Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 23:25:38 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org> To: Scott Dodson <sdodson@eagle4.cc.gasou.edu> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rebuild Message-ID: <20030523062538.GC19745@vectors.cx> In-Reply-To: <1053652345.14171.2.camel@localhost> References: <E19J0kS-000G8y-L6@ran.psg.com> <20030523005542.GA19745@vectors.cx> <1053652345.14171.2.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (05.22.2003 @ 1812 PST): Scott Dodson said, in 1.0K: << > This brings up an interesting question. marcusmerge tells us to do > portugrade -r pkgconfig. I'm wondering if any of these are particularly > different? Wouldn't portupgrade -R gnome2 work as well? I've never had > problems with any of the different methods. I'm just wondering if one > is particularly useful in a certain situation over another, etc. >> end of "Re: rebuild" from Scott Dodson << portupgrade -R gnome2 will upgrade all the components of the basic gnome2 desktop. portupgrade -r pkgconfig will upgrade everything that is *or uses* gnome2. adding a -f will rebuild all of them. no -f means just upgrade the pieces that need to be upgraded. # Adam - -- Adam Weinberger vectors.cx >> adam@vectors.cx FreeBSD.org << adamw@FreeBSD.ORG #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+zb7ho8KM2ULHQ/0RAqcqAJ9iVA4clPe/xPpUP3MNTnMi34vsiwCcDfcZ XyEWLN/8lw/qudXIhOHc0WE= =qlYZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030523062538.GC19745>