Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Feb 2005 09:25:01 -0800
From:      Joshua Tinnin <krinklyfig@spymac.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
Subject:   Re: favor
Message-ID:  <200502070925.02289.krinklyfig@spymac.com>
In-Reply-To: <399973539.20050207171622@wanadoo.fr>
References:  <200502061420.24415.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <20050207161015.GH21722@thingy.apana.org.au> <399973539.20050207171622@wanadoo.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 07 February 2005 08:16 am, Anthony Atkielski 
<atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> David Gerard writes:
>
> DG> That would sorta suck. I know I write my questions and answers
> with DG> a view to them being searchable on the web maybe months or
> years DG> later, as I know how very grateful I am to those whose
> archived DG> words have helped me before.
>
> Having to search an archive of e-mail messages as a substitute for
> real support sucks to begin with.  I've almost never found anything
> useful when searching the archives, and even when I have, it takes
> longer to find it in the archives than it does to just ask the
> question again.

If you want "real" support, that costs money, and it doesn't matter if 
you're talking about BSD, Linux, Windows, Solaris, etc.

> DG> So it helps the copyright situation, but breaks the usefulness of
> DG> any archive.
>
> The copyright situation is an unavoidable legal mandate, not an
> option. You cannot defend against an infringement action by saying
> that respecting copyright would have been inconvenient for you.

Again, what are the damages?

- jt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502070925.02289.krinklyfig>