Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:26:04 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: committers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Message-ID: <20000106172604.T13922@bitbox.follo.net> In-Reply-To: <200001061609.JAA77304@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 09:09:22AM -0700 References: <20000106122256.B13922@bitbox.follo.net> <200001060927.UAA03779@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> <38746AEC.167EB0E7@elischer.org> <20000106122256.B13922@bitbox.follo.net> <200001061609.JAA77304@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 09:09:22AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000106122256.B13922@bitbox.follo.net> Eivind Eklund writes: > : I believe putting down RELENG_4 without having a finished IPv6 and > : functional laptop support (I'm not sure what state this is in right > : now) would be a bad idea. > > The laptop support is approx that of 3.x. The fe device is no longer > supported as a pccard. The sn device has been added. The YE_DATA > floppy device isn't supported, but could be if some is motivated to > fix it. There may be a few lingering hot plug issues in the old > code's migration to newbus. How much benefit would you be getting by having 4.0 ship with newcard instead of what's there now? E.g, by having 4.0-PAO relate to newcard rather than what's in presently? Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000106172604.T13922>