From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 29 06:03:10 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75E01D58EF for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic309-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic309-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47lqjn30nrz49cc for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: PzFqy9sVM1lXv_FSCUAVNqrDnpO5ecX6fm5jxVpNDqtbRpsDaqET0CpIAjtjLlG FaEyZwZr6wKDXh.sEtNDfnhP7spCrotKbpm0D4Wgw2gRm684.0fgbyuLh2Y0niXWXzpGbfve8UdM 3Kwky4CLKlla8lr_SJMhmE7MKALJtjjSN5NV33tjw4Iqbu.ggSxu2Yj1_SuYTsp9Ca6fCIw4nl1V IEtB0AiuJI1Ystv2Z6j5SuN_0Tn9bQ6CM8hLlUbPAjNdorzUcrkx34.c.RScVf5fPlDTMGLWp0qB 4w2fqm7EDWrJ_BgsNNtJ7DmsoiuVhOl_oM3khqEl_W24pOt0NLKzeubLZjfO3sPRueDEpNITx9ih _eOi4umOb9RyugPUoAbYFLZwkSvywPjaX0eKRObSUYwjjxypSttW5f_NhlA.4vn_HakEWIm1GnVh s4q5tSVLnHs.EOqEq.9pnovbj2RciTNU4lBmQdJ91cFVU_krd7F._5olhBWCk4n4aBigr9h7SpRV yITnXbj9Zad9kFR2ZhGiyZZFVcMWkgAmSp4ggOocG8mdipi3JaaEvvnyg2oTKmOJgyhfRHBRBI9n T36rx4G6NK_6nq2_xK1.RCKTAFeOAPTZS2TwUovlOkU1ta29KPIgUayhHplcYAMTxI_gX7YCOhyY vpEYvqJxNkGL8jevkOA2n8r2yYiy09IJ6roGRgECUVZ2U_YbofToa7ZN.VEFXcrapniEudMtHBeo IHRCp165vziBix7WBSsRRfHsd5T0EMq6QZZRNtLIt3osgLybxSmo_OeEh7eEMtSLLkQtvzPdb4gG .5XQk8.zjqwB2oqbwH2VY6LNYttAy0E56KeSKe4qJ8TmdeVdc3_0.3DP3Dhzahh72p3ObaDVz4Uc BAVQLK3mfDo84wwvk.wd9kfaGHq7zThX5cct20mc8yTT4F2bz1u_ReHGcsvuZNe2AcX54sU3xaGZ hC3583kFbAaXfFPjbwMMGNTg6Ev_WQs7ZrG6nAJ11pnjz7EbwlL3qsKQwREdflC5xcEYy9uL0KgY dzRAokF1Fr9lKlHwVyTpZC46e4xnEzfvP2lvD5GIgFIpXzxWJWJXsfmrlEdzXEiLqiHj0UpDaesU yz9Wh.ZhjbGH9gIpVh_4gA6GCqRavmNtdUKwHnWv4AiZ39JmZOqqqDlv6j77b9e4g7wnExUgmNpx MfezTyiXRRs0wuPZM9_vIjFrttgUOKf6MpN.2XbD8rju413UYJx1anfnyutyc3p4uCIHLndo2Yi9 XbC.R8pWaz0wjMPQkj7nZIGXyA0j55GtIJQJKIJpkjzB.fj62jz6rdvFTt.Kog6d3sDcMq9GtY0T SW_AiGSkqbYP.l5_piR5LZzu4wSfY4TbAClkoKpOhBXGKZPGo4_BkJRvvHgo.JvaL1mRYIeQAh8E bJP1Q._1UFrCusjv.EBZec.Zfo7Hrmp3Z35PdsnFJDQY- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:03:06 +0000 Received: by smtp403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 792d29fcf967bd30fbb65f30061a1709; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:03:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: x11-toolkits/qt5-gui build on/for Cortex-A7 ( head -r356109 ) failed with: unable to execute command: Executable "as" doesn't exist Message-Id: <122B34CA-9CCC-4299-BB5C-F97D76C7426E@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2019 22:03:03 -0800 Cc: freebsd-arm To: FreeBSD Toolchain , FreeBSD ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) References: <122B34CA-9CCC-4299-BB5C-F97D76C7426E.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47lqjn30nrz49cc X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.984,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[148.65.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-0.25), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.89), asn: 36647(0.71), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 06:03:10 -0000 Is system-clang 9.0.1 supposed to implicitly try to use /usr/local/bin/as ? It does for this context . . . Note the -fno-integrated-as use in the later quoted log material. I'll also note that an experiment via -### shows that system-clang 9.0.1 then uses a command like (from a very simple example test): "/usr/local/bin/as" "-mfpu=3Dvfp" "-meabi=3D5" "-o" "a.o" = "/tmp/a-14ae2e.s" and that in turn presumes that devel/binutils has provided /usr/local/bin/as . That in turn means that, for ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel to work for x11-toolkits/qt5-gui , BUILD_DEPENDS=3D at-spi2-core>=3D0:accessibility/at-spi2-core \ ${LOCALBASE}/include/linux/input.h:devel/evdev-proto \ = ${LOCALBASE}/include/vulkan/vulkan.h:devel/vulkan-headers would need to also include (or the @native explicita-flavor variant): ${LOCALBASE}/bin/as:devel/binutils HOWEVER, I'm not sure if the implicit use of /usr/local/bin/as is intentional or not for system-clang. The failure report (1st error only, there were more): . . . --- .obj/pixman-arm-neon-asm.o --- cc -c -O2 -pipe -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fstack-protector-strong -isystem = /usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -std=3Dgnu11 -fvisibility=3Dhidden= -fno-exceptions -Wall -W -pthread -fPIC -DQT_ACCESSIBILITY -DQT_DBUS = -DQT_FONTCONFIG -DQT_FREETYPE -DQT_GLIB -DQT_IMAGEFORMAT_PNG -DQT_OPENGL = -DQT_SHAPE -DQT_XCB -DQT_XKB -DQT_XKBCOMMON -DQT_XRENDER = -DQT_NO_USING_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_FOREACH -DENABLE_PIXMAN_DRAWHELPERS = -DQT_NO_NARROWING_CONVERSIONS_IN_CONNECT -DQT_BUILD_GUI_LIB = -DQT_BUILDING_QT -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -DQT_ASCII_CAST_WARNINGS = -DQT_MOC_COMPAT -DQT_USE_QSTRINGBUILDER -DQT_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS = -DQT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE=3D0x050000 -DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS = -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -DQT_CORE_LIB = -fno-integrated-as -I. -I../../include -I../../include/QtGui = -I../../include/QtGui/5.13.2 -I../../include/QtGui/5.13.2/QtGui = -I.tracegen -isystem /usr/local/include/libdrm -isystem = /usr/local/include/qt5/QtCore/5.13.2 -isystem = /usr/local/include/qt5/QtCore/5.13.2/QtCore -isystem = /usr/local/include/qt5 -isystem /usr/local/include/qt5/QtCore -I.moc = -isystem /usr/local/include/libpng16 -isystem /usr/local/include = -I/usr/local/lib/qt5/mkspecs/freebsd-clang = ../3rdparty/pixman/pixman-arm-neon-asm.S -o .obj/pixman-arm-neon-asm.o . . . --- .obj/pixman-arm-neon-asm.o --- cc: error: unable to execute command: Executable "as" doesn't exist! cc: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see = invocation) *** [.obj/pixman-arm-neon-asm.o] Error code 1 make[1]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work/qtbase-everywhere-src-5.13.2/= src/gui . . . For reference: Build based on ports-mgmt/pooudriere-devel . =46rom early in the log, showing compiler information: #### /usr/ports/Mk/Scripts/ports_env.sh #### _CCVERSION_921dbbb2=3DFreeBSD clang version 9.0.1 = (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git = c1a0a213378a458fbea1a5c77b315c7dce08fd05) (based on LLVM 9.0.1) Target: = armv7-unknown-freebsd13.0-gnueabihf Thread model: posix InstalledDir: = /usr/bin _ALTCCVERSION_921dbbb2=3Dnone _CXXINTERNAL_acaad9ca=3DFreeBSD clang version 9.0.1 = (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git = c1a0a213378a458fbea1a5c77b315c7dce08fd05) (based on LLVM 9.0.1) Target: = armv7-unknown-freebsd13.0-gnueabihf Thread model: posix InstalledDir: = /usr/bin "/usr/bin/ld" "--eh-frame-hdr" "-dynamic-linker" = "/libexec/ld-elf.so.1" "--hash-style=3Dboth" "--enable-new-dtags" "-o" = "a.out" "/usr/lib/crt1.o" "/usr/lib/crti.o" "/usr/lib/crtbegin.o" = "-L/usr/lib" "/dev/null" "-lc++" "-lm" "-lgcc" "--as-needed" "-lgcc_s" = "--no-as-needed" "-lc" "-lgcc" "--as-needed" "-lgcc_s" "--no-as-needed" = "/usr/lib/crtend.o" "/usr/lib/crtn.o" CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_58173849=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_9bdba57c=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_6a4fe7f5=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_6bcac02b=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_67d20829=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_bfa62e83=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_f0b4d593=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_308abb44=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_f00456e5=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_65ad290d=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_f2776b26=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_b2657cc3=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_380987f7=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_160933ec=3Dyes CC_OUTPUT_921dbbb2_fb62803b=3Dyes _OBJC_CCVERSION_921dbbb2=3DFreeBSD clang version 9.0.1 = (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git = c1a0a213378a458fbea1a5c77b315c7dce08fd05) (based on LLVM 9.0.1) Target: = armv7-unknown-freebsd13.0-gnueabihf Thread model: posix InstalledDir: = /usr/bin _OBJC_ALTCCVERSION_921dbbb2=3Dnone ARCH=3Darmv7 OPSYS=3DFreeBSD _OSRELEASE=3D13.0-CURRENT OSREL=3D13.0 OSVERSION=3D1300069 PYTHONBASE=3D/usr/local _SMP_CPUS=3D4 CONFIGURE_MAX_CMD_LEN=3D262144 HAVE_PORTS_ENV=3D1 # uname -apKU FreeBSD OPiP2E 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #12 r356109M: Fri Dec = 27 17:24:56 PST 2019 = markmi@FBSDFHUGE:/usr/obj/armv7_clang/arm.armv7/usr/src/arm.armv7/sys/GENE= RIC-NODBG arm armv7 1300069 1300069 # cc -v FreeBSD clang version 9.0.1 (git@github.com:llvm/llvm-project.git = c1a0a213378a458fbea1a5c77b315c7dce08fd05) (based on LLVM 9.0.1) Target: armv7-unknown-freebsd13.0-gnueabihf Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin # svnlite info /usr/ports/ Path: /usr/ports Working Copy Root Path: /usr/ports URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 520539 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: ler Last Changed Rev: 520539 Last Changed Date: 2019-12-20 18:01:52 -0800 (Fri, 20 Dec 2019) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 29 11:24:08 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B7B1DBD9B for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com (mail-yb1-f181.google.com [209.85.219.181]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47lyr71GBnz4NpK for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:24:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lwhsu.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id k128so2063861ybc.13 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 03:24:06 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hjC3XZeb+oj1Uuk4wicFNX2xFa3lNkDkPcObVNBhzQE=; b=jOLISJ8KY56nJSYAcIlf5Qz9oxr59FQN2u92wgjC4WiNiVtqi+eIYvhVucQosKOvas pnasGMALhEtSrnMeYRKw4M9q5rNgsLg3BiKVmshpV1YpWfNFdXpzuFgADVLuGuaxLAGc J8Do8bSUYLq/rQ579b4AnCsyeSsX27QvP5viV4QjWOjFtUYy/4eUnHn3yGMRw9FoIOh4 b2Ts4Lf5wzKpUGk9JOxugqrgAuDxnoBsBjPpeFAFzwQlQ/JjziNIiZTXCs8ssHV3AV+y 6dY6NjRkDMmY47yu08nD0bdnRhInNnvdS7nut59iiuvA2zMPkdr3kLk+o3gMyPiiraHr 8mnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUM/JHJiEVxsHl9MWfnrVFxGr3yWkzzMtlna2LrLhuUQrzZZRn4 JqrrBibrgfth7d5ATWWCc9x+VpsYfsIIcSJDIjN5PPsO X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJQMLUpSveflC9GSRtLDo6QztWb2Rm1bPC7B0fVPOsRn2QhuBASbl0aYf3cCnYCL2r/8OVG2zV/3VfKmw9t2w= X-Received: by 2002:a25:1841:: with SMTP id 62mr21297318yby.405.1577618645706; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 03:24:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <116348b6-fe05-9cea-c914-388014ce600a@xinuos.com> In-Reply-To: <116348b6-fe05-9cea-c914-388014ce600a@xinuos.com> From: Li-Wen Hsu Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 19:23:52 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cad/gerbv can be helped To: Tim Rice , Ash Gokhale Cc: "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47lyr71GBnz4NpK X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[181.219.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(-2.82)[ip: (-9.05), ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.11), asn: 15169(-1.88), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[lwhsu@freebsd.org,lwhsufreebsd@gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:24:08 -0000 On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 6:13 AM Tim Rice wrote: > How about checking the git log and doing a git diff. > git clone git://git.geda-project.org/gerbv.git > > Looks like README-cvs.txt was pulled and README-git.txt added. That should also work. Ash, Could you also check these? Thanks, Li-Wen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 29 17:54:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3F01E5761 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47m7VF6vvCz3QVJ for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB2981E575E; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF181E575B for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47m7VD2WT7z3QVD for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xBTHs0SZ088187 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:54:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=201911; t=1577642043; bh=lMI04N83r0Fg5i3+gVhWJ1pZhf3/jQQpzenw6QFKbVs=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=YwD3onmG5qLCZrLH5DWKPs7B7GPM0/jpidhDdRQCfEuw6uqZWBhwwCSS9nRWLlyKU zipFTgCMnN6M4+b8AFiiWmGU4MW+QqVIyDjyYzSb+j7FdWi+HvXTI0O5l6+gStnJtZ 3ta7VFiHB3iSsB3jAee2HGB+LAUcj6fJemK6L4zs= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu To: ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Help with porting Python libraries Message-ID: Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:54:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47m7VD2WT7z3QVD X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=201911 header.b=YwD3onmG; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.38 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=201911]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.38)[ip: (-7.20), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-3.60), asn: 30722(3.84), country: IT(0.03)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:54:14 -0000 Hello. I've got a system where I had to install a few Python libraries with pip, but I don't like this, since pkg info will not list them. Thus I'm trying to port them, but I never ported Python libraries before; so, before I submit my work, I thought I'd ask if someone more experienced than me might have a look at it. My first attempt was at IMAPClient: I copied another port (net/py-GeoIP2) and modified it; this is the Makefile I came up with. > # $FreeBSD$ > > PORTNAME= IMAPClient > PORTVERSION= 2.1.0 > CATEGORIES= mail python > PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} > > MAINTAINER= ml@netfence.it > COMMENT= Easy-to-use, Pythonic and complete IMAP client library > > LICENSE= BSD3CLAUSE > > RUN_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}six>0:devel/py-six@${PY_FLAVOR} > > GH_ACCOUNT= mjs > GH_PROJECT= imapclient > > NO_ARCH= yes > USES= python > USE_GITHUB= yes > USE_PYTHON= autoplist distutils > > .include "port test" gives some warning, but seems to say it's ok. Anything wrong? bye & TIA av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 29 18:23:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5551E60EE for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47m87V542Mz3xJf for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ADDC41E60ED; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA101E60EB for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:23:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47m87T4YDgz3xJd for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:23:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ildDG-0005UG-9n; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 19:22:50 +0100 Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 19:22:50 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with porting Python libraries Message-ID: <20191229182250.GA87956@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47m87T4YDgz3xJd X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pi@opsec.eu designates 2001:14f8:200::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pi@opsec.eu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[opsec.eu]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-3.25)[ip: (-8.45), ipnet: 2001:14f8::/32(-4.48), asn: 12502(-3.33), country: DE(-0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:23:03 -0000 Hi! > I've got a system where I had to install a few Python libraries with pip, > but I don't like this, since pkg info will not list them. > > Thus I'm trying to port them, but I never ported Python libraries before; > so, before I submit my work, I thought I'd ask if someone more > experienced than me might have a look at it. > My first attempt was at IMAPClient: I copied another port (net/py-GeoIP2) > and modified it; this is the Makefile I came up with. [...] Thanks. If you test it with portlint -AC and re-arrange a few lines, portlint will report 'looks fine.' A testbuild with poudriere worked fine. USES before the rest of the lines, and it's silent: USES= python USE_GITHUB= yes USE_PYTHON= autoplist distutils GH_ACCOUNT= mjs GH_PROJECT= imapclient NO_ARCH= yes -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Dec 29 18:32:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC72B1E641C for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml+freebsd@vishwin.info) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47m8LT4NZTz3xhK for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml+freebsd@vishwin.info) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 966A31E641B; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9524C1E641A for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:32:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml+freebsd@vishwin.info) Received: from varun.vishwin.info (varun.vishwin.info [46.101.93.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "varun.vishwin.info", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47m8LS3P4Lz3xhJ for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml+freebsd@vishwin.info) Received: from varun.vishwin.info ( [fd35:9eae:7575::2]) by varun.vishwin.info (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1f7d5b33; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:32:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:302:cad7:19ff:fec0:a06d] ( [2001:470:1f07:302:cad7:19ff:fec0:a06d]) by varun.vishwin.info (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id f10e2d5a (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:32:22 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Help with porting Python libraries To: Andrea Venturoli , ports@freebsd.org References: From: Charlie Li Autocrypt: addr=ml+freebsd@vishwin.info; keydata= mQINBFt7iHUBEADCorTixbMGuHd9WYSKCELlv/TFcRtvpHUw/n9LtXzKixUUwl7iuMFMYTz3 QXePX0Twq4jCQYySfcxWbPkLsSYlPOkaGQ+XytfmIHoqG5ba4i1fp+F41is0oCtLt1+oL84j NKUd13em/JWd+PJeQbSTVnHbT2yaAi7vqWw5WKVaMExjfPGU5TArV46wSRU6Zuy1ZX66q0q5 dPzeBdeKYWJE8aGtyi3pYUpKUOX4gxiNetf6leDFZ4OsexWaRdU0n8fId5d1qwjAE3lOwV5z 0Ilt8t4iXtX3JL3DAQyLZIeXHIg9O3rrpPMXQWSp2/5g39PohNk7farbhcpIKxuDN+L5N6U9 OxNHBSCv9FGDO4R/mw3YwJCovDzsF7RSyXQDIY36yjdh2uTLZ0uD5Ci/DPmJUySFLRvpqWnQ M7V5cYhdqDfcElGpRbi8JZQVYRJjvI5Jj0byG98KeaD0YFxKqmmm+Oh+xWXE7xt/DsBoZeZJ BFP84LvFbwQqprvI+sg+1z2+JIgNbYwl8VaYzfyGnqTEXTOsQYEKTdKA9MODSAsN31MlQICe CIHZV+OwOqH1KQ/mZp59AnpXAmj4T94bnahE9yJtVW/qglX/nTeFNUdu5MyEgkeB0x7mx+t0 3hE20yp/NbyvG1T/o53NHwHiURC/8Fxd1NWPZ6n4X8npQn6iyQARAQABtC5DaGFybGllIExp IChGcmVlQlNEKSA8bWwrZnJlZWJzZEB2aXNod2luLmluZm8+iQJOBBMBCAA4FiEE/3/Cqr5a +41PbEb+jnB43vIDq2wFAlt7iwoCGyMFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQjnB4 3vIDq2zlBQ/7Boe3K9i4pxvIlBWlFDmDuclLiju/LTsc81mO607TIwUMx5p3BfnhqTwqpcuT Gilj2JKSlIw0NioJ3HnPiPyIpMmOmdeLBwvBn8iBmjs14DdDMgKusE8gKc0KRFbTM397rB7K oXj2/R8VF3Uuo8i3vlWyah6p+Osz1dAad/7COqPeM9OBMKaYAOrdKvxMC96l5k+Wc1JKOLeA BP7BtgmQB7HydHUm+dzqUB1rgMP2djIXd5Ngc749kzNQIFvC9ZXbaABw5M4JqKRbVFm08Wgw IUyhkNEtMpkBxMPwqXsk3t1KVptYQSAfW/+8mWDP2sgUOyz9O2IBfb1acCPk04/jf8SsXRaT HzJr64NseWlZUHAMYl9EC09gdE6UDCIHR68+IzutMtgT17Djuu1HRYly+RWAGkyTOeR7Sv/V 2B89Nsq5OfHYs3F2vD57/aRj5TmZJDQWxH/rDYbj8Pk6UjXcaY6QWUtNFidvCMFlBpXuncXU ZWgTsJEyZLHP5SJ7S9sRSHU5+CVUkjsbEFNuHkkGHAkSnpP+HosnH8/q9Rykn9FTamLbiQRQ UxJ6+IlqvOUtRRrMGMBF7ZIFGHcl8tcKynsPTeaHjpqPhCrZx8PmCKKoJHwW4Ua7+cdZkBJq R20qvXuLIrInjkIpA1CbacMckS5a7el6pi/nU0NG1S1K4Zu5Ag0EW3uIdQEQANdl7YHG8JOy HbEYv+7ExSrO96qBRavg1FsDG0riDmlsOSfZ2fqL6/YJF5WsfsX99+YSdIiLQfC4QOw/cA+M I65pgY4cCu42L7YIW/AR+jB1hFg+Q/cbeOwjuKPFYtZvxeDpSsaA6iIR+p+t4DXkjWl86g6W aFLC+til/rCilFHY/1/6M918F1gm/6xCIADDFu0BXLkASc5B4LuvaFEiJIuI9ZoQDIgWxnsX 0tXXE36SwK/XrowzRzsOa+2iOHAPKu7rPGHwy28vO4T5Uq7UynMZG2sK3RTbOijaxL4IJF4W MRqpuGdBSJ4sWmr5aIpgX9au5L1TNAAILJpHXnkv+k825+9VgbhFtFYBHEkgUtXb+w34JnkH okpr9A78dpWb+T+jOEP6ZUgM+4VVy+hCCpbcCVI2PEXu8w2z3+4yZWxIFmy8UYZRoeTMKzV2 zLeisoA0XA8jj548YNPiAl20Mjyoqu42WNv0P8fD9PMTcfLFCj2PlxOhuUFaIUH3ty0/bNeS jPtVK+L9x4W37R7U1tYk+tB5MlPakQiSQtdToB+8K34rnBt/3kCoAYL7Hygw9+qyZrEKZDtP 5JKekfgsy28t1z66xWCUwq9PHuUFiij3cjbwIbskI9uy2+xITcXt4ZqVfpZcdGmjfbdTPkGf PH2pjDoCJaezYdbha/3OVhmVABEBAAGJAjYEGAEIACAWIQT/f8Kqvlr7jU9sRv6OcHje8gOr bAUCW3uIdQIbDAAKCRCOcHje8gOrbExnD/9qwSL4HiorJmUEJ+5CTh8IJql4PzeQK8Dx93gi Zs5jWVlCJTmcpQNirWIZM2eRt67C/wTJjLmEVGzySVLpGiUqhXqdROgFmDwvEnmpIbtWWyvG sgSOCmZj/tz0GEtLSsjJcV/kLffkv7XEKkt9ZjIJnFYVYSovDK1o2PoO6Rfi5AWHHB7jYhjS HJvJjDx0yClO9gEYhtw7R60YOLH+cKoDou9tu+4wR3QwRsNGO6wrzLGhptxuBrDMI+HuOx+j wBTliuzuvZrry6OdKDDdq5D4vvQCj4vFnK4p7LZXhBshCMoLkWoA0I2T+YF/V5Ob5EuvsTIC re/pO/g941ipVkehvVNAsiplSaHjasB1HS6BQ95csI8E/b6PnKm+IECp2bANbLP1jrxKeBGj UkeyRxTmOV/ADUIIj8S4a2yOxTxlysN2O5wqXCJcxaYelC/Y4TUcL6ENxn2dLBdCYKQEna0u DdxZp7fS+pXN6qyK8Qz6Q42MHAxFAZdLKf6a44d4HQt6rPcWdETVlnVKnJr0b9kg5K1Q8N4k PVoTGVrkGAZhmjFYsqWulq445VU46mX7WcqsrZx8LqNTwP6i3Bf71FJ9EBxTyA8fP8k0qosP 8U8D7jhcc5x4yVW8RBBtB+a5q3odWdFnjMLEm4wtxBH/mSN/UKRcFSBvKQ8FxTgpX4Yxcw== Organization: FreeBSD mailing lists Message-ID: <8c5ab43f-a0c3-3a63-2291-15e3b7a2dc2c@vishwin.info> Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 13:32:15 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UR071FW11kc6Xgx6o7PYphvtXyaW2go8P" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47m8LS3P4Lz3xhJ X-Spamd-Bar: ------- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.74 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[vishwin.info:s=fuccboi12]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; IP_SCORE(-2.64)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 46.101.80.0/20(-4.95), asn: 14061(1.72), country: US(-0.05)]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[vishwin.info:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[vishwin.info,quarantine]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:46.101.80.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:32:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UR071FW11kc6Xgx6o7PYphvtXyaW2go8P Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fKfMRtvcugnyg1qqz3ZtUeICWU9gEtomU"; protected-headers="v1" From: Charlie Li To: Andrea Venturoli , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8c5ab43f-a0c3-3a63-2291-15e3b7a2dc2c@vishwin.info> Subject: Re: Help with porting Python libraries References: In-Reply-To: --fKfMRtvcugnyg1qqz3ZtUeICWU9gEtomU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrea Venturoli wrote: > I've got a system where I had to install a few Python libraries with > pip, but I don't like this, since pkg info will not list them. >=20 > Thus I'm trying to port them, but I never ported Python libraries > before; so, before I submit my work, I thought I'd ask if someone more > experienced than me might have a look at it. >=20 > My first attempt was at IMAPClient: I copied another port > (net/py-GeoIP2) and modified it; this is the Makefile I came up with. >=20 >> # $FreeBSD$ >> >> PORTNAME=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IMAPClient >> PORTVERSION=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 2.1.0 >> CATEGORIES=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 mail python >> PKGNAMEPREFIX=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} >> >> MAINTAINER=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ml@netfence.it >> COMMENT=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Easy-to-use, Pythonic and complete IMAP c= lient library >> >> LICENSE=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 BSD3CLAUSE >> >> RUN_DEPENDS=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}six>0:devel/py= -six@${PY_FLAVOR} >> >> GH_ACCOUNT=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 mjs >> GH_PROJECT=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 imapclient >> >> NO_ARCH=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 yes >> USES=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 python >> USE_GITHUB=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 yes >> USE_PYTHON=3D=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 autoplist distutils >> >> .include >=20 > "port test" gives some warning, but seems to say it's ok. > Anything wrong? >=20 Since you said you installed these Python packages with pip, they are probably on pypi. In that case, it is recommended to use CHEESESHOP as the MASTER_SITE (cheeseshop is the old name for pypi itself) instead of going through github. Also recommend reading through the documentation in the "Using Python" chapter in the Porter's Handbook and the comments in Uses/python.mk to really understand everything you're doing. --=20 Charlie Li =E2=80=A6nope, still don't have an exit line. (This email address is for mailing list use; replace local-part with vishwin for off-list communication if possible) --fKfMRtvcugnyg1qqz3ZtUeICWU9gEtomU-- --UR071FW11kc6Xgx6o7PYphvtXyaW2go8P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEE/3/Cqr5a+41PbEb+jnB43vIDq2wFAl4I8TQACgkQjnB43vID q2xj+w/+I761+Dp+zL8JA+aBKfuDhJPW4fZc35hmJNIuOZisdyb+qEQsowIZlhCx Xj/gk1oBl49pTTAQzIGDRgtWr6mVhJfR7nS/VXFbWQ8LaMS3yzE/Gm13k2ZnRncY 8/NRB0rLZ4edMbJ3l0CPxzaOWUxH6HyQTs2IMMFv+WVsNd2FuCBgPi9E0hU8maQ7 Zk+u6g520x85WXtO6lD4mwExVdZAEZPNlka3ZNtU6S6pz+iIlMZhPSriYrVPHgBt 5yTFbf7vc5IVdNeJdmTmc6RQfj4LbaOb9OoH6ZKqWzINp296VqFSlqEhJ7U3wCW7 5xkdnPKs45UvP9n4JfnyCFFOUpupo/tcHDLfQnkB1nCNRg6QE1ZPOv59JhDeRdYN SudJ5s/5wTAaL1Tg3ya27jrFuHQJN181dNTE3OVfGoawUlBbqIgqmpbcfyJFcMdH 9QrF5s3T5b/XkVSxOcvxju2dzYzVKDLljM67BqBbgJ3dkvX7ji9GnKowmBg7WAMk zTFwONu3zZoWY2lLOL12Q65D0Kmr9iAvwn0xlylbDTG8ZWabuxqcifCNx5Ix7CfZ oE3LE2PxX4UxI0rKQfz9ABkl8m3wGIkwPk8VbG/DRjQ7iWjhBS0VPRdMGYkFNrTZ Evr9h32t+IKzRCC6TwX3ccEmyImrHmrJPKC8rWdo0PiqkarPH30= =8Tua -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UR071FW11kc6Xgx6o7PYphvtXyaW2go8P-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 01:52:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8AA1D17A7 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mL5W0jjGz4Ncn for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:51:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id c14so31436401wrn.7 for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:51:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yaByrz8CDhWnJOy4wcTZCbx6rfFw1uqlKUWqMAHUtco=; b=u8Dsh+UJL86JKZxFKswsP0dp4XHyXWWpT5bx9318/XmP0WZ9HJ49h7wmbg0YqFo8Iy VT4uFev1SsaxcKHWvPGUJMYFJxBN7qisa1Pf5LwYpGXxfrBXG8Ln6ntddRRm3JqSWVa3 sIMYEO/amCZYU4GTnTTJGSnu3mfbgtFwtmn1/ec2wuEtU/05Cye2GBt8X1Mid8R9o0tU VgohruGkxcQ77zkBmz+vv/Zx0G+MMSMlSEtLisSuOVKKEZ1OBHISwPNIEuKm76pAktFH 5Wz3NgIX+QGDrpiV/s1WMPQYnQ3CTZ2QwKLrUF1BDMCi56i+vqUSlGWP6hVQKTT6+mKF Fb/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yaByrz8CDhWnJOy4wcTZCbx6rfFw1uqlKUWqMAHUtco=; b=G8tZZwu9PNQdm6w9Ge/j8bZupy/8Ua/Z27dJqev+LPituQfMocaQbxCmZTGuhY7VU4 mZo/Drj4TqY2aty9q3jSAa9jZDUhWUp+8UnT/Gs5l4tmo8Btq6g+NqK/V8xQe+bZyPDb pnNktbxCpzZjsyyOwaER3Y0i9ptCf7R8PZuj0T8Kq13fQuXARiiJQwtK7ljf+FTUzpdU i5wY1xqiVq0ncYQpzKxfdMWKY5iOTj+UjZpaXDy8X0gQT2kgOrcvXfHn5ikzNRXYZNQp DZRkUdyhetIQig3eG0Wq2R3dSsESv1bxIum8GGFwN79m2Odm3AInLhPi8WD2R7QAIy6a p1Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXa786OXV9pc94HgMrWcIFEkpUhlP3eLQnsrfVV/PKlMzL61MEO ZK3/rTXM0akx4hF537H8/4BBNyhv0jSRXc1nzZm1rGAkXEChmw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz+/gfqGirP6RAXP0g1ZEONofebHzxswtrnQVhvKBKuNKZ47MufLCnrzJ4FMcDFHpcc3787en79gxpDVLaS+QU= X-Received: by 2002:adf:b193:: with SMTP id q19mr63888934wra.78.1577670717297; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:51:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered To: "Kevin P. Neal" Cc: Greg Rivers , FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mL5W0jjGz4Ncn X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=u8Dsh+UJ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.22 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.72)[ip: (-9.03), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.64), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:52:00 -0000 On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions on exFAT[1]. > > > > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed from sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the FreeBSD base system (like msdosfs) one day? > > > > > > [1] > > I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see an > explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the license needs > to be transferable. > > The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. Simply saying > "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't really say anything. > It's a statement of corporate direction and nothing else. Expanding on what Kevin said, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module that they submitted. The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 02:26:19 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93F91D21D1 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47mLs74MV2z4QCP for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 925A81D21CF; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920621D21CC; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mLs656JLz4QCM; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:26:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id z16so17594833pfk.0; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:26:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=6BqwX2BXrRaOdKxU1G0TjyoJ/UGqrsHAPOhAdQa/dd0=; b=uYcIOOQtzJOr3KF9zgvyt3Cg422oxMXRDEki+TIBITG8VjcpENrjBau8avKoHmebPg qHBnCD6wSv/sxa8zzuMgVziC5V3Ojnvx59U84tSG4orguOobthSh/5m/a2T02JTYMGjh YVQVYktpaRge60AOuHcapBYGCjcYSnPM7oY+iP7ZsrVxWD8OdG/Q5htpxdOppalZooYy JFWR9laZzq/n7G29+vzFxRVbfA7WHLtEzH7lWeaxJEPAJm/HhazCCvGzV2DeZ72YUZAK IPmEfjavqGKKFL1wVpP4I3qrh0pQx/ptOZo+Mm+O3Dtwjb+N0EStH4gWCp5uUGThHdVY MspQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6BqwX2BXrRaOdKxU1G0TjyoJ/UGqrsHAPOhAdQa/dd0=; b=lthVg/SY5VZyvP4ZpJiL6mI6mzqTRZs380On10sW7BRvLvxPscLZKi/AwSq7uhhmGS lwUbGc/ZTzVUvCExJllq+33ihDh7U+sS0eCw5VJPR3Rx89APFCg/dnjm6ZcMZ7Je+At+ BFTTRQFaTvqP8+e+djJQNVoYQEHCGhmRGv07wBYQTJYXrA1WbbsHTrh5NN0TBN5OcGSO C9SdTl3BHrbDZum/XzRV6JXymhiLBFBR24XgFUOaraGlc0+HWo21Y0wkG4hjD8uM0yWT h0Uz41GUMMu5iIEizYUYodMoz+mi2mIohlS93/R1sPjYd5gbgRME/ONMDI7gLMhhtTPC s7mA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVBl8zSnZsKa8lH0XhV/uI9QOujP4zipa4TvQTgz6GHYueK2BIE wbyZjWNMEuyjlDxF4lESRUBEywRW X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzhBbYLtOmgyxcR3c7EAsNHtWMakIs03VmSEcXtyCwSahBk9bpD08pS79FOQFg7QbT1NJFBSA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9296:: with SMTP id j22mr39031146pfa.201.1577672776970; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (180-150-68-130.b49644.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.68.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 64sm47568601pfd.48.2019.12.29.18.26.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:26:16 -0800 (PST) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Help with porting Python libraries To: Andrea Venturoli , ports@freebsd.org, python References: From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <850bbe75-06a2-0af6-fec8-8f6d3bd7c260@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 13:26:12 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:72.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/72.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mLs656JLz4QCM X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=uYcIOOQt; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of koobsfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::443 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=koobsfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.16 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-0.96)[ip: (-0.70), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.4.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 02:26:19 -0000 On 30/12/2019 4:54 am, Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hi Andrea, nice first job on a Python port :) > # $FreeBSD$ > > PORTNAME=    IMAPClient Lowercase this PORTNAME > PORTVERSION=    2.1.0 > CATEGORIES=    mail python > PKGNAMEPREFIX=    ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} > > MAINTAINER= ml@netfence.it > COMMENT=    Easy-to-use, Pythonic and complete IMAP client library > > LICENSE=    BSD3CLAUSE Add LICENSE_FILE pointing to license file if one exists in the source download Both the PyPI sdist (MASTER_SITES=CHEESESHOP) and the GitHub repo have one: "COPYING" > > RUN_DEPENDS=    ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}six>0:devel/py-six@${PY_FLAVOR} > > GH_ACCOUNT=    mjs > GH_PROJECT=    imapclient > > NO_ARCH=    yes > USES=        python > USE_GITHUB=    yes Use MASTER_SITES=CHEESESHOP if the project uploads a source tarball ("sdist") there, unless there's a compelling temporary reason to use an alternative source, like missing license files, test files, etc. > USE_PYTHON=    autoplist distutils > > .include For details Python Ports Policy & Guidelines/Tips: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Python/PortsPolicy If it doesn't answer any questions, needs clarifications or additions, let us know If you need further help or just want to hang out, we have a #freebsd-python channel on freenode IRC, come and say hi :) ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 11:40:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C591DD384 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam11olkn2081c.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7eaa::81c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mb8x6MZVz3PPM for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=f2mD3meFcM2qjAdM+Z6z9ZHztn0XUeYaU3U1X7/ochskhFXtqc9J/UX1NNs/1JwTqnVOhCEfMlU7dOCKGys36EFjUBCnlA/igdY6r5cMogV2ehbzEhpe6JPqaOl/GRnc41K9pi1DUGhIZyzQzofMTLfWBjeB/GsbikrsSKyZ0Njq9XP7nMzyOQLuSXP6Jvj+4GYr4GTFURz1PWVmO2fqsuGaQCCkSRRe5/zghSikadey/FEZDb00vUlgIDRujvRN7sk+Eo1RHEcDh8EYtvbiIRF3+5BF3xdNm4qSf4AVd6/YP6qxpXlYTAyop52ywVbjfiNO2s/jXYxSaGS/V+P0Jg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=VaUpTlwDTfupQ/dvh9om3SSc3EfvCF3D2OtEfonQ0Oo=; b=EvyPWzBF3brpS+aP89gNJx+zwRNKuspOPMb85OhzWmxhe22ZU7ZDsO7gUuo+EcACc7GB2ex9S4eU2Z9Zl+0PFyyV9Zv8WQQZTKzcjft4OcWOI2JA5nwWl/Vjjbof0gzQlJeyD9lKjeBCiz/D2Vn3b8JZm/j5ik+U6ZGwGz4mnAzangqpAuTh7OvLl03BToGpVgaKad7nO537TRk8KG/mRns+Y5eBG53OJFAhOd85qRVw8RZRP3AWIOek3RycA96pjPC5lWM7xiLFO6ixbUkxDUKzXI7b8SU2vnWf5XpOeavmdePQuhKsLbGYskaXiVJI5G0fBNoNM3bWM5o3rzirsg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=VaUpTlwDTfupQ/dvh9om3SSc3EfvCF3D2OtEfonQ0Oo=; b=CG9Ex4aFkpI13q9IiM2r0DvdOee1j6UduQwigFuLJ1WSh3SjrcSbEgMy9lAQzWTuftw4Ze/HRDJGGwnV3eHxoXhHESAAwd5BItSNncL+ACuSpsGrKirK7DjecHrf3jzf2K64Kwrv6MTmd0ziuh4blKj4ZE08Kw3MCEAhVGhZjbmX04eVntcYKatHiwqoxCoXQzUGFMwPcsEquN1HZGO5TTr0rjJY715NBq125AYXg1f08VfPnB1bZAGbk2rFq6EZdGWWqToUFduTD//Jt51AhJ7pe2OS97YNApbs02aNG9KOM+XH6gaYlMGj+WI/AkAB3m40gb4ku+hCOUOB08kVsA== Received: from DM6NAM11FT045.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.55) by DM6NAM11HT077.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.13.172.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.11; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:46 +0000 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.13.172.59) by DM6NAM11FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.13.173.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:46 +0000 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7cab:af09:c65b:4798]) by SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7cab:af09:c65b:4798%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2581.007; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:46 +0000 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (174.109.225.250) by MN2PR13CA0005.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:160::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.7 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:45 +0000 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@outlook.com) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47mb8r1Mppz2hnH for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 06:40:44 -0500 (EST) From: Carmel NY To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Thread-Topic: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Thread-Index: AQHVvwX5zu2G4ORHxEaDRaKUhM/2Vg== Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: MN2PR13CA0005.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:160::18) To SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:9f::32) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.3) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:38DFF9BD2E181C3CE89F2B311CBC46B3243C1EB5A2744074D4BDCD4BEF1B7716; UpperCasedChecksum:24862349807CC8CC3024CD7B20A43E1B7FF82A73FC570D6BB5DA7C5257F7FBC0; SizeAsReceived:8245; Count:53 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [MYjGn/CINB/biBSCtkATEH8a9Ga4wUXEzRbLTr4c3bY=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20191230064036.18e99935@scorpio> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 53 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 66a3e9aa-431a-48ef-ef2b-08d78d1d1be1 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM6NAM11HT077: x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: oUIEon3pj0SnPmd9pwbepi3tiwf7IDn+ZjthV0fu/0IT+uheZJmazv+RK9cIT8zzpuY2srLzI8bsOGzWMGr6Tz7XgZSoUDfBtym3xroiEjqeuYOgUyFEkxGvjRjCBZ7oVmN9Z4B1Abl0XlRfOIpEOuBkjswMgjoUvnXnQMEZcBOPMxr3OWP1Wg6PWwUZXfk76xKlSb+npKl68q8wBEFtuJ8QtktfW5EE/KFrC5bUWyw= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/x7g5VVWXsoOE8ZR_GM67vNa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 66a3e9aa-431a-48ef-ef2b-08d78d1d1be1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Dec 2019 11:40:46.3290 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM6NAM11HT077 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mb8x6MZVz3PPM X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=CG9Ex4aF; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 2a01:111:f400:7eaa::81c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[250.225.109.174.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 2a01:111:f000::/36(-3.61), asn: 8075(-2.95), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:40:51 -0000 --Sig_/x7g5VVWXsoOE8ZR_GM67vNa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >wrote: >> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: =20 >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions >> > on exFAT[1]. >> > >> > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed from >> > sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the FreeBSD base >> > system (like msdosfs) one day? >> > >> > >> > [1] >> > >> > =20 >> >> I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see an >> explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the license >> needs to be transferable. >> >> The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. Simply >> saying "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't really say >> anything. It's a statement of corporate direction and nothing else. =20 > >Expanding on what Kevin said, >https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licen= sing.aspx >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module >that they submitted. > >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > ># Adam I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing --=20 Carmel --Sig_/x7g5VVWXsoOE8ZR_GM67vNa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIQb/tTwl6I1ueEVtOHMGOIfexWQFAl4J4jUACgkQOHMGOIfe xWS6Bgf/dhEnvF0pLzV3+U81psREMFeAG9OfsebhJz00+qPhUZlaRNmdK6VycD9q 2gZmV2iKAzHgw+SZcaVK1nGZStQ31phgILhAEys3U8fywcaErSKCwJvjo2kjp4fS JqiakJ/0aC3LHII9aSuSrb8yv/cYiWWpWYoWz6VjIfoIU2VAY6xUg4In0QWzb5Th ecdRg0RbBbjigHJWGS/QNyDLJnY2mPR5z+1fghmfJi7QnLtGUJ3ZWF1HTmg6y/5M HogWwQ++dS+RftjU2hQy9E6nqXXl2zgOw6yr2X3tbGZLX336Dyu1PuhR+7qnvE9B P89rzXI/Dby3kdBcPXAM5R13IsqpZg== =k7dE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/x7g5VVWXsoOE8ZR_GM67vNa-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 17:48:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668AA1E579F for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:48:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darkfiberiru@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mlKH17M4z4HbV for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darkfiberiru@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id k16so42523166otb.2 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 09:48:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=X53/THnZDfvjeOFYdsGhjgYiHXjeLxW9vvaxJwqqpco=; b=LYnEUb7OaEUWCfkEQ8Qdc4/gAt1bIJi34AY58CARpD7bSDJStfk0yru9Jr8F/DjuGD IsSs4aWtDS8EzjowuwYTYjAAAByewFCDDWUelftr5Gxk5vE4Z4q8QN5wA/oCq4MNG4Ir Ote7XqepfjnsEUoVcxpWcy+DIG8Z+1V++KaHGQ9wRIHWkZB6aotdSdE9vfxkXXcFAl4D rSMN4eEHE60lo8JtFXogSUHPTlKejQtlzl4iOedsjGcNxF47O1Xe/IAW7Vw/hnAPK9cD O3o1Jh41I+f1AHF6HmhoSq7I8NvLBoyyLLuz+5vXegkZe9oEJIU7cci9vK7YuvH3ihkr IxrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=X53/THnZDfvjeOFYdsGhjgYiHXjeLxW9vvaxJwqqpco=; b=RnJAOM5bJtCcb/4QICKcxQvykuVtB3DHopr/mWh12P4CcBNFlnW3p+gh2UExkok+uX OkDU/aO9ia3TyD2M6GYXsbAbd4gD5ilAlZSgsijH78sRlQoIts65/fzHhrQzmX5RbNPP MTfihtwSgR9OqTxMjRe/cFHhllP4cSD0YssM+HttAA3vnRsPfLnhcrYCx9Z5UPR2XgIa UToNbyo5ZUaqDfoE+Ke21i/bY+/Rt5OtZVKBp1SjKqqTRVYNpXojeYKcmb3wkhZbznrA G2UM8IEBR3XwKvDLT5SFaihDf40NIZ3f3fLh+YAJZOj5WYrKwinP8hZ4bWG1As7WNLlq kcvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUgNn8mpB2Rki4LdRNYkSrKBkqZbcq2QWmfr0KR32U5g2Rq84Il hU5ZodVbgHUu8j87rP0AUlQ6/kQkQ+GSGV9TBg/dLQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy61TGSIAta7AaNVGuVySpWEH3tSffasFKfivxnA3G5VhThjf96Xm32tb/9K2xW24WIRW37bWL4v8UAPImG3V0= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:588c:: with SMTP id x12mr73042438otg.2.1577728113870; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 09:48:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: From: Nick Wolff Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:49:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , info@freebsdfoundation.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mlKH17M4z4HbV X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LYnEUb7O; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of darkfiberiru@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=darkfiberiru@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[9]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-7.07), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:48:36 -0000 Sounds like something the foundation might be able to help with. On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 6:41 AM Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal > >wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions > >> > on exFAT[1]. > >> > > >> > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed from > >> > sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the FreeBSD base > >> > system (like msdosfs) one day? > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > < > https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2019/08/28/exfat-linux-kernel/ > > > >> > > >> > >> I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see an > >> explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the license > >> needs to be transferable. > >> > >> The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. Simply > >> saying "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't really say > >> anything. It's a statement of corporate direction and nothing else. > > > >Expanding on what Kevin said, > > > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx > >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, > >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module > >that they submitted. > > > >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in > >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to > >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > > > ># Adam > > I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing > and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. > > http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing > > -- > Carmel > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 17:54:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1151E5A57 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:54:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org) Received: from roadkill.tharned.org (tunnel294749-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:107f::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "tharned.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mlS64mnMz4J6g for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org) Received: from flake.tharned.org ([IPv6:2001:470:1f11:107f:19c8:4221:c069:155d]) (authenticated bits=0) by roadkill.tharned.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xBUHsKnx099529 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:54:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tharned.org; s=2017; t=1577728462; bh=nD3IUqwwdeEdB2Tkr/HG/qg6of8PLT22a7nLMK6apAg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=THLegHFDXK1u4+WLlqN5926woITWYxmaK16nUtr4NF7fSC7Dv0DZS40Y4UngyAvmU WUt3cQN4+IPw3BWxeItcUYDA/BaGXo2RBqdJfy/IOG2FCEWSfVUPtNlm9R10x4nbmk FWmn3FocCJC9/VZPlFcIMbieZvJKzNwKpQzlJnYVYYawmsLLnn736gM9BU8uxYZFSd HXCTrrR7oILHRSm57p3atcd4L0SOQK+HRTpey+7sW9ATrzNlKiE7G9HxYvx8gH7zJx tOeU9fuSMEsh1MfVY/2zQZ8ZINwwBEqa7YuKrBcPpmYPRFrfBR4Zi5JMRvDMRMpUSR PCXS9VClTRyJA== X-Authentication-Warning: roadkill.tharned.org: Host [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:107f:19c8:4221:c069:155d] claimed to be flake.tharned.org From: Greg Rivers To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:54:20 -0600 Message-ID: <1915406.bl7DLxgNLY@no.place.like.home> In-Reply-To: References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (roadkill.tharned.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:107f:0:0:0:2]); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:54:22 -0600 (CST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mlS64mnMz4J6g X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tharned.org header.s=2017 header.b=THLegHFD; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gcr@tharned.org has no SPF policy when checking 2001:470:1f10:107f::2) smtp.mailfrom=gcr@tharned.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tharned.org:s=2017]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[tharned.org.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; IP_SCORE(-1.66)[ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.67), asn: 6939(-3.57), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tharned.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tharned.org:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:54:31 -0000 > Expanding on what Kevin said, > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx > suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, > and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module > that they submitted. > > The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in > commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to > relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > Yeah, IANAL either. My quick read of the blog post may have been overly optimistic. Perhaps the Foundation could help? I brought this topic up because I think a lot of people could benefit the cross-platform compatibility that this would provide. -- Greg From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:06:15 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A13B1E5ED8 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47mljg1phcz4Jnl for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3C4951E5ED6; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0DE1E5ED5 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mljf6Ygsz4Jnk for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ilzQa-000764-AG; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:06:04 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:06:04 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: info@freebsdfoundation.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Checking if exFAT can be used unrestricted now ? Message-ID: <20191230180604.GE1258@fc.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mljf6Ygsz4Jnk X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.94 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.946,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:06:15 -0000 Hi! Please have a look at this posting in ports@: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2019-December/117385.html > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent > restrictions on exFAT[1]. > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed from > sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the FreeBSD base > system (like msdosfs) one day? > [1] https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2019/08/28/exfat-linux-kernel/ During the discussion the question came up if the Foundation can get in touch with Microsoft, see http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing and get a clear statement from them about the use in the ports tree ? -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:11:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A239B1E62B1 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47mlqY3wlrz4KK8 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8674A1E62AB; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8621F1E62AA for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mlqY31pSz4KK7 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6328A5B84 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBUIBLWe046347 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBUIBLsm046346 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201912301811.xBUIBLsm046346@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:11:21 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.sysutils --- sh: freebsd-version: not found make[5]: "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/sysutils/etc_os-release/Makefile" line 18: warning: "freebsd-version -u" returned non-zero status --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/py-arrow: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/py-backports.functools_lru_cache Committers on the hook: adridg hrs jsm sunpoet tcberner ume Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U japanese/font-myricam/Makefile U japanese/font-myrica/Makefile U japanese/font-hackgen/Makefile U japanese/font-genshingothic/Makefile U japanese/font-genshingothic/pkg-plist U japanese/font-genjyuugothic/Makefile U japanese/font-genjyuugothic/pkg-plist U japanese/font-nasu/Makefile U japanese/font-cica/Makefile U japanese/kterm/files/patch-Imakefile U japanese/kterm/files/patch-KTerm.ad U japanese/kterm/files/patch-VTPrsTbl.c U japanese/kterm/files/patch-VTparse.h U japanese/kterm/files/patch-charproc.c U japanese/kterm/files/patch-main.c U japanese/kterm/files/patch-menu.c U japanese/kterm/files/patch-scrollbar.c U japanese/kterm/files/patch-util.c U multimedia/mpv-mpris/Makefile U multimedia/mpv-mpris/distinfo U security/olm/Makefile U security/olm/distinfo U security/olm/pkg-plist U security/py-certifi/Makefile U security/py-certifi/distinfo U security/lxqt-openssh-askpass/Makefile U security/lxqt-openssh-askpass/distinfo U security/lxqt-sudo/Makefile U security/lxqt-sudo/distinfo U security/lxqt-sudo/pkg-plist U german/mythes/Makefile U german/mythes/distinfo U polish/hunspell/Makefile U polish/hunspell/distinfo U net/rubygem-opennebula/Makefile U net/rubygem-opennebula/distinfo U net/rubygem-google-cloud-spanner/Makefile U net/rubygem-google-cloud-spanner/distinfo U mail/rubygem-roadie/Makefile U mail/rubygem-roadie/distinfo U devel/rubygem-mustermann-grape/Makefile A devel/rubygem-mustermann-grape/files A devel/rubygem-mustermann-grape/files/patch-gemspec U devel/rubygem-mustermann/Makefile U devel/rubygem-mustermann/distinfo U devel/rubygem-mixlib-install/Makefile U devel/rubygem-mixlib-install/distinfo U devel/rubygem-google-api-client/Makefile U devel/rubygem-google-api-client/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ssm/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ssm/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-resources/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-kendra/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-kendra/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ec2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ec2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core2/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core2/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-core/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-comprehendmedical/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-comprehendmedical/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-apigatewaymanagementapi/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-apigatewaymanagementapi/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-accessanalyzer/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-accessanalyzer/distinfo U devel/rubygem-aws-partitions/Makefile U devel/rubygem-aws-partitions/distinfo U devel/py-semantic_version/Makefile U devel/py-semantic_version/distinfo U devel/py-python2-pythondialog/Makefile U devel/py-python2-pythondialog/distinfo U devel/py-graphql-relay/Makefile U devel/py-graphql-core/Makefile U devel/py-graphql-core/distinfo U devel/py-graphql-core/pkg-descr U devel/py-graphene/Makefile U devel/py-configargparse/Makefile U devel/py-configargparse/distinfo U devel/p5-FFI-Platypus/Makefile U devel/p5-FFI-Platypus/distinfo U devel/p5-CPAN-Perl-Releases/Makefile U devel/p5-CPAN-Perl-Releases/distinfo U devel/readline/Makefile U devel/readline/distinfo U devel/re2/Makefile U devel/re2/distinfo U devel/Makefile A devel/rubygem-ruby2_keywords A devel/rubygem-ruby2_keywords/Makefile A devel/rubygem-ruby2_keywords/distinfo A devel/rubygem-ruby2_keywords/pkg-descr A devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ebs A devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ebs/Makefile A devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ebs/distinfo A devel/rubygem-aws-sdk-ebs/pkg-descr A devel/py-graphql-core2 A devel/py-graphql-core2/Makefile A devel/py-graphql-core2/distinfo A devel/py-graphql-core2/pkg-descr U devel/liblxqt/Makefile U devel/liblxqt/distinfo U devel/liblxqt/pkg-plist U devel/libqtxdg/Makefile U devel/libqtxdg/distinfo U devel/libqtxdg/pkg-plist U www/py-instabot/Makefile U www/py-instabot/distinfo U www/you-get/Makefile U www/you-get/distinfo U www/ckeditor/Makefile U www/ckeditor/distinfo U www/cutelyst/Makefile U www/cutelyst/distinfo U www/cutelyst/pkg-plist U textproc/py-pyaml/Makefile U textproc/py-pyaml/distinfo U graphics/py-mapclassify/Makefile U graphics/py-mapclassify/pkg-descr U graphics/charls/Makefile U graphics/charls/distinfo U graphics/charls/pkg-plist U graphics/lximage-qt/Makefile U graphics/lximage-qt/distinfo U graphics/lximage-qt/pkg-plist U databases/py-zodbpickle/Makefile U databases/py-zodbpickle/distinfo U databases/py-leveldb/Makefile U databases/py-leveldb/distinfo U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-Helpers/Makefile U databases/p5-DBIx-Class-Helpers/distinfo U databases/plpgsql_check/Makefile U databases/plpgsql_check/distinfo U databases/plpgsql_check/pkg-plist U sysutils/debhelper/Makefile U sysutils/debhelper/distinfo U sysutils/lxqt-admin/Makefile U sysutils/lxqt-admin/distinfo U sysutils/lxqt-admin/pkg-descr U sysutils/lxqt-admin/pkg-plist U sysutils/lxqt-policykit/Makefile U sysutils/lxqt-policykit/distinfo U sysutils/lxqt-policykit/pkg-descr U science/hdf5/Makefile U science/hdf5/distinfo U science/hdf5/pkg-plist U science/eccodes/Makefile U science/eccodes/distinfo U science/eccodes/pkg-plist U audio/sayonara/Makefile U audio/sayonara/distinfo D audio/sayonara/files/patch-src_GUI_InfoDialog_GUI__InfoDialog.h U audio/sayonara/files/patch-src_Components_Covers_LocalCoverSearcher.cpp A audio/sayonara/files/patch-src_Components_Streaming_LastFM_LastFM.cpp U audio/sayonara/pkg-plist U audio/pavucontrol-qt/Makefile U audio/pavucontrol-qt/distinfo U audio/pavucontrol-qt/pkg-descr U deskutils/lxqt-notificationd/Makefile U deskutils/lxqt-notificationd/distinfo U deskutils/lxqt-notificationd/pkg-descr U deskutils/lxqt-notificationd/pkg-plist U x11/compton-conf/Makefile U x11/compton-conf/distinfo U x11/compton-conf/pkg-descr U x11/compton-conf/pkg-plist U x11/libfm-qt/Makefile U x11/libfm-qt/distinfo U x11/libfm-qt/pkg-plist U x11/lxqt-about/Makefile U x11/lxqt-about/distinfo U x11/lxqt-about/pkg-plist U x11/lxqt-globalkeys/Makefile U x11/lxqt-globalkeys/distinfo U x11/lxqt-globalkeys/pkg-plist U x11/lxqt-runner/Makefile U x11/lxqt-runner/distinfo U x11/lxqt-runner/pkg-descr U x11/qterminal/Makefile U x11/qterminal/distinfo U x11/qterminal/pkg-plist U x11-fm/pcmanfm-qt/Makefile U x11-fm/pcmanfm-qt/distinfo U x11-toolkits/qtermwidget/Makefile U x11-toolkits/qtermwidget/distinfo U x11-wm/lxqt/Makefile U x11-wm/lxqt-panel/Makefile U x11-wm/lxqt-panel/distinfo U x11-wm/lxqt-panel/pkg-plist U x11-wm/lxqt-session/Makefile U x11-wm/lxqt-session/distinfo U x11-wm/obconf-qt/Makefile U x11-wm/obconf-qt/distinfo Updated to revision 521555. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:13:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1F31E63D3 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic301-22.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.64.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mltJ0MTQz4KcB for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: CivHmuEVM1l4AFuzkAXnqThytyymhQ8pSS5H75Zrr6nHcjqY4bnfdo_HsfV6ydm SCT6k_EIjka0XzP33iH.ZtVslp2PaOj.5kZTaaWbD0hAzOi0cXMPMf08fLVIC8T4GJGxw0dSarhe YUYahFcxC4xLChIkb6jT2WFczrJjvx4Pgj7eL1m1iXBpoxY5K6IlEtd9y7adCCw_myTrwIdcJRSB S2PnSHV4rTXcmcRlyxRA1BaVjxe4wOCITs9l4n.0.AJLvR4N88S4bYgMredAKSyvcsfNYOqdHB8x vv0vj8pdRCan5yGPWOHT9sTkBmKigpSG8ZmrBCeZMfvudTr3zvdihHeUd_yetn1Bg_EPBalZZhG2 NLy6It4tki3SCeeWNzdPW3YjpdrBl3bdEumDcTn5eQ.6zWit041zP9VmX4oMyv7zeWl0nJTSSSms eUttv9lU6rKh.yGDxFVsZuM8JHk3pnyKpTW5ihlEAW_mxMiRaWILKJJPBClZ.YSX35iBDeJxuBd7 CD2X9i_AHyXPjqSifmh7SkfnFxocxUwbq6T4EdmKhTMbGI5fifhAF1yaWrp085ymlowdW2.2nDjZ 8HDE_guye5AJUXhzf.Rwigj60DqBCgpVW3hs.Pk93p7rDMZou3yRAdRrBARASQDZ8qsX7Y9lYZaL 7F0Azfsnhgm38xNkx95SEhPrDvlR_mYrw4dJG3wkgVs05dBRECODavYcZs036MW96rqR8O0rEQ_n .uj_Y6xGJpLZEkGklS8JgJmTYqK1zmRo_ps7nvsJHGkRcffIjP5q4dbkZcDFU1w5KvNTidzmUT2a rjZX6ZZrFwu7GNqvsfmJ3EXeNf14ewb1cfAgPtGhPMvxe__iWS_pz8ImSgOTLfMHv3ITUpS4.btt ng6WEetk3Bgu63fEGi.15O9WtnNBRKsNMgHIwQ1vMMMfmLkrLHlBHrxiYagmu_yoVr.jg_yFeJQi Iz5fT9Avpn408yBRFMz0SRS19x3LbZPvAerTTgIWfym1SOtA8.IIGQgv8NkF6NW1X0ao_nWzB_t6 45KQ4NB0tDL.uqWD7tmuzbOw2feMNGyKyAh9MoXfMIz8Ydj1EI45bx_xSu.1nfm9vRyC6746..9R nK5ZcKnANhnil2y4Xj3k_qGLOsQhsRmwlABDlLJMMH_UpF6ariTDDVI9pYysgxh.XAY4lAF2IY4O XXqcC1FH3VYbbqmhvZDsSoetulf2Pwyg5OOVXWrTuz3ficV955fz8t8B11XQhQfNMETh9W5OV2YU qC5G0HjT2FNztWV6Ggz3WF_eCqI7EogjVpQ0mPqt9ljVvIOPmX.9FbV_18fNnN3wX1mM7BwZsEWi 0499N.683jWtnWKPV1Fft4Hjy9Xhya98c_gisweL0uigsxOjkDthL721JeyNoFrduqnSOtrzN8M0 BYvqxivjtruS3E1pI0MHVF7Wn_QTkOdbpFDKHxA-- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:13:41 +0000 Received: by smtp417.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 74d28e342bb80412c9da099e00cfb633; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:13:40 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: devel/binutils@powerpc64 ( powerpc64-unknown-freebsd13.0-ld ) unbounded loop in bfd/elf64-ppc.c : the source code and values Message-Id: <89FF670E-3C97-44F6-9B16-FE1B68B304E9@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:13:38 -0800 To: FreeBSD Toolchain , FreeBSD ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) References: <89FF670E-3C97-44F6-9B16-FE1B68B304E9.ref@yahoo.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mltJ0MTQz4KcB X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.49)[-0.490,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[148.64.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (3.86), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.89), asn: 36647(0.71), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:13:45 -0000 I ran into the following ubounded loop (via the continue) in bfd/elf64-ppc.c while trying to do a devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc64 based buildworld buildkernel : /* Read the relocations. */ relstart = _bfd_elf_link_read_relocs (ibfd, sec, NULL, NULL, info->keep_memory); if (relstart == NULL) return FALSE; relend = relstart + sec->reloc_count; for (rel = relstart; rel < relend; ) { enum elf_ppc64_reloc_type r_type; unsigned long r_symndx; asection *sym_sec; struct elf_link_hash_entry *h; Elf_Internal_Sym *sym; unsigned char *tls_maskp; r_type = ELF64_R_TYPE (rel->r_info); if (r_type != R_PPC64_PLTCALL && r_type != R_PPC64_PLTCALL_NOTOC) continue; Nothing is done before the continue to make rel progress towards relend (or relend towards relstart). It just repeats the same activity over and over on the same rel value. This was in: devel/binutils/work-powerpc64/binutils-2.33.1/bfd/elf64-ppc.c The 1st line quoted above was line 7455 according to vi. Ref reference, both of the stuck links (clang.full and lld.full) have: (gdb) print r_type $1 = R_PPC64_REL16_HA (gdb) print/x *rel $3 = {r_offset = 0x2, r_info = 0x18000000fc, r_addend = 0x2} === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:35:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8631E6B6A for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mmMZ3r7Qz4Ldp; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (unknown [181.52.72.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pfg) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24CC713753; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: svn commit: r521562 - in head/java: . wildfly17 wildfly17/files To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Simeo Reig References: <201912301828.xBUISOHL074374@repo.freebsd.org> From: Pedro Giffuni Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 13:35:36 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201912301828.xBUISOHL074374@repo.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:35:38 -0000 On 30/12/2019 13:28, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Author: pi > Date: Mon Dec 30 18:28:24 2019 > New Revision: 521562 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/521562 > > Log: > New port: java/wildfly17 > > WildFly is a flexible, lightweight, managed application > runtime that helps you build amazing applications. > WildFly - new name for JBoss Application Server > > Fast Startup > Small Footprint > Modular Design > Unified Configuration and Management > > And of course Java EE / Jakarta EE! > > WWW: https://wildfly.org/ > > This is the first Wildfly with JAKARTA EE8 full support. > > PR: 242962 > Submitted by: Simeo Reig > > Added: > head/java/wildfly17/ > - copied from r521432, head/java/wildfly16/ > head/java/wildfly17/files/wildfly17.in > - copied unchanged from r521432, head/java/wildfly16/files/wildfly16.in > Deleted: > head/java/wildfly17/files/wildfly16.in > Modified: > head/java/Makefile > head/java/wildfly17/Makefile > head/java/wildfly17/distinfo > head/java/wildfly17/files/pkg-message.in > head/java/wildfly17/pkg-descr > head/java/wildfly17/pkg-plist > > Modified: head/java/Makefile > ============================================================================== > --- head/java/Makefile Mon Dec 30 18:16:59 2019 (r521561) > +++ head/java/Makefile Mon Dec 30 18:28:24 2019 (r521562) > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ > SUBDIR += wildfly14 > SUBDIR += wildfly15 > SUBDIR += wildfly16 > + SUBDIR += wildfly17 > SUBDIR += wildfly90 > SUBDIR += xdoclet > Not complaining, but I wonder why we have so many versioned ports instead of having just one wildfly and wildfly-devel. wildfly 18 is available, BTW. Pedro. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:37:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5900D1E6D8F for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mmPl1Ywtz4Lpm; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ilzux-0005ga-C6; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:37:27 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:37:27 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Simeo Reig Subject: Re: svn commit: r521562 - in head/java: . wildfly17 wildfly17/files Message-ID: <20191230183727.GH1258@fc.opsec.eu> References: <201912301828.xBUISOHL074374@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mmPl1Ywtz4Lpm X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:37:31 -0000 Hi! > Not complaining, but I wonder why we have so many versioned ports instead > of having just one wildfly and wildfly-devel. I guess Simoe has more context about this. > wildfly 18 is available, BTW. Yes, I'm just testbuilding that one. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 One year to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 18:42:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21491E7136 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org) Received: from roadkill.tharned.org (tunnel294749-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:107f::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "tharned.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mmWd0Ty5z4MGH for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org) Received: from flake.tharned.org ([IPv6:2001:470:1f11:107f:19c8:4221:c069:155d]) (authenticated bits=0) by roadkill.tharned.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xBUIgZEX099906 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:42:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from gcr+freebsd-ports@tharned.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tharned.org; s=2017; t=1577731355; bh=Q0RsEp6TShM/5JvKSSyXjuu9b6LuoPXYC83esQ8nO9c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=wq/tZRGewxc7knwwsvOvY2w+bGe0w0k5aVa4qJenU3FkTrgSvRf9FlUGYm5+hlHog 9nBQpc6P4/zyyg8R6J5RjVxXWoGM1D6nRrri1ih4LWVLYeQLzFNWRH2P/Ig9VhkeEX 9DFVqvCRLT1VWWnz3YAnquKUTKE9Er0qu9fcg8YqLpBklj2F16OLnLaKSEpSF+A3AV jJwZW8Tg/Es7tLwxBiBvIlNq2Xa78hV+RmvZNRnM8OVdktOap5clmxpLG2EzfIC/+3 bCyU/Ngd3ciATvuJtgB97eMM+h96znEe9RCbFET32b1RunV2hJPb5Z+jyPlKmWtcLy leFJ3DeFW568g== X-Authentication-Warning: roadkill.tharned.org: Host [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:107f:19c8:4221:c069:155d] claimed to be flake.tharned.org From: Greg Rivers To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:42:35 -0600 Message-ID: <1725621.FofnG9SaRJ@no.place.like.home> In-Reply-To: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (roadkill.tharned.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:107f:0:0:0:2]); Mon, 30 Dec 2019 12:42:35 -0600 (CST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mmWd0Ty5z4MGH X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tharned.org header.s=2017 header.b=wq/tZRGe; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of gcr@tharned.org has no SPF policy when checking 2001:470:1f10:107f::2) smtp.mailfrom=gcr@tharned.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.46 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tharned.org:s=2017]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_MED(-2.00)[tharned.org.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.66)[ipnet: 2001:470::/32(-4.67), asn: 6939(-3.57), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tharned.org]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tharned.org:+]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; CTE_CASE(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6939, ipnet:2001:470::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 18:42:37 -0000 A final thought: legal issues aside, a FreeBSD port of the Microsoft exFAT implementation (i.e. the kernel module) could have a number of benefits over the fusefs(5) implementation. -- Greg From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 19:59:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EE31E8AD6 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mpDB0GBKz4QRn for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id b15so28684622iln.3 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hpcVlgo+ttHxJL8/O7TFk7yAoU7YkKqW0P+LLOptX9Q=; b=biBAciPbe5wRGgC/95ej7/lEAaCam64tk+gLuRAIWQsbAbMWbQGygSFsipJOKXsJJu K6y5TwN36KqBKOIIDc6NaninOkhcKggaO6D9KQlR47YXU/rrLfcl3xtRcJUMcEnDfkjr YQWVpVahuLs5oG5b3oyhTrumQ6t85m4ALAgHeL+xkOSd4t37wM1I2Gk+e5Jf98nx6CnO 9hNuPSqlZxO4AYavSt4K7ZTxtBq6SmqEPa7KZAA9NF8DYvhctlmGj/W9x/m/nbR/Z4kp EOmX88piTaS8+NyghDLYL9rB1a1TjYmWD8cyaREMuo47q26yN/zvTLMkhcFnNq3pWDi9 g4Wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hpcVlgo+ttHxJL8/O7TFk7yAoU7YkKqW0P+LLOptX9Q=; b=mbfMXk9T4o9liemuxVSAR03kzDMEDUv+qXmbJQwqIYqBjM++1dgpSYzxCXi1ckfVQw KO70f/Hh70aE7sjSiyLJwFl5jA7ZWoApV6SN7WWyNK8evXX5jJPd/isAEcXGBgGXlZSX oUyL7OabFCc88HBjuLTdOLYG3hrt1XwoxWSP9lQx08Gd92X+TYcVwq1/ddRJ9gK9R2jx 0Q0H06x7ORKqfjOhpCj6KVZ/7MORZbkUp2s4fQD/om/niruQgOYvYncgbee5lScoiIn2 R6Kz3Ha7GN9Wr6N2zxcaQcNiq2Fx0wrF0Wi9pge4TgGq741hF5jWBtAsO6Sh/O/PoMD1 fnLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLsDgx+z3bmxAWH5BqTXK+uxK3NtpF3aVW5R8JgxgXQjDWSGNy EzhJFt8VkplDIGlqaPi/WO3OCyFxf7KLH/6RahIY6pwc X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzFaKlpRmRpupNrZwLQewQ6QRudQB84Zr3DfGQQJoRhd8STRMnQlKlc4J4ZeiXmcKatv21i0jlKBAcB4K4RY9E= X-Received: by 2002:a92:cb11:: with SMTP id s17mr61607307ilo.114.1577735960716; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: From: Russell Haley Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mpDB0GBKz4QRn X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=biBAciPb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of russhaley@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=russhaley@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-7.78), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 19:59:23 -0000 On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal > >wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent restrictions > >> > on exFAT[1]. > >> > > >> > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed from > >> > sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the FreeBSD base > >> > system (like msdosfs) one day? > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > < > https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2019/08/28/exfat-linux-kernel/ > > > >> > > >> > >> I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see an > >> explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the license > >> needs to be transferable. > >> > >> The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. Simply > >> saying "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't really say > >> anything. It's a statement of corporate direction and nothing else. > > > >Expanding on what Kevin said, > > > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx > >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, > >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module > >that they submitted. > > > >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in > >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to > >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > > > ># Adam > > I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing > and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. > > http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing > On my phone the site displays a "Contoso, Ltd." title (That's Microsoft's pretend company for all it's examples). The IP Address resolves to a seemingly non-Microsoft server: waws-prod-bay-059.cloudapp.net [23.99.91.55]. To boot, there is no corporate branding or other links back to the Microsoft site. Forgive me, but it seems like a terrible idea to submit information to that site. > > -- > Carmel > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 21:10:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D128D1E9F21 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47mqpY5HYLz4TcY for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B3A1F1E9F20; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B36751E9F1F for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mqpY4PFKz4TcX for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::16:115c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79A927BD9 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.8]) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBULAjF3038556 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBULAjva038554 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201912302110.xBULAjva038554@portsindexbuild.nyi.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 11.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:10:45 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 21:42:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74B81EB179 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic313-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic313-20.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.65.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mrWW1yM1z4Wrb for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: wKhLJp8VM1n.pTWGUYPAl.4tjIKadYz.3eE4Yz71fqq3Oio9q5TODyDmGiGgsYz YnughzDMuEJiMTwsgs7YPeVnQ0ZA1BlsGlI__6LIOHsptLoSvoKl8RmVbnllNaHriomCvANve3PX eNbsFmFc1F7oJ6iMWjCLaTWWoqd8OmOH0gLhOKeuJdCSikI2Re88DLokFI0K_gOACzBDnd_hWGyv _Ag.1ZgVzkqRhjbMMpnJDU6MfPL13LUwFoqJRz3W8Ia6jK6rWeAcs9GH02jn63FuqjnB.HJEKv6C ALrXYysIssXpQKfkN6pwHdHsogTMFkF6ErQUQMVUbjSErCSL4pdbfa4c24vpEHLLfnVqcsCfhIzc eRZ9ndYywsw_GbxtELJBQhwChJ54hO47kxOy0uNHhCwL4FA6unqiAFrm6Y20qMSGbVigUPg2POWQ 4BX7MJbxshbQSxLk4AachNwxn6AM_gUesx2LlSSF0KG.C9gG4WdunZ9z7iar0NdYoTp9M7PWaiLE zSLzj47mc_QQU5u5H3sV0vVA_MtujeVbCaaCyC3ql.H93pSwMU_PQfh3LdNGcZASrkiJKfijb5.v j5dkhujYj_cpy8nY4N.2xb4B887Sj.YtZ4aoIiPitZs_116_9gODD6K3B.HeNIJwet8fAod7zxPl ary0eCGQJM1yFO9JBOzKPPaVaXiotcMcsiDUUOX41H4Q9.mPXF4927vofbXR_n7RJfLgKyI2d.np c39BwaKjKCtfVls6jB3ED6ily7vRJ0rpGYE.MHx7wbQ_k_mufIkE.lwfT8p.JbjG8.37IVD85xKE wWrj2Ts8U_cQRRF3HR5TBNf_hEIyiCRr6TsjfpP8kILs.D.aU2Z6fVbp5MVnO0KStI92aITFuIXX BXjaZKU_awuOa0XoQ7DJ0smANZ7fV5M3eRfFR2VaFwhCtgVxxmJfrTItaHcMxloNmPuXez3YMKi5 DkTy65OJkE_EwDpMjZsBGS9gHTbaF3Flb_.lM90LI8YE.1VU6kFX0rhxN.gKoWmrvRmbLaE6Umw9 I6RzWIeeIEfL.n.UGIvBUq5TAaf2fMPeWM31QIyjoq8HpI.Ylp1YbrvsMfOlRw62aCf92rp6SGWy 9zcAZCOfAzXsrNbI67R42wkBAhQ2pQDI1OtuCE0g2GNupL6yZI8UPAtaezWZa61PAQZjR_fGaASi D.zkyzHTy5B6oTN_uZUTLmngKnSpIVV02RAgfGs.ThBMC_f6hK59o9qGZrnh_KhZfqGS2BesoBdH kC9.4lb_vebK.7kxKSaeDMphVm.k91NPlpc6jKKEq1L1XLghR4BzbzgT9LWObPVQ_6YBr45t6eKl A2FRmUQWRzCTwlx1lkxU3wFvpphvsnyJfgWcHJv213K6HGhxv1Ez.vh_3Dtb1WXYSU2jURWLGlut UIMtAqZ7zt0HdT_4GetsD_ZtO3LAWSPAt Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic313.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:42:44 +0000 Received: by smtp401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID ce1ede42491486dc64ccc82669c2b332; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:42:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Message-Id: Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 13:42:39 -0800 To: Russell Haley , FreeBSD ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) References: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mrWW1yM1z4Wrb X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.01 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.57)[-0.573,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.934,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[83.65.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (3.60), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.89), asn: 36647(0.71), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 21:42:48 -0000 On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY = wrote: > > On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > > . . . > > = https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licen= sing.aspx > > >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, > > >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel = module > > >that they submitted. > > > > > >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in > > >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to > > >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > > > > > ># Adam > > > > I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing > > and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. > > > > http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing > > > On my phone the site displays a "Contoso, Ltd." title (That's = Microsoft's > pretend company for all it's examples). The IP Address resolves to a > seemingly non-Microsoft server: waws-prod-bay-059.cloudapp.net > [23.99.91.55]. To boot, there is no corporate branding or other links = back > to the Microsoft site. Forgive me, but it seems like a terrible idea = to > submit information to that site. It seems poor form on Microsoft's part in several respects, but the page at: = https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/iplicensing/def= ault.aspx has a link for "process of obtaining a license". Guess where it goes: http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing The earlier "Contact a licensing executive" link on the page also goes there. Both of those are under the "Learn More about Patent Licensing" section of the page. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Dec 30 22:46:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7522B1EC4BB for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM02-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02olkn080d.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe45::80d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mswT63vwz4ZYZ for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=afcUEP4RortoRFBAQ6s1iOCJdlOPcN8mJdkrFiMKNhVWbeFtk+6WpjQ1hU8+7O5QxkFdzFrk42FtHGCnn881tyKq6v9kv7MmRTaBOFTnTkDIdbj7SIxLZFQuJZg/tHxIXld5S1cLe8eTy0/47Gvs4LhqBVf3dI61kwvQGOYC1d0L3sJNX6WMuwIC45WgiAKOydV6VtHEDbEMaV+wXRBD0A0NVa336p6ZfaCUvGYMed5wJi4neVupQAxK1iDdpZv72T/xkz6i6DqAYTr6Q6hIkyx9CfZzpIuXHBsl2lRGUyLFWmkOQQlvSlvscJuYImNvUttGPbN2MTuJzaK9LThxdg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8xj9qMdgl5NurHys53qEJ1O2HGI6WhcZVKM8Mi3gNSY=; b=IyLxnZ7whW/kM603tUZEkTPXeLrTr1wbR4D0ff/7vB7PVjlxwTs0PF9pCw/Uih9g7fFSDPjGRu2JyP3aIvY2SqSZxC5rujhlxkgYj+1FrEspO/d0Moj/bn8vQXW0jV4FUUzcd2eHGpvITrEINnAo76yyG9XVko/4iS/6wwd7MeKFYT3NMGqeftCOOKuZPaHwGsLI8KzyPEsLiopD6B+jul5rJr3HYBvTyVrpHMLiltlRxi91Qp8jWMPku7n4Eyy1lw9kzv/qtJ9YjQhP6qdpPZYRCxKa0pQuKfkIKUsIGHHUMe1O2ICUDSVObUN1Abc3yu9PY6M/LTKXjsfBDLbj6g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=8xj9qMdgl5NurHys53qEJ1O2HGI6WhcZVKM8Mi3gNSY=; b=U5M8SS8j/Ty+b2oGdjlAkwzDPb0ZAarJzd/GLnGMtVAODsErHR+PPvjvt8q8dN1rR0PyPuZxW15tMgxMfVFmZD65Uyt3Qv1pxPpULBlUIAKPgKI7ahPF7mw4x/g0BOhc7Yl226BTVPDaJuCT5ocYYPMN9Jg10E7G4XrdiQL5EjGOG8jfexlvusRM+MqK9o6jpE/jA8fd1MtwdMZVv6xXunGQqk2ja05iKIiUdD/FmeSjtJVFWDHMvzp7MzigVj86qSLqm/SDKEfP27Vx/3TqGkqFQn5iH/Mpb5bvQTSATfyg/YRCMeJ4JZALrzj/ZDhQMSKTez3tKPycdh6h6l3J0A== Received: from BL2NAM02FT019.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.58) by BL2NAM02HT033.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.12; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:45:59 +0000 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.76.56) by BL2NAM02FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.77.166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.12 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:45:59 +0000 Received: from SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7cab:af09:c65b:4798]) by SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::7cab:af09:c65b:4798%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2581.007; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:45:58 +0000 Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (174.109.225.250) by MN2PR15CA0041.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:237::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.12 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:45:58 +0000 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@outlook.com) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47mswN5sDtz2jnm for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:45:56 -0500 (EST) From: Carmel NY To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Thread-Topic: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered Thread-Index: AQHVvwX5zu2G4ORHxEaDRaKUhM/2Vg== Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:45:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: Reply-To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: MN2PR15CA0041.namprd15.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:237::10) To SN6PR04MB5021.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:9f::32) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.3) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:2DF7F2EAC4E4853907C0F5EDDD22FB737CD54EC22902FCDCF64F8D1B2588F34E; UpperCasedChecksum:1D3E7CEE8C71EFE7930FCC5FF97523FD85DBFFD3F266943F421DA00B0FD3C395; SizeAsReceived:8392; Count:53 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [04s+mtVtLGIW6vEC+lKXy34pvf7DWxgQdDgFfuPqvks=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20191230174549.6e458c68@scorpio> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-incomingheadercount: 53 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8752adf9-944a-4046-6595-08d78d7a099d x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL2NAM02HT033: x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2HRzQxQPxlOlqsudBJtqiNSeFTmYjG5j0iY16GdhuBxSNoNtVybGIue5/WAdZIWYbOC69TplX2bkHKncc7p1Q8vxwhABTPp/LqrXHDM8IoD8dnR8dj88E65OKWNDKhwiKj/gSEHzIV1v6n2+OnJblyYovj+4dvkXWJatQRgN2a0fR16f8MbG0zY1kdD9OiHd5NdYcQaDkdBrm+hFHPIQsT+PxgkDGPoxpQOwwNK1bYc= x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/qU4lDr1NmGzJY43Hjz1xuOP"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8752adf9-944a-4046-6595-08d78d7a099d X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Dec 2019 22:45:58.7098 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2NAM02HT033 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mswT63vwz4ZYZ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=U5M8SS8j; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 2a01:111:f400:fe45::80d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.10 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[250.225.109.174.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ARC_ALLOW(-1.00)[i=1]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 2a01:111:f000::/36(-3.61), asn: 8075(-2.95), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.0.8.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.4.e.f.0.0.4.f.1.1.1.0.1.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 22:46:03 -0000 --Sig_/qU4lDr1NmGzJY43Hjz1xuOP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800, Russell Haley stated: >On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY >wrote: > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: =20 >> >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal >> >wrote: =20 >> >> >> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: =20 >> >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent >> >> > restrictions on exFAT[1]. >> >> > >> >> > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed >> >> > from sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the >> >> > FreeBSD base system (like msdosfs) one day? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > [1] >> >> > < =20 >> https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2019/08/28/exfat-linux-kerne= l/ >> =20 >> > =20 >> >> > =20 >> >> >> >> I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see >> >> an explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the >> >> license needs to be transferable. >> >> >> >> The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. >> >> Simply saying "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't >> >> really say anything. It's a statement of corporate direction and >> >> nothing else. =20 >> > >> >Expanding on what Kevin said, >> > =20 >> https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-lic= ensing.aspx >> =20 >> >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, >> >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module >> >that they submitted. >> > >> >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in >> >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to >> >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. >> > >> ># Adam =20 >> >> I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing >> and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. >> >> http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing >> =20 >On my phone the site displays a "Contoso, Ltd." title (That's >Microsoft's pretend company for all it's examples). The IP Address >resolves to a seemingly non-Microsoft server: >waws-prod-bay-059.cloudapp.net [23.99.91.55]. To boot, there is no >corporate branding or other links back to the Microsoft site. Forgive >me, but it seems like a terrible idea to submit information to that >site. That link leads to: https://celaiplicensing.microsoftcrmportals.com/IPlicensing/ is owned by Microsoft. I am not sure what your specific complaint is. --=20 Carmel --Sig_/qU4lDr1NmGzJY43Hjz1xuOP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEIQb/tTwl6I1ueEVtOHMGOIfexWQFAl4Kfh0ACgkQOHMGOIfe xWS6iAgAjPsf5aaQ1sBIIT0ieC3Yho04tE2fzfOSNk2DTl20jzbhj5THwiCWNc9j rtwGNdx1NJ6TwRIwbyNksocTRoTku18qZ13mfL5XKioL4RojVNbZZKPOpyoJmqjv TTvQ7I6jY4z2NPrW/g9d1HMf8sGPnXRROc+vAiwnporfPYz7ONhhrdxJ0XYyQcAR SUFwcvZVcbrE49QE0DoUb+e3VtYm7kKxrYG2VYtifHZqhABKr2BLzYOFMI5HtJxs LLXsjxyAdIAW9b0YW/tr1J+ZqvEyWsuxYqNeTHHQ+CuFD7YqFqRInTmH+7Z5a962 uPmVQCZBXixqF7oQQgywHfUxUeSdIg== =WflW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/qU4lDr1NmGzJY43Hjz1xuOP-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 31 00:10:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2A51EDAA8 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-il1-x131.google.com (mail-il1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47mvnc0dd5z4dh8 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-il1-x131.google.com with SMTP id g12so29090729ild.2 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:10:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IteygOQIHyCaSqIoSmlDFeJASaqTtCA8IsHRTBBCQSA=; b=ZvbSIegN3DwgLl2gQGpNXounWWz1Rhng6cCjISkPl/Xqy7wLQsyh6PHNPpJUx8UdYm cBBeA4lStK2MAtr//jb4xcJtEtOTy5KSliknxB/H88jU8TeMkBD84bqiZm2fCmqiYgF+ MfQHy+WbbuYLlDpGDcwSEjBZO4uTwCnyfyJ1COOtaoEmwkO3/ENSfoxcMzjwusiEGhhJ qafkApeRbe9fdyYIbhlC/ra/M5k7IIRPDHK4w3BvIQV+TWngxQPaARmbTW5j0EwaIQz3 Pjh4ht1sKTRA2Q/zGXMJz9YNRddjoqSaINBzhlceXNyt291DTFy1iihRUtWR0nGP6zl3 LEBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=IteygOQIHyCaSqIoSmlDFeJASaqTtCA8IsHRTBBCQSA=; b=sTN6EtAY8iEdXrNOz0veTWvgolUsJdeum5srclgZ707KzdZ7aCR7VITDglH+VJTVpM GI6IxyDPcxO1RgLKSq0kMjQJ5H+U/lkT2Fu6QI8BIdUtWAHDxcMrs1xOXq2OfOTegxZP WUzpGPjlvWqnsRmcjYpnfQEWE67KGuULVwlIVT7uHr3JohGhE/PRSkKTwOkt036vi3fN ePjd9+/QVaZdf6YKSzHhV3Hclq9P4PJ61KtOVsLgoZ4iYCw78RyOOwJK1J925hfvBunE YjrZL3uh4u7dilfNQVotF2HAEZeczBtn/yQCaNzXIYqwOVuRb8vr2A4lLIoQfLzFHCye 4fPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWousiveTWCzuwd5rYrHU8yCRIkyviiftM1MbbkPnEkuHpYHXQI +vrlfpNOHLWASC6i8P95xP6iDIswo6InAZdfHnckxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2qRqMSvNR7p/XvZNxA942oCK9L/9mXb4NU6aqL+0metm5SXPsxRswjiDF+zw5RkjFnxMmhCcrkqeOh0E403I= X-Received: by 2002:a92:8f4b:: with SMTP id j72mr62815665ild.1.1577751010624; Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:10:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1921981.4WAli8B44Z@no.place.like.home> <20191230013752.GA74518@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: From: Russell Haley Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 16:09:59 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Re: Re: exFAT is no longer encumbered To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47mvnc0dd5z4dh8 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZvbSIegN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of russhaley@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=russhaley@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.01), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:10:13 -0000 On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:46 PM Carmel NY wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 11:59:09 -0800, Russell Haley stated: > >On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 3:41 AM Carmel NY > >wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:51:41 -0700, Adam Weinberger stated: > >> >On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:38 PM Kevin P. Neal > >> >wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 01:01:52AM -0600, Greg Rivers wrote: > >> >> > As of last August, Microsoft have relaxed the patent > >> >> > restrictions on exFAT[1]. > >> >> > > >> >> > Can the Makefile LICENSE_PERMS_MSPAT restrictions be removed > >> >> > from sysutils/fusefs-exfat? Might exFAT make it into the > >> >> > FreeBSD base system (like msdosfs) one day? > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > [1] > >> >> > < > >> > https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/opensource/2019/08/28/exfat-linux-kernel/ > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> I'm not sure that counts as a license. IANAL, but I'd like to see > >> >> an explicit granting of a license to anyone at no cost, and the > >> >> license needs to be transferable. > >> >> > >> >> The way Berkeley eliminated the advertising clause was good. > >> >> Simply saying "Microsoft is supporting the addition of" doesn't > >> >> really say anything. It's a statement of corporate direction and > >> >> nothing else. > >> > > >> >Expanding on what Kevin said, > >> > > >> > https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/mtl/exfat-licensing.aspx > >> > >> >suggests that (a) exFAT is still patented and restricted as before, > >> >and (b) GPLv2 licensing was granted only for the Linux kernel module > >> >that they submitted. > >> > > >> >The BSD License grants the ability to use BSD-licensed code in > >> >commercial products, so I'm not sure that Microsoft would want to > >> >relax their licensing for us. As Kevin said, IANAL. > >> > > >> ># Adam > >> > >> I imagine that someone could actually inquire. It would cost nothing > >> and end this FUD that is surrounding this subject. > >> > >> http://aka.ms/celaiplicensing > >> > >On my phone the site displays a "Contoso, Ltd." title (That's > >Microsoft's pretend company for all it's examples). The IP Address > >resolves to a seemingly non-Microsoft server: > >waws-prod-bay-059.cloudapp.net [23.99.91.55]. To boot, there is no > >corporate branding or other links back to the Microsoft site. Forgive > >me, but it seems like a terrible idea to submit information to that > >site. > > That link leads to: > https://celaiplicensing.microsoftcrmportals.com/IPlicensing/ > > is owned by Microsoft. I am not sure what > your specific complaint is. > My complaint is that the site looked dodgy and I was pointing out why I thought so. Apologies if I was incorrect. -- > Carmel > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 31 06:38:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746521F4E9E for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47n4P72YCFz3yD4 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 555241F4E9D; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551921F4E9C for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47n4P71flhz3yD1 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33BABE47B for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBV6c3nM036343 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBV6c3dH036342; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201912310638.xBV6c3dH036342@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 06:38:03 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/trophy | 2.0.3 | 2.0.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 31 13:28:42 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D801D508C for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (107-204-234-170.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nFVx1WvXz4HmV for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBVDSdIP028190 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:28:39 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBVDSd9F028189 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:28:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:28:39 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: How should follks migrate from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7? Message-ID: <20191231132839.GT1088@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lIC76ItX9S6XOZ/S" Content-Disposition: inline X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nFVx1WvXz4HmV X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of david@catwhisker.org designates 107.204.234.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=david@catwhisker.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.85 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.204.234.170]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[catwhisker.org]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7018, ipnet:107.192.0.0/12, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; IP_SCORE(-2.45)[ip: (-9.60), ipnet: 107.192.0.0/12(-4.80), asn: 7018(2.20), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:28:42 -0000 --lIC76ItX9S6XOZ/S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable As noted in , the -c6 ports "expire tomorrow." I don't see a documented process for migrating from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7; perhaps I'm being thicker than usual. For example, from prior migrations (e.g., the 20141209 entry in ports/UPDATING), there's a mention of: | 2. Persistently update the Linux kernel version in /etc/sysctl.conf: | | compat.linux.osrelease=3D2.6.18 and since there has (as far as I know) been no indication that that should be changed, I still have it (in stable/11, stable/12, and head). But does not mention a compat.linux.osrelease sysctl value at all. I had asked about the migration process Fri Sep 30 20:30:24 UTC 2016; at the time, the response was: | We are still working on the other c7 ports: | https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7886 but I have seen nothing further about the migration process itself. ports/UPDATING entry 20190710 does discuss the "c6" Linux emulation (but not "c7"). So: how should a system that has been configured to support linux_base-c6 be migrated to support linux_base-c7? Thanks. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org At least Trump can count on McConnell and Putin to "have his back." And the rest of us can consider what that means about each of them. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --lIC76ItX9S6XOZ/S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl4LTQZfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PclgBggA1mYW01XBQjHNncwHSQUAZnmdctJvRCprkwqDWlWS7k7cqbZKIz7z2MKt OOz/L0t2c0sGeea5IjdEZ0/0fqbRJO/V/g2aAuzDTwb1xglgjfnEwvYHoSYOgDqG tc1LJflyBT3j4Xkrnv/6HW3sox5g9CRKdM029uddrV9TMwMloHcaL6sF9y6QqPbd vxJDSBMiDFeRqYlczcZLCL08ykcx/f3M5mdN5ecdzGzow1LMusvLpxsnusVwsPTq MH3MLONhmJakq6o0gJtAAVDeQmOlR+uR6naDUrqv8EBz28S8x/mgk6lZp+kyUt6W 76iBssvCl+BzA7jkAkASnSQy4rRHiQ== =8/aw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lIC76ItX9S6XOZ/S-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 31 15:19:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898CC1D70D1 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nHyv0n0Xz4NG8 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) IronPort-SDR: hK14dPenAsEd9KFWY55w/bM59GxEtpJyfFF6+CORQIL1qXdnmXPEaZYLzt3jU+tQYwVxUoqTcF 3r5fuIB/TmhDyWMVHRPNPV/x/PJ1AOXi2FZ1fOOfaVruY/C6A4jlJOc1DkI2gxvIEUd2dAZlGS WRAQY8iYueFdTHGg1vryAkaqcSRP3aVHmpy2vuM2QZvoZ8EM1L7NfSssD1PeXT1/9zeX9mrjhu +qBl9wqkng0H7iB9rR8igmevjBjKQSmNCMCdNfjjPD3XOUZTOS80jAExDLJR/pDQFcAqO7i78h if4= X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BbEwCYZgte/1tL8lFlHAEBAQEBBwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BEQEEBAEBgXyCKVkTVAEgEiqNDIYRAYIQiluQWAkBAQIBAQEBASsMAQGEQAK?= =?us-ascii?q?BZic4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAQEFBG2Ea0wMhV8BBTocIxALGAklD0gGE4Mjgns?= =?us-ascii?q?LrnSETkFAg2KBBYE2jDOCAIQkPoJkBIdPBJcVlwp0gj6HM45aJ4JGdpcbLY9?= =?us-ascii?q?rhwyUFSKBWE0wCIMnCQo9GA2NHheIZIVAQAMwAQGQJwEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BbEwCYZgte/1tL8lFlHAEBAQEBBwEBEQEEBAEBgXyCK?= =?us-ascii?q?VkTVAEgEiqNDIYRAYIQiluQWAkBAQIBAQEBASsMAQGEQAKBZic4EwIDAQELA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEFAQEBAQEFBG2Ea0wMhV8BBTocIxALGAklD0gGE4MjgnsLrnSETkFAg2KBB?= =?us-ascii?q?YE2jDOCAIQkPoJkBIdPBJcVlwp0gj6HM45aJ4JGdpcbLY9rhwyUFSKBWE0wC?= =?us-ascii?q?IMnCQo9GA2NHheIZIVAQAMwAQGQJwEB?= Received: from 91.75-242-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.242.75.91]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 31 Dec 2019 16:19:32 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBVFJVhA018167; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:19:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:19:30 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: David Wolfskill Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How should follks migrate from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7? Message-ID: <20191231161930.4c09130e@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20191231132839.GT1088@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20191231132839.GT1088@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nHyv0n0Xz4NG8 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.94 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.948,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.995,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5432, ipnet:195.238.0.0/19, country:BE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:19:35 -0000 On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 05:28:39 -0800 David Wolfskill wrote: > As noted in > , > the -c6 ports "expire tomorrow." > > I don't see a documented process for migrating from linux_base-c6 to > linux_base-c7; perhaps I'm being thicker than usual. > > For example, from prior migrations (e.g., the 20141209 entry in > ports/UPDATING), there's a mention of: > > | 2. Persistently update the Linux kernel version in /etc/sysctl.conf: > | > | compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.18 This was needed when the default value was 2.4., but nowadays the default is already higher than 2.6.18 so you can just remove this. Besides that it's just a matter of removing c6 packages and installing c7 packages. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 31 15:21:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B971D73F4 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:21:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from mx.catwhisker.org (107-204-234-170.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [107.204.234.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nJ1W32P8z4NhX; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id xBVFLmAA028932; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:21:48 GMT (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xBVFLm3H028931; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 07:21:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 07:21:48 -0800 From: David Wolfskill To: =?utf-8?Q?T=C4=B3l?= Coosemans Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How should follks migrate from linux_base-c6 to linux_base-c7? Message-ID: <20191231152148.GU1088@albert.catwhisker.org> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20191231132839.GT1088@albert.catwhisker.org> <20191231161930.4c09130e@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Rsp728Nwk8twChKq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191231161930.4c09130e@FreeBSD.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nJ1W32P8z4NhX X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 15:21:51 -0000 --Rsp728Nwk8twChKq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 04:19:30PM +0100, T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote: > ... > > | compat.linux.osrelease=3D2.6.18 >=20 > This was needed when the default value was 2.4., but nowadays > the default is already higher than 2.6.18 so you can just remove this. > Besides that it's just a matter of removing c6 packages and installing c7 > packages. Excellent: thank you! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org At least Trump can count on McConnell and Putin to "have his back." And the rest of us can consider what that means about each of them. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --Rsp728Nwk8twChKq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEE4owz2QxMJyaxAefyQLJg+bY2PckFAl4LZ4xfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEUy OEMzM0Q5MEM0QzI3MjZCMTAxRTdGMjQwQjI2MEY5QjYzNjNEQzkACgkQQLJg+bY2 PcnPxwf/aI8gjLmEapqD3Fe92MgFZbh2GS+X1vwxdzJHlO9EOE1j4UK4n4gi2Qqw bJzhqW3/5LjbP/VGsm5stWtJJXi6ZvrqxUQtOjUNfO3MdkRpMfeEAosqb0ehMXnK ba9IyA82NnCwBJgrWucImq24qQrW1dWkNCj/aHYABJf9C6R+L7EJ+fbZu9qWYzNi c0e29S+g7k6VfPtF960XZctJw/FRLFAqvvq2J2D0j3lpzMoHJoOizx+ZbAk+eyQc FOIcAMXi8/gE863vYT6eQ0WcR9JNV+zvlrXCliEQPoaCeXtK79Cjs2D7nMVFYR+V GFXoDwC5quTJVwdJWO+p8gKn8/LzbA== =P/6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Rsp728Nwk8twChKq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Dec 31 18:01:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A7C1DA63B for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47nMZG31znz4XxL for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 65FD21DA637; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ADE1DA636; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nMZF031sz4XxG; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xBVI1j1d015302 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:01:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfence.it; s=201911; t=1577815308; bh=dGpbTMHpJw2mAbsVhfIAesXJXyWfgbaqViNGQSAem7s=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To; b=pmyHugMJ//ZucP0oh1wulvBo/sjzf9I/u4HqmuPIQiwIVq8BX7wGqJ+jzTGqcZpzA Y3jNHBq8KThIXHA4SjzlQiWL+Wi976BtAVAMGJvEso35jlLLlMNBkYDTxbum395xbU vBZ7qMAGyC3psPiBmv1xKTukTzY0vF0Wmtm8+sQc= X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Help with porting Python libraries To: python References: <850bbe75-06a2-0af6-fec8-8f6d3bd7c260@FreeBSD.org> From: Andrea Venturoli Cc: koobs@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7e268a15-280b-ab38-e90e-bab23702684c@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 19:01:45 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <850bbe75-06a2-0af6-fec8-8f6d3bd7c260@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nMZF031sz4XxG X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=netfence.it header.s=201911 header.b=pmyHugMJ; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=netfence.it; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it designates 2.44.121.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[netfence.it:s=201911]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:2.44.121.52]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[netfence.it:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[netfence.it,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-1.40)[ip: (-7.26), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-3.63), asn: 30722(3.84), country: IT(0.03)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:01:58 -0000 On 2019-12-30 03:26, Kubilay Kocak wrote: Thanks to all that replied. Especially the link to Python Ports Policy & Guidelines/Tips was very useful, as I hadn't found this myself :( I tried to follow all your suggestions, but I'm having some problems with it... Using CHEESESHOP I removed USE_GITHUB, GH_ACCOUNT and GH_PROJECT, and added "MASTER_SITES= CHEESESHOP". However, running make makesum I get: > # make makesum > ===> License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user > ===> License BSD3CLAUSE accepted by the user > ===> py36-imapclient-2.1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/i/imapclient/imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz > fetch: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/i/imapclient/imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz: Not Found > => Attempting to fetch https://pypi.org/packages/source/i/imapclient/imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz > fetch: https://pypi.org/packages/source/i/imapclient/imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz: Not Found > => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz > fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/imapclient-2.1.0.tar.gz: Not Found > => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 I'm not just into it enought to understand what I have to do to solve. Tests In setup.py, I see: > test_deps = ['mock>=1.3.0; python_version < "3.4"'] I think I have to put in Makefile: > TEST_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}mock>1.3.0:devel/py-mock@${PY_FLAVOR} However I don't know how to handle that <"3.4"... Then I wrote: > do-test: > @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${PYTHON_CMD} ${PYDISTUTILS_SETUP} test Is this correct? Finally, tests fail: > # make test > ===> Patching for py36-imapclient-2.1.0 > ===> py36-imapclient-2.1.0 depends on package: py36-setuptools>0 - found > ===> py36-imapclient-2.1.0 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python3.6 - found > ... > test_invalid (tests.test_datetime_util.TestParsing) ... ok > test_rfc822_style (tests.test_datetime_util.TestParsing) ... ok > > ====================================================================== > FAIL: test_redacted_password (tests.test_imapclient.TestDebugLogging) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/ports/mail/py-IMAPClient/work-py36/imapclient-2.1.0/tests/test_imapclient.py", line 521, in test_redacted_password > extra={} > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/unittest/mock.py", line 824, in assert_called_once_with > raise AssertionError(msg) > AssertionError: Expected '_log' to be called once. Called 0 times. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 254 tests in 0.115s > > FAILED (failures=1) > Test failed: > error: Test failed: > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/mail/py-IMAPClient Is this my fault, a problem upstream, a problem in some dependency? Docs I'm trying to learn by example, here, so I looked at a couple of ports and came up with the Makefile I'll post at the end. Troubles: _ this way, documentation files are not in the plist, and "port test" obviously complains. _ Documentation files are not versioned: do I need to use "concurrent" then? _ If I run "port test" without py36-sphinx installed, it doesn't work; shouldn't it install this as a dependency (and remove it afterwards)? bye & Thanks av. > # $FreeBSD$ > > PORTNAME= imapclient > PORTVERSION= 2.1.0 > CATEGORIES= mail python > #MASTER_SITES= CHEESESHOP > PKGNAMEPREFIX= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX} > > MAINTAINER= ml@netfence.it > COMMENT= Easy-to-use, Pythonic and complete IMAP client library > > LICENSE= BSD3CLAUSE > LICENSE_FILE= ${WRKSRC}/COPYING > > RUN_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}six>0:devel/py-six@${PY_FLAVOR} > TEST_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}mock>1.3.0:devel/py-mock@${PY_FLAVOR} > > USES= python:2.7-3.7 > USE_GITHUB= yes > USE_PYTHON= autoplist distutils > GH_ACCOUNT= mjs > GH_PROJECT= imapclient > NO_ARCH= yes > > OPTIONS_DEFINE= DOCS > > DOCS_BUILD_DEPENDS= ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}sphinx>=0:textproc/py-sphinx@${PY_FLAVOR} > DOCS_VARS= PYDISTUTILS_BUILD_TARGET+="build_sphinx -a -E" > > post-install-DOCS-on: > @${MKDIR} ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR} > (cd ${WRKSRC}/doc/html && ${COPYTREE_SHARE} . ${STAGEDIR}${DOCSDIR} "! -name .buildinfo -and ! -name objects.inv") > > do-test: > @cd ${WRKSRC} && ${PYTHON_CMD} ${PYDISTUTILS_SETUP} test > > .include From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 00:41:53 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A97C1E16A8; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 00:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nXRh62Mkz3Nn7; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 00:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from John-Baldwins-MacBook-Pro-7.local (unknown [IPv6:2601:648:8881:1e90:9916:9604:53d0:4c9f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jhb) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3BC1E28D61; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 00:41:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (for example) : it has the clang vs. gcc vec_step name conflict (for powerpc families): build fails under clang To: Mark Millard , Gerald Pfeifer Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: John Baldwin Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Autocrypt: addr=jhb@FreeBSD.org; keydata= mQGiBETQ+XcRBADMFybiq69u+fJRy/0wzqTNS8jFfWaBTs5/OfcV7wWezVmf9sgwn8TW0Dk0 c9MBl0pz+H01dA2ZSGZ5fXlmFIsee1WEzqeJzpiwd/pejPgSzXB9ijbLHZ2/E0jhGBcVy5Yo /Tw5+U/+laeYKu2xb0XPvM0zMNls1ah5OnP9a6Ql6wCgupaoMySb7DXm2LHD1Z9jTsHcAQMD /1jzh2BoHriy/Q2s4KzzjVp/mQO5DSm2z14BvbQRcXU48oAosHA1u3Wrov6LfPY+0U1tG47X 1BGfnQH+rNAaH0livoSBQ0IPI/8WfIW7ub4qV6HYwWKVqkDkqwcpmGNDbz3gfaDht6nsie5Z pcuCcul4M9CW7Md6zzyvktjnbz61BADGDCopfZC4of0Z3Ka0u8Wik6UJOuqShBt1WcFS8ya1 oB4rc4tXfSHyMF63aPUBMxHR5DXeH+EO2edoSwViDMqWk1jTnYza51rbGY+pebLQOVOxAY7k do5Ordl3wklBPMVEPWoZ61SdbcjhHVwaC5zfiskcxj5wwXd2E9qYlBqRg7QeSm9obiBCYWxk d2luIDxqaGJARnJlZUJTRC5vcmc+iGAEExECACAFAkTQ+awCGwMGCwkIBwMCBBUCCAMEFgID AQIeAQIXgAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BI6RAJ9S97fvbME+3hxzE3JUyUZ6vTewDACdE1stFuSfqMvM jomvZdYxIYyTUpC5Ag0ERND5ghAIAPwsO0B7BL+bz8sLlLoQktGxXwXQfS5cInvL17Dsgnr3 1AKa94j9EnXQyPEj7u0d+LmEe6CGEGDh1OcGFTMVrof2ZzkSy4+FkZwMKJpTiqeaShMh+Goj XlwIMDxyADYvBIg3eN5YdFKaPQpfgSqhT+7El7w+wSZZD8pPQuLAnie5iz9C8iKy4/cMSOrH YUK/tO+Nhw8Jjlw94Ik0T80iEhI2t+XBVjwdfjbq3HrJ0ehqdBwukyeJRYKmbn298KOFQVHO EVbHA4rF/37jzaMadK43FgJ0SAhPPF5l4l89z5oPu0b/+5e2inA3b8J3iGZxywjM+Csq1tqz hltEc7Q+E08AAwUIAL+15XH8bPbjNJdVyg2CMl10JNW2wWg2Q6qdljeaRqeR6zFus7EZTwtX sNzs5bP8y51PSUDJbeiy2RNCNKWFMndM22TZnk3GNG45nQd4OwYK0RZVrikalmJY5Q6m7Z16 4yrZgIXFdKj2t8F+x613/SJW1lIr9/bDp4U9tw0V1g3l2dFtD3p3ZrQ3hpoDtoK70ioIAjjH aIXIAcm3FGZFXy503DOA0KaTWwvOVdYCFLm3zWuSOmrX/GsEc7ovasOWwjPn878qVjbUKWwx Q4QkF4OhUV9zPtf9tDSAZ3x7QSwoKbCoRCZ/xbyTUPyQ1VvNy/mYrBcYlzHodsaqUDjHuW+I SQQYEQIACQUCRND5ggIbDAAKCRBy3lIGd+N/BCO8AJ9j1dWVQWxw/YdTbEyrRKOY8YZNwwCf afMAg8QvmOWnHx3wl8WslCaXaE8= Message-ID: <70ace2dc-ab93-3fee-8ecf-019730195d5a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:41:51 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:41:53 -0000 On 12/26/19 11:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >>> is missing the patch-clang-vec_step that is in: >>> >>> FBSDG5L2# ls -laT /usr/ports/lang/gcc9/files/ >> >> That is a hack that can be used to work around the issue; I strongly >> recommend addressing this in clang properly, though. I think using the hack patch in devel/freebsd-gcc* is fine for now, but can you confirm if both 6 and 9 need it or only 9? -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 01:28:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444F21E255C for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 01:28:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) Received: from sonic317-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (sonic317-21.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.66.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nYTH1XSYz3QWf for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 01:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marklmi@yahoo.com) X-YMail-OSG: 8l3wQjkVM1m6Nx4y0izPsLd_QkLG0GlV.QLMp.HBCuzl8jRfrFIRJe.LsUUY1uz MIi5VT9Kq7KbNWSYaQqDuGQXV_h3JjB1CFhlkZFI4x_NRpPMegjO6Q5IcA5teyTyvqlyVIOHYXLM TZERPrxIYSLzOjols4oZlYgfZ24pIclLlpJ0mvB4Qzk4AZXpoPtZYwvA51bL64giKEp4uFyCyEKP bXluwpvgzVriXsEnpP.B_GsD.3cIaMuTjYW.9ldS1M0X2AJC3E9Fk45HxkUqSc4xjPGJPn7fURE7 HPepRv05wy.X6YoHBvfMsXkVe47Q8pvwNzGkzrcsqObFBjjcB8phpytggi6j1LmnUNzEHGNZFLl2 DmDw0_06RC7vIQ9eYVNziqqn0PQ9lvcpt1QRfdnh.Q3cv0piKm4N4FxwShKPpbma2BVayJXcGrxM bWc3SH8VeWZvCk0p7w3DbFynwk50pRJP366g.eXRKp.62pLRYhpvYyd3fJstH8oj4usM9xhsFqyg iy0kI0u1IwMERGx4DrJMrvsGwnPzrirfLV4Er_pzFM_DAHao3hANqt4C15l39O2hcORvqcYWWC3T auaPJWFt5CRHow0uC8s7126bzu9TvVixdUI7tMNcx10taz4D.g1KGFsew_FWoCkBTaRADZqdJKny H7RgxB2WyW3a1osM2nR7nPjHQfrM5RRrJy4E7GMMaomQnWcGgF_xiBOwPmkURJYb5yv6ZD159F.V vXsdPVhYsKreTkbIWwyHcUsqVU98VoELU7ekw2ZW4dw5rYUpXBqPHBqnDTxTv8JVADrIvCGyTAmC bxe_u0c23_4N9uQ3gXNCArLO0pw4soiVcpJaZqIt8wwE2d3QVnlHAwFFyLGsr3R1GDhWMcKjB11s p.MJ1I.1sMW89nBpO9WMIiJuwUrFFq9uyz7mo.9X9uExfu4ARYNTLsi3LQF5wfPVUWmddZa1iwww sAoHPoHr85yCeeGRW9hyipkbWJgsiAZCZIZkpcKdPVMEqLNQDXumUMfHfcXMYUXpSZOSYO5zRPCN 0z4RJK0XH2guHA50_failG_0.xl3RWaClMmKR_2xCgpYeLwwSe08kNuovZ7mcZIixLqqv_890e.G eEYpc.P2F1sYib.T44cYR54yVCB8uJ8ZY8UG.ZBijEHaAQGxGG9TGY7rgUvZqzUhBra1X6Ar4Wlj e.WPS8yE3NzlNEv30E.D6E0ENOOHHOthO7kmMuszkQgDwD.68MlYpcZU9._JcGvOXcO3ryPqevdF jB9Z9zp8ciISxi4bw_Pdu.1tGrA1Pde.hn9DWNKaqhHWWagBZsVprJn3PmOAoQ0GuULdFfBJag24 X7_eNj5XK65Jtur7.wou2KydI2UGujUKpkxgvQT1DiSAy07gG1wth6a7UHK1zFFIrlt6_tUfLGZv PhqSpKdDa1sSQvluXaNXfsiOXCZWxdZ7O8Jo- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic317.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 01:28:16 +0000 Received: by smtp426.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 437ea9b333fad99f810cb9cb57033503; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 01:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (for example) : it has the clang vs. gcc vec_step name conflict (for powerpc families): build fails under clang From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <70ace2dc-ab93-3fee-8ecf-019730195d5a@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 17:28:10 -0800 Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <70ace2dc-ab93-3fee-8ecf-019730195d5a@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nYTH1XSYz3QWf X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.19 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.08)[-0.077,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[yahoo.com:s=s2048]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr:yahoo.com]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.61)[-0.611,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[yahoo.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[yahoo.com,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[147.66.137.98.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:36647, ipnet:98.137.64.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (6.67), ipnet: 98.137.64.0/21(0.88), asn: 36647(0.71), country: US(-0.05)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[yahoo.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 01:28:21 -0000 On 2019-Dec-31, at 16:41, John Baldwin wrote: > On 12/26/19 11:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >>>> is missing the patch-clang-vec_step that is in: >>>> >>>> FBSDG5L2# ls -laT /usr/ports/lang/gcc9/files/ >>> >>> That is a hack that can be used to work around the issue; I strongly >>> recommend addressing this in clang properly, though. > > I think using the hack patch in devel/freebsd-gcc* is fine for now, but can > you confirm if both 6 and 9 need it or only 9? > devel/freebsd-gcc6 and devel/freebsd-gcc9 both need it. The vec_step identifier has been in use in gcc's gcc/tree-vect-loop.c for a long time and still is in use. Going the other way, reserving vec_step for opencl/altivec for PowerPc's has been in clang for a long time. I've had to have local patches for lang/gcc6 and later and in devel/powerpc64-gcc historically (2017+) because of my clang-targeting-PowerPc activities and trying to build gcc versions via clang as part of those activities. (Of course, some places have patches of their own now.) === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 06:37:54 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629741F1438 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47nhLV1zglz4Zlq for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 43EEF1F1431; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BB31F1430 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nhLV18tHz4Zlp for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23339267F1 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0016bs4W077222 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0016bss7077221; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202001010637.0016bss7077221@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 06:37:54 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 06:37:54 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/shotcut | 19.12.16 | v19.12.31 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 12:25:38 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50F51D560C for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47nr3k3z1Vz3PMg for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 864321D560B; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860611D560A for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x933.google.com (mail-ua1-x933.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::933]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nr3j3Pgqz3PMd for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 12:25:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x933.google.com with SMTP id o42so12737522uad.10 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:25:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dyxqJ8pd8nuA8EqdKdnmjPs9/jRPAyL4qShSZuy2OHY=; b=t1gglZRj1IirGdUvkB/cCr2HgH0Q2KTCAp/maOYukTNFGg9Co7mM2dkGYy4gdGHMyu M+ssebPixW52BYmTKm0Cqi+liCK8W0NcTTFB40GVRP4lSINMOAy510gA1/OBIIfe76u0 aKa95r7BuVMgeHpFpIpUkepOqe/mHXIXX3Nxa0NSa2aA6fkbcqjcTrkVsrNTx0W3sdpO uEKhyXnexicqfQ5isuq7+jnJGE4s7FYQkK5njOXsuf7FID1MOeAqXLcpKCXmHT4DvHvy cwkWZrxwyIznbpuaXXnkedv3qhR3symJwts4uINXIgu6io1KTYhrrjJAxPnIhzT8gEgV 6qfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dyxqJ8pd8nuA8EqdKdnmjPs9/jRPAyL4qShSZuy2OHY=; b=IcxHROjTw7mXN0NU+VgXLy3OM1wMrzErw50s9k4GmaQUBPVYLAyAZBHzsfBbFAozb/ kuOX0SK8XfNPm8fImb/wKPYRAYHdxIrbXjySd07rlY/vhCr5nAXGW4XLboI7cVB2lTYl jIaiu3voAtzbvXyIP0RnqpOxJr86aYF4mLcYETDqnor0LTfaE5i7pOECzPEWc1o1Fskz 0vn2zVkYsv2dVrdrRHU5Lyji4+5e0nMnpTyhwjQGiliB1G4ef6tUbfCoIxkqDHtSeMOx 2EarGfuIOgtuygPAZSIuFVKWJc/Mi/XMYJScdigSEupqAoO6aBWuTrq1TqeS7sdZX51G OtfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX2/Us4g2H3ToL9eQilue6NG+VMsJ35pvrs5F4HIAL5Sult/1fl 2PNmvOoaxIKEtfGuywm3HdymFh5amSpKvOBFYwU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxk3FJ08nC1VNh1wCj+KePOtIXgOV9kcApKbBkO90NyNGfShOQzdHSijm4UjFhxbve3t1BRiPeaAsWBFIn1Edc= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:2903:: with SMTP id v3mr7207457uap.12.1577881536067; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:25:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191230200000.56ea9774@mscad14> In-Reply-To: <20191230200000.56ea9774@mscad14> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 14:26:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [multimedia/audacious-plugins] Fix playback at wrong tonality To: soralx@cydem.org Cc: ports FreeBSD , john@jlindgren.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nr3j3Pgqz3PMd X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=t1gglZRj; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of fernandoapesteguia@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::933 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=fernandoapesteguia@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.9.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.58), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 12:25:38 -0000 On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 5:25 AM wrote: > > > Howdy! > > [CC'ing one of audacious developers whose email I was able to find, as > this really is an upstream issue] Hi there! Thanks for the heads up. Would you mind opening a PR[1]? Also, ideally, this would be fixed upstream :-) [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ > > I noticed that on a certain USB audio device that I have, audacious would > play songs too fast when the sound device is in BITPERFECT mode, while > mpv, for example, plays them at correct speed. > > Turns out that this device supports only one samplerate (48.0 ksps), but > audacious fails to detect that, and plays the 44.1 ksps song anyway, > resulting in playback that is almost 9% too fast. > > The attached patch for OSS4 plugin fixes that. Please review. > The 3% figure was chosen more or less arbitrarily, based on a random > Internet article [0]. > > Also, I would like to request the port maintainer to add a DBUS option, > enabling to compile the player and its plugins without Linux's dbus > dependency ("--disable-dbus" configure option does the trick, though > stops `audtool` from building as well). > > [0] https://cecm.sitehost.iu.edu/etext/acoustics/chapter1_pitch.shtml > > -- > [SorAlx] ridin' VN2000 Classic LT From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 14:43:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3589A1D7C9A for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 14:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simeo.reig@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nv6G6ljKz40HJ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 14:43:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simeo.reig@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id k14so53557400otn.4; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 06:43:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=V4jwTXjTi3yGpgatEJMtIRdkYhAZ/g7Ozpk4/Tls6Uc=; b=q4z4zcFWeLWhHzmXVy98RhWm5jSPahT4/6SG02uxM4u8f7LwJwr8P482Az2WT6oa4c msRPqcys1TpplXUvNgesH9DRJvE1wIv8NZNqwgDLmfNQEmA3Vej/+bGyb1IzaR3VNJQC eOsAZnuNmPxis9wLGbqx2PJGyA3VUThJ390HHVUfAWH+Zyz7pftl8Um6dl15YEJ+ospM uPbQ/EBnHhDinJFAAqKNBgKmXMSYNhd4jByfQN7P/7fw6z6vn8N5DAp0r3FdEI3BLMSY Eam+1CEr2AVpJ6w+CAH7ogDC5htvQ0Br6RHNAh0YV5Z5+VEgNdXLt7k2YVVIYa+hh/t3 7qaA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=V4jwTXjTi3yGpgatEJMtIRdkYhAZ/g7Ozpk4/Tls6Uc=; b=V03ghpapY9EQaO8ouqsb0LS5pdxpVr6hHJ7fkQy0GBuXVYOirjOSVWGU88huMKPyRv /HvB82s2epoYn7WL9UNQX3S4yvIWp1xMSlywLFpNLJFPdk8DLHXfGAt8tgVfKqgPUoap HxoY474EM/bksBxiSQcwKKE8775lJtnac4p86KuRnCrh9F3FfIiz1cYd6WnXxxNiPjbO HJ1baAADtkqd9Z7YWY9MHEtp3IcQpcsJVqDX3V81TRUqZ+UhSsPTjNoAo1zGfYex547g mRolZ4U6GYWhCloY3SvcUlbzIIiTuKC0Ym7HbotCYmQobM14gC5Ofz92hJodR80RLRlJ CkuA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXP72/Wn3DmWln6dXPsymX2wZBWwjZvb4HrlFOxu6sM687JMJGQ YKqpTtODj/P3gOq1fa3EXb7CJapcIR/J/tVDwAXGmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxRkUDUYBtq1xq5FOn1KFnXFWmcc0Kb3sXH9vqPWtuyKHgOWpkUG8CvYEHSs/h70tT+BeWxf0qSvDz1tFx9LEc= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:798e:: with SMTP id h14mr84033889otm.257.1577889780928; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 06:43:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201912301828.xBUISOHL074374@repo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Simeo Reig Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 15:42:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r521562 - in head/java: . wildfly17 wildfly17/files To: Pedro Giffuni Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Simeo Reig X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47nv6G6ljKz40HJ X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=q4z4zcFW; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of simeoreig@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::336 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=simeoreig@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.70 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[19]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[reigsimeo@gmail.com,simeoreig@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-8.25), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[reigsimeo@gmail.com,simeoreig@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[6.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 14:43:04 -0000 Hi all, Pedro=C2=B4s question could make sense in a regular environment but this = is Java world!. Still nowadays there are not so few companies running java 7/java EE7 despite we have java 13/Jakarta EE8. In official Wildfly page, https://wildfly.org/downloads , you can see there is still available from Wildfly 8 since the last Wildfly 18 more, summing more than twenty versions all maintained. Why? some versions are javaEE7 certified, some javaEE8 and some others jakartaEE8. Some can use jdk7, some jdk8 and others can use last jdk11. Some have microprofile included, some other no etcetera. Java EE has moved from oracle to eclipse fundation, there have been more changes in last two years than last twenty and therefore many companies are stilln adapting their code. By the way, thanks for your comments Pedro and commit new version Kurt. Sime=C3=B3 Reig On Wed, 1 Jan 2020, 14:01 Simeo Reig, wrote: > Hi all, > > Pedro=C2=B4s question could make sense in a regular environment but thi= s is > Java world!. Still nowadays there are not so few companies running java > 7/java EE7 despite we have java 13/Jakarta EE8. > > In official Wildfly page, https://wildfly.org/downloads , you can see > there is still available from Wildfly 8 since the last Wildfly 18 more, > summing more than twenty versions all maintained. > > > Why? some versions are javaEE7 certified, some javaEE8 and some others > jakartaEE8. Some can use jdk7, some jdk8 and others can use last jdk11. > Some have microprofile included, some other no etcetera. Java EE has move= d > from oracle to eclipse fundation, there have been more changes in last tw= o > years than last twenty and therefore many companies are stilln adapting > their code. > > By the way, thanks for comments Pedro and commit new version Kurt. > > Sime=C3=B3 Reig > > > > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, 19:35 Pedro Giffuni, wrote: > >> >> On 30/12/2019 13:28, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> > Author: pi >> > Date: Mon Dec 30 18:28:24 2019 >> > New Revision: 521562 >> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/521562 >> > >> > Log: >> > New port: java/wildfly17 >> > >> > WildFly is a flexible, lightweight, managed application >> > runtime that helps you build amazing applications. >> > WildFly - new name for JBoss Application Server >> > >> > Fast Startup >> > Small Footprint >> > Modular Design >> > Unified Configuration and Management >> > >> > And of course Java EE / Jakarta EE! >> > >> > WWW: https://wildfly.org/ >> > >> > This is the first Wildfly with JAKARTA EE8 full support. >> > >> > PR: 242962 >> > Submitted by: Simeo Reig >> > >> > Added: >> > head/java/wildfly17/ >> > - copied from r521432, head/java/wildfly16/ >> > head/java/wildfly17/files/wildfly17.in >> > - copied unchanged from r521432, head/java/wildfly16/files/ >> wildfly16.in >> > Deleted: >> > head/java/wildfly17/files/wildfly16.in >> > Modified: >> > head/java/Makefile >> > head/java/wildfly17/Makefile >> > head/java/wildfly17/distinfo >> > head/java/wildfly17/files/pkg-message.in >> > head/java/wildfly17/pkg-descr >> > head/java/wildfly17/pkg-plist >> > >> > Modified: head/java/Makefile >> > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D >> > --- head/java/Makefile Mon Dec 30 18:16:59 2019 (r521561= ) >> > +++ head/java/Makefile Mon Dec 30 18:28:24 2019 (r521562= ) >> > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ >> > SUBDIR +=3D wildfly14 >> > SUBDIR +=3D wildfly15 >> > SUBDIR +=3D wildfly16 >> > + SUBDIR +=3D wildfly17 >> > SUBDIR +=3D wildfly90 >> > SUBDIR +=3D xdoclet >> > >> >> Not complaining, but I wonder why we have so many versioned ports >> instead of having just one wildfly and wildfly-devel. wildfly 18 is >> available, BTW. >> >> Pedro. >> >> >> From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 15:49:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773A21D8C1C for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 15:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nwZY3HFjz42T8; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 15:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (unknown [181.52.72.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: pfg) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6A0D2F6FF; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 15:49:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfg@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: svn commit: r521562 - in head/java: . wildfly17 wildfly17/files To: Simeo Reig Cc: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201912301828.xBUISOHL074374@repo.freebsd.org> From: Pedro Giffuni Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <43942a07-d03b-b668-7ea8-f1c1c630c233@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 10:49:10 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 15:49:09 -0000 Hi Simeo; On 01/01/2020 09:42, Simeo Reig wrote: > Hi all, > > Pedro´s question could make sense in a regular environment but this is > Java world!. Still nowadays there are not so few companies running > java 7/java EE7 despite we have java 13/Jakarta EE8. > Hmm ... that is reasonable and surely justifies having your versioning scheme. Do note however, that we deprecated Java 7 and anything before that in the ports tree so those ports should be deprecated. People can still install and use older versions manually, of course. > In official Wildfly page, https://wildfly.org/downloads , you can see > there is still available from Wildfly 8 since the last Wildfly 18 > more, summing more  than twenty versions all maintained. > > > Why? some versions are javaEE7 certified, some javaEE8 and some others > jakartaEE8. Some can use jdk7, some jdk8 and others can use last > jdk11.  Some have microprofile included, some other no etcetera. Java > EE has moved from oracle to eclipse fundation, there have been more > changes in last two years than last twenty and therefore many > companies are stilln adapting their code. > Very interesting indeed. C++ has also been changing a lot. > By the way, thanks for your comments Pedro and commit new version Kurt. > Thanks for the explanation, Pedro. > Simeó Reig > > On Wed, 1 Jan 2020, 14:01 Simeo Reig, > wrote: > > Hi all, > >   Pedro´s question could make sense in a regular environment but > this is Java world!. Still nowadays there are not so few companies > running java 7/java EE7 despite we have java 13/Jakarta EE8. > > In official Wildfly page, https://wildfly.org/downloads , you can > see there is still available from Wildfly 8 since the last > Wildfly 18 more, summing more  than twenty versions all maintained. > > > Why? some versions are javaEE7 certified, some javaEE8 and some > others jakartaEE8. Some can use jdk7, some jdk8 and others can use > last jdk11.  Some have microprofile included, some other no > etcetera. Java EE has moved from oracle to eclipse fundation, > there have been more changes in last two years than last twenty > and therefore many companies are stilln adapting their code. > > By the way, thanks for comments Pedro and commit new version Kurt. > > Simeó Reig > > > > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, 19:35 Pedro Giffuni, > wrote: > > > On 30/12/2019 13:28, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > Author: pi > > Date: Mon Dec 30 18:28:24 2019 > > New Revision: 521562 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/521562 > > > > Log: > >    New port: java/wildfly17 > > > >    WildFly is a flexible, lightweight, managed application > >    runtime that helps you build amazing applications. > >    WildFly - new name for JBoss Application Server > > > >    Fast Startup > >    Small Footprint > >    Modular Design > >    Unified Configuration and Management > > > >    And of course Java EE / Jakarta EE! > > > >    WWW: https://wildfly.org/ > > > >    This is the first Wildfly with JAKARTA EE8 full support. > > > >    PR:                242962 > >    Submitted by:      Simeo Reig > > > > > Added: > >    head/java/wildfly17/ > >       - copied from r521432, head/java/wildfly16/ > >    head/java/wildfly17/files/wildfly17.in > >       - copied unchanged from r521432, > head/java/wildfly16/files/wildfly16.in > > Deleted: > >    head/java/wildfly17/files/wildfly16.in > > Modified: > >    head/java/Makefile > >    head/java/wildfly17/Makefile > >    head/java/wildfly17/distinfo > >    head/java/wildfly17/files/pkg-message.in > > >    head/java/wildfly17/pkg-descr > >    head/java/wildfly17/pkg-plist > > > > Modified: head/java/Makefile > > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/java/Makefile        Mon Dec 30 18:16:59 2019      >   (r521561) > > +++ head/java/Makefile        Mon Dec 30 18:28:24 2019      >   (r521562) > > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ > >       SUBDIR += wildfly14 > >       SUBDIR += wildfly15 > >       SUBDIR += wildfly16 > > +    SUBDIR += wildfly17 > >       SUBDIR += wildfly90 > >       SUBDIR += xdoclet > > > > Not complaining, but I wonder why we have so many versioned ports > instead of having just one wildfly and wildfly-devel. wildfly > 18 is > available, BTW. > > Pedro. > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 16:07:42 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E041D95CB for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47nwzy0t6Xz43Wh for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1E0721D95CA; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCE31D95C9 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47nwzy00ndz43Wg for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rene@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1185) id ECF701B351; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:07:41 +0000 From: portmgr-secretary@freebsd.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: New 2020Q1 branch Message-ID: <20200101160741.GA80773@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 16:07:42 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, The 2020Q1 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2020Q1 branch. A lot of things happened in the last three months: - - pkg 1.12.0 - - Default version of Lazarus switched to 2.0.6 - - Default version of Python and Python3 switched to 3.7 - - Default version of Samba switched to 4.10 - - Firefox 72.0 - - Firefox-esr 68.4.0 - - Chromium 78.0.3904.108 - - Qt5 5.13.2 - - Linux CentOS 6 ports removed - - Virtual category "ipv6" remvoved, this is now the norm - - Physical category "palm" removed Next quarterly package builds will start on Thursday 1:00 UTC and should be available on your closest mirrors few days later. For those stat nerds out there, here's what happened during the last 3 months on head: Number of commits: 7907 Number of committers: 157 Most active committers: 1991 sunpoet 471 jbeich 462 yuri 340 tobik 289 amdmi3 240 pkubaj 234 tcberner 220 antoine 131 swills 118 dmgk Diffstat: 22449 files changed, 291733 insertions(+), 434760 deletions(-) and on the 2019Q4 branch: Number of commits: 358 Number of committers: 61 Most active committers: 59 jbeich 31 mfechner 24 kai 20 antoine 15 koobs 13 riggs 13 rene 12 tz 11 zeising 11 linimon Diffstat: 1255 files changed, 18153 insertions(+), 9189 deletions(-) Regards, René -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGyBAEBCgCcFiEE+zdFyG8V6O2sgTL82ClOw7vE19UFAl4MvydfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEZC Mzc0NUM4NkYxNUU4RURBQzgxMzJGQ0Q4Mjk0RUMzQkJDNEQ3RDUeHHBvcnRtZ3It c2VjcmV0YXJ5QGZyZWVic2Qub3JnAAoJENgpTsO7xNfVBwIH/21n7ZHseZTmh48F b3Q116MuVj7TnaMmSH/eSy3aHkpVOkwSHTeHW29BQMvKLpH0S5cBs/551v8jmGei gqngv8FI5g8D3U0Ijfv17z4yKOo3Q4tev+9KvTsXXzesWOFxtes4wKxxStDxJSlZ dK5SP7zKXClQKBxFfYiwn1HvxNAnoBxyq1afLedED7GlHg+Anl8Kwn8milvd7DYE mhUddCOEysk4gB7EfpIxGfjzI3Cs0mTFJy7yJeKajDNh+05CJcx4MO8A1g+1SeiR zd7K26Oau1cKbI9bGSSqTwKb0D1XZZK+u4jhLD/9xFol0SWNv9rh1QzcMIW15mW+ DtMOyYw= =pi4+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:38:03 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CBE1DF545 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:38:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p2zr4j7Dz4Kvt for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Portmaster failing Message-Id: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:37:58 -0700 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p2zr4j7Dz4Kvt X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.83)[-0.829,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:38:03 -0000 Portmaser -L errors out with make: "/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk" line 97: You are using an unsupported = SSL provider openssl Make.conf: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl apache=3D2.4 php=3D7.2 perl5=3D5.28 = mysql=3D10.1m Worked fine on Saturday, maybe Friday. --=20 i wasn't born a programmer. i became one because i was impatient. - Dave Winer From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:40:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DFF1DF61B for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:40:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p32c6bCYz4L1P for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.fritz.box (ip9234d229.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [146.52.210.41]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47p32Z5d4TzKqJl; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:40:22 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: Portmaster failing From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:40:22 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> To: "@lbutlr" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.4 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p32c6bCYz4L1P X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of franco@lastsummer.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.239.241.64) smtp.mailfrom=franco@lastsummer.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[41.210.52.146.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.16)[ip: (0.78), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.01), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lastsummer.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.836,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[64.241.239.213.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.72)[-0.717,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:40:26 -0000 security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has become = security/openssl. A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private trees, = don't we. ;) Cheers, Franco > On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:37 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >=20 > Portmaser -L errors out with >=20 > make: "/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk" line 97: You are using an = unsupported SSL provider openssl >=20 > Make.conf: > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dssl=3Dopenssl apache=3D2.4 php=3D7.2 perl5=3D5.28 = mysql=3D10.1m >=20 > Worked fine on Saturday, maybe Friday. >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > i wasn't born a programmer. i became one because i was impatient. - > Dave Winer >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:42:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34241DF879 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p34Z02JFz4LJT for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:42:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:42:04 -0700 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p34Z02JFz4LJT X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.81)[-0.811,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.980,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:42:06 -0000 On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote: > security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has = become security/openssl. Ugh. > A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private = trees, don't we. ;) This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 are = any indication. --=20 people didn't seem to be able to remember what it was like with the elves around. Life was certainly more interesting then, but usually because it was shorter. And it was more colourful, if = you liked the colour of blood. --Lords and Ladies From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:44:16 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CDD1DF96C for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p3734CkCz4LPp for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:44:14 -0700 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <29D70129-B6AB-42F3-847F-74F3704C647F@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p3734CkCz4LPp X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.19 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.83)[-0.827,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.980,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:44:16 -0000 On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote: > security/openssl111 has become security/openssl. I have /usr/ports/security/openssl111 and no /usr/ports/security/openssl = which doesn=E2=80=99t sound like what you said. --=20 'Pcharn'kov!' Footnote: 'Your feet shall be cut off and be buried several yards from your body so your ghost won't walk.' --Interesting Times From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:46:22 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EA71DFADC for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:46:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p39T4wx4z4LYM for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:46:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.fritz.box (ip9234d229.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [146.52.210.41]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47p39K5TY0zKkf3; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:46:13 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: Portmaster failing From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:46:13 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> To: "@lbutlr" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.4 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p39T4wx4z4LYM X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of franco@lastsummer.de has no SPF policy when checking 2a01:4f8:a0:51d7::103:2) smtp.mailfrom=franco@lastsummer.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[41.210.52.146.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.97)[ip: (-0.85), ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.43), asn: 24940(-1.54), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lastsummer.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:46:22 -0000 > On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >=20 > On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner = wrote: >> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has = become security/openssl. >=20 > Ugh. >=20 >> A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private = trees, don't we. ;) >=20 > This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 are = any indication. With PHP 5.6 axed prematurely a while back I am interested to see = OpenSSL 1.0.2 phased out now with a number of ports still not supporting 1.1.1 and = seeing them marked as broken sooner or later. With all this in mind, I'm surprised Python did not suffer the same fate and was deprecate-extended to the end of 2020 in the ports tree which is = an unusual 180 regarding previous arguments that having expired ports still supported is "too much work". Happy new year, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 20:51:43 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C358D1DFD57 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p3Hf6XMRz4Lq9 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:51:41 -0700 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p3Hf6XMRz4Lq9 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.17 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.80)[-0.805,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.979,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 20:51:43 -0000 On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:46, Franco Fichtner wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >>=20 >> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner = wrote: >>> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has = become security/openssl. >>=20 >> Ugh. >>=20 >>> A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private = trees, don't we. ;) >>=20 >> This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 are = any indication. >=20 > With PHP 5.6 axed prematurely a while back I am interested to see = OpenSSL 1.0.2 > phased out now with a number of ports still not supporting 1.1.1 and = seeing them > marked as broken sooner or later. Well, at this point I cannot install openssl111 without deinstalling = openssl, which I cannot deinstall since it is gone from ports. Looks like I have to remove openssl, which =E2=80=A6 I mean, seriously, = this seems pretty hostile. Name : openssl Version : 1.0.2u,1 Installed on : Sun Dec 22 08:13:27 2019 MST There was nothing at all on the 22nd about =E2=80=9CWARNING THIS WILL = BREAK EVERYTHING IN A WEEK=E2=80=9D which to mean seems like it should = have been made super obvious. --=20 There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don=E2=80=99t. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 21:04:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962921E03A3 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p3ZR4xVbz4MhR for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 001L4Nu4008330 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:04:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 001L4NHH008329 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:04:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 13:04:23 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: mail/junkfilter is several broken Message-ID: <20200101210423.GA8324@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p3ZR4xVbz4MhR X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.23 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.23)[ip: (0.05), ipnet: 128.95.0.0/16(-0.25), asn: 73(-0.90), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 21:04:33 -0000 For users of mail/junkfilter, it now will filter all emails claiming a "Bad Date line". The following patch seems to fix the problem for the next decade. --- junkfilter.three.orig 2020-01-01 12:59:56.005681000 -0800 +++ junkfilter.three 2020-01-01 13:00:26.254199000 -0800 @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ * ! $ ^Date:$JFWS((Sun|Mon|Tue|Wed|Thu|Fri|Sat),$JFWS)?\ (0?[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$JFWS\ (Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)$JFWS\ - ((19)?[789][0-9]|(20)?[01][0-9])$JFWS\ + ((19)?[789][0-9]|(20)?[012][0-9])$JFWS\ (0?[0-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-3]):(0?|[1-5])[0-9](:(0?|[1-5])[0-9])?$JFWS\ (([+-][0-1][0-4]([03]0|45))|("?\(?(UT|GMT|EST|EDT|CST|CDT|MST|MDT|PST|PDT|[A-I]|[K-Z])\)?"?))? { JFMATCH="$JFSEC: Bad Date line" INCLUDERC=$JFDIR/junkfilter.match } Suggest either installing the patch or marking the port as broken. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 21:18:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3771E0695 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p3tl1cYTz4N9Y for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:18:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id t2so37673716wrr.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:18:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2VGdtd5ox0ZPlZN68Ype/FsI4OvxwuWXg9kcfvK6tmE=; b=DfYHtHsSWCzwwnWYl5eLUT/cJ661NDYMYZGPjeweEmqnE7Te5l+eWbGnps0YJ8WIDq CLHeWfIS92zsEhD8/OlgSYUzSQ0EWUE71TFRt+7l1EwmoxVkFvoRUrZbqWc2a7g8bzNj JxBHn7Rof99irCbEhbKQSNO+ujd8Wbi3D40SQf04diTzfcJaPlL89rpQI2FqSDFqoz25 A14Tg4ezDpZxE8baX4zR4R8FH6Ro3o56IMc805Q0tbK+z1BoiCSnFdESri9vKLU7mprI c+lgfdmXROLFaHtDk00r7AKahMRQ7FNQ2z0rUXvHQKoinwvuzJKqpnKC6BP4aCp02/4Y nC2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2VGdtd5ox0ZPlZN68Ype/FsI4OvxwuWXg9kcfvK6tmE=; b=RlPlP8w+Oo51m75ljwXdA7dgIy2B4UXwTMbZDU6y+48mq66gOZEEZ6IIB0iQLCPIJE hu2kbRL141hyjavglBO6g5qDsd2PAmN7bJpI04t5Bc7srnY1x7+BuXa6JtJCMkdYORj2 Bj9ub/886PEz6mpmg6d0XXV4K3LGcRCx9EWJHfEg86JEh6jR00n8zhNVgE6d28W6zcMp c1HRAEZzqPfB26YIwShJHV/E51EXejzGQ5Kx7xOMlr+xCr1kywapN48oCFGGovAmQpkv 6fkkcI0Ha9WZqc+YgtcnTcmwfjV8qnlKrb/mtagl16HyK1fa7osYy6it3FB6Ij/bKpGV qmVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUuaa4aBNAWCcJSjM0go3bM03ulO/fT9k93rySGmBUL5MCero+I PH984ZfFqT+/CpJiI4v4sdPbX2VHyn/xC9z1UEm32aJYpS0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw661YhLGQWs9FuHOgPlGVxT2+UHstPO4RxWqB3NpHJ/IbK1c/0i0r4WrnyEySnKRNTU0MI7G7ZTAKQP5hv2Js= X-Received: by 2002:adf:b193:: with SMTP id q19mr78779723wra.78.1577913517294; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:18:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 14:18:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Portmaster failing To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p3tl1cYTz4N9Y X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=DfYHtHsS; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::443 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.4.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.46)[ip: (2.26), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.63), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 21:18:40 -0000 On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:51 PM @lbutlr wrote: > > On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:46, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: > >> > >> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote= : > >>> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has beco= me security/openssl. > >> > >> Ugh. > >> > >>> A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private tree= s, don't we. ;) > >> > >> This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 are = any indication. > > > > With PHP 5.6 axed prematurely a while back I am interested to see OpenS= SL 1.0.2 > > phased out now with a number of ports still not supporting 1.1.1 and se= eing them > > marked as broken sooner or later. > > Well, at this point I cannot install openssl111 without deinstalling open= ssl, which I cannot deinstall since it is gone from ports. > > Looks like I have to remove openssl, which =E2=80=A6 I mean, seriously, t= his seems pretty hostile. > > Name : openssl > Version : 1.0.2u,1 > Installed on : Sun Dec 22 08:13:27 2019 MST > > There was nothing at all on the 22nd about =E2=80=9CWARNING THIS WILL BRE= AK EVERYTHING IN A WEEK=E2=80=9D which to mean seems like it should have be= en made super obvious. This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. There seems to be a pervasive misconception that poudriere is "advanced" and portmaster is simple or straightforward. That notion is completely and totally backwards. Poudriere makes managing ports as simple and trouble-free as possible, and portmaster is specifically for people who can troubleshoot and fix problems like the one you're describing on their own. These problems WILL continue to happen very regularly for portmaster, because portmaster simply cannot do the right thing on its own. It will ALWAYS require manual intervention every time anything remotely significant changes. I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. If you choose to stay on portmaster, however, then you need to check the resentment about build failures. They are simply an inevitable consequence of using a very old and broken tool that should only be used by people with substantial port-handling experience. You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 21:23:30 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD281E09B2 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (host64.shmhost.net [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p40L0Hfzz4Ngr for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.fritz.box (ip9234d229.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [146.52.210.41]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47p40J4PwdzKkf3; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:23:28 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.40.2.2.4\)) Subject: Re: Portmaster failing From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:23:28 +0100 Cc: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> To: Adam Weinberger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.4 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p40L0Hfzz4Ngr X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of franco@lastsummer.de has no SPF policy when checking 213.239.241.64) smtp.mailfrom=franco@lastsummer.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[41.210.52.146.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.16)[ip: (0.75), ipnet: 213.239.192.0/18(-0.01), asn: 24940(-1.54), country: DE(-0.02)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lastsummer.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.940,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[64.241.239.213.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.791,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 21:23:30 -0000 Hi Adam, > On 1. Jan 2020, at 10:18 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: >=20 > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:51 PM @lbutlr wrote: >>=20 >> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:46, Franco Fichtner = wrote: >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>> On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner = wrote: >>>>> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has = become security/openssl. >>>>=20 >>>> Ugh. >>>>=20 >>>>> A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private = trees, don't we. ;) >>>>=20 >>>> This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 = are any indication. >>>=20 >>> With PHP 5.6 axed prematurely a while back I am interested to see = OpenSSL 1.0.2 >>> phased out now with a number of ports still not supporting 1.1.1 and = seeing them >>> marked as broken sooner or later. >>=20 >> Well, at this point I cannot install openssl111 without deinstalling = openssl, which I cannot deinstall since it is gone from ports. >>=20 >> Looks like I have to remove openssl, which =E2=80=A6 I mean, = seriously, this seems pretty hostile. >>=20 >> Name : openssl >> Version : 1.0.2u,1 >> Installed on : Sun Dec 22 08:13:27 2019 MST >>=20 >> There was nothing at all on the 22nd about =E2=80=9CWARNING THIS WILL = BREAK EVERYTHING IN A WEEK=E2=80=9D which to mean seems like it should = have been made super obvious. >=20 > This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. Let me stop you right here and say: ports Framework itself is suffering from this wishful attitude and this has nothing to do with readily available poudriere "replacements" which are not as good as poudriere for sure. If the ports framework isn't seen as a stand alone infrastructure worth its own integrity the discussion is already dead and the quality will keep to decline for every casual FreeBSD user who doesn't really care for this or that tool, but wants to install software from the ports tree manually. Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 21:40:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A371E0F4C for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-il1-x142.google.com (mail-il1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::142]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p4Mk60Bpz4PNK for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 21:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-il1-x142.google.com with SMTP id x5so32798980ila.6 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:40:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=w0dYp+WKWXR5P5zBbLrSwj5YzzFRiCI8/QL1VdW7GhY=; b=tGbX/FhZ1etK+1dgVsnrdNopcqMBt7bKJUnpzb1A4BwFCTORF+PfpvDU/0ElTYuD6l zgKkKzXaZxuM2wgXZ/a3xidfC0dEzRWaN5EZkRJi7I9qSO+yIt8x0/87A6+POU+OTDN/ KJNV3L6mAv7OOvfTyJrArExBpDKvF6NHgJ5FfSvdTwQXNRSZ/6GzAJTJHvE7pND1fMes P6yJsPyBL8RbbuXut3Xj2VAqpfGR6zXUNMQSRRVq/fbmVCB+CTHV7V/KIWgsKZs61DrQ ou8pg3JNlZuZxX4tZH7UJMYG2a6bw45AQd6k0Pinbum+m+PQ4S+0HfgKjwFQVmcy9rPo /YRA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=w0dYp+WKWXR5P5zBbLrSwj5YzzFRiCI8/QL1VdW7GhY=; b=ei42zZENP+B7vlWWh/Vg+zwpc3kQiYvluT8+6qw+BXNz/Md3rcH2DSXC+mYN9Qs4iQ XWYQngGVk+E3uQ2nKrkzZtpeBq0c16yyE5DriYbv5/qPw3c+S/rumVUnFDynhh5ceqTa FIRt7UmRRmaIkZLUoP9LTjtUhBru39pXty50nvnWnvxPHba3TBbx2dWl9VsCOmF5bv3N l35FAV636BfEN9Dgy3iCtdOr2beJ6wvzQoX2LB/TCKFplXZBj6unNXvKphx34Mba71r3 wLjtkMT+U4V8b477Fq39q4dj0pdILVe6wYVz8zJClS+B3EoRWX+W8RquPd0u1+Rqm4xz eWzg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXnnM/KpJRy33vzTv0ihQHxle1+1aGGTBeaqOFSYTjYOXgArEMX A5bXDjcPBdLW8xeRosnplgKyH7MB+QfDkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqydG6UnblkJJaKMgEtvRDAej/xGypuMgz7SMNM5Ilymur81GXouv64WXkp8PveHJfu6PKPTHw== X-Received: by 2002:a92:d18a:: with SMTP id z10mr70167374ilz.48.1577914817549; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:40:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.192.169] (c-76-18-79-193.hsd1.nm.comcast.net. [76.18.79.193]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm13500465ioo.27.2020.01.01.13.40.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jan 2020 13:40:16 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Adam Weinberger Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 14:40:10 -0700 Message-Id: <6D2033C3-225B-422F-8285-110085BC7B33@adamw.org> References: Cc: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD In-Reply-To: To: Franco Fichtner X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17C54) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p4Mk60Bpz4PNK X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=tGbX/FhZ; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::142 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.44 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.44)[ip: (1.86), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[193.79.18.76.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 21:40:20 -0000 On Jan 1, 2020, at 14:23, Franco Fichtner wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFHi Adam, >=20 >> On 1. Jan 2020, at 10:18 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: >>=20 >>> On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 1:51 PM @lbutlr wrote: >>>=20 >>> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:46, Franco Fichtner wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>> On 1. Jan 2020, at 9:42 PM, @lbutlr wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>> On 01 Jan 2020, at 13:40, Franco Fichtner wrote= : >>>>>> security/openssl was removed before, now security/openssl111 has beco= me security/openssl. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Ugh. >>>>>=20 >>>>>> A bit too eager for my taste, but that's why we all have private tree= s, don't we. ;) >>>>>=20 >>>>> This is going to go poorly, if previous attempts to update to 1.1 are a= ny indication. >>>>=20 >>>> With PHP 5.6 axed prematurely a while back I am interested to see OpenS= SL 1.0.2 >>>> phased out now with a number of ports still not supporting 1.1.1 and se= eing them >>>> marked as broken sooner or later. >>>=20 >>> Well, at this point I cannot install openssl111 without deinstalling ope= nssl, which I cannot deinstall since it is gone from ports. >>>=20 >>> Looks like I have to remove openssl, which =E2=80=A6 I mean, seriously, t= his seems pretty hostile. >>>=20 >>> Name : openssl >>> Version : 1.0.2u,1 >>> Installed on : Sun Dec 22 08:13:27 2019 MST >>>=20 >>> There was nothing at all on the 22nd about =E2=80=9CWARNING THIS WILL BR= EAK EVERYTHING IN A WEEK=E2=80=9D which to mean seems like it should have be= en made super obvious. >>=20 >> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. >=20 > Let me stop you right here and say: ports Framework itself is > suffering from this wishful attitude and this has nothing to do > with readily available poudriere "replacements" which are not > as good as poudriere for sure. >=20 > If the ports framework isn't seen as a stand alone infrastructure > worth its own integrity the discussion is already dead and the > quality will keep to decline for every casual FreeBSD user who > doesn't really care for this or that tool, but wants to install > software from the ports tree manually. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, > Franco I agree wholeheartedly with everything you said. The ports tree has grown to= o complex for a simple =E2=80=9Cmake install=E2=80=9D to be a predictable pr= ocess. What we have now is a major usability problem wherein we have a large= handful of tools, all but one of which are essentially broken. We do need a= new approach to this problem.=20 # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 22:03:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCD71E1DDA for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [74.104.188.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "m5p.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p4ty4ZHbz4R4t for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:03:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff::26] (court.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:15ff:0:0:0:26]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 001M3d5B048542 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:03:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) To: Franco Fichtner , Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD , "@lbutlr" References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> From: George Mitchell Autocrypt: addr=george+freebsd@m5p.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFgnLnwBEADAJDiBKQX77LFRz9wZW8mz3KvaQol2nIremcws0F1mz/zgFlk6uhQVtwnL wb4XL5LdFwcNE1+QZzPLcbYWoWQlz0lBw1bMuKAgr0S6V2e0+I0DqhKeslVFctcTwtvT6pnK VLZXO/7ZGAaLzG4K5vSPzgoevU+YI/pxNsVCH2UO/c3jQW63uEt25mIZbCF1Pu4jgp4RhIgF ujn877r/j6OwBwjzRUu3E6ADp+U825d+5YCuQMEH0wIPnn9GTpXvfdKdbwOIl2akqXqs4cnk iATWfK3r6D4mvDEj1OPHlTvJYcfic7aOIiAwmx1C1v78GjXOdOOA0SGffNix3C2/8oZUO1+V Aet4MKpUKkduWSvULhIkHNZ5Nu8SIJOqge8pmtHxuNXAMfMrAjMdjPwwBFLsYg3Xa2E2oJwg ehTauwd/EDJFcVCyDCyCAYOi/BH/+XQyxzgDlY9N9qj9tHqhVPI6XK7t8UVffGiZUq4rHp5J RdOToqiTNC6eCJBczhMIW+DuFvWU9e6W708T1dz0Accn6Lrgk4eRIn3GFPBG+TxnpjAqHsbW 607dcnD3YKAqY4e+khczL4EObhe7dC1v2fmZiAC6Ds3WHR11IfqoUgCkIwJ590Ej+ElygJFF XxI82wtEz9hkeLLvItpyEJNVjppViRW+Dgl/U7ypHB3qDgYjgwARAQABtChHZW9yZ2UgTWl0 Y2hlbGwgPGdlb3JnZStmcmVlYnNkQG01cC5jb20+iQJUBBMBCAA+FiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZX wRES3m+p4fkFAlhZcR0CGyMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQgJCgsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQwRES 3m+p4flqmw/9Emr/ydTG2n9o/IX1yVCNcHVFenVrcOY0L+DGQYZRO/XpLvsGYcuSIQId1w7h l4HZKI89ri2fF2ks6upMqBajLf8s7a8PnYrbw5bPaoOFyNTjv57GLZVsYw95kmMUpK6siuAA fXvHfKUpC/sThbwSv/1CLryVG74+5vdI8j7cQeDM436FThxlVfHKrILIiL34D4WThFB3hV/Y 2A+mQwXmdLcuQXXeAazqsFJL8sgEKSC7GMcExDkVpGc5Rh2hu97a4Sa7qWX9G/YdZOrcDacJ XxfvePn3m3WfRtXN/r0lUfiVXiqkFfbvqSaZQ0I4UvZXNGd/gH4jKHtX9RTH9G96UZeHNoMo tPw9U0fx8Ceh72nUL9qzqnmok/ryWm+6gt4Q1eRP7QAosOa1g/RgUdS1Z9IuCmbXMDp5kbNw L4ZoDMF5U3mmh8/IOKkhGopNLbNv0mwUgC59pnCptiOVx8DyckXWC4L2r6PKbWGrcGIzsUER 9smfL10gpp5H5agjwwPZI6/kzJ0R5nBzQWAlwqI73YAy6JI0HTD6lvxW7yWm2fGjEfmyaBOU 8OLUin7auoFSn+QmD5yNCUn5Ls77qHARkT1ZGocAnQkvZBGTwXpvyJixygXsm+vSUFDYBOSn cR54vdXOEMqrJk6SGau5YI9V7EhQVveE1BUp8ofWf2oo4RG5Ag0EWCcufAEQALuTOxmqMFE+ ieev/rcL3wVJrcuKS+pBbKCY9IIL0OwVf98HQJJcgdOsdDhruVd19nJNlwZ3Fc34wLw7y2GO 9WrpZiYKnI4n9urhLE5r1ydBInlI/1UKZWgM3/dPjJtcXMsC3vnqR9DmOxW4/SbqJDjP3XzO FleT4yip3AaNhPGwEPTZrubVp5hp/JojaZn690TLRwOFXg8NcjpOEs0Bq9M+OLpmsF0flrgs yDfS7y+SQ17R4Iq9T7RxZvZVAh510yGGIZIETYO/4Dh417VVm+gaksOVh2egetpUUvYYc0Ub KaP+5F/WGNrmRb1F6SKypvLlKkYAHCsUUSzsAGl9gbQhEEpuOMbUKp1979HoRMkW+8046kIo 8BZ6ph8izG/g4dZOaEqKGEhqdhYIB7UwMtFFuPtSs5Nl6JrZYni/nzFtTmtVCgcj9PNqrzqt fNFYhNznD6St6wxp3TOm9D3TQF0dzwBM1jZpb8WvmK3k6oy8hbpjiBzxn3kyRA9Vzy+PdbN/ G5a1k0rpZu/ivpBuLCDVGljUmgQigXg6xkk5UxBoHp7MPvG9prZ5jqdEa2r1KgnGjaq+VJsu Uqrw10dVgeG1NulDU1+sQl+/mwtflbkimhjDDjxsVgfrv7uvV/9be+gGm1KATuqdgCboSb1s QAo5ARfwFfChrnh+fTfPpPKHABEBAAGJAiQEGAEIAA8FAlgnLnwCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQwRES 3m+p4fno9w/4m+swztkzxSWdutjgSv2mw+PdrKWVGFAUD2HoY1Qpi5LNLE6s9pP3qzwpQYwK viOufVJYWZ540ss6BImZBGJwyHouacqrpZjpRo5+ftj07rY1SNd8QjcHDggPfpgJ1D4Il3Xi vRg5/gzkXnRu8dXeVvMP1Ndk/F5wcoLZlQwFtPfu2xyRYIsveXMoyypAvAFSaAGXU0hRzuDJ fGI3LFvpI9UXU2C4MMzjfyZyD2NJEDKOACTo85QQzxgheTDQaDocXW00wknXFMwEItiXp8dO 2zEml/3Kj4efDfjqGpjNefjK0cnj02Byt7y6GozWXyIylrXu0SN9qWRzUVZH3+q+ijA4q3Gm 9uWzLdpjN4QWAiiaEvMhLPohp9DdLsy3kAWWrA3+pAfHSTZXrobMMbSeBkE9E4/WxdKl0nM7 TNslAWcxkTd/7Ly9cxwT8wFdHuQB1hgCmIQxDNXHL1N1ANTeUYum1w9nUg6e1M0UWu+nk3Cw qL7oL2KZe13mQnU/CFwlhbf+i//j3SXrQLlIVQv9Fn805bxIcVo9yqUZyoiV7EUpvOsxDCZh ej3mNYF5nRCf6trEJQVk0aLC26zJAYExykdUlRqc4I13XPhlt+aFSMMkoL/thYO6e9oNFK6Q aJEKXomzxxqpceJVmPH6zvqJbOboAdE/mOD0PoS1M6saIQ== Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Message-ID: <2726af4c-e160-01cd-b3ae-5bd02f984787@m5p.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 17:03:32 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ywxYSE6lmC6Rq85Neska8eturzpCdPidH" X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=10.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,HELO_NO_DOMAIN autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.3 (2019-12-06) on mattapan.m5p.com X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p4ty4ZHbz4R4t X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of george@m5p.com designates 74.104.188.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=george@m5p.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.21 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; IP_SCORE(-2.81)[ip: (-9.86), ipnet: 74.104.0.0/16(-4.93), asn: 701(0.77), country: US(-0.05)]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,multipart/mixed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[m5p.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:+,3:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:74.104.0.0/16, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[freebsd]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:03:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --ywxYSE6lmC6Rq85Neska8eturzpCdPidH Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="hXjIq2gxvsY5CqNb7oX1E4hchcYdMMfXj"; protected-headers="v1" From: George Mitchell To: Franco Fichtner , Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD , "@lbutlr" Message-ID: <2726af4c-e160-01cd-b3ae-5bd02f984787@m5p.com> Subject: Re: Portmaster failing References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: --hXjIq2gxvsY5CqNb7oX1E4hchcYdMMfXj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2020-01-01 16:23, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi Adam, >=20 >> On 1. Jan 2020, at 10:18 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> [...] >> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. >=20 > Let me stop you right here and say: ports Framework itself is > suffering from this wishful attitude PLUS UMPTEEN*!!! > and this has nothing to do > with readily available poudriere "replacements" which are not > as good as poudriere for sure. Assuming you can get poudriere to work. Even by today's standards, a low-cost PC is not going to have the juice to support it. And to reiterate, the ports framework itself MUST work standalone. > If the ports framework isn't seen as a stand alone infrastructure > worth its own integrity the discussion is already dead and the > quality will keep to decline for every casual FreeBSD user who > doesn't really care for this or that tool, but wants to install > software from the ports tree manually. > [...] -- George * umpteen: an unspecified large number --hXjIq2gxvsY5CqNb7oX1E4hchcYdMMfXj-- --ywxYSE6lmC6Rq85Neska8eturzpCdPidH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEENdM4ZHktsJW5kKZXwRES3m+p4fkFAl4NFzsACgkQwRES3m+p 4fl3Bg/+NUp7BHROh7nPHarCU6P3BPy5AzVwzjYEOPVPCWoHctQCPOv8XCgx0T0n FLj0IHrMtYHrJduOUy7VSb0PkTTz6Gwk8oTthJB5ypVZNfSziL2mk8vsXm8zI8tS 3XtDj6nhUubr/AeI1ws33ifIu744N/bQ16RJ3YNFZtWKiA3wvPlGi5SN5IEFVelO IDbvF0nGoud/X8da401k1NFWiyPcWcApiIv+LB5vWSo4jAJvjAmUtAUJymCIn1RG G/E7F59G/MxIQUXIAN4UomJATuXEF3h7YfIRm+7ubM0Wg+/fGj+X6ZT+BO+DgaKk a1Uy2OXOg1r9LO+drEafbb0zfL5+U8p0iIZeNAgXnrDX67GJnUI3IyofH74yzAZr vpeq8zio/Nc1a8TjnOwU5XBUjmDaOmYP5h8edVs0JeqJ8EkvsA9xwaREltM8HaB+ 1WvrJ1GEzH8cEl2Dt4otlWCBiMlYq6xzx/3gnuN4eZTMw/zcxP992rAtKf3AJV4R bik0rrHa/TXpBwxSWUqOl94in3eDvt2GV2EXS2F3q+68GpoB98h+TvRenB78KHD8 Sjpeu3kAQu4nLAG0fOtQVvUUxaBOp2MBqcmRZ5uGtuOb9+FACpgKtdtogtirHfhv KjTBUaoZtht5ejJvofafrxYdVFwTI9JhC6XUy66vvVRj89sQrCI= =enA8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ywxYSE6lmC6Rq85Neska8eturzpCdPidH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 22:04:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793DE1E1EB3 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:04:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [88.198.69.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p4vz2Nf6z4RBg for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B04DC00308; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:04:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AECAA139890; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:04:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:04:44 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Message-ID: <20200101220444.GA37433@elch.exwg.net> References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <29D70129-B6AB-42F3-847F-74F3704C647F@kreme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <29D70129-B6AB-42F3-847F-74F3704C647F@kreme.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.2 (2019-12-18) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p4vz2Nf6z4RBg X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 88.198.69.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.198.69.140]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[140.69.198.88.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.17)[ipnet: 88.198.0.0/16(2.42), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:04:48 -0000 ## @lbutlr (kremels@kreme.com): > I have /usr/ports/security/openssl111 and no /usr/ports/security/openssl which doesn’t sound like what you said. You're missing https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&sortby=date&revision=521745 By the way, base openssl is at 1.1.1d in FreeBSD 12.1. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 22:12:57 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7DC91E22EC for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:12:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from smtp.burggraben.net (smtp.burggraben.net [88.198.69.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.burggraben.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p55P1YXTz4Rss for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:12:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cmt@burggraben.net) Received: from elch.exwg.net (elch.exwg.net [IPv6:2001:470:7120:1:127b:44ff:fe4f:148d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "elch.exwg.net", Issuer "Christoph Moench-Tegeder" (not verified)) by smtp.burggraben.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECD2C00308; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:12:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by elch.exwg.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5DA75139846; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:12:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:12:55 +0100 From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder To: George Mitchell Cc: Franco Fichtner , Adam Weinberger , FreeBSD , "@lbutlr" Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Message-ID: <20200101221255.GB37433@elch.exwg.net> References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <2726af4c-e160-01cd-b3ae-5bd02f984787@m5p.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2726af4c-e160-01cd-b3ae-5bd02f984787@m5p.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.2 (2019-12-18) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p55P1YXTz4Rss X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of cmt@burggraben.net designates 88.198.69.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cmt@burggraben.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.32 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:88.198.69.140]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[freebsd]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[burggraben.net]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[140.69.198.88.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.6.2]; IP_SCORE(0.16)[ipnet: 88.198.0.0/16(2.39), asn: 24940(-1.55), country: DE(-0.02)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:88.198.0.0/16, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:12:57 -0000 ## George Mitchell (george+freebsd@m5p.com): > Assuming you can get poudriere to work. Even by today's standards, > a low-cost PC is not going to have the juice to support it. And to > reiterate, the ports framework itself MUST work standalone. The pain you'll experience (eventually) from the breakage resulting from just ol' plain "make install"s is much worse than running poudriere. Most non-trivial software will not build predictably in an unclean environment, and forget about keeping it working when your environment changes (the time I've spent chasing shared library problems... that's time I'll never get back). (Note that I'm not talking about reproducable builds, which is yet another can of worms). If you can't build with poudriere locally, you should look into renting CPU time ("cloud" as they call it these days) or use packages. Regards, Christoph -- Spare Space From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 22:19:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1D31E242A for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p5Dy62DXz4S2J for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 15:19:28 -0700 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <4F3040D5-0EA9-44B7-BD69-3CF57A2E19B8@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p5Dy62DXz4S2J X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.788,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.977,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:19:31 -0000 On 01 Jan 2020, at 14:18, Adam Weinberger wrote > This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere.=20 If FreeBSD is going to REQUIRE poudriere, then go ahead and do so. If = not, then the other packages managers and the ports tree itself have to = work without screwing the admin, failing to build for inexplicable = reasons, inputting a dependency that breaks other packages, or my = favorite, failing to update dependencies. > I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about > encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) > frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will > be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. It is not that simple, of course. This will take quite a lot of work, = and a lot of time, for something that I deal with a handful of times a = year. This means that for the foreseeable future, I would be starting = over basically every time there is some issue. > They are simply an inevitable consequence of using a very old and = broken tool If the tool is broken, remove it. > You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major > mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and > security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. Since openssl updated about a week ago, this oversight falls into the = class that I would call =E2=80=9Cinexcusable=E2=80=9D. If I did this on = a job I would (rightly) be immediately fired. I would fire me if I did something like this. --=20 In the 60's, people took acid to make the world appear weird. Now the world is weird and people take Prozac to make it appear normal. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 22:28:44 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E4E1E26A5 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:28:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p5Rb641Kz4SMD for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1immTe-0008br-Tu; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 23:28:30 +0100 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:28:30 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "@lbutlr" Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Message-ID: <20200101222830.GA32466@home.opsec.eu> References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <4F3040D5-0EA9-44B7-BD69-3CF57A2E19B8@kreme.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F3040D5-0EA9-44B7-BD69-3CF57A2E19B8@kreme.com> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p5Rb641Kz4SMD X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.93 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.938,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:28:44 -0000 Hi! > If FreeBSD is going to REQUIRE poudriere, then go ahead and do > so. If not, then the other packages managers and the ports tree > itself have to work without screwing the admin, failing to build > for inexplicable reasons, inputting a dependency that breaks other > packages, or my favorite, failing to update dependencies. If we'd remove portmaster, we'd loose a relevant part of our user-base, that's why is has not been removed. This caused other issues, as you are well aware. But there's no easy solution given the amount of volunteer skills and capacity available, see below. > > I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about > > encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) > > frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will > > be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. > > It is not that simple, of course. This will take quite a lot of work, and a lot of time, for something that I deal with a handful of times a year. This means that for the foreseeable future, I would be starting over basically every time there is some issue. > > > They are simply an inevitable consequence of using a very old and broken tool > > If the tool is broken, remove it. For example: FreeBSD uses mailman2 for lists.freebsd.org, which needs python 2.7, which, as far as the python community is involved, is no longer supported. The open source community (and FreeBSD) really has problems with the velocity of the software involved -- and can barely keep up. So it's not that easy. > > You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major > > mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and > > security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. > > Since openssl updated about a week ago, this oversight falls into the class that I would call ???inexcusable???. If I did this on a job I would (rightly) be immediately fired. > > I would fire me if I did something like this. If we fired every volunteer when some mishap has happened, we would run of of volunteers very fast. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 22:49:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C3E1E2C49 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p5vF4vlsz4T9q for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 22:49:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 15:49:11 -0700 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <4F3040D5-0EA9-44B7-BD69-3CF57A2E19B8@kreme.com> <20200101222830.GA32466@home.opsec.eu> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20200101222830.GA32466@home.opsec.eu> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p5vF4vlsz4T9q X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.16 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.79)[-0.790,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 22:49:15 -0000 On 01 Jan 2020, at 15:28, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> If FreeBSD is going to REQUIRE poudriere, then go ahead and do >> so. If not, then the other packages managers and the ports tree >> itself have to work without screwing the admin, failing to build >> for inexplicable reasons, inputting a dependency that breaks other >> packages, or my favorite, failing to update dependencies. >=20 > If we'd remove portmaster, we'd loose a relevant part of our > user-base, that's why is has not been removed. This caused > other issues, as you are well aware. If you are concerned about losing users without postmaster then fix = postmaster. Leaving a port manage that is =E2=80=9Cbroken=E2=80=9D is = not going to do anything but hurt everyone. > The open source community (and FreeBSD) really has problems with > the velocity of the software involved -- and can barely keep up. >=20 > So it's not that easy. Bit they are perfectly happy to drop support when the replacement = packages are still not up to snuff. >>> You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major >>> mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and >>> security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this = switch. >>=20 >> Since openssl updated about a week ago, this oversight falls into the = class that I would call ???inexcusable???. If I did this on a job I = would (rightly) be immediately fired. >>=20 >> I would fire me if I did something like this. > If we fired every volunteer when some mishap has happened, we > would run of of volunteers very fast. This was the responsibility of a single volunteer? Removing openssl = without warning wasn=E2=80=99t something that was discussed over the = last six months? --=20 Lead me not into temptation, I can find the way. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 1 23:57:05 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4201E43D5 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47p7PX0kkfz4X6T for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id t8so32951640iln.4 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 15:57:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=SedYhKE2eiB0YTmGvAzz3d8yWP4B8YAzV9DBVEFsvjQ=; b=zQkwxB+7tIv49QT+vEuz6eysrgykoMK8W27ELqmS2G64VIlsgCdHgYflq8rx6RvFPY v4ufNrV7EoFGb/dX6ZHLcp284WGGDNQGC3xNJydTQv8ii7/9g9rpA7r+oO3oFfBzucZj i+hTupzBaobxRugN1lUMpoASB49AkLuuz9+1EJilKokIiM4jDALzAoJYHkcvyVcek4ED 3Dn+iGQuT8TO+h2UiEWHUqkFpXD2Tk+ikDVJxJ39tmMmqmtT7O1Uu9cyYqfaNL7RGwaM vGnbhjCSjp53kQGmhdtTHhOpaHOB7lbbJpmGmHje+JXNmouCi/Os/100SkM42IzFT8x1 9NXA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=SedYhKE2eiB0YTmGvAzz3d8yWP4B8YAzV9DBVEFsvjQ=; b=WzvfoWb/SuN7P9YOD4GEx3EmovIMWQf/A3kZB4QN0XIAhZqBEgFNaNyX2g+kDhsIy8 EZ0l3+5Nd+Qmw1ySdW8anoBlp96q+rDIL2rvMpsmPfFBelkqfubb6xh4ex9ZaigHuPj/ M/u+Twku0Y4GwWXcM2K0JtZm5Nwi2crIchH+F1mQE/Og/Vg8Z3/wBjYf4qKnuD/1lo1x n6seE0FEw9NWO9nXmhXFUlAVpnTuWPJlVp4EH56/KPn/1D7FpCsJ5NIXu1XTtPy45Vpg Jy9oDVmZl5lPz26b9dcbHi+aE0DdrmuC1EhX1WBH3Q2mR7Rf3DVvdiWaNzQtq1WuLjsa drxw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWpCvlzkphGNqJho5E6cRp6LoeMU3v67kJ10rrPctJpImMko0qp +CuK4hQzNoREo92U29Pdw8vXNIwFjaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7Btx5Fmy881gt/mYjqLxjouGWqh1gynjfuY8oW09iKhnJgsqGWUA/TTThIP+xvkJgPxGZtQ== X-Received: by 2002:a92:4781:: with SMTP id e1mr65806313ilk.147.1577923022489; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 15:57:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([75.161.204.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 81sm19205890ilx.40.2020.01.01.15.57.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jan 2020 15:57:01 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Adam Weinberger Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 16:57:00 -0700 Message-Id: <69EC35FF-8952-44D9-960E-5BC764B37D6B@adamw.org> References: Cc: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: To: "@lbutlr" X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17C54) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47p7PX0kkfz4X6T X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=zQkwxB+7; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.55 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.55)[ip: (-8.66), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 23:57:05 -0000 > On Jan 1, 2020, at 15:49, @lbutlr wrote: >=20 >>>> You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major >>>> mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and >>>> security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. >>>=20 >>> Since openssl updated about a week ago, this oversight falls into the cl= ass that I would call ???inexcusable???. If I did this on a job I would (rig= htly) be immediately fired. >>>=20 >>> I would fire me if I did something like this. >=20 >> If we fired every volunteer when some mishap has happened, we >> would run of of volunteers very fast. >=20 > This was the responsibility of a single volunteer? Removing openssl withou= t warning wasn=E2=80=99t something that was discussed over the last six mont= hs? Ok, let=E2=80=99s stop there. Nobody is going to get fired, and insulting ou= r team of volunteers who worked incredibly hard to bring the openssl switch t= o fruition is unproductive and uncalled-for. I already acknowledged that we n= eed to do it better next time, so let=E2=80=99s focus instead on solving pro= blems rather than lashing out to people who are here simply to help. # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 02:56:33 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B63B1E8DF0 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 02:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout009aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pCNc2GPvz3Cqb for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 02:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id mqevijkIwHRLqmqevi3pqJ; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:56:25 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=EY62v8uC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=6WEML5oEIqsejf4HZD4A:9 Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:56:52 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster failing References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNCyIASIi/Lhbzcy6JKjrLtN02WdRqvl8VIw5vim7+OlbTeCmi37/4qZ3jXenUIybOb5Dnc21JnrGAaNhNWyq2L6Xxf9DYI4313ydzqWIUS9umCDGlvg VNJQQB10oiFeIj11BGK046E8sK6FSNek5ryUy2Vhfm3ZHEKhVthGT+ve X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pCNc2GPvz3Cqb X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.72 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[163.177.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.70)[0.704,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.82)[0.816,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[asn: 40294(1.15), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:56:33 -0000 > This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. There seems to > be a pervasive misconception that poudriere is "advanced" and > portmaster is simple or straightforward. That notion is completely and > totally backwards. Poudriere makes managing ports as simple and > trouble-free as possible, and portmaster is specifically for people > who can troubleshoot and fix problems like the one you're describing > on their own. These problems WILL continue to happen very regularly > for portmaster, because portmaster simply cannot do the right thing on > its own. It will ALWAYS require manual intervention every time > anything remotely significant changes. > I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about > encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) > frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will > be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. If you choose > to stay on portmaster, however, then you need to check the resentment > about build failures. They are simply an inevitable consequence of > using a very old and broken tool that should only be used by people > with substantial port-handling experience. > You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major > mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and > security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. > Adam Weinberger I suppose what you say about portmaster applies equally to portupgrade? I get the impression that synth and its dependency gcc6-aux are falling into desuetude if not actually officially deprecated. gcc6-aux has not been updated while gcc is up tp 8.3 and 9.2. I have never used poudriere, guess I will have to learn how if I stay with FreeBSD. NetBSD pkgsrc also has its problems: has been ported to many other mostly (quasi-)Unix OSes including FreeBSD, but I never tried pkgsrcc outside NetBSD, don't think I really want to. DragonFlyBSD switched from pkgsrc to dports, and Haiku switched from pkgsrc to Haikuports. Upgrading a large number of ports with portmaster usually required many runs, correcting the errors after each run, waiting for updates for broken ports. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 03:15:34 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9C81E985C for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 03:15:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pCpY0XH5z3F4c for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 03:15:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id x8so21247862pgk.8 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 19:15:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=M6eNvHtsxPMSZubl48tPY27mxk7I2APVNcOyyp/sHTE=; b=eM/vEYiCAZoDCOhv/Do5cAPaSYIlpf55S/JKVodpCurPKoqgtSBXxtgw0OiozEmKWC 6HZE5KvUPSXgu28388fwtrL9aDI1B532vFev8at5QJTOUCMaXSs6wrUpROCnsKxnYiIz KbYQPLpyQaJqXTfzW9sq7q4NCL4s7+RLJ2vjBEMSfEEDQOzgKOG5KRRtIsHcWGyECt7d pmtpIDfUyOk2AEwKKlJJVXjUQkKIHKTy/irLENbggw5+m6NhvcUmE0PTum2ZTOKg/+Do /zMvZCNoLQJol/IfF8s1BI1VZHXzFGU4wO9k214s01/KAzR/TC+F31yz7VTRYFRBDTeo 52rA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:to:references:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=M6eNvHtsxPMSZubl48tPY27mxk7I2APVNcOyyp/sHTE=; b=eDJiNMwXc+TMoFtWYgbKm1f3luKr22pujmXSwbRX0AbaUZh0GEeERgLGRxROqBIOz1 urbQbAPsWY3tbhadsZd17tXrcelt7aMG2s1tIESB3im/1lmnOeDK/Dz+z2JbwZ1Xk79V LBzg0Trm7xw0UXTywQxVLhK9+uDK8AQNw4AjsDeVNFHdBZa83lriYPZTZRB+mA7LE8J0 FLKUrZf2/2FevWIC9gm2lhTzlDB2bqKmbDLCZ45CnL25QuzLW6v/xP7B6rTggIHqvSiX KqcDN6sg0mmFiW3Fz6WXlSXv7LQ3ybxJ3dNk973PNZho4cNb6rUDeObXbQFNvvyiXvKS Qg3A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWzGO6I3wymcQooqAVIiQYcE2YV3l04TfmfQnQnz8moNi0fK0nG i+ip31dpA+TfQKuPGZrR+cMvfoQl X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqycniAO07EX8cejJ3eCOHuJuAv42SnzJ6IPbR7XGPadBCDzy14OIkeQw40GSBDcW7wFMGkgMA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:950c:: with SMTP id p12mr88004969pgd.85.1577934931400; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 19:15:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (180-150-68-130.b49644.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.68.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q11sm61165159pff.111.2020.01.01.19.15.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jan 2020 19:15:30 -0800 (PST) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Portmaster failing To: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 14:15:27 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:72.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/72.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pCpY0XH5z3F4c X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eM/vEYiC; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of koobsfreebsd@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::531 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=koobsfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.83 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-2.63)[ip: (-9.10), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[koobs@FreeBSD.org,koobsfreebsd@gmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 03:15:34 -0000 On 2/01/2020 7:37 am, @lbutlr wrote: > Portmaser -L errors out with > > make: "/usr/ports/Mk/Uses/ssl.mk" line 97: You are using an unsupported SSL provider openssl > > Make.conf: > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=openssl apache=2.4 php=7.2 perl5=5.28 mysql=10.1m > > Worked fine on Saturday, maybe Friday. > > > Tracked earlier and resolved here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243014 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 03:19:17 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF981E9995 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 03:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pCtr1hbTz3FCK for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 03:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2020 20:19:13 -0700 References: <69EC35FF-8952-44D9-960E-5BC764B37D6B@adamw.org> To: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <69EC35FF-8952-44D9-960E-5BC764B37D6B@adamw.org> Message-Id: <405AAEDC-0C5E-434F-A28E-580CB608BFA9@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pCtr1hbTz3FCK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.21 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.84)[-0.840,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 03:19:17 -0000 On 01 Jan 2020, at 16:57, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Ok, let=E2=80=99s stop there. Nobody is going to get fired, and = insulting What? No, seriously, what? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 06:49:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F111EE8CE for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47pJYz5LVqz3wqn for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B52311EE8CB; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CF41EE8CA for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pJYz3v5mz3wql for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7649FF5A4 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0026nxDG010992 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0026nxQe010991; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202001020649.0026nxQe010991@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:49:59 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 06:49:59 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net-mgmt/nbtscan | 1.5.1 | 1.6 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 07:09:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539FB1EEE65 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:09:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pK0N6mjsz3xt6 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C355685D for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:09:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:4451:e080:8da1:ecb8]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CCC71586B for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:09:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/4CCC71586B; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Portmaster failing To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <2726af4c-e160-01cd-b3ae-5bd02f984787@m5p.com> From: Matthew Seaman Autocrypt: addr=matthew@FreeBSD.org; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFJIL80BEADi7/VbnnErDU6pjEhI/SzEZ/HbDRkJ5g7HroAtqIRm6nj8ZwOAgZ/2ZnWn 5F+fXTuLsG0FLNtkd17FoVcuCi5e/GPliXI5cmamV7E1Yz4T8UsJ7RQolimyxVexccKd16Tc AA7B9bFlJSKkBUSD0buj7VjT07xWhRzu6Vgi5r0UjLALYJz977uZA0F1aOGOXREDEAOhdcNc kSNjynqAwDA6dCT1Elpi4key1fYjv4jyDF+GU/YXul2Y/rguA8FCkHd9vyym5eAsLQ5mG00V V9fkEHIpH5KorNVnl/ufHXnkZqmHAZVpFDcrshb7aZ/pL45PXyWgLj+e6etelgj3a2bZi0JF cVdXCnBZVP2oIyYblM11ugTbfCwodORU8a5KfPeztMdAtDr4e+32NTrPdPi5rLT+GUsYz+PL 3A3m3u8bdsFp40DlIrBtSByVjqERxcfhphrEB4J8BXHUG7OAtXkZMlW/PGKDwXJq0O6Z5Tcg YHAoEiSWbXiexHgXNJyP+sqnIlhLWhSJGeJ+C83wqI6oYlZUCW00NkPxcIHnQPV/z+5wQVci TMyaWC2YCIHz4Ljs+TnwWMz0E8PNFDfHVbQ0W4PRGV7gRAqxfL+yKufauIEGbEq8rNDbSwL3 bcUCxR4ZDlaUEUwT4J8naf7rjdgiEYHs2Ig3jeK1+ER4FPG1sQARAQABtCRNYXR0aGV3IFNl YW1hbiA8bWF0dGhld0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz6JAlQEEwEKAD4CGwMFCwkIBwMFFQoJCAsFFgMC AQACHgECF4AWIQRyz6whebywJLW1RZADb2ye5/OevwUCWttU6gUJDFmAlAAKCRADb2ye5/Oe v7D/EACF6YL98cq6u20rai9gDCS+XY7HDGxowreE2HTAZXQmJTatSaEgiJMJUXfjXn7U/L+q zFhjOC2kiOze1yIWrptoxFa29lSUi3jWHNv7BM2bA4i7jjtwR8Ep2wSvDDl99jewDc6Ewot4 p598S5tZt4my9yGLeaCiN44IPg4U2ftnjcoONtrBOVyIHvVK5QL5r+wyqfdlySbAs026kJAZ rkwAL2ZVy3m1xNSmM8MojwSeX/5puv5JG2FoFb+VphZKCpgaqoEAN2jCqoJW9nnbAth1bYiM djiVr+k8pQl4CltFgpzSKxGbxXUSdPmEpA67FsV0BLIq5xy5VkvzoM+SD1hd3EQgfCyvFlf5 ClSwb5aQRf9ZqiyFAkVEtEOgF7S9q7H6MHyVFzrLfGzmTdpzu7jCCoYbZ7dX1aniatAxLKl6 EBgZxtLRu5bqalguv0FV1C8qnGLuvUMqp8RoJzLd8sWBGMTsUl/GOf+cEZl5u0q9vg9pBJxg KLi2NX3V4Bk8vkOUJFuk8ll7kRQ/7rrGLBkZNfcadb970jB5bvsxMhoc9P/2dIa1YzsGnqbE vG+JrZ2475hvs1jPZ/gdLWEcquGAhGjekfArLBbagqfo6gsuHnUD1K+HfVGQBkKJl+lNhbOR guHGT5hx/4RSYBVakz1RpM5dnk271lH0LxWeE4okSrkCDQRSUUKTARAAt6FH3HbDFoumOWUu JlDgOQs3wdp2n3IKv7gqzbDdgaoWW7hDTvjO0Cb6p2PGUKEoxMQQoIdDO0pQ9rgr4Sh4VSVC 9WMO/fUwqdrIs2nACIg4OwvNhIccW08S+N72f+yuXWOQ/dv79cwruE26/BEXgIP09MYcOWwc UCXzOoUR3er+jzcsN9uFjcsBVUJLIEru1askHRzCUa5P9S9GAFBwN49HC5IJWEzdLP27FjjO G5UG3+QZahHrjG1i6S3bIYXtaGsqNyfkp9Is7Wpj2kk+s9Ua+YMG/V5YVlbANIexa1yr75p1 W9biqXpCWnB3TaHSfI0G1t9w8K2qhR/Z1/YLIcRzZ2aHJnvbzJYw5Cs1jfNpFytbASsxj0rb ReouftlBvVWFRxsZ+oG1ZXL64/SVKMZAnfBNxd1uajp+HtoQtYoTu88la6zcdnAhOD5JdOnt N2VF8iQnDfPgkidfuSZ1C059xaRPTSRJBgMRDtOlDxgz7Pxx/7L2jwxRY1dq6NGioflY7CCp Gc7bi1K6xnf3lBL8X2nGpRAVsg9Lx1ShIWkgNbTAcPXpXcXlJ1xqz8HS8Twadh6gIfk/RNch BIED9lkVCKHYp/XQb8T8vMwn/kTWUm5WlPkQUFQN4D1b6+dJw4bwn/wiRS8did1MU1OytJB6 tljfEUCx0uKkzqr+33MAEQEAAYkEuwQYAQoAJgIbAhYhBHLPrCF5vLAktbVFkANvbJ7n856/ BQJa21VJBQkMUG42AonBvSAEGQEKAGYFAlJRQpNfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3Rh dGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0Yz MDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp5OdNFg//ZqeVdGoKkMvALPzZjGz84+6l0kcM xSN4TfWmec0YpSmDEzCw4/SZoGqHlZb8lcTevmNrNXg6c+wVw6P+Ycl20Nzb98Kt9C5sz+zG VmPPK+3O9gaPnEqlIKnnbxKXXNHQdd8Mf0UTpifMqX0IkWOqhe/tQKGoQ9+feKvLIaToIe/N josW6vJ9YAgFqZ0015zwbElhMNFmgDMOI2SgjBZ9ngP1U82Mqb7/7G9GxHtnwuJBSnPJgN8t av2O9uWPC0N8deyZBH4y9ERBPTFMc46wjkW030olcq7g4hZ55rpPIEyGQZCq4u1gGibbiQJZ EyUQT7BJm70/PeUr3uNjPlQODV/lF5TBvqGHEmlSQfo6Yb/QQx07CK9bvhUSO2XP3ybS8Jwo MZlgZzZcjiPiQF9ot6152/Cp/XrsKgtk+fg5ARZpyywRlQk1JCHRZvhgXIxqNYA04uwdPFcL I4vPiDaLS8mhXHLRZsSpHmIBqqrnam5Lq7iDc39UZrSJMM40oy3iAOI2B7AOCbzxRuEplJd3 E/tEqrnFGcPVN+h52ka74lEyfkwA2RrASWJJcXLN3/VsizEj8okepefzjU/UPnU8sirzeWWo 8Z4uKddovk//NwAPUJbee4vZLjYE6MWdpEoZP9CZXbtIPWuc9Djg16aHOgv44JPokDMaHA27 A4rw2KwJEANvbJ7n856/SPkP/1bGUde7lnRTNd8c0ZrUtEi+OOibKyh7BjLUpzlihj3rGl9l jAF0eCdBrL1We3MDDcyi+XO7VZLiecZTlG6LLXFvEFjYpyPRx3bXlWk1/ahEiBoLWxedseNd FrO+H5XX6ODmKFFLhXgpsXnAxtM6Mxmrx0CGW4qzfUi7Vsqj86gqlcet0/k5RqPMAhrGX5fN nQNWSAwumeFKM8UgDpKY0u7M2tS07B0ozXOSpqGTSJhX6Ld2Nl95CL3wbSGuh1pDUOysAnzK 5Rl/OQ9LtYpWomAKg6yn7gKYij5XmekAg/E+ybr5Gyx2PgMQUGtuNmBRWP1qKtVUbrOekiuN z7kpdrP7M2O7i/cxWjGpVtjDNWuGkFgY3c+sKKawBma81K4rg044nkGwFX98vfEHVGu+HOd3 D+Mv47nv4LQvzynBG/YflwaPmLhpw7HCPvpa4W7y8+5AKxDqWlM2NvrLwmwbmz9dQMGtjnNR m4uHfPX8AyzBoMtDrxNLIvDYlLqh+G2Q1shNNNdRNXn9Z1pvri6KAHmH9GlISuM/jQfItout +Gtx9QUlNX3aIsdScTLA3jnMOpHcALCGI+XMiBNaVuYUxHgHh+MNYhmjQZZqASBCvVj1Hyib DPZa/iQ4DBGBRlJb+8saPPqYVDQhosWSF20aJKwepZIIOFjpMgmCIqZAnqK4uQINBFJRQrgB EADUWFag56O3CaycayGght1rYWYz7P9/3s7OlqAuEAId8/kSz8jXzAb/Qb6t0247a2MD0gxn jgZQy2OiQOsOTrc31L6tUrLVATL5Q3oKIh9hOlNMA+cRjsgY3UmMaSw+Gftp64EJDBQwBXWT 7CSUEJw4PqzwMPiTHRkmqQfzdfNagFJVqZ0e+cznoLzI9WvkccwLW1kicBYEysX5yOXUQ9/P cKqRWcbxLFznJ16JsxL1DeUct5WRWUxECY2rM0t+AkNRa3NpzskiMUSzFhiGmJo9yyy1RS4d rjMhEn/IcM1sO21ZF/WWuUVkul65qngFnaFDDRQ5lU3AagWhLhmppmK/yabSVfqz38B1APoB WuldYprslTbAOJrL2xFtiH7m9VYbP2aGdwr9V/C27kiNWnm/lYzP9Z+dTFkxw2V+BOjiLWzD DD6pEE7YDhiPyoopadOyXtoJf3aK1OI+DBu3piBA/CDDDvavruM+3mjxUxcOo8w8rMaJzDUD LG0yOyhKWef3UW5ly3CKXe8+m/MZe0GavNBJt0ObLQpPmnn9b2kP/xS0ssszo8uzlfSMiGi9 AedAoRQ7vFXfI0MBb0M8gJ6Ht/+j1b5Al9ABeeA3PRuu+aBJwBRdFp4AV5BsCa0Qb3aqVJUP uBvtY56aWWB9sSfQ1qeu/loRxkJbHhaPJswscQARAQABiQI8BBgBCgAmAhsMFiEEcs+sIXm8 sCS1tUWQA29snufznr8FAlrbVUkFCQxQbhEACgkQA29snufznr+YBw//TJtAC9d/FYQQHKQg /QOEkcAL8Qx4HA2SICnhKqv64jPcYIUYocOO8Qayh+IVDa6MGkbsWdweUFuexMsW+17dqETf QjUApx32TUwF44WgIEfARLW2zRdRcXfsT4A2sQJCvNJrJnH3lywiJi+V848Q4sC3sSJREpcJ d07oc2jxSKZyYZ1DBPfK1MyiwcBt2uFCTXdyFMham2aYLDP2JYvFP08tjTUAIKhe4B0bPTtl dCf5sH5q8xrpaHnKHf0n7qMmK7NtGW/9R6WiCruiNsLnO95fms1tzKKfA4QXIYCEWl8XsRKw p51HZDjQu/KxPsjm6BL4eThnae9t3Zs5J0LiPxoFbN+pW7anft3YCeezB8+gus7I1Rn5yJMR yYRRVHtZZTBDQfoDqHgLY14GYtFGOT0IR/OuAzYM1CoMvVExgqVWixDwF5RH1OHO1TANqTGc rRm1lvasCWIphpoQVtkN4/PXGa+NhzsRmr/c5OUYxQNroE8cdsK8mOIBRz9D2JpF7d2nr1X+ vA4zk2JL61aCnc62BfSYNZWhCcOPJZUhFT9BqAkew0kkJzQ3jwHGAhfcfozTHoFsD08qAW0O UriEtH+EOXl+dYbjlNUjFPjJu49cZbtp/1TpsYOBdME1QLM1TPanYXa7tb+IrRZN+Oi9i9VV ym16DK7q21k3j0qRC0s= Message-ID: <5763c3f7-c808-7c58-ddd6-925dd5e674ba@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:09:19 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2726af4c-e160-01cd-b3ae-5bd02f984787@m5p.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDnb0sD9V0LAsap2VypcEaW3xNDHqa8TQ" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 07:09:25 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --KDnb0sD9V0LAsap2VypcEaW3xNDHqa8TQ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fdynSQZdAhqI6jAebQEwuewgNiKez4U7T" --fdynSQZdAhqI6jAebQEwuewgNiKez4U7T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/01/2020 22:03, George Mitchell wrote: > Assuming you can get poudriere to work. Even by today's standards, > a low-cost PC is not going to have the juice to support it. And to > reiterate, the ports framework itself MUST work standalone. Rubbish. I maintain my own poudriere repo on a machine that is over 6 years old and that cost less than =C2=A3500 when I first built it. A ver= y ordinary PC will be able to run poudriere perfectly well. Cheers, Matthew --fdynSQZdAhqI6jAebQEwuewgNiKez4U7T-- --KDnb0sD9V0LAsap2VypcEaW3xNDHqa8TQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEGfFU7L8RLlBUTj8wAFE/EOCp5OcFAl4Nlx9fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDE5 RjE1NEVDQkYxMTJFNTA1NDRFM0YzMDAwNTEzRjEwRTBBOUU0RTcACgkQAFE/EOCp 5OeBjhAAs6BHDdTZwD8HiS21Tpud27mFT3h9bt5TqPH94prI9fAB0DF3YvRycnB5 kPD4GJw4Hjjrd3gE4ZjFyNeXngEUSTLbKNBS7SUbAn7F872jhCZAAA/xiUbMeksl O7m5A2+seD1qK2akGMET00VCWt80Ge4qry5XGrryC/LCHZ8XDpUdzS5XF80jBUnX ZRasP6C9J2tbnpoqWRGp+ZmCuBs0Fi/qm+aiCJ0wRpQbVCqwS6i36efb21DAFmAU vnUqDe5yEydBxj2EXzhtUUp+Ja1f4zrMwiLsGKus6hxEs3OA4ojO7xPhx4t1ELln ZiEzZKoqmVCHiAnnDgUDmi9Tspzeqs/vCeg5aoTkXkrL+k9IE9R5tkExoiBS64ez YWU983OmA3uSK5HT1w3t0A2qsarathxzLZeCrGUIB8fGHWmLjO0B0ubMfY7zo+v7 z1OZ7t9yi0ZrhWwh1tLTlRQocHL3lQI86btJzlQpX4p10/ORt9yY1VJOkiGppJR9 /mK759BC2bWAVS8fX/RTSAf+R42OUtltuhKOrX1HlYKDYaWxZs8ICi+Mvj6wPITG 7ZRwHIZFkkiwx/xe83CD/4Q39xTizmbLLozsD5mHXEbLnoHnHztu0r0yeTvKr1kI FHy76Hk+sQZnY1jLfysjJHJbXr9nrNHws6nZJu60dHuaNRIPUOk= =ilei -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KDnb0sD9V0LAsap2VypcEaW3xNDHqa8TQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 11:12:09 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C077F1F4B15 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pQNT2Khqz4HyZ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3e7a4ce0; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:12:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c664ef49; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:12:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id e5c942ea; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:12:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 26c0507b (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:12:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:11:59 -0500 From: To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: "@lbutlr" , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Message-ID: <20200102061159.69fe47b6@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <20200101222830.GA32466@home.opsec.eu> References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <4F3040D5-0EA9-44B7-BD69-3CF57A2E19B8@kreme.com> <20200101222830.GA32466@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pQNT2Khqz4HyZ X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 11:12:09 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 23:28:30 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > For example: FreeBSD uses mailman2 for lists.freebsd.org, which needs > python 2.7, which, as far as the python community is involved, > is no longer supported. >=20 py27-backports-1 =20 py27-backports.functools_lru_cache-1.5=20 py27-backports_abc-0.5 py27-cairo-1.18.1_1 =20 py27-cython-0.29.13_1 =20 py27-dateutil-2.8.0 =20 py27-futures-3.2.0 =20 py27-gobject-2.28.6_8 py27-gtk2-2.24.0_5 =20 py27-html5lib-1.0.1 =20 py27-isodate-0.6.0 =20 py27-kiwisolver-1.1.0 py27-lxml-4.4.2 =20 py27-matplotlib-2.2.4_1 =20 py27-numpy-1.16.5_2,1 =20 py27-pygments-2.4.1 =20 py27-pyparsing-2.4.6 =20 py27-pytz-2019.3,1 =20 py27-scour-0.37 =20 py27-setuptools-41.4.0_1 =20 py27-setuptools_scm-3.3.3 =20 py27-singledispatch-3.4.0.3_1 =20 py27-sip-4.19.19_1,1 py27-six-1.12.0 py27-tkinter-2.7.17_6 py27-tornado-5.1.1 py27-webencodings-0.5.1 For example: pkg info -r py27-numpy py27-numpy-1.16.5_2,1: py27-matplotlib-2.2.4_1 inkscape-0.92.4_12 root@lumiwa:~# pkg info -d py27-numpy py27-numpy-1.16.5_2,1: suitesparse-5.4.0_4 lapack-3.5.0_8 cblas-1.0_12 blas-3.5.0_6 python27-2.7.17_1 gcc9-9.2.0 py27-setuptools-41.4.0_1 pkg info -r py37-numpy py37-numpy-1.16.5_2,1: blender-2.80_6 py37-spyder-3.2.7_7 py37-pandas-0.24.2_1,1 py37-scipy-1.2.2_1 py37-numexpr-2.7.0 py37-bottleneck-1.3.1 py37-matplotlib-2.2.4_1 root@lumiwa:~# pkg info -d py37-numpy py37-numpy-1.16.5_2,1: suitesparse-5.4.0_4 lapack-3.5.0_8 cblas-1.0_12 blas-3.5.0_6 python37-3.7.6 gcc9-9.2.0 py37-setuptools-41.4.0_1 And how long is python 27 deprecated? I am portmaster user too because I have a single FreeBSD machine and I do not want to destroying hard drive with poudriere. --=20 =E2=80=9Cgood people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws=E2=80=9D=20 Plato From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 11:22:21 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11C51F4E5E for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pQcF3scyz4Jrq; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:22:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Received: from Stefans-MBP-449.fritz.box (p200300CD5F08C900DD66A1C7383F4560.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:cd:5f08:c900:dd66:a1c7:383f:4560]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: se/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05A038758; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from se@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: mail/junkfilter is several broken To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20200101210423.GA8324@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stefan_E=c3=9fer?= Cc: gsutter@zer0.org Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:22:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200101210423.GA8324@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 11:22:21 -0000 Am 01.01.20 um 22:04 schrieb Steve Kargl: > For users of mail/junkfilter, it now will filter all emails claiming > a "Bad Date line". The following patch seems to fix the problem for > the next decade. Hi Steve, thank you for providing a patch. Since the maintainer (gsutter) has not been active in FreeBSD for a long time (AFAICT) and due to the difference in time zones, I have taken liberty to apply the fix to the port. I have sent mail to Gregory who probably will want to apply the fix to the sourceforge repo and to remove the patch, but the fixed port will allow to keep junkfilter working, meanwhile. Regards, STefan > --- junkfilter.three.orig 2020-01-01 12:59:56.005681000 -0800 > +++ junkfilter.three 2020-01-01 13:00:26.254199000 -0800 > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ > * ! $ ^Date:$JFWS((Sun|Mon|Tue|Wed|Thu|Fri|Sat),$JFWS)?\ > (0?[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])$JFWS\ > (Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Nov|Dec)$JFWS\ > - ((19)?[789][0-9]|(20)?[01][0-9])$JFWS\ > + ((19)?[789][0-9]|(20)?[012][0-9])$JFWS\ > (0?[0-9]|1[0-9]|2[0-3]):(0?|[1-5])[0-9](:(0?|[1-5])[0-9])?$JFWS\ > (([+-][0-1][0-4]([03]0|45))|("?\(?(UT|GMT|EST|EDT|CST|CDT|MST|MDT|PST|PDT|[A-I]|[K-Z])\)?"?))? > { JFMATCH="$JFSEC: Bad Date line" INCLUDERC=$JFDIR/junkfilter.match } > > > Suggest either installing the patch or marking the port as broken. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 13:50:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8571F7A02 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pTtk2Cczz4R41; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 2B034D459; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:50:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: "Thomas Mueller" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster failing References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <38085.1962416031$1577933805@news.gmane.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 14:50:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <38085.1962416031$1577933805@news.gmane.org> (Thomas Mueller's message of "Thu, 02 Jan 2020 02:56:52 +0000") Message-ID: <5zhu-klwz-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 13:50:06 -0000 "Thomas Mueller" writes: >> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. There seems to >> be a pervasive misconception that poudriere is "advanced" and >> portmaster is simple or straightforward. That notion is completely and >> totally backwards. Poudriere makes managing ports as simple and >> trouble-free as possible, and portmaster is specifically for people >> who can troubleshoot and fix problems like the one you're describing >> on their own. These problems WILL continue to happen very regularly >> for portmaster, because portmaster simply cannot do the right thing on >> its own. It will ALWAYS require manual intervention every time >> anything remotely significant changes. > >> I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about >> encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) >> frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will >> be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. If you choose >> to stay on portmaster, however, then you need to check the resentment >> about build failures. They are simply an inevitable consequence of >> using a very old and broken tool that should only be used by people >> with substantial port-handling experience. > >> You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major >> mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and >> security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. > > >> Adam Weinberger > > I suppose what you say about portmaster applies equally to portupgrade? > > I get the impression that synth and its dependency gcc6-aux are falling into desuetude if not actually officially deprecated. > > gcc6-aux has not been updated while gcc is up tp 8.3 and 9.2. DragonFly has lang/gcc9-aux since https://github.com/DragonFlyBSD/DeltaPorts/commit/bb774aced6d7 Synth is still used to build binary packages on DragonFly e.g., https://sting.dragonflybsd.org/dports/logs/lang___gcc9-aux.log From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 13:58:51 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B5B1F7D97 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x443.google.com (mail-wr1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pV4q03k3z4Rgf for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 13:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x443.google.com with SMTP id z3so39334167wru.3 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 05:58:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6isFCrmyvkxyThbUJXRQA11Qe7LD+XAh1N2TCkC3qs8=; b=hHleVa4WSdSKvlhn76ebxg+3XltuNuzkxyX8gDjB+SPhHK5DPrQoykjW+JDDm1ZjkI RbfCEYrIqdAUkipwFMDoaSMnZXAUw0uBIgEDWDISy6bVlCKA9dal+FlTc17NZ4tbhFYy nG25g2YSb5EV9DWa8XSl6VCBKgVioyyYC0zTH/pZiOvD1D6IPez9dB6EfShD/6Q5kyYg g605bUuNIooENaxSwFFir8kH2uAHjn+2rioMsDIpMZ0QcM/zIkZa3EdzBoWMqEPwzbGp f5/EegMLPld7/TBylcl5/6tu3kPu4sVVpWij6nnb1K2YVTUunDwh1MNu9IqhmIszH2Nh HfQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6isFCrmyvkxyThbUJXRQA11Qe7LD+XAh1N2TCkC3qs8=; b=YbGURRp1JDACCs5HgiufzymE0XXVmJTsPEmbYL9fUtq08jRuM0zzGQmZZDUYVQqdtv nlVU0rAoAq8ahFskupRA/2rX+k8qsMoBPgfcW40P88GnHNP0HaJ2cKLv5GFc1xLjSqas KJyH9BDOqFwSNO2Npzi/JdFdsOF4wNLJnt5qJTEhGh2tpfiyhOBbqrn8ulul36mv/Y29 LjcrR2kaMk/tNNwOdKsvt1wpL7eLf8Fyw79OtEgD1lJDXnMvjkbdjrJKunGDvRX7vre1 66k6Ix/ddsaw6hAk6N3NuvKXAli/vSZ6E9Zv45jrRE8tNBC/Z3MFda7pw3bJHLjcBzQM JAzA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXIRb5BakJxr0u/yYMjVBsWluFw2Fbi4tYQJOM9OHBd3SwSCY7f 0T2vve14aqglo0MWa1kiXr6OX6otjogErdz4hs9m+g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOroN5QxzwvK2eimGuO4hfmqDDqQ2Q72PUpy8jcOYdPZp8JfsMiTKLdz0oQRUj1JH29fZ/epLT/FZPflQN3+Q= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4386:: with SMTP id i6mr82274072wrq.63.1577973529798; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 05:58:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <5e0d5be5.1c69fb81.e7e68.ece8SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> In-Reply-To: <5e0d5be5.1c69fb81.e7e68.ece8SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 06:58:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Portmaster failing To: Thomas Mueller Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pV4q03k3z4Rgf X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=hHleVa4W; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::443 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.4.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[twc.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.46)[ip: (2.24), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.63), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 13:58:51 -0000 On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 7:56 PM Thomas Mueller wrote: > > > > This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. There seems to > > be a pervasive misconception that poudriere is "advanced" and > > portmaster is simple or straightforward. That notion is completely and > > totally backwards. Poudriere makes managing ports as simple and > > trouble-free as possible, and portmaster is specifically for people > > who can troubleshoot and fix problems like the one you're describing > > on their own. These problems WILL continue to happen very regularly > > for portmaster, because portmaster simply cannot do the right thing on > > its own. It will ALWAYS require manual intervention every time > > anything remotely significant changes. > > > I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about > > encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) > > frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will > > be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. If you choose > > to stay on portmaster, however, then you need to check the resentment > > about build failures. They are simply an inevitable consequence of > > using a very old and broken tool that should only be used by people > > with substantial port-handling experience. > > > You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major > > mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and > > security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. > > > > Adam Weinberger > > I suppose what you say about portmaster applies equally to portupgrade? > > I get the impression that synth and its dependency gcc6-aux are falling into desuetude if not actually officially deprecated. > > gcc6-aux has not been updated while gcc is up tp 8.3 and 9.2. > > I have never used poudriere, guess I will have to learn how if I stay with FreeBSD. > > NetBSD pkgsrc also has its problems: has been ported to many other mostly (quasi-)Unix OSes including FreeBSD, but I never tried pkgsrcc outside NetBSD, don't think I really want to. > > DragonFlyBSD switched from pkgsrc to dports, and Haiku switched from pkgsrc to Haikuports. > > Upgrading a large number of ports with portmaster usually required many runs, correcting the errors after each run, waiting for updates for broken ports. Unequally, actually. portmaster still has some developers putting in the hard work to keep it running. portupgrade hasn't had much focused development in many years and should probably be removed from the tree. There are some problems with building on a live system that portmaster can't ever truly alleviate, but it certainly works (when used by people experienced in handling fallout). portupgrade is just a system-mangling disaster waiting to happen. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 15:32:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC691D25A9 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pX940X3zz4XbQ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 15:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 002FWbMP014079 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:32:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 002FWbWX014078; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:32:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 07:32:37 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Stefan =?iso-8859-1?Q?E=DFer?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, gsutter@zer0.org Subject: Re: mail/junkfilter is several broken Message-ID: <20200102153237.GA14071@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20200101210423.GA8324@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pX940X3zz4XbQ X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 15:32:40 -0000 On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 12:22:20PM +0100, Stefan Eßer wrote: > Am 01.01.20 um 22:04 schrieb Steve Kargl: > > For users of mail/junkfilter, it now will filter all emails claiming > > a "Bad Date line". The following patch seems to fix the problem for > > the next decade. > > Hi Steve, > > thank you for providing a patch. Since the maintainer (gsutter) has > not been active in FreeBSD for a long time (AFAICT) and due to the > difference in time zones, I have taken liberty to apply the fix to > the port. > > I have sent mail to Gregory who probably will want to apply the fix > to the sourceforge repo and to remove the patch, but the fixed port > will allow to keep junkfilter working, meanwhile. > Thanks for the quick response. I could not tell from the SF page whether junkfilter was still being maintained or not. I find junkfilter to be a handy way to deal with email, but having everything flagged as spam was a little too much. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 19:29:41 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555BE1D7C04 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pdQW5PrLz3L2R for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 19:29:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: @lbutlr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Mariadb101-server fails to build Message-Id: <25ADDC0F-4521-4B6D-A8A7-34C7C1094608@kreme.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 12:29:37 -0700 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pdQW5PrLz3L2R X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.81)[-0.808,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.980,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[ip: (0.01), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(0.13), asn: 209(-0.02), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:29:41 -0000 Not sure if the top part of this is relevant: -- =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> REST support is ON CMake Warning at storage/connect/CMakeLists.txt:326 (FIND_PACKAGE): By not providing "Findcpprestsdk.cmake" in CMAKE_MODULE_PATH this = project has asked CMake to find a package configuration file provided by "cpprestsdk", but CMake did not find one. Could not find a package configuration file provided by "cpprestsdk" = with any of the following names: cpprestsdkConfig.cmake cpprestsdk-config.cmake Add the installation prefix of "cpprestsdk" to CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH or = set "cpprestsdk_DIR" to a directory containing one of the above files. If "cpprestsdk" provides a separate development package or SDK, be sure = it has been installed. -- =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> cpprestsdk package not found -- Looking for include file lz4.h -- Looking for include file lz4.h - found -- Looking for LZ4_compress_limitedOutput in lz4 -- Looking for LZ4_compress_limitedOutput in lz4 - not found -- Looking for LZ4_compress_default in lz4 -- Looking for LZ4_compress_default in lz4 - not found CMake Error at cmake/lz4.cmake:31 (MESSAGE): Required lz4 library is not found Call Stack (most recent call first): storage/innobase/CMakeLists.txt:28 (MYSQL_CHECK_LZ4) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also = "/usr/ports/databases/mariadb101-server/work/mariadb-10.1.43/CMakeFiles/CM= akeOutput.log". See also = "/usr/ports/databases/mariadb101-server/work/mariadb-10.1.43/CMakeFiles/CM= akeError.log". *** Error code 1 =F0=9F=91=B9 # portmaster -l | grep -i lz4 =3D=3D=3D>>> liblz4-1.9.2,1 =3D=3D=3D>>> p5-Compress-LZ4-0.25 I=E2=80=99ve rebuilt cmake, though it was already built today. LZ3 = always was rebuilt. I can build MariaDB if I disable lz4 AND lzo. The error log above = (=E2=80=9CSee also=E2=80=9D) was overwritten when I rebuilt without lz4, = so I don=E2=80=99t have it. --=20 Women like silent men, they think they're listening. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 21:17:27 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E351DAC29 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:17:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.41.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pgpt4R4hz3x8c for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from [IPv6:2003:fb:4f00:e601:65e7:5617:86ea:8f7b] (p200300FB4F00E60165E7561786EA8F7B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:fb:4f00:e601:65e7:5617:86ea:8f7b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47pgpg0St3zstg for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:17:15 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.1 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net From: Michael Grimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: [patch] security/ipsec-tools is broken Message-Id: Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:17:13 +0100 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_NONE,TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.3 (2019-12-06) on mail.mer-waases.lan X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pgpt4R4hz3x8c X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org has no SPF policy when checking 91.121.41.56) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.44 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ellael.org]; RBL_MAILSPIKE_WORST(2.00)[56.41.121.91.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.10]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.93)[0.927,0]; IP_SCORE(0.13)[ipnet: 91.121.0.0/16(-1.24), asn: 16276(1.89), country: FR(0.00)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.98)[0.983,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:91.121.0.0/16, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 21:17:27 -0000 FYI, the recent renaming of security/openssl111 to security/openssl breaks = security/ipsec-tools. Have a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232169 = for details. Regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 21:32:48 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A301DB33B for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47ph8c1gwpz3y8T for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1in85C-0002LO-DH; Thu, 02 Jan 2020 22:32:42 +0100 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:32:42 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Grimm Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: [patch] security/ipsec-tools is broken Message-ID: <20200102213242.GA5825@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47ph8c1gwpz3y8T X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.93 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.94)[-0.940,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 21:32:48 -0000 Hi! > the recent renaming of security/openssl111 to security/openssl breaks security/ipsec-tools. > > Have a look at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232169 for details. Any reason you attach a patch to a closed/fix bug from Feb. 2019 ? This is a sure way to loose track of it... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 21:37:20 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099471DB660 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.41.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47phFq2Wwhz3yf8; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from [IPv6:2003:fb:4f00:e601:65e7:5617:86ea:8f7b] (p200300FB4F00E60165E7561786EA8F7B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:fb:4f00:e601:65e7:5617:86ea:8f7b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47phFn0M0Yzt17; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:37:17 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.1 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [patch] security/ipsec-tools is broken From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <20200102213242.GA5825@home.opsec.eu> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:37:15 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20200102213242.GA5825@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.3 (2019-12-06) on mail.mer-waases.lan X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47phFq2Wwhz3yf8 X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org has no SPF policy when checking 91.121.41.56) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ellael.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RBL_MAILSPIKE_WORST(2.00)[56.41.121.91.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.10]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.963,0]; IP_SCORE(0.13)[ipnet: 91.121.0.0/16(-1.23), asn: 16276(1.89), country: FR(0.00)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.991,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:91.121.0.0/16, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 21:37:20 -0000 Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> the recent renaming of security/openssl111 to security/openssl breaks = security/ipsec-tools. >>=20 >> Have a look at = https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232169 for details. >=20 > Any reason you attach a patch to a closed/fix bug from Feb. 2019 ? I am not very familiar with bugzilla. I believed, that this would reopen = the old bug with my old patch. > This is a sure way to loose track of it=E2=80=A6 Should I file a new bug report?=20 Ups, just realised that you reopened bug 232169. Thanks and regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 22:06:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD82A1DC18E; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.41.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47phw26g1zz41JJ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 22:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from [IPv6:2003:fb:4f00:e601:65e7:5617:86ea:8f7b] (p200300FB4F00E60165E7561786EA8F7B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:fb:4f00:e601:65e7:5617:86ea:8f7b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47phvz4FPWztCD; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:06:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.1 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net From: Michael Grimm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: replacement of security/ipsec-tools Message-Id: <50378AC0-0A0A-4E33-961F-3D180987A8C1@ellael.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:06:53 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,RDNS_DYNAMIC,SPF_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.3 (2019-12-06) on mail.mer-waases.lan X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47phw26g1zz41JJ X-Spamd-Bar: +++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org has no SPF policy when checking 91.121.41.56) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [5.49 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ellael.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RBL_MAILSPIKE_WORST(2.00)[56.41.121.91.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.10]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.968,0]; IP_SCORE(0.13)[ipnet: 91.121.0.0/16(-1.23), asn: 16276(1.89), country: FR(0.00)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.992,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:91.121.0.0/16, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 22:06:59 -0000 [X-posted, please chose the relevant ML for such a thread] Hi, I am running ipsec-tools to implement a VPN tunnel (esp) between two = hosts for years now. But this statement on http://ipsec-tools.sourceforge.net makes me think = about an alternative: The development of ipsec-tools has been ABANDONED.=20 ipsec-tools has security issues, and you should not use it. = Please switch to a secure alternative!=20 Could you provide me with links where I could find more details about = the above mentioned 'security issues'? I want to find out, if my = specific setup has security issues at all. Thanks. What would be a secure alternative if one is needed?=20 #) security/racoon2 #) security/strongswan #) something else? What do I need? #) a VPN tunnel between two hosts #) both local networks reachable from the remote host Thanks and regards, Michael From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 2 23:28:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4371DEAFA; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:28:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pkk656Vrz47sN; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 23:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92.3 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1in9t5-0002af-Oz; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:28:19 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 00:28:19 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Michael Grimm Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Subject: Re: replacement of security/ipsec-tools Message-ID: <20200102232819.GB5825@home.opsec.eu> References: <50378AC0-0A0A-4E33-961F-3D180987A8C1@ellael.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50378AC0-0A0A-4E33-961F-3D180987A8C1@ellael.org> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pkk656Vrz47sN X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.87 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.89)[-0.892,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.983,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 23:28:31 -0000 Hi! > What would be a secure alternative if one is needed? > #) security/racoon2 > #) security/strongswan This is also ipsec based. > #) something else? openvpn or wireguard -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 3 05:57:31 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913BD1E73B0 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 05:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from p-impout001.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net (p-impout007aa.msg.pkvw.co.charter.net [47.43.26.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pvLy2gc2z4S3Y for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 05:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.177.163]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id nFxaioScK9CDVnFxbiJ2sl; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 05:57:23 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Q8+sHL+a c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:117 a=xqrt2BZAGHte7XHhrxJgbA==:17 a=HpEJnUlJZJkA:10 a=yhI-jwk9AAAA:20 a=8ggJXkvBAAAA:8 a=PGMt32rcAAAA:8 a=mDV3o1hIAAAA:8 a=X-OP_bXp-m2tLvEo7MAA:9 a=GHEzSmbhvkB-cyu2CITy:22 a=cYVhV4zampsNfKbjUK-z:22 a=_FVE-zBwftR9WsbkzFJk:22 Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 05:57:49 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster failing References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <5e0d5be5.1c69fb81.e7e68.ece8SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> <38085.1962416031$1577933805@news.gmane.org> <5zhu-klwz-wny@FreeBSD.org> X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFUd3ntOqClFUlrIGhYnB9w1w0K5Fgc+7gmI06WONnJgwk7fmXm1VOi0OiSYyV/W/0QZt4wy3N82IjDfNXaTMSG4kGLSRtNF4FW5kYRUuhA4DnkFYYpR UxZ+AeXDYTkmWAdYo/Zv+0tAvaPfETyaiWVo05IedNrZ9qDbYeuK13xx X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47pvLy2gc2z4S3Y X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 47.43.26.138 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.73 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:47.43.26.0/24]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.63)[0.635,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.90)[0.900,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[163.177.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:40294, ipnet:47.43.24.0/21, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[asn: 40294(1.13), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 05:57:31 -0000 > Unequally, actually. portmaster still has some developers putting in > the hard work to keep it running. portupgrade hasn't had much focused > development in many years and should probably be removed from the > tree. There are some problems with building on a live system that > portmaster can't ever truly alleviate, but it certainly works (when > used by people experienced in handling fallout). portupgrade is just a > system-mangling disaster waiting to happen. > Adam Weinberger I suppose what you say about portmaster applies equally to portupgrade? (from my previous post) I am strongly advised to heed your advice on portupgrade. It seemed to work fairly well, once upon a time, but even then it was necessary to run "pkgdb -F". I looked in the FreeBSD Handbook online, found poudriere. I even ran "make all-depends-list | more" from my FreeBSD installation, found surprisingly few dependencies, wish there were a good way to configure options without dialog4ports. Still, dialog4ports was an improvement over the old dialog, which always messed my screen when I kept a log file. Speaking of system-mangling disaster, NetBSD pkgsrc with pkg_rolling-replace can do that, I am typing this on such a system. from Jan Beich: > DragonFly has lang/gcc9-aux since https://github.com/DragonFlyBSD/DeltaPorts/commit/bb774aced6d7 > Synth is still used to build binary packages on DragonFly e.g., > https://sting.dragonflybsd.org/dports/logs/lang___gcc9-aux.log I looked on gitweb.dragonflybsd.org, found gcc9-aux, but no gcc7-aux or gcc8-aux, and no gccn-aux on dragonlace.net where n > 6. DragonFly uses git for src and dports trees, in contrast to FreeBSD which uses svn, and NetBSD and OpenBSD which use cvs. Possibly I could try to create my own gcc(7 or 8)-aux on FreeBSD or NetBSD, or cross-compile for Linux. I would follow instructions on software.gnu.org or gcc.gnu.org . Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 3 06:03:59 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F50B1E76BC for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 06:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pvVR2Mvjz4SPL; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 06:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3496E10B8F; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 06:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 20158E2ED8; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:03:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:03:57 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jan Beich Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portmaster failing Message-ID: <20200103060357.que3v4nvgakwusq4@ivaldir.net> References: <8DDB987C-5276-4F35-BBD1-84043ED26E03@kreme.com> <288FEB87-3D88-4696-BF83-6918DAE656E5@kreme.com> <38085.1962416031$1577933805@news.gmane.org> <5zhu-klwz-wny@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="asygcqbn5tglfybr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5zhu-klwz-wny@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 06:03:59 -0000 --asygcqbn5tglfybr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 02, 2020 at 02:50:04PM +0100, Jan Beich wrote: > "Thomas Mueller" writes: >=20 > >> This is why we practically beg people to use poudriere. There seems to > >> be a pervasive misconception that poudriere is "advanced" and > >> portmaster is simple or straightforward. That notion is completely and > >> totally backwards. Poudriere makes managing ports as simple and > >> trouble-free as possible, and portmaster is specifically for people > >> who can troubleshoot and fix problems like the one you're describing > >> on their own. These problems WILL continue to happen very regularly > >> for portmaster, because portmaster simply cannot do the right thing on > >> its own. It will ALWAYS require manual intervention every time > >> anything remotely significant changes. > > > >> I've mentioned this to you before, lbutlr, because you post about > >> encountering these snags quite regularly, and your (quite warranted) > >> frustration is apparent. I really do think that your FreeBSD life will > >> be simpler if you switch from portmaster to poudriere. If you choose > >> to stay on portmaster, however, then you need to check the resentment > >> about build failures. They are simply an inevitable consequence of > >> using a very old and broken tool that should only be used by people > >> with substantial port-handling experience. > > > >> You are right that there wasn't a warning, and that was a major > >> mistake that should not have happened. security/openssl and > >> security/openssl111 should have contained messages about this switch. > > > > > >> Adam Weinberger > > > > I suppose what you say about portmaster applies equally to portupgrade? > > > > I get the impression that synth and its dependency gcc6-aux are falling= into desuetude if not actually officially deprecated. > > > > gcc6-aux has not been updated while gcc is up tp 8.3 and 9.2. >=20 > DragonFly has lang/gcc9-aux since https://github.com/DragonFlyBSD/DeltaPo= rts/commit/bb774aced6d7 > Synth is still used to build binary packages on DragonFly e.g., > https://sting.dragonflybsd.org/dports/logs/lang___gcc9-aux.log And is phase to be replaced by dsynth in there (rewrite in C by dillon@) Best regards, Bapt --asygcqbn5tglfybr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl4O2UoACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plp7PxAAlPrz1xtqkPyYV142opB6r1aaDyB2btaHVvnNjHA8asLIg51MnIR1N6Oy jtOQh7ERtE4hlHOJ13AnV9NELCMTlqqCKGZM9YIo9nIouFEo/qs1Dl3PMBWMMFe2 iFZmKI/BP8REE/w5DdrsJ5URYupWRxVWUkMhInBIKU6iljZHyTbqSoFw06V7y+iV 0Q4t16lcI3iMQNEVxsHEq5H2K1/EyFNdAh0PAQXe5n7V1EjwOpx5JzbBgzrJE26M fDUXCHbpiPM0UHmqObvzg1qhmCNAunelfRXWBgcxS5kqZhgmLue1L8ROEERn+kQC nCv/GNA/OPwDbcEWMODtxJArn3zZwQOdrHxHKVQvEuq00vDOOcxkrnNBPq4mFvIU RShujfDKJquQikMN2/UXCGFBpzKXYGWQKITNjdVuL95F4QS6Ch0p7/F77feQejeD uyTT/Ox0pf/3w/NELj6O9vYeOCCvhIjL3mFb1v+0TMHovsS6ICgONHs9Fx+t24Zg uN5lEZ6O79MpHR9QYCH5MRT+KppZcCFpVt//Uq1DlvV4wWxPVhxdA2buJNOhL1yf Vv0k93xHASchRIkXirZAosgTfZTYDua0aKm8Ync7CWNkeHQJ/9yM1TU3o7/Cm7fp ygg+rL0xIAlcxYhj7X5Z86+9KWfZUb/KdUFg3KN2HOmsawV7K68= =0MIG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --asygcqbn5tglfybr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 3 07:04:11 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ED91E886B for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47pwqv2W6Vz4V8L for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 544821E8867; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5414E1E8866 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47pwqv1gDKz4V8H for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B4C28588 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.10]) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00374BiE067205 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 00374Bi6067204; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <202001030704.00374Bi6067204@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 07:04:11 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 07:04:11 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ security/gsasl | 1.8.0 | 1.8.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Reported by: portscout! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 4 16:57:24 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245981E2B34 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 16:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashfixit@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw1-xc41.google.com (mail-yw1-xc41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47qnxv0dKKz4Pdw; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 16:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ashfixit@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw1-xc41.google.com with SMTP id h126so19992350ywc.6; Sat, 04 Jan 2020 08:57:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pKY9tzmV/BMzhUtnzhwYCBR2tPR9yURX1Jld/TgHp+U=; b=cYJI4Ff+S7QGlBbc0ZC6YlUmg5GJgdyrmy0/fZ5nnbvcKlieNPfZ3YS2YIh6SFP04s YOY1feT8jnSuw0gyvzkSPxIuPLpVEuqkP5VD/6lLfeOCWPv8vtnZEBjE1fI9OKsu8qqR Da+hNzHxHez3WQE7LGczkvvpd9jYhyZqh4O6weWfKdr+R/s8e5we19t6RpH3zdCC1Tqs /YapI7JgUZQ1rQT6vWTvliUZz4ekJpGkW78J+0zlbSuMOpIwJJrNqE4pWxzhfhDSAiWy GuT+3QlhkLmKOqcdM3FI3MP55vpnHV7vBX+iTemqjB6GM8VZYaG0fw3hYcyDuQ6eXfPv 03SA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pKY9tzmV/BMzhUtnzhwYCBR2tPR9yURX1Jld/TgHp+U=; b=Cvxvw0VlgF0KVxYp5vxzZ49MHXq3cU78SWk/Hn0LS3frr8xbCeFng+mxUvAg/jASIz EmeJj7AODBqdjiL/QlgXyN6wV/p1j3NpHOheQ1Z6MNB84X7A8uw20w/VaqNp1LuesI2H l/EwsWX2w12NpJd8f9xN8jLdxy0+oD+3g7d9eO58jhWuqqqQ+H1O1q3NFe+rQv0BnUmC qote6EirkEzhoLq8Gb8ZEEGR8d+Qpta21JCMdxaE3hVlY1zC30y9enYfqgSo9lthEYzy lXHUlsE5Gqz4I77nHTa+qcZd8jDSG0NPDnBwP7N+P7RO1IgyfB21NHDhI1ttNnNq0Ngr +uMw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVHAegY7bYdXm3cWDG4e42LbJzJG3hEr68d1uA/jgg6BKY/R8Ul 9zW8ZG5ucGWwwCiMRzVlviQ1jaiagTrGOUnUdafRsL8i X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzA7SRPqt2yF2+KgNbEDAN4DnhUOwAOflr0SPoHSknvGplv6+SLT3HsK3VE+EOuLc4bx2Q0izyQlHrCsEbi+fo= X-Received: by 2002:a81:8405:: with SMTP id u5mr70673776ywf.93.1578157041732; Sat, 04 Jan 2020 08:57:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <116348b6-fe05-9cea-c914-388014ce600a@xinuos.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ash Gokhale Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 11:57:10 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cad/gerbv can be helped To: Li-Wen Hsu , alyoshin.s@gmail.com Cc: Tim Rice , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47qnxv0dKKz4Pdw X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=cYJI4Ff+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ashfixit@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::c41 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ashfixit@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[11]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (1.56), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.4.c.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 16:57:24 -0000 This is the possible culprit from their git per Tim's analysis, I'm unable to check a specimen of the distfile with the incorrect signature as it is unavailable and the original was not built from the gerbv-2-7-RELEASE tag. https://github.com/agokhale/gerbv-git/commit/f9df7f32d7ee60988b5608ae7f0faee60e906591 commit f9df7f32d7ee60988b5608ae7f0faee60e906591 Author: Sergey Alyoshin Date: Mon Dec 17 21:02:01 2018 +0300 Update README-cvs.txt to README-git.txt I'm not sure what there is to do here except accept the changes or let this port go. I've canned a version of the port that works for me(tm), and gone over the recent commit history for obviously untoward behaviour. https://github.com/agokhale/freebsd-ports-cad-gerbv I've also created a readonly copy of the whole distro to browse it as the source git is a bit unfriendly. https://github.com/agokhale/gerbv-git On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 6:24 AM Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 6:13 AM Tim Rice wrote: > > How about checking the git log and doing a git diff. > > git clone git://git.geda-project.org/gerbv.git > > > > Looks like README-cvs.txt was pulled and README-git.txt added. > > That should also work. Ash, Could you also check these? > > Thanks, > Li-Wen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 4 23:10:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1911E0618 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 23:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47qyCr14s5z4l7X for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 23:09:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id k16so61640780otb.2 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2020 15:09:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IaI78qmO6nUB8mG7wuO2Y2ehQWK1s2Ha/uLPymXaL80=; b=BMzqBP889vxMgrDs3Cl2NWk5+KVWR11VJOXw4Pif5GIBqSefanZ2SF1uZ3FwMBtrrm sfC8Y0QD5lpV8mA5v5So9Xwc4T+IQ658peyJDLOYvnfZZZ3gkUryFJReUJNIIYGwwo63 NFMq/L3MbIscOJs6Z4GX4aPVswCBu82kW6Io9/wZoXO0rMRRcUK12JFqzutjZ4mg9bQH YB14m/4RP/NvVC3O2zl+ugkbOfAM9ZnKLFZXJ/sYmsgEFJyhgeMVs/TdrMjetYGvnndn 811xIB8LOvsOI3yS+sMwbX+3rPogpOZpP3KCjL8bY+UR1vdtuGZyzihFw+moDpxZR2h5 eHWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=IaI78qmO6nUB8mG7wuO2Y2ehQWK1s2Ha/uLPymXaL80=; b=TxgMlNn4fbQmnRp+ZbA15PbXj7svxAKDMKSJw2WO5YpBkqyvn4fk+OKjvO38K7uu4w rW5+wZUeTQ+fTiDHHYe0k78ZUjzE8bfjqO9KsW7AZbrh2TFm/xTCqruuO9jS/kBkfSZr YhkKErGU15ElGe1yAdOjzs92maThYfhH5UhkKlE3UWIbzQw7yA/8zC07zui0lBMu1Ls0 hR/gagQBKry+IQnDVjoEybmCTZO+bLMKNTFw7np0rOR1Z44dfZcshifQC+lBHcJhJ3Nt 1Qjsrhyzt0game4xLnxUQRb83hF9dZewuIqZMmy0zMKdgkYsXMbskUOgsktnEjSyr1mf sqTQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXb8F1aMfoJ4rEsmRghwwDLP0fyqvJy+JQEQC+9MiNBWkRNYtXb Z7WJhXV/VLzqKjYluSwwbwc54FZiYzjSw/Jyw2cC57ks X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmMftUDJUK+rJoA2MYAGk3qcsQr2102CSa+Jypu88hn6r0W5cdXF51iuBQQVMbSZwFkFilp9IAxy9qcTSoaHk= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1c95:: with SMTP id l21mr96592310ota.271.1578179398513; Sat, 04 Jan 2020 15:09:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 15:09:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Tool to check for non-default options for installed ports To: FreeBSD Ports ML X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47qyCr14s5z4l7X X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BMzqBP88; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kob6558@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kob6558@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-7.16), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[rkoberman@gmail.com,kob6558@gmail.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2020 23:10:01 -0000 I should just write this as it looks very straight-forward but I'm lazy and hate reinventing wheels. On my development system I build from ports. An on-going issue is that ports frequently change options from non-default to default and I never see the change. The result is that every now and then a port won't build due to a change or a port runs with reduced capabilities or performance when a new option becomes the standard. Looking at the DEFAULT_OPTIONS in the port Makefile and comparing them with saved config is trivial and I suspect a tool for this has probably been written several times. Thanks! -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683