From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 15:54:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2796D16A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:54:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mid-1.inet.it (mid-1.inet.it [213.92.5.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC9F43D31; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:54:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrea@acampi.inet.it) Received: from acampi.inet.it [::ffff:213.92.1.165] by mid-1.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.1.7-516 id ::ffff:213.92.1.165+HAEt17fusWOj; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:54:30 +0200 Received: by acampi.inet.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8715B15594; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:54:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:54:29 +0200 From: Andrea Campi To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20040622155429.GB82977@webcom.it> References: <20040622151128.GA82977@webcom.it> <40D851FA.1030103@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D851FA.1030103@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is NO_YP_LIBC working? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:54:55 -0000 Ciao Alex, On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > >in the process of setting up a nanobsd-based system I've stumbled on so > >many issues during a make buildworld that I've started wondering whether > >NO_YP_LIBC is meant to work. Is anybody using it, and do you need local > >changes? > > Currently it's broken. Try this patch: > http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/patchset/10039-no-yp-libc.diff Oh, I hadn't noticed a previous discussion (or possibly I've forgotten about it). I'm trying a buildworld with the patch; it looks definitely good. In fact, although I had only gotten about halfway, my patch was practically identical (modulo whitespaces). Any hope to get somebody to commit it? Bye, Andrea -- 0 and 1. Now what could be so hard about that?