Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:14:01 -0700 From: Darren Reed <darrenr@freebsd.org> To: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> Cc: Olivier Warin <daffy@xview.net>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dtrace port status Message-ID: <46F38B59.9070707@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070921070347.GA17990@what-creek.com> References: <6385B28C-01D1-459A-9543-E36C89C7F36E@xview.net> <20070920203413.GA13737@what-creek.com> <46F367E0.4000300@freebsd.org> <20070921070347.GA17990@what-creek.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Birrell wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:42:40PM -0700, Darren Reed wrote: > > John Birrell wrote: > > >DTrace consists mainly of kernel modules, however in order for DTrace > > >to inspect the kernel internals it has to have some code inside > > >existing BSD licensed files. > > > > > > > This should not be a problem. > > Code added to BSD licensed files should be BSD licensed. > > Only if it is clean-room coded. > So find someone who hasn't read that email, write up a spec for the missing fields that dtrace requires and ask them to implement and commit the change to the dtrace branch on freebsd.org ? :) Darren
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46F38B59.9070707>