From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Tue Feb  2 17:37:56 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230D4A985AB
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue,  2 Feb 2016 17:37:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13DC0E68
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue,  2 Feb 2016 17:37:56 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u12HbtDf070291
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:37:55 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205852] Be nicer about multiple sqlalchemy ports
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:37:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: mi@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-205852-13-vSswfM3oY5@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205852-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:37:56 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205852

--- Comment #16 from Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Palle Girgensohn from comment #15)
> OK. I would prefer we just had one sqlalchemy port, and bend the other
> ports to work with the new fresh version only.

I very strongly prefer that too, but it just is not always achievable -- to=
day
or in the future there may be a need to retain multiple versions of a port =
in
the tree because the latest version breaks compatibility for some of the
consumers.

Such a situation should not cause more damage than necessary, however, and a
port that could use multiple versions of a dependency needs to be able to s=
ay
so -- instead of insisting on only one of the alternatives.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=