Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 02 Dec 2022 07:03:29 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 268118] mail/mlmmj: WWW, maintenance
Message-ID:  <bug-268118-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D268118

            Bug ID: 268118
           Summary: mail/mlmmj: WWW, maintenance
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: bapt@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: grahamperrin@freebsd.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(bapt@FreeBSD.org)
          Assignee: bapt@FreeBSD.org

Whilst (WWW) <http://mlmmj.org/>; is alive, I can't easily find evidence of
anything significant since 2017.=20

<http://mlmmj.org/downloads/>; the most recent release was more than five ye=
ars
ago.=20

<http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/2017-11/0000001.html>; was significant, then
<http://mlmmj.org/archive/mlmmj/>; in December 2017 it seemed that hope was
abandoned.=20

>From spam in the bug tracker, I assume that the tracker is alive, but no lo=
nger
managed:=20

* <http://mlmmj.org/bugs/bug.php?id=3D71>;
* <http://mlmmj.org/bugs/bug.php?id=3D73>=20

I see <https://www.freshports.org/mail/mlmmj/#history>, so I do not doubt t=
hat
development occurs. However:=20

* if true development for this port will never be in the mlmmj.org domain,=
=20
  then can we be more realistic about the WWW?

Thanks

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-268118-7788>