From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Nov 16 01:09:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA01218
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 01:09:51 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from bubble.didi.com (sjx-ca115-54.ix.netcom.com [207.223.162.118])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA01213
          for <FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 16 Nov 1997 01:09:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from asami@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by bubble.didi.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA00817;
	Sun, 16 Nov 1997 01:09:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from asami)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 01:09:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199711160909.BAA00817@bubble.didi.com>
To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, pst@Shockwave.COM
In-reply-to: <199711152000.MAA07519@hub.freebsd.org> (message from Paul Traina on Sat, 15 Nov 1997 12:00:10 -0800 (PST))
Subject: Re: ports/5056: upgrade enlightenment to DR-12.6
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Paul,

 * From: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>
 * Cc: vanilla@MinJe.com.TW

While I certainly appreciate the help, it is a bad idea to CC: the
maintainer (or anyone else for that matter) when you submit a PR.
If the CC'd person responds to the direct mail (without the
"ports/5056" in the subject line), it can cause extra PRs to be
opened.

Yes, it has happened in the past.  It took me a while to calm down
both parties and there were like 4 or 5 bogus PRs that came out of
that.

Satoshi