Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 23:49:01 +0000 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Cc: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@fnop.net>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ephemeral port range (patch) Message-ID: <47CB3CED.7070303@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200803011338.m21DcY9Z026418@venus.xmundo.net> References: <200803011338.m21DcY9Z026418@venus.xmundo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+1 on increasing the threshold, 1024 is way too low. Also consider the folk who depend on the existing behaviour: a predictable ephemeral port range is useful, if for some reason you need to apply a NAT policy to that traffic, with no other knowledge about how the applications you must NAT actually behave. later BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47CB3CED.7070303>