From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 11:04:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB3616A41C; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:04:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay-er5.mbrd.ru (relay-er5.mbrd.ru [194.117.71.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC74843D1F; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:04:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from msd.mbrd.ru ([172.16.4.9]) by relay-er5.mbrd.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x) id 1DiVh1-000E81-NE; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:04:23 +0400 Message-ID: <42B00B37.7060804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:04:23 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Berezin References: <200506150810.j5F8AEPA013710@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050615090623.GA27207@alaska.cert.siemens.com> <20050615104110.GA56428@heechee.tobez.org> In-Reply-To: <20050615104110.GA56428@heechee.tobez.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org, Vsevolod Stakhov Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:04:26 -0000 Anton Berezin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Udo Schweigert wrote: > > >>As the maintainer of the mutt ports I vote against it. > > > I don't think it is a reasonable position. There will undoubtedly be a > number of people willing to give it a try, and the rest is just politics > better to be avoided in the ports tree. Agree. If it's an official fork, why we can't have the separate port? -- Sem.