepend ; make depend; make -j3 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I have done > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> cd src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3Dheadvm > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> And even > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DGENERIC > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> to make sure that the build works without bbr. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I attach my headvm config.. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> What exactly are you building and how? kernel config = too please? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> looking > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I was at 352408.. let me update and try it > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 1:10 PM, Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Hmm > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Did you get the patch I updated too this am? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I have built it both with and without the bbr stack and = had no issue.. > > > > > > >>>> there was > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> an issue with KTLS before the update though. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I don=E2=80=99t recognize what you have below there = though=E2=80=A6 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:47 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an = error. Following is SVN > > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 = Sep 2019) > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo = vdisk.llo dev_net.llo > > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld = bbr.o sack_filter.o > > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:41 PM vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Got it - thank you! > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> btw, I tried to build the patch but its giving an = error. Following is SVN > > > > > > >>>> info + make error mesg. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I have also attached the entire build log...snippet is = below > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Please let me know what am I missing here? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks! > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> #svnlite revision > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Path: . > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Relative URL: ^/head > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Revision: 352436 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Node Kind: directory > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Schedule: normal > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Author: jah > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Rev: 352434 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Last Changed Date: 2019-09-17 03:39:31 +0000 (Tue, 17 = Sep 2019) > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> root@osboxes:/usr/src # > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> -------------------------------------------- snip > > > > > > >>>> ---------------------------- > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ad_elf64_obj.llo reloc_elf64.llo disk.llo part.llo = vdisk.llo dev_net.llo > > > > > > >>>> bcache.llo interp_simple.llo zfs_cmd.llo > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rm -f .depend .depend.* GPATH GRTAGS GSYMS GTAGS > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> =3D=3D=3D> sys (cleandir) > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rm -f export_syms machine x86 tcp_bbr.ko tcp_bbr.kld = bbr.o sack_filter.o > > > > > > >>>> rack_bbr_common.o opt_inet.h opt_inet6.h opt_ipsec.h = opt_tcpdebug.h > > > > > > >>>> opt_kern_tls.h > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rm: x86: is a directory > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make[3]: stopped in /usr/src/sys > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make[2]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make[1]: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> *** Error code 1 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Stop. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:27 PM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Pacing is provided by tcp_hpts.c. The current linux = patches do not have > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> to have fq.. they built an alternate means of doing = pacing into bbr. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> In either case our testing has shown that our pacing is = more accurate than > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> either fq or the internal pacer :) > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:05 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks Randall. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> I was able to apply the patch - now rebuilding the = kernel. Would update on > > > > > > >>>> how it goes. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> BTW, is there any description on how lack of tc_fq = under FreeBSD is > > > > > > >>>> compensated here? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> The original BBR patches on Linux show that as a = must-have? Is that > > > > > > >>>> functionality implemented via tcp_ratelimit.[ch]? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Any pointers to existing presentations/discussions = highly appreciated? > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 5:39 AM Randall Stewart = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> You should be able to compile it against the current = head. I re-doing that > > > > > > >>>> now (had an > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> issue with my machine and had to roll it back to a = backup). > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> When I put the patch up on Sept 10th it complied with = and without BBR on > > > > > > >>>> whatever > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> was that rev.. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Looking in the commit logs that would have been around = 352191 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Hope that helps > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> R > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Sep 17, 2019, at 3:32 AM, vm finance = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Hi Randall, > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks for releasing BBR patch: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582#change-xcAWBif3E9Jq > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Could you please let me know what SVN/GIT label tag = this is based on? I > > > > > > >>>> would like to patch and experiment with it. I couldn't = find this info in > > > > > > >>>> the released patch. > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Thanks a lot! > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:26 AM Ryan Stone = wrote: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rrs@ has just posted the BBR patch to phabricator: > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21582 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>> ------ > > > > > > >>>> Randall Stewart > > > > > > >>>> rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>>>=20 > > > > > > >>> _______________________________________________ > > > > > > >>> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > > >>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > > > > > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > > ------ > > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > ------ > > > > Randall Stewart > > > > rrs@netflix.com > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > ------ > > > Randall Stewart > > > rrs@netflix.com > > >=20 > > >=20 > > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > ------ > Randall Stewart > rrs@netflix.com >=20 >=20 >=20 ------ Randall Stewart rrs@netflix.com From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 04:20:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8657CF78F5 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f1v52zRkz3Gch for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6632EF78F3; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65F6AF78F2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f1v523BTz3Gcg for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B0D222889 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q4KnOF048047 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q4Kn0e048046 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240825] Vlan interfaces does not work on lagg from em0, em1 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 04:20:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240825 Eugene Grosbein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open CC| |eugen@freebsd.org, | |gallatin@FreeBSD.org, | |jhb@FreeBSD.org, | |mav@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Eugene Grosbein --- >From console.log at boot time: lagg0.11: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu= 1496 options=3D403 ether 00:e0:81:ba:ad:90 inet xx.xx.170.82 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast xx.xx.170.95 groups: vlan vlan: 11 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: lagg0 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active nd6 options=3D29 mtu=3D1496 for lagg0.11 (while mtu=3D1500 for lagg0) means that vlan was cr= eated while lagg0 had no registered members with hardware vlan support. This is v= ery strange. It looks like some race condition at boot time between internal lagg configuration and another ifconfig process creating vlan over lagg. Adding CC: for some people that worked with lagg(4) code recently. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 08:36:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45462FE62D for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f7ZN10kZz3y6G for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 22312FE62C; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E7AFE62B for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f7ZN05c0z3y6D for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4DB257D4 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q8ahYU052113 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q8ahss052112 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: aleksandr.fedorov@itglobal.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:36:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 Aleksandr Fedorov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |aleksandr.fedorov@itglobal. | |com --- Comment #3 from Aleksandr Fedorov --- What do you think about submitting this patch to the phabricator? https://reviews.freebsd.org/ https://wiki.freebsd.org/Phabricator --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 08:52:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AABABFEDA0 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f7w245Qkz3yym for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8C437FED9F; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C035FED9E for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f7w238FQz3yyl for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508A625A34 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q8q2EY091102 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q8q2x1091101 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240818] igb drivers: vlanhwfilter feature generate link UP/DOWN for each new vlan created Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: piotr.pietruszewski@intel.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 08:52:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240818 Piotr Pietruszewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |piotr.pietruszewski@intel.c | |om --- Comment #1 from Piotr Pietruszewski --- Currently, iflib based drivers issue an init after registering or unregiste= ring vlans with IFCAP_VLAN_HWFILTER enabled ( https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/12/sys/net/iflib.c?revision=3D351276= &view=3Dmarkup#l4265 ). In case of e1000 driver, init is needed as vlan hw support setup is part= of driver's initialization routine. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 09:02:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC513FF5B0 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f88Y54QVz40fL for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AE186FF5AF; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD8DFF5AE for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f88Y3p50z40fK for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D7925D25 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q92rR3019701 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q92r2f019700 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:02:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 --- Comment #4 from lutz@donnerhacke.de --- Thank you for pointing me to phabricator. I'll try to find out how it works. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 09:12:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83D7FF946 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f8N54yqFz4156 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AA720FF945; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA354FF944 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f8N54464z4155 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7085925EF9 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q9Craf079565 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q9CraK079554 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240825] Possible race between vlan interfaces and lagg(4) w/ em0/em1 post-EPOCH Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc flagtypes.name short_desc keywords bug_severity version Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:12:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240825 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmacy@FreeBSD.org, | |net@FreeBSD.org, | |shurd@FreeBSD.org Flags| |mfc-stable12? Summary|Vlan interfaces does not |Possible race between vlan |work on lagg from em0, em1 |interfaces and lagg(4) w/ | |em0/em1 post-EPOCH Keywords| |needs-qa, regression Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People Version|12.0-STABLE |12.0-RELEASE --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 09:15:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73684FFB12 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f8RG2VHJz41Dt for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 558CAFFB10; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55518FFB0F for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f8RG1W5fz41Dr for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1767525F10 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q9Fbvs095985 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q9Fbx9095975 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked bug_file_loc keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:15:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236724 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |240700 URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D21769 Keywords|needs-qa | --- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak --- @Krzysztof Could you please add re@f.o to the review as a blocking reviewer= to get approval to merge this to releng/12.1 after stable/12 merge, so that th= is makes it to 12.1-RELEASE Thanks Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240700 [Bug 240700] [META] FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE blockers --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 09:18:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D584AFFCA4 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46f8V25D3nz41PF for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B32B5FFCA3; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F05FFCA2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46f8V249jDz41PD for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72B2E25F21 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8Q9I298085620 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8Q9I2TL085616 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239704] ixgbe(4): Only one queue (of eight) enabled on 12.0-RELEASE (ProLiant DL380 Gen10) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:01 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: erj@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc assigned_to blocked Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 09:18:02 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239704 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |net@FreeBSD.org Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |erj@freebsd.org Blocks| |240700 --- Comment #8 from Kubilay Kocak --- ^Triage: Assign to committer resolving. @Eric Could you please arrange for a approval from re@ to merge this to releng/12.1 so it makes it to 12.1-RELEASE please Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240700 [Bug 240700] [META] FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE blockers --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 11:39:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1CA1239B9 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fCd24sRwz47lc for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A507E1239B8; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CDE1239B7 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fCd22y7hz47lb for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C5C27874 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QBdIrN025101 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QBdI6w025100 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240825] Possible race between vlan interfaces and lagg(4) w/ em0/em1 post-EPOCH Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: yar@shvets.name X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240825 --- Comment #3 from Yaroslav Shvets --- However if destroy the broken vlan-interface and lagg-interface after FreeB= SD booting, and create them again, the vlan-interface works. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 11:41:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D37123BFB for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fCh321Tnz482b for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 453BA123BFA; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FFE123BF9 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fCh317ybz482X for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AC0E278E3 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QBfsJP036029 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QBfsO8036028 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240818] igb drivers: vlanhwfilter feature generate link UP/DOWN for each new vlan created Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: olivier@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:41:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240818 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Cochard --- Here is a user use case: FreeBSD as a router serving multiple customer: one customer per vlan. Each time we add a new customer, we add a VLAN=E2=80=A6 and the link re-ini= t, so all the customers are impacted. It's a big limitation for this use case. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 11:45:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15523123CD4 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fCmD6nbXz48Br for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E7310123CD3; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F5D123CD2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fCmD5b5nz48Bn for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A486A27A49 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QBjWYr043769 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QBjWh5043768 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240825] Possible race between vlan interfaces and lagg(4) w/ em0/em1 post-EPOCH Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:45:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240825 Hans Petter Selasky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hselasky@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Hans Petter Selasky --- Does this also happen if you disable devd. When network interfaces are crea= ted devd will receive an event and do some configuration in the background. This will typically race with netstart . --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 12:35:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9053B125920 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fDsS3GXnz4C6c for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 702E912591F; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF4012591E for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fDsS2LDYz4C6b for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 339B7390 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QCZ8I6095827 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QCZ8d6095822 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240818] igb drivers: vlanhwfilter feature generate link UP/DOWN for each new vlan created Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:35:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240818 Andrey V. Elsukov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ae@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- It was reported by several people a year ago: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2018-November/052184.html I also think that this behavior makes Intel cards with iflib drivers unusab= le for setups many vlans. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 12:39:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEA0125A22 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:39:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fDyV0KFtz4CDv; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id u192so391021vkb.12; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3wxrKeZA90IgNciHbsq29ms6NR4HpbgndZEqCVlTqNc=; b=fMkadTc6b47pwJjNfdThKXKQEukUUercFsjx0X4MMwdQ7/nS+0ydfSgG04otP/vYfX UjeSIMz6Rp5NtSeZzq2fs0IBA8imwgGb1s2SitoJHmZaKzHfd1jXt5HAyo/eXtvJfdT1 Daf4Dp+KP2wE329w70AlYSpvqVxHWWMoN4FAK2ds8x/6YFQrwuXy45BaF2YB5Dm5rgxN CW9ybDvd8T3JdoudPRA78ZdSSO1FpcehstYD2DTWQRdHniadrz94dWst6b9YA53ajFbW /Oovdsi4J156wZ8AUVLbrk6lonFfXu5pK1kZt3Fi96TzjwNb48h9Lx64ZiYt2m0guyzQ 6ENg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3wxrKeZA90IgNciHbsq29ms6NR4HpbgndZEqCVlTqNc=; b=D9wlbk2KzGtCPT5h8LCehY59tvjyrbX5jQHb7BOh4fw2C4DvOhGqMRuvWMe1t1GL1z ml/4DoQ8yZbNYtGycDc2qlhgXI303FZRGFaKtsFT+54WtwlHrWIeQ0NkwN2r2N3YYQTe iHp0djU5LuWVtz/atf2JmmfmwCViJTVblkN4O+fHgPsOc8FbFuwcsGVdgrNA3rTrU+3Q yvw+2qHBfAJZdhZ5V/Q7Z33uEOvWrdZp09N7rcLFLTibwx/3vMhNW5j2Wgh3+3Jq1Wpa DKgHXD5e/AH+1Id2L764bvdKXdj0afh/4D/YORee6H0New3t2b7+muljQbFvA9L/1Eaf 5j+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/NqqVRcQJnwo6Ak/2YvK53zpdbHmzTGv0GCJi/KYz7C2u0Rup mNwVYMfyOSpOXq5HPeyU2Y+71LAR0Widl7U61INGYhKw X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUeAn3Mu36UUe8SxEHVuDJxlpB9DufVpGC2m7W7zcJ4AkWYb1LDnSpVdp09AeeAW8OkBCx+GDvBnYIz65v9X0= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:3251:: with SMTP id y78mr1517967vky.68.1569501568793; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:39:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> From: Mihir Luthra Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:09:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? To: Hiroki Sato Cc: freebsd-net , hrs@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46fDyV0KFtz4CDv X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fMkadTc6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of luthramihir708@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luthramihir708@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.a.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.73), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.60), asn: 15169(-2.18), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 12:39:31 -0000 > > > I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a > class of transport protocol, not address family. > > Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today. In `statd.c` what I see is in `create_service()`/`complete_service()`, transport info is being fetched through getnetconfig(), which makes it listen on all transports. I guess its clean in `statd.c` but same can also be done in `procs.c`/`file.c`. Maybe trying all transports until it finds one which is connectionless? Apologies if I got something wrong, new to this topic. Also, while looking at the code, I think it always assumes ipv4 is always present. Like `127.0.0.1` is added to host list always. On ipv6 only machine this may fail. Kind Regards, Mihir From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 15:25:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5465129F2F for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fJfF41zjz4NNC; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jl4IDQQxVj4s2uc0i/7Z2q+L/j1r8guEBi7WyBmsGBjPQ8B7Jjwm1gHx44Oi51tGb4ahnB+yt45Zpg6EEaZ60F5/azCA/Tsoiy/xNVxUBGKufW1M5hM3GjiMtvFC7gnsgQ80BvaFAT807AKuxw7F5/MEsb8F8OkD9RJ/v7kNozk1jRXBK0STk1ChPwZEAswmVhfHvyVPUYNj1kvjsZj3krJ9iUJDihDvzpM53sjo6F430OQmNKL9Os6/OG7mOE5vg9xnbH+7UkwEN0rwf7zNBvXuQsYbDdYnez2+TaE9NCxxYz2tK+32vCAxcvUv2wW5koAQP6FgM7/g+T/z4LM9/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=JzQIj6PwKAK/3BIrGiXeyBMTD3ztbi2CYt8rQ/kDvEI=; b=B6vzv6Uu+VxrKRxbs6DgHxQWko+d+BvD6ThKWZ2d2fwxHgmz//bOFXep2P9bGM3/PHXrIF9QkJbGJIzMxYwt7R8Ob0Po/YshPZhgdn6i3h9fo+Ak8H4PkyLvVSpmsHuGN6LkbuKJwZI6FAgGXifrqScGD+VFYQcIk8d8z9jR1BglbtJcyKPGYQhnuS0d0m7pgp2juiMil2C7jY6KstkGBcb0Hp1kJqOP7PYtUmtE6TyvbHjyC6lcb4d1Z6cKC0CsK6m05TJBTiTMm2TOxu26/YISStcWPGpCfKtXgPql9PYYfEHKazy5J7d73KQaiPngbi5fw9BUXyj6zpMYHThvxg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none Received: from YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.51.22) by YTOPR0101MB0972.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.46.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2284.20; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:25:39 +0000 Received: from YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::157f:eebf:d4d4:451]) by YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::157f:eebf:d4d4:451%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.017; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:25:39 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: Mihir Luthra , Hiroki Sato CC: freebsd-net , "hrs@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Thread-Topic: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Thread-Index: AQHVdGd0vvt0AdNYvUi0bBe7GEcLYKc+EjgO Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:25:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 94bda4f5-c459-471f-bfa8-08d74295c96e x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600167)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:YTOPR0101MB0972; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTOPR0101MB0972: x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508; x-forefront-prvs: 0172F0EF77 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(376002)(136003)(189003)(199004)(256004)(316002)(7696005)(186003)(102836004)(478600001)(305945005)(54906003)(76116006)(9686003)(5660300002)(66946007)(6306002)(66476007)(229853002)(66556008)(8936002)(25786009)(64756008)(81156014)(66446008)(86362001)(8676002)(71200400001)(71190400001)(76176011)(46003)(81166006)(55016002)(6246003)(2906002)(33656002)(99286004)(6506007)(14454004)(786003)(110136005)(11346002)(446003)(966005)(74316002)(476003)(6436002)(52536014)(486006)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:YTOPR0101MB0972; H:YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: uoguelph.ca does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: eRNnB6uQFjcLfA5EizdCNjn25EkbK/B0vcte4ZvFG4tcW9+9z9enDXj8Vo7a6HC5JPRBHq/0lFY1+lnNoy0rnYz6o655Q7KAwRrnOR+HVSM3dAbsai5vX+6g/XNw/vCfA+UALaK+bfQkqAVl4us4/OGsJqIyVFMvi3/7Dt87ig9XgSY3ObOBs0r2zdBr/TWRUQ7/vq98RaDsi/cKpqzpcTwOhzEPH8aAQW+HZm9t30cneFJcVHprUdwiaAUvTJgcQGQL9ANGQbUkNm5b7PbpxH5ivx0aw45LIlUi3mUAtek2LHICMVNM/xVGuTT6+Q9nnSQF7+30auN76dtKFaVbIugyUIaPE6O3v0ooLx3w90tngEInxpWzk+IyBwME4B0gxCRSnfXfpERshW350YO2WUsrku7SuwMNo6OmVgJD671vuGz0ptMZK/6cKSNbfUePzo4Wwti1KSiWa2mhf9g1dQ== x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 94bda4f5-c459-471f-bfa8-08d74295c96e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Sep 2019 15:25:39.2553 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: xXELKUsOsVF0sySjdmk94OrB3wxfuoHQdsjkka8Gof5INhiLaP9y1IbdxKdlXTROwDNUQxS/5orleAelNQbrZg== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTOPR0101MB0972 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46fJfF41zjz4NNC X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 40.107.67.84 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.58 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[84.67.107.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.28)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.79), asn: 8075(-2.55), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:25:42 -0000 Mihir Luthra wrote:=0A= >Hiroki Sato wrote:=0A= >>=0A= >>=0A= >> I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a=0A= >> class of transport protocol, not address family.=0A= >>=0A= >> Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today.=0A= >In `statd.c` what I see is in `create_service()`/`complete_service()`,=0A= >transport info is being fetched through getnetconfig(), which makes it=0A= >listen on all transports. I guess its clean in `statd.c` but same can also= =0A= >be done in `procs.c`/`file.c`. Maybe trying all transports until it finds= =0A= >one which is connectionless? Apologies if I got something wrong, new to=0A= >this topic.=0A= >=0A= >Also, while looking at the code, I think it always assumes ipv4 is always= =0A= >present. Like `127.0.0.1` is added to host list always. On ipv6 only=0A= >machine this may fail.=0A= Although I'll admit it isn't something I am particularily fond of, FreeBSD = likes=0A= utilities to build/work with only one of ipv4/ipv6.=0A= To do this, "#ifdef INET" and "#ifdef INET6" is applied to the code and the= =0A= Makefile is tweaked to define one or both of these.=0A= (You can look at usr.sbin/nfsuserd for an example of this.)=0A= =0A= Btw, these protocols are old Sun Microsystems ones without any published=0A= RFC, so what is "correct" is difficult to determine. I suppose the Open=0A= Solaris sources is the best protocol specification. (Interop. testing with = Linux=0A= would be nice, since Linux is the "defacto standard" now.)=0A= =0A= Good luck with it, rick=0A= =0A= Kind Regards,=0A= Mihir=0A= _______________________________________________=0A= freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 15:38:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E5D12A519 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fJwv5hfcz4PW2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C337C12A514; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EF112A513 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fJwv4jVzz4PVy for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86A1E2470 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QFcN7a063280 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QFcNsG063276 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:23 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:38:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233952 --- Comment #21 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Thu Sep 26 15:37:40 UTC 2019 New revision: 352749 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352749 Log: MFC r352625: Revert r316820. PR: 233952 Changes: _U stable/12/ stable/12/sys/dev/jme/if_jme.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 15:52:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D1B12B01D for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fKF94KHrz4Qx4 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9446B12B01C; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940AA12B01B for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fKF924vRz4Qx1 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C0CE27FE for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QFqT5C005562 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QFqT56005561 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:52:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 --- Comment #5 from lutz@donnerhacke.de --- Moved to https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21803 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 15:55:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6854A12B2E8 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fKJT0BnPz4RLw; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (cross.sbone.de [195.201.62.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: bz/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9475115504; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 612758D4A171; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091EDE70875; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NtM4hN3OUduv; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31:55c5:32d7:5d40:945b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17B5EE707E6; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:15 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Rick Macklem" Cc: "Mihir Luthra" , "Hiroki Sato" , freebsd-net , hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:13 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6137) Message-ID: <4D750DC4-B2D6-4561-8335-99413F419762@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:55:21 -0000 On 26 Sep 2019, at 15:25, Rick Macklem wrote: > Mihir Luthra wrote: >> Hiroki Sato wrote: >>> >>> >>> I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a >>> class of transport protocol, not address family. >>> >>> Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today. >> In `statd.c` what I see is in >> `create_service()`/`complete_service()`, >> transport info is being fetched through getnetconfig(), which makes >> it >> listen on all transports. I guess its clean in `statd.c` but same can >> also >> be done in `procs.c`/`file.c`. Maybe trying all transports until it >> finds >> one which is connectionless? Apologies if I got something wrong, new >> to >> this topic. >> >> Also, while looking at the code, I think it always assumes ipv4 is >> always >> present. Like `127.0.0.1` is added to host list always. On ipv6 only >> machine this may fail. > Although I'll admit it isn't something I am particularily fond of, > FreeBSD likes > utilities to build/work with only one of ipv4/ipv6. > To do this, "#ifdef INET" and "#ifdef INET6" is applied to the code > and the > Makefile is tweaked to define one or both of these. > (You can look at usr.sbin/nfsuserd for an example of this.) I am not sure if this is entirely on-topic but here’s a diff from a work-tree of mine from sometime earlier this year: https://people.freebsd.org/~bz/20190926-01-golegacy.diff This is a lot of resolver and rpc (libc) code. I think this did compile but I am almost certain that a few changes are not doing the right thing and need review and testing. I might have upstreamed 2 or 3 lines of this already in case the patch doesn’t apply cleanly anymore. I’ll be more than happy to work with someone going through this as well and reviewing/updating it. I can also put it into Phabricator; at the moment it only collects dust as I didn’t have time to work on this hobby project lately. /bz > > Btw, these protocols are old Sun Microsystems ones without any > published > RFC, so what is "correct" is difficult to determine. I suppose the > Open > Solaris sources is the best protocol specification. (Interop. testing > with Linux > would be nice, since Linux is the "defacto standard" now.) > > Good luck with it, rick > > Kind Regards, > Mihir > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 17:36:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4422912E91A for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fMYN0x6xz4bgQ for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1FFA912E919; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB8512E918 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fMYN0520z4bgN for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBAB93CF2 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QHad4B092591 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QHadPD092589 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:36:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 Harald Schmalzbauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 367 | |24 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 17:39:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DB212EA6E for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fMcC4wNcz4bx8 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A8D8112EA6D; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A0712EA6C for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fMcC3z5Lz4bx6 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BFE23D0F for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QHd7OS096134 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QHd7Xx096133 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240658] iflib: if_igb(4) and some if_em(4) devices don't recognize/report carrier loss. Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution see_also bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240658 Harald Schmalzbauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE See Also| |https://bugs.freebsd.org/bu | |gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D2= 408 | |18 Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #11 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to Harald Schmalzbauer from comment #9) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240818 confirms that the remaining issue is by design (iflib igb). Since the fix for my issue is also reported in Bug 236724, I'll close this = as duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 236724 *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 17:39:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B1812EA81 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fMcF1x18z4bxS for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4249612EA80; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4211D12EA7F for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fMcF162mz4bxP for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ADB33D1A for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QHd8Kx096177 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QHd8YS096176 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:08 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 236724] igb(4): Interfaces fail to switch active to inactive state Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 17:39:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236724 Harald Schmalzbauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de --- Comment #14 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- *** Bug 240658 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 18:36:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40A8130C7B for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fNtr5c1mz3JKv for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BDECA130C79; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAB9130C78 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fNtr4Yzlz3JKr for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 819AF4881 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QIaqt6046121 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from bugzilla@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QIaq5u046120 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: bugzilla set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:36:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233952 --- Comment #22 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: markj Date: Thu Sep 26 18:36:15 UTC 2019 New revision: 352766 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/352766 Log: MFS r352749: Revert r316820. PR: 233952 Approved by: re (gjb) Changes: _U releng/12.1/ releng/12.1/sys/dev/jme/if_jme.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 18:38:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066FC130E4B for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fNxF6K14z3Jls for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D8B7F130E4A; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8822130E49 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fNxF5Rjvz3Jlr for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E500488F for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8QIcvHN048603 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8QIcv8W048602 for net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233952] if_jme: Does not send/receive packets after 11.2 to 12.0 upgrade Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 18:38:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233952 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #23 from Mark Johnston --- This will be fixed in 12.1. Thanks for the report and for tracking down the commit responsible. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Sep 26 19:00:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43A2131862 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:00:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from mail.otcnet.ru (mail.otcnet.ru [194.190.78.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fPPv580gz3LJ1 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vit@otcnet.ru) Received: from MacBook-Gamov.local (unknown [188.164.215.2]) by mail.otcnet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CE8774B36 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 22:00:12 +0300 (MSK) To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Victor Gamov Subject: bridged vlan down but traffic still exists Organization: OstankinoTelecom Message-ID: <49e039a7-d76c-eb9d-fea2-60b7090e5913@otcnet.ru> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 22:00:07 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46fPPv580gz3LJ1 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vit@otcnet.ru designates 194.190.78.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vit@otcnet.ru X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.52 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mail.otcnet.ru]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-net@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[otcnet.ru]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-3.32)[ip: (-8.75), ipnet: 194.190.78.0/24(-4.38), asn: 50822(-3.50), country: RU(0.01)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50822, ipnet:194.190.78.0/24, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 19:00:20 -0000 Hi All I have vlan111 and vlan222 bridged into bridge2. Then multicast traffic from vlan111 sending and I get it at vlan222 even if 'ifconfig vlan222 down' issued. Is it bug or known feature? FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE r348449 GENERIC amd64 Thanks! -- CU, Victor Gamov From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 04:47:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06612F5D90 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (mx.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature ECDSA (P-384) client-digest SHA384) (Client CN "mail.allbsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ffRY6ZXVz4Lw8; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:58:65ff:fe00:b0b]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8R4l5Pu055618 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) (Client CN "/CN=mail-d.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=Let's+20Encrypt/CN=Let's+20Encrypt+20Authority+20X3"); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:47:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=allbsd.org; s=20190220; t=1569559646; bh=qks2gIue3+0p91ILbGhGONIVb4yJ0dH6FiPt1LlyRH4=; h=Date:To:Cc:From:In-Reply-To:References; b=jZB1Xj1G/sX8cujD5mBYCl5PRfTjM/T+tsr+kxdOYkDiVZ1dklASbm83VzwkSVfey lmSt0zyySiAPblSei2lzIfBA8xtAvpb8oJo1kBIZ1v00QyQNH6GljjTS42zo7sfJMP QKVcrRryaX+dapemvNrN58ng4dKBlivFglBee+KM= Received: from alph.d.allbsd.org ([IPv6:2409:11:a740:4700:16:ceff:fe34:2700]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8R4l0Gb079619 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:47:00 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id x8R4kwOK079612; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:47:00 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@allbsd.org) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 02:31:52 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190927.023152.1179355129866318906.hrs@allbsd.org> To: luthramihir708@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> X-Old-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-PGPkey-fingerprint: 6C0D 2353 27CF 80C7 901E FDD2 DBB0 7DC6 6F1F 737F X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Fri_Sep_27_02_31_52_2019_841)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001:0:0:0:41]); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:47:26 +0900 (JST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46ffRY6ZXVz4Lw8 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=allbsd.org header.s=20190220 header.b=jZB1Xj1G; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of hrs@allbsd.org designates 2001:2f0:104:e001::41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=hrs@allbsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[allbsd.org:s=20190220]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[allbsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[allbsd.org:+]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7514, ipnet:2001:2f0::/32, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.21)[ip: (-9.05), ipnet: 2001:2f0::/32(-4.21), asn: 7514(2.25), country: JP(-0.02)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 04:47:41 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Sep_27_02_31_52_2019_841)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mihir Luthra wrote in : lu> > lu> > lu> > I think you should learn TI-RPC API first. The nettype specifies a lu> > class of transport protocol, not address family. lu> > lu> > Thanks, I did some more research on TI-RPC today. lu> In `statd.c` what I see is in `create_service()`/`complete_service()`, lu> transport info is being fetched through getnetconfig(), which makes it lu> listen on all transports. I guess its clean in `statd.c` but same can also lu> be done in `procs.c`/`file.c`. Maybe trying all transports until it finds lu> one which is connectionless? Apologies if I got something wrong, new to lu> this topic. clnt_create() checks /etc/netconfig and tries all of the transport protocols with the specified class which are listed there, and then chooses the first usable one. So if IPv6 is available, "udp6" will be used because it is before "udp". statd.c handles the bind addresses on the server (service) side while file.c and procs.c handle the client calls. They are different. lu> Also, while looking at the code, I think it always assumes ipv4 is always lu> present. Like `127.0.0.1` is added to host list always. On ipv6 only lu> machine this may fail. Yes. We should fix this kind of hardcoded loopback addresses and make userland utilities transport-independent wherever possible. It can be replaced with getaddrinfo() with AF_UNSPEC for all available address families. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Sep_27_02_31_52_2019_841)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iMcEABMKAC0WIQRsDSNTJ8+Ax5Ae/dLbsH3Gbx9zfwUCXYz2CA8caHJzQGFsbGJz ZC5vcmcACgkQ27B9xm8fc398FAIHUMAg46tMGLZWhkUuzLstd+vuwQMb0w3sLtle 38G/vbZzEz1BXq4yjGxxmtyfsy4X0/gXmrWdI+M7ITu5G9E7CwYCB2dAU7VKk2es Lnhszomw80+2Se2USe718FRslw2v4g03YY+Njb8yWELlH4bhJTcBPE+xwN8mEta2 +Ax2JPBtkjwb =XfWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Sep_27_02_31_52_2019_841)---- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 11:54:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FBDFFFC5 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fqwW4S3lz3FTQ for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 96B83FFFC4; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967CDFFFC2 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fqwW3MHJz3FTP for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58225186D5 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8RBspRV076048 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8RBspaV076047 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240787] netgraph/ng_bridge: Replace NG_BRIDGE_MAX_LINKS with auto-incrementing (Unlimited) links Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: lutz@donnerhacke.de X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:54:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240787 --- Comment #6 from lutz@donnerhacke.de --- manpages review is "green" What are the next steps @Phabricator? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 12:52:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F14122900 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46fsCT6k14z3JTw for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E69C91228FF; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66891228FE for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fsCT5cTFz3JTv for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58F8191D6 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8RCqrc3046870 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8RCqrh0046866 for net@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239240] igb: TX(2) desc avail = 1024, pidx = 0 messages appear when the network card (igb/ixgbe/em) loses ethernet link Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking, needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: 76nemo76@gmx.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:52:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239240 --- Comment #20 from 76nemo76@gmx.ch --- I am a little busy this week. I will apply the patches and test the system probably next week. Against what sources (FreeBSD 12_1?) should the patches be applied? Thanks --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 13:31:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7051233E1 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lan@zato.ru) Received: from mail.zato.ru (mail.zato.ru [178.255.248.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.zato.ru", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46ft4T5RcWz3LS9 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lan@zato.ru) Received: from startsnto.ru ([81.200.243.105] helo=[192.168.175.30]) by mail.zato.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1iDqLe-0002aQ-Hf for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:31:52 +0300 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "Alexander N. Lunev" Message-ID: <213f9284-5ddd-4dbc-6631-f8592efa2995@zato.ru> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:31:41 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: ru Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 81.200.243.105 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lan@zato.ru X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.zato.local X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: no network between jails and host with VNET on same interface X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.zato.ru) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46ft4T5RcWz3LS9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zato.ru:s=mailserverdkimkey]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.991,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:178.255.248.12]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.01)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zato.ru:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[zato.ru,reject]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[105.243.200.81.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56868, ipnet:178.255.248.0/24, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 13:31:55 -0000 Hello everyone! I have a strange connectivity problem on jails with VNET networking. I've deployed a jail system with VNET networking on a server with FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p10. Jails are working fine, can reach out outer network and each other, but there's no connectivity between host and jails. Server is connected to switch trunk port by igb1 interface, which is bridged with epairXa interfaces in bridge0, while jails using epairXb interfaces (they are renamed to jail0 in each jail to simplify things). ======= host ============================= [igb1]-----------------------\ | +---------+ [vlan4 (10.1.1.247)] | | | bridge0 | /--[epair1a]----------------| | / +---------+ | /-[epair0a]--------------------/ | | ===== jail1_filter2 ====================== | \-[jail0(ex-epair0b)] | | | [vlan4 (10.1.1.26)] ===== jail2_noc ========================== \-[jail0(ex-epair1b)] | [vlan4 (10.1.1.201)] =========================================== On the host and in every jail i have a vlan4 interface, and here's addresses for those vlan4 interfaces: host@vlan4: 10.1.1.247 jail1_filter2@vlan4: 10.1.1.26 jail2_noc@vlan4: 10.1.1.201 Host can't ping jails, but can ping outer world. Jails can ping each other and outer world, but not host - "ping: sendto: Host is down", there's no ARP entry for host' vlan4 address. I've tried to add static arp entry for 10.1.1.247 in jails - with no success (arp is added, network still not working). Host and both jails have firewall_type=OPEN configured. What is wrong here? Below are pings, ifconfig output for host and jails and jail.conf. From jail1_filter2: root@jail1_filter2:/ # ping 10.1.1.201 PING 10.1.1.201 (10.1.1.201): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.1.1.201: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.688 ms 64 bytes from 10.1.1.201: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.552 ms root@jail1_filter2:/ # ping 10.1.1.247 PING 10.1.1.247 (10.1.1.247): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down root@jail1_filter2:/ # arp 10.1.1.247 ibm.zato.local (10.1.1.247) at (incomplete) on vlan4 expired [vlan] From jail2_noc: root@jail2_noc:/ # ping 10.1.1.26 PING 10.1.1.26 (10.1.1.26): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.1.1.26: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.542 ms 64 bytes from 10.1.1.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.510 ms root@jail2_noc:/ # ping 10.1.1.247 PING 10.1.1.247 (10.1.1.247): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Host is down ping: sendto: Host is down root@jail2_noc:/ # arp 10.1.1.247 ibm.zato.local (10.1.1.247) at (incomplete) on vlan4 expired [vlan] Jail's ifconfig: root@jail2_noc:/ # ifconfig jail0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:3e:b2:17:83:0b groups: epair media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=29 vlan4: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 02:3e:b2:17:83:0b inet 10.1.1.201 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 groups: vlan vlan: 4 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: jail0 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=29 root@jail1_filter2:/ # ifconfig jail0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:09:d8:ee:38:0b inet 178.255.248.13 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 178.255.248.31 groups: epair media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=29 vlan4: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 02:09:d8:ee:38:0b inet 10.1.1.26 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 inet6 fe80::9:d8ff:feee:380b%vlan4 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 groups: vlan vlan: 4 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: jail0 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=21 Host's ifconfig: igb1: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=a520b9 ether 40:f2:e9:0e:8c:65 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=29 vlan4: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=200001 ether 40:f2:e9:0e:8c:65 inet 10.1.1.247 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 groups: vlan vlan: 4 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: igb1 media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) status: active nd6 options=29 bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether b6:cb:19:20:0f:60 id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: epair1a flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 10 priority 128 path cost 2000 member: epair0a flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 9 priority 128 path cost 2000 member: igb1 flags=143 ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost 20000 groups: bridge nd6 options=1 epair0a: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:09:d8:ee:38:0a inet6 fe80::9:d8ff:feee:380a%epair0a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x9 groups: epair media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=21 epair1a: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:3e:b2:17:83:0a inet6 fe80::3e:b2ff:fe17:830a%epair1a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0xa groups: epair media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T (10Gbase-T ) status: active nd6 options=21 jail.conf: ======================== $uplinkdev = "igb1"; $jbridge = "bridge0"; $vn_iface = "jail0"; vnet.interface = "$vn_iface"; vnet; exec.prestart = "ifconfig $jbridge > /dev/null 2> /dev/null || ( ifconfig $jbridge create up && ifconfig $jbridge addm $uplinkdev )"; exec.prestart += "ifconfig $epair create up || echo 'Skipped creating epair (exists?)'"; exec.prestart += "ifconfig $jbridge addm ${epair}a || echo 'Skipped adding bridge member (already member?)'"; exec.created = "ifconfig ${epair}b name $vn_iface || echo 'Skipped renaming ifdev to $vn_iface (looks bad...)'"; exec.poststop = "ifconfig $jbridge deletem ${epair}a"; exec.poststop += "ifconfig ${epair}a destroy"; filter2 { $epair = "epair0"; } noc { $epair = "epair1"; } =========================== -- Best regards, Alexander Lunev From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 17:52:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7525F128C4D for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lan@zato.ru) Received: from mail.zato.ru (mail.zato.ru [178.255.248.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.zato.ru", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46fzrc4x64z45wM for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lan@zato.ru) Received: from [82.209.121.13] (helo=[192.168.101.200]) by mail.zato.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1iDuPM-0005a9-D0 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 20:51:57 +0300 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <213f9284-5ddd-4dbc-6631-f8592efa2995@zato.ru> From: alexander lunev Message-ID: <5be958c9-4b6b-f8ea-b6b2-4a797f1200bf@zato.ru> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 20:52:01 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <213f9284-5ddd-4dbc-6631-f8592efa2995@zato.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: ru Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 82.209.121.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: lan@zato.ru X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.zato.local X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Re: no network between jails and host with VNET on same interface X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.zato.ru) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46fzrc4x64z45wM X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zato.ru:s=mailserverdkimkey]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:178.255.248.12:c]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zato.ru:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[zato.ru,reject]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: RU(0.01)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:56868, ipnet:178.255.248.0/24, country:RU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 17:52:02 -0000 I have to add: if i configure same network (10.14.14.0/24) on jail0 interfaces in jails and igb1 on host, then host and jails can ping addresses in this network. But vlan interfaces in jail and on host (10.1.1.0/24) can't ping each other. > =======  host ============================= >     [igb1 (10.14.14.1)]---------\ >        |                     +---------+ >  [vlan4 (10.1.1.247)]        |         | >                              | bridge0 | >  /--[epair1a]----------------|         | > /                            +---------+ > | /-[epair0a]--------------------/ > | | > =====  jail1_filter2 ====================== > | \-[jail0(ex-epair0b) (10.14.14.2)] > |     | > |     [vlan4 (10.1.1.26)] > =====  jail2_noc ========================== > \-[jail0(ex-epair1b) (10.14.14.3)] >     | >     [vlan4 (10.1.1.201)] > =========================================== -- Best regards, Alexander Lunev From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 21:17:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594B812D32F for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x92c.google.com (mail-ua1-x92c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46g4Pv5gfMz4LGj; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:17:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x92c.google.com with SMTP id b14so2397194uap.6; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:17:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XsGQOs6YbR84CciTH4Kk2wIn7wF7YDhpzf7KuNht03U=; b=Z8za7ucKpshHo08yQecrp0RXswWNThL4g8ARfoXANWe2OgGQ+GyekkKIbYvTmiotNT GG/GUliJMwkopJgs4cfIlTrrAjnFaKuRm2VKjKe4wnvCWRB2EZcX6tdB/d/lQF5xWf2N 27H/23PoqKoX+AOQlg+l76vSr5m2vtlUs+pGwcUfWDbiCgbHnerIN/ffVWgEwWheG6pN 5emHfhP2dUrwDs2fo51myrP4GwZG+hcmKdn79+ImXCupIRpiZKyJIf3Lv9ozl6Qk4eoI 5Kg3sUbt9J1xudWL/R4gTeVKkpWP+bcgHc9TH1Ad0S5obUhhSw+Hh+QNOgnR0ogxq+5g SQMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XsGQOs6YbR84CciTH4Kk2wIn7wF7YDhpzf7KuNht03U=; b=tDllstFNHQojuMNzLie3a8woShTRWuj+9nvqJLQUIpRADbpC80K2yX08mUlR1IGJpo 2hrf8Scxl1IYgUCfcLsNtzvAxrNZzPa9dwDOfGXnGhLX7tmiLsxVdj0Yvvemrnl0wrwj cskaiyVXZr/iQqIplGN/Ul+QxRBabau2HyAxIkVp73qZ56CTxfLdfmED1ph89WUsnSi+ JMUltPlPIcG9TlbHJChxb653ROv0z9rvahDodjq5QNVYiprbQtAz6ezssOyCZ2asXfan zbYkySa4UAo25uyVRvAPO9KTE/P8Hsg+K0cVZ1ZXLOiHaC5iBEH9uYjFaorIe4DYs2RC lNww== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUNhg4ro/zBUftpqYU3u/tYqtKntlnfBupmt+9zFH68C8GQ0vsa 33claIcb9UxeHXCQQ3u9sSFee3Jo8gD/m8H7ziA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmM+Qvidiymygk+6/wgHRZsBFghpiFc2MyyINAf8fR/XOjUcQ2H9AkD5LZ3JZh3Ix/KJm/Dhyfp+pu+541R7I= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6046:: with SMTP id o6mr5708265ual.75.1569619058612; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:17:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Mihir Luthra Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 02:47:27 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? To: Rick Macklem Cc: Hiroki Sato , freebsd-net , "hrs@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46g4Pv5gfMz4LGj X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Z8za7ucK; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of luthramihir708@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::92c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luthramihir708@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.9.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.36), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.59), asn: 15169(-2.17), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:17:41 -0000 Hi Rick, > Although I'll admit it isn't something I am particularily fond of, FreeBSD > likes > utilities to build/work with only one of ipv4/ipv6. > To do this, "#ifdef INET" and "#ifdef INET6" is applied to the code and the > Makefile is tweaked to define one or both of these. > (You can look at usr.sbin/nfsuserd for an example of this.) > Yes I see. Although I was thinking, wouldn't it be better if we can take a flag via getopts for ipv6/ipv4 if the machine supports both with macro guards around too? > > Btw, these protocols are old Sun Microsystems ones without any published > RFC, so what is "correct" is difficult to determine. I suppose the Open > Solaris sources is the best protocol specification. (Interop. testing with > Linux > would be nice, since Linux is the "defacto standard" now.) > > Good luck with it, rick > Thanks for the tips, Mihir From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 21:30:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA9012DF89 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46g4j72fZwz4PgD; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:30:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luthramihir708@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2e.google.com with SMTP id d3so2871316vsr.1; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:30:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uTqGp1wznnovZb1KDxMj5PKjQZCtFv4m5nJyo7hcxUI=; b=FjH97Wnqbbd4/w4DBxwW21LHf7udlfZV6s+XkmP/nUpYdhT4Hk6IONwnk7Zrl51OeX ZgN+ftUitRfdovJWEbB7wf8KqnnZoOj8EUY5an4FsvifHdAU1b/9HuzMdHohiGXwIrkE P9DDH+YZNpqxw8p827/c2gbNsbDCHF5BQY9xhBWCy5nZtCcbDzbJxI64b95CajUmOGA3 5jYvt9SrbahDt7adDz773s6oWWGBt6qkOKmHj4985cTv+tgMF5slx5TaUTAaAUjufPsv uHIbsl8c5auK8IqU/FjMeieHgh6oIuzvuPr9/Ywu1oNPHpk/ylqOmfIEKx48ZXi8Pven 4TXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uTqGp1wznnovZb1KDxMj5PKjQZCtFv4m5nJyo7hcxUI=; b=focwQ90GQtM77Qxnf2SLoIlif2nnXKmpUgcCjYJw+Qy/qeg16bW/pX6y/4iYgACEZk Xd084jVqiHj9efNBB+NGY+8aETUJNJpbVqH9R5vxuBSc+6LDOu2q9nIKDCoexWr04PT6 m+A4l9ZhDtfFZrtjXe5y9tPgo6HJReA/6zX0VTB1TnmED+NryDXXOaMSXvXibylnoaIO AhpS7KGAUtvlhBQT2Gz0/Qq6ZWTXuKtiMoIjrmilw6p5hUj/Jt/e+5fH3mcJhDtYNluz WS4vJoBtah1NY0F8ypqJoYLoFurKHYCIojg94CMiY1LEpgf8uiZGQ0VpXJXbKxPdjlgx j6lw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXLUuIIOTlQZeKE++SUAywKBijHrw7w3IBD5uv6CnL5GnhCoRUL Oizh+kxPsX9rXLH3ub2x47N9v5YFjS6SYZMAlFY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfx15zd0s3KjhziKI4NDxIVCvBur4rJCTLJxXklo8fZy244WRdD3nHVdczlUxAhRF7GTp1n1HWn5TNHOG96uw= X-Received: by 2002:a67:646:: with SMTP id 67mr3919127vsg.151.1569619849908; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:30:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190927.023152.1179355129866318906.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20190927.023152.1179355129866318906.hrs@allbsd.org> From: Mihir Luthra Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 03:00:38 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? To: Hiroki Sato Cc: freebsd-net , hrs@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46g4j72fZwz4PgD X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=FjH97Wnq; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of luthramihir708@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luthramihir708@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.58), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.59), asn: 15169(-2.17), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:30:52 -0000 > > > clnt_create() checks /etc/netconfig and tries all of the transport > protocols with the specified class which are listed there, and then > chooses the first usable one. So if IPv6 is available, "udp6" will > be used because it is before "udp". > > statd.c handles the bind addresses on the server (service) side while > file.c and procs.c handle the client calls. They are different. > Thank you. I read more about it and I can relate it more now. Although, I was thinking if the transport is being selected at runtime through netconfig, aren't they already transport independent? > > lu> Also, while looking at the code, I think it always assumes ipv4 is > always > lu> present. Like `127.0.0.1` is added to host list always. On ipv6 only > lu> machine this may fail. > > Yes. We should fix this kind of hardcoded loopback addresses and > make userland utilities transport-independent wherever possible. It > can be replaced with getaddrinfo() with AF_UNSPEC for all available > address families. > > Yes I did fix that hardcoded thing and some code in rwhod too which I pushed to phabricator. Kind Regards, Mihir From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 21:52:19 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185BC12EA20 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:52:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-QB1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr660071.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.66.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46g59s587fz4Qgd; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=VsTMnI79a2sO2uJNl2bGkIkZJF7VKPrcdrQ4jeBl/0lfFY3XA4TQ9k3osZ6qX7jwmgvRKoCKnmH6/jO+nr0pN9C68AzWLENfBIzRiWRfxJbHQexGp5vJuOp84t0WYewwMTTuDa5BzPhiDMEsDEOF8OH4CSAVIQFkCpIX3rKNZYIS6RY7gSYW+lX9G415OOFkQS9HfX78KnYU8PDrfQmAIO6oPQWcNPZE8nFSezlm/Farug1IR5DLiVSwoh1qjJLWZ3NIfENTO1hM7EZmtlMdVnEggAYtBytY2AAhxqjHfZH9/jPRGd7swFuFU7W1TRMYtg3lvtJIUzXl6/vBnmXUXA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sqGj3QNq9lBd4qVTOd8McBNMu9xRFFYZj8sEDyYpXy4=; b=KENgDEdy6vulZ8kFmlWPcMUz+0Pe7aU2rPCyZ5b1gvaNfLCligNtGjjdoz+4DlJ5gthdSv3OdLquAJT8P01wvzjyZ/Ss1AzUiqxzeDaJ/AG9kx8zXFo5eij4964mf66fsrfogrT2ChKc1+wXzxkGJyChE8eN3PmJOpuCAWoSINQcwvNufjCIPhHZW0cGAAYSZWX+jMHNPngSIzHIFekL9iAPHh5ODIX7tVyb7IYAJ2d0ZkUCDZGlkCIwd9z219qucUstRReJWbP5yqywKKQid5IyOBn0JLHS7GuJNaK02qkjs4FoOnlUPanOLf1Rhk9+pvqe8y8yQdEzQdrcfHzN5g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none Received: from YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.51.22) by YTOPR0101MB1883.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.47.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.20; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:52:14 +0000 Received: from YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::157f:eebf:d4d4:451]) by YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::157f:eebf:d4d4:451%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.017; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:52:14 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: Mihir Luthra , "Bjoern A. Zeeb" CC: Hiroki Sato , freebsd-net , "hrs@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Thread-Topic: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Thread-Index: AQHVdGd0vvt0AdNYvUi0bBe7GEcLYKc+EjgOgAH25oCAAAjLXg== Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:52:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 077df6ea-aaa1-487d-3060-08d74394f573 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTOPR0101MB1883: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882; x-forefront-prvs: 0173C6D4D5 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(51914003)(5660300002)(46003)(6436002)(54906003)(2906002)(446003)(110136005)(81166006)(8676002)(8936002)(14454004)(91956017)(256004)(55016002)(25786009)(86362001)(11346002)(9686003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(66946007)(486006)(76116006)(305945005)(66556008)(66446008)(476003)(316002)(4326008)(4744005)(81156014)(229853002)(7696005)(99286004)(52536014)(478600001)(186003)(6506007)(64756008)(66476007)(786003)(6246003)(76176011)(102836004)(33656002)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:YTOPR0101MB1883; H:YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: uoguelph.ca does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 924/eKne925r2QHZ2y5TQlmM9ZBV95mFrASVu5jD42RlA81++EeG3ATEf9sUSe6Xgm6JyrGURrsDoM4NUvLDmtR0U4L0Zehlt3UQ7R9Ypf4pd29+M91d+u1plvjp7iQy6xVLV/mIOluCc1vscXC17r6GvNCz91qN/yHTbBx60dccTXUwwARlQJsyKcQ4DBOqEGc3NMOcP/KPjsV7VdrjA/bVGbsY+XqaKDzjzOGNMSxoGDogY5o/nVFaMxhMJK+/vQ5RTR1U91UhX7d+em1SzHASM2OVO3EHRGfKH5wYeorL/Dpj0Z3ODpU30pc+Wcu0T7nOJ2fbDxQm5W0jXZMIBfWGKK498CGqGQ46rfJEgEMF//EJUBgs5JHiGqaDs5J1npspbJ6c/K+WsnSuAplULotG18zYH1j7FeodXd5cTEk= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 077df6ea-aaa1-487d-3060-08d74394f573 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Sep 2019 21:52:14.7033 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: /tt0xgcSrkINgacMDIQ4i1hISbdktxM1HjSo0XV4nFnIMEiqxDgi4Tv+TbrFsa/lRs6BnzXnVLAhpkBn/j0oCQ== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTOPR0101MB1883 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46g59s587fz4Qgd X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rmacklem@uoguelph.ca designates 40.107.66.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rmacklem@uoguelph.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.58 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.107.0.0/16]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uoguelph.ca]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[71.66.107.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.28)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-3.80), asn: 8075(-2.55), country: US(-0.05)]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:52:19 -0000 Mihir Luthra wrote:=0A= >Hi Rick,=0A= >Rick wrote:=0A= >>Although I'll admit it isn't something I am particularily fond of, FreeBS= D likes=0A= >>utilities to build/work with only one of ipv4/ipv6.=0A= >>To do this, "#ifdef INET" and "#ifdef INET6" is applied to the code and t= he=0A= >>Makefile is tweaked to define one or both of these.=0A= >>(You can look at usr.sbin/nfsuserd for an example of this.)=0A= >=0A= >Yes I see. Although I was thinking, wouldn't it be better if we can take a= flag via >getopts for ipv6/ipv4 if the machine supports both with macro gu= ards around >too?=0A= bz@ is the guy to ask. I've cc'd him.=0A= =0A= >Btw, these protocols are old Sun Microsystems ones without any published= =0A= >RFC, so what is "correct" is difficult to determine. I suppose the Open=0A= >Solaris sources is the best protocol specification. (Interop. testing with= Linux=0A= >would be nice, since Linux is the "defacto standard" now.)=0A= >=0A= >Good luck with it, rick=0A= >=0A= >Thanks for the tips,=0A= >Mihir=0A= rick=0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 22:14:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70F412EF63 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46g5g75JnQz4Rbs; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx1.sbone.de (mx1.sbone.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:13b:39f::9f:25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.sbone.de", Issuer "SBone.DE" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: bz/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EC262D25; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bz@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.sbone.de (mail.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31FD18D4A154; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340DAE707B9; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sbone.de Received: from mail.sbone.de ([IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:587]) by content-filter.sbone.de (content-filter.sbone.de [fde9:577b:c1a9:31::2013:2742]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-jOG9F_cZBr; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.110] (unknown [IPv6:fde9:577b:c1a9:31:58ea:7c85:750a:d274]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.sbone.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97B2DE707B8; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:05 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" To: "Rick Macklem" Cc: "Mihir Luthra" , "Hiroki Sato" , freebsd-net , hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:04 +0000 X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6137) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 22:14:11 -0000 On 27 Sep 2019, at 21:52, Rick Macklem wrote: > Mihir Luthra wrote: >> Hi Rick, >> Rick wrote: >>> Although I'll admit it isn't something I am particularily fond of, >>> FreeBSD likes >>> utilities to build/work with only one of ipv4/ipv6. >>> To do this, "#ifdef INET" and "#ifdef INET6" is applied to the code >>> and the >>> Makefile is tweaked to define one or both of these. >>> (You can look at usr.sbin/nfsuserd for an example of this.) >> >> Yes I see. Although I was thinking, wouldn't it be better if we can >> take a flag via >getopts for ipv6/ipv4 if the machine supports both >> with macro guards around >too? > bz@ is the guy to ask. I've cc'd him. We are also exchanging private emails currently to sort out the confusion between “compiling out”, transport protocol, and addresses/protocol carried inside the (RPC) packets. This is three different things and all should be sorted. My work is mostly on the “compiling out” as I don’t want/need INET anymore mostly. Ensuring that the transport protocol works dual-stack is a good, easier part. For RPC and some others making sure to be able to not only transport IPv4 addresses in the payload protocol but also IPv6 addresses can be the hard part. I assume the latter is what you were referring to in the lines below? >> Btw, these protocols are old Sun Microsystems ones without any >> published >> RFC, so what is "correct" is difficult to determine. I suppose the >> Open >> Solaris sources is the best protocol specification. (Interop. testing >> with Linux >> would be nice, since Linux is the "defacto standard" now.) >> >> Good luck with it, rick >> >> Thanks for the tips, >> Mihir > rick From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Sep 27 23:30:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00D0F0162 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 23:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from midnightdreamer@aliyun.com) Received: from out30-41.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-41.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46g7MD4079z4VCR for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 23:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from midnightdreamer@aliyun.com) X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=CONTINUE; BC=0.4935767|-1; CH=green; DM=||false|; FP=17487317922548118157|4|1|4|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e01e04395; MF=midnightdreamer@aliyun.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=1; RT=1; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0Tdamzaw_1569626699; Received: from midnightdreamer(mailfrom:midnightdreamer@aliyun.com fp:SMTPD_---0Tdamzaw_1569626699) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:25:00 +0800 From: "midnightdreamer@aliyun.com" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?5YWs5Y+45pW05aWX6LWE5paZ5Ye65ZSu77yM5bim5a+55YWs6LSm5oi36ZO2?= =?UTF-8?B?6KGM6LSm5oi36IO955u05o6l5L2/55SoLFE1NDbkuIA2OOS4gDY2Mw==?= To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64 Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 07:26:05 +0800 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46g7MD4079z4VCR X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++++ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [9.19 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:115.124.30.0/24:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[aliyun.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[aliyun.com:+]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[aliyun.com,quarantine]; SUBJ_ALL_CAPS(2.62)[35]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[aliyun.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:37963, ipnet:115.124.24.0/21, country:CN]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[aliyun.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[aliyun.com:s=s1024]; FROM_DN_EQ_ADDR(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 115.124.24.0/21(-1.87), asn: 37963(-1.57), country: CN(0.02)]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.971,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[41.30.124.115.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[41.30.124.115.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 23:30:34 -0000 6aOYDQo= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 28 00:36:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BECF1645 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from CAN01-TO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr670057.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.67.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46g8q13k9dz4XTQ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=LtcCtuHSnsTSno83J0PlDyVC24dDi25IeSVz7cwrNLFtab3Fp/jfmQ7M6E1qkTT9FJrg/s3htkaFUxG8Q0KcLD13/ptb5ujMMsuNrZV+1di40YzAsKZAoUpcvmkxVqgracQrD3j4RZinKzAN2sh3+pPPnVrx1eAvukcY0/BH/8vMvtvZLVpEbN2/s48ZOOZoNC+T/ohqa637sxWEANWBrPVisU31gBOxkcGV49ESazloTRIlqXIkrPNP3huUDNqgxqVyyBobgDz/EfQmP1nPSvyBO6J/t9tb0CZlJLGaIbLxwWhgpY+tKBfNfC/Tm6NuPlDR0kpqDw9RxJC1yc9LWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=kmnWiY8APd+BYugAWbPgzRDnmKxXjSnhMrH9pGYCzFA=; b=bjYuOa9D/K5c6fdsVhKKzCrfBbjC3r0tBwroYRHZyJE92WI4t0LDHyHRiN06rwlR/+76XSNJgDCKT2QfdqNz+Kc4ZVwif9xDWv/1geYo93uWb39A1c2croBS087MStPxmoxyQ7ZQmSe+asE6hMVAliR/INfYFpoMMdW3Ay7nNz1UjAHTHjKRs9D8Dje4OKDL9EEUQd3uaEY57LbLVBLuSk3K3b6Nb5OU2Fnqwz0OllXZhEz4HJcBCB3eRGkYeB53pAS17+YGYDiPBw/OD9aaOCVtTdPWS4x+ewMThLwW/fs8t1EBs344BP1UD/sVG64uQ1aa33ohSAqPYBIuK7A10w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=uoguelph.ca; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=uoguelph.ca; dkim=pass header.d=uoguelph.ca; arc=none Received: from YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.51.22) by YTOPR0101MB1787.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (52.132.44.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2284.23; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:36:07 +0000 Received: from YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::157f:eebf:d4d4:451]) by YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::157f:eebf:d4d4:451%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2305.017; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:36:07 +0000 From: Rick Macklem To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" CC: Mihir Luthra , Hiroki Sato , freebsd-net , "hrs@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Thread-Topic: rpc.statd already ipv6 clean? Thread-Index: AQHVdGd0vvt0AdNYvUi0bBe7GEcLYKc+EjgOgAH25oCAAAjLXoAABwYAgAAlLko= Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:36:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20190925.085753.1800759957383540219.hrs@allbsd.org> <20190926.054603.242590258844901628.hrs@allbsd.org> , In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 37f93731-2005-4da3-a0d9-08d743abda05 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(5600167)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:YTOPR0101MB1787; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: YTOPR0101MB1787: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000; x-forefront-prvs: 0174BD4BDA x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(396003)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(136003)(51914003)(199004)(189003)(52536014)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(7696005)(229853002)(6506007)(76176011)(8936002)(8676002)(86362001)(5660300002)(66946007)(81156014)(76116006)(71200400001)(256004)(81166006)(11346002)(486006)(786003)(476003)(446003)(46003)(316002)(6246003)(305945005)(74316002)(71190400001)(4326008)(54906003)(102836004)(6436002)(9686003)(33656002)(478600001)(6916009)(25786009)(99286004)(2906002)(14454004)(186003)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:YTOPR0101MB1787; H:YTOPR0101MB1163.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: uoguelph.ca does not designate permitted sender hosts) x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: BcFKSJiMX1ieO8cWKdVNIRL20EctOUeyIAD8EFwrwBQ5cZ9NxdpwkVMSugvfj5jAc363B9KnzzL9JB2Yz8LBf6fIMys+ooFJMspw9nxATafQi+gjqIPLJ9CUjOgjpBHB5k+j4ZrWa1IaOdrnZU4ftClvB8kzxxpoKjK0+RyYfOC54dYnhN0ETJZTWKd/HOUVpmFCtoFHyiN41ImCk9RZiPo+oM4/Nfiwx4njsf1ZkXDCjYGX0i29DOJ5ZJxGlSnrUO5Z+v2H+5K9tHWKVF2dbMO95/JU8yIuxUOWli+K1rO1MESiZGaCGZGm1sOvjYXjDZri42erqWRamtImNzhJvGVyNyAaBFm5pZV6qGxx/z8s0YZfWFx5mO9uZQ3IBQpzgPDroOu1OBHxrX0mmy/PkTxDsV4mstSzq4kl8ZV6Biw= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: uoguelph.ca X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 37f93731-2005-4da3-a0d9-08d743abda05 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Sep 2019 00:36:07.2015 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: be62a12b-2cad-49a1-a5fa-85f4f3156a7d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: Ue6+SOdQlomoqudA91CT1TITdU6cEifTDBH21dcIGunzC8gLixdHvNe9bo8WAlIG7KJV7f9hYDpFxTCJZQefow== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: YTOPR0101MB1787 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46g8q13k9dz4XTQ X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 00:36:13 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:=0A= >On 27 Sep 2019, at 21:52, Rick Macklem wrote:=0A= >=0A= >> Mihir Luthra wrote:=0A= >>> Hi Rick,=0A= >>> Rick wrote:=0A= >>>> Although I'll admit it isn't something I am particularily fond of,=0A= >>>> FreeBSD likes=0A= >>>> utilities to build/work with only one of ipv4/ipv6.=0A= >>>> To do this, "#ifdef INET" and "#ifdef INET6" is applied to the code=0A= >>>> and the=0A= >>>> Makefile is tweaked to define one or both of these.=0A= >>>> (You can look at usr.sbin/nfsuserd for an example of this.)=0A= >>>=0A= >>> Yes I see. Although I was thinking, wouldn't it be better if we can=0A= >>> take a flag via >getopts for ipv6/ipv4 if the machine supports both=0A= >>> with macro guards around >too?=0A= >> bz@ is the guy to ask. I've cc'd him.=0A= >=0A= >We are also exchanging private emails currently to sort out the=0A= >confusion between =93compiling out=94, transport protocol, and=0A= >addresses/protocol carried inside the (RPC) packets.=0A= >=0A= >This is three different things and all should be sorted. My work is=0A= >mostly on the =93compiling out=94 as I don=92t want/need INET anymore=0A= >mostly. Ensuring that the transport protocol works dual-stack is a=0A= >good, easier part. For RPC and some others making sure to be able to=0A= >not only transport IPv4 addresses in the payload protocol but also IPv6=0A= >addresses can be the hard part. I assume the latter is what you were=0A= >referring to in the lines below?=0A= Yes. I do know there is some code in sys/rpc/rpc_generic.c (around=0A= line# 320-340) which shows how an IP6 address is coded in ascii to=0A= go on the wire. It basically uses inet_ntop() for the host address and=0A= then appends .N.N for the port#.=0A= However, I have no idea when/if rpc.statd uses that?=0A= =0A= >>> Btw, these protocols are old Sun Microsystems ones without any=0A= >>> published=0A= >>> RFC, so what is "correct" is difficult to determine. I suppose the=0A= >>> Open=0A= >>> Solaris sources is the best protocol specification. (Interop. testing= =0A= >>> with Linux=0A= >>> would be nice, since Linux is the "defacto standard" now.)=0A= >>>=0A= >>> Good luck with it, rick=0A= >>>=0A= >>> Thanks for the tips,=0A= >>> Mihir=0A= >> rick=0A= rick=0A= =0A= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Sep 28 17:16:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A473F12BC2D for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46gb1f3sgwz4QC7 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 82BAE12BC2C; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827E312BC2A for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46gb1f2wyyz4QC6 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A5B4BBD for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8SHGsuo070587 for ; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8SHGsRe070586 for net@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239118] iflib: Panic in ether_output_frame on ESXi Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: markj@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 17:16:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239118 Mark Johnston changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Open |In Progress Assignee|net@FreeBSD.org |markj@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #18 from Mark Johnston --- https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21831 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=