Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 20:29:16 +0000 From: Dan Foster <dsf@globalcrossing.net> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dan Foster <dsf@globalcrossing.net> Subject: Re: ports/63192: mutt change breaks vim syntax highlighting Message-ID: <20040326202916.GA7101@gblx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040326044521.GA61327@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040324174642.GB18920@anyware12.anyware> <20040324181628.GB6200@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040326042741.GA16229@gblx.net> <20040326044521.GA61327@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hot Diggety! David O'Brien was rumored to have written: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:27:41AM +0000, Dan Foster wrote: > > This appears to be why vim developers will not commit the patch, and > > they seem to be on solid ground with that position given the reasoning. > > Can you forward what they said? No need to spam GNATs with it. Per request: From: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@moolenaar.net> If the patch adds a new feature for only one OS I would hesitate to include it, since I prefer functionality to be available on many platforms. Translation: if it's a patch made by the Mutt folks that runs under most all platforms Mutt runs under, he'll accept a filetype.vim patch; but if it is a change specific to a single OS, he seems to prefer that we take care of it ourselves. -Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326202916.GA7101>