From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 27 08:14:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F9D1065670 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125248FC0C for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:14:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BFD61D5; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:14:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 43B758D0C; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:14:29 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Eric van Gyzen References: <20120626063017.D05DA58081@chaos.jnpr.net> <86wr2uwdgf.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4FE9D84E.7080402@vangyzen.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 10:14:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4FE9D84E.7080402@vangyzen.net> (Eric van Gyzen's message of "Tue, 26 Jun 2012 10:42:06 -0500") Message-ID: <86hatxw4rf.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Tim Kientzle , Simon Gerraty , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allow user install X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:14:37 -0000 Eric van Gyzen writes: > Tim's idea sounds great, and would cover several use-cases. > Specifically, it leaves the build artifacts in the usual places so > other, later builds can build against them, whereas writing the > artifacts directly to a tar file does not. I'm not sure what you mean. The "build artifacts" would still be in the obj tree. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no