From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 28 20:45:42 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21436106566C; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:7:d77::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A228FC1F; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:45:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maximum3.maximumdata.biz (akbeech-2-pt.tunnel.tserv14.sea1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:a:2e9::2]) by bsdevel2.freebsdnorth.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAF1C3B23; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:36:24 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:45:39 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/10.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.6.5; i386; ; ) References: <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <4E8377F1.7020906@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4E838127.5090601@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E838127.5090601@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201109281245.40015.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Matt , Doug Barton , Garrett Cooper , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, aakuusta@gmail.com, "Hartmann, O." Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 20:45:42 -0000 On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote: > On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > The mess started to happen when I tried to "repair" a non CLANG > > compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas. > > Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they > > got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation report from > > portmaster. But the libiconv.so.3 wasn't there anymore when I checked! > > > > This is a catastrophy ... > > > > I'm on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r225844 > > It's been widely reported on the ports list that you can't do fresh > ports compiles on 10-current, and won't be able to until well after > 9.0-RELEASE. The primary reason is that auto* stuff doesn't understand > the 2-digit release version. > > Solutions are to set UNAME_r=9.0-CURRENT in your environment, and/or > twiddle the version in newvers.sh and rebuild/reinstall your kernel. > > > hth, > > Doug So if I change /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh to something like vers 9.9 I'm not going to shoot myself in the foot if I try and update? I would really like to avoid downgrading this box.I've altready been bitten once today and had to build packages on my tindy and force install. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------