Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 09:47:56 -0500 From: Steve Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com> To: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> Cc: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>, Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>, louie@TransSys.COM, committers@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Message-ID: <20000106094756.B30328@virtual-voodoo.com> In-Reply-To: <v04220812b49a32b0b570@[195.238.1.121]>; from Brad Knowles on Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 12:55:06PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0001060520490.21904-100000@lcm97.cvzoom.net> <v04220812b49a32b0b570@[195.238.1.121]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> More releases more often are better than indefinitely holding up > releases waiting for just that one last thing to be finished. I think a recent thread on -STABLE indicates that the majority of end users seem to believe that -RELEASE means STABLE and should be fully operational not a wide-beta under a release name. I also thing that an extremely complete and stable .0 release would be good for the FreeBSD release image. -Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000106094756.B30328>