Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:44:45 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Andrey Zonov <andrey@zonov.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r232321 - head/share/man/man9 Message-ID: <4F4F450D.3060607@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CANU_PUHCvk6U25A7kUi=NJ5mRvZDJBkLbFxaCeo3ueEXOfT3fQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201202292241.q1TMffCk048359@svn.freebsd.org> <4F4F2375.3080209@zonov.org> <4F4F3BFB.5030104@FreeBSD.org> <CANU_PUHCvk6U25A7kUi=NJ5mRvZDJBkLbFxaCeo3ueEXOfT3fQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 01/03/2012 11:11 Andrey Zonov said the following: > It doesn't make sense. For (CTLFLAG_RD|CTLFLAG_TUN) there is relevant > code in sysctl(8), but for (CTLFLAG_RW|CTLFLAG_TUN) there is no any > code, or did I miss something? In the existing code - no. But I would appreciate if e.g. sysctl -d could report that a sysctl also has a twin tunable. I can imagine that there could be things which are better be set to a certain value from the very start (via a tunable) rather than switched to that value later in a boot process (via sysctl). Extra user-friendly information doesn't hurt, IMO. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4F450D.3060607>