From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Apr 28  3:50:23 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from coventry.ac.uk (mercury.coventry.ac.uk [193.61.107.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5982A14FFB
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 1999 03:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from justin@mascarpone.coventry.ac.uk)
Received: from mascarpone.coventry.ac.uk (mascarpone.coventry.ac.uk [194.66.38.77]) by coventry.ac.uk (8.8.7/8.6.11) with SMTP id LAA10101 for <@mercury.coventry.ac.uk:questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 1999 11:49:56 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from justin@localhost) by mascarpone.coventry.ac.uk (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA25638; Wed, 28 Apr 1999 11:49:47 +0100
Message-Id: <199904281049.LAA25638@mascarpone.coventry.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 99 11:49 +0100
From: Justin Murdock <justin@csad.coventry.ac.uk>
Reply-To: justin@csad.coventry.ac.uk
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.2 to be given to attendees of USENIX Technical
	Conference
To: questions@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: Jordan K. Hubbard's mail of Tue, 27 Apr 99 22:51 +0700
References: <68533.925278695@zippy.cdrom.com>
X-Mailer: Af v1.98.4
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Berkeley, California (April 27, 1999)

> USENIX is providing grants to the OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, and Debian
> Linux development projects, to support each of them in issuing new
> releases.  These releases will be given free of charge to all 1999 Annual
> Conference technical session registrants. The 1999 Annual Conference takes
> place June 6-11, in Monterey, California. Programs for the tutorial and
> technical sessions, including the FREENIX track, and associated events are
> online. Please go to http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix99

Hmm, another FreeBSD produced to deadline :(

I don't want 2 releases a year, I want 1 release every time FreeBSD is
ready for a new release. Or does FreeBSD require 2 releases a year to
keep Walnut Creek happy?

Will this install and work out of the box. (unlike 3.1)?
I don't want to take another credibility hit - have the high (as I
perceived them) production values of 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2 been ditched in
an attempt to be as sexy as Linux?

Justin.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message