From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 16 5:20:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8A337B400 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 05:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0GDK2195602; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 05:20:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 05:20:02 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201161320.g0GDK2195602@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Ruslan Ermilov Subject: Re: misc/33906: tic program is missing from the base FreeBSD installation Reply-To: Ruslan Ermilov Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR misc/33906; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Alexey V. Neyman" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/33906: tic program is missing from the base FreeBSD installation Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:16:23 +0200 On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 04:04:56PM +0300, Alexey V. Neyman wrote: > On 16 January 2002 15:37, you wrote: > >> Considering all above, I dare suggest inclusion of > >> /usr/share/misc/terminfo in BSD.usr.mtree :) At least our > >> base-system libncurses uses this directory. > > > > I'm not sure about this one. Nothing in standard distribution seems > > to use this directory, except compiling its name into libncurses. > > An alternate solution would be to define TERMINFO and TERMINFO_DIRS > > in src/lib/libncurses/ncurses_cfg.h to point to /usr/local, but > > that would be bogus too. I think that the good compromise would > > be to leave it out of BSD.usr.dist scope -- as you say, tic(8) > > will create it if necessary. > > I agree. The only thing that worries me is that people relying on > mtree(8) to check integrity of /usr will be annoyed with complaints > about unknown share/misc/terminfo entry. Worth a pkg-message? Or leave > this concerns alone? > As I already told you, I'm not sure about this one. Let others speak on. But definitely it should not be in BSD.usr.dist. > > By target directory first (bin, sbin), then by name within directory, > > then links. The same order as in Makefile. And nope, your /sbin > > entries were not alphabetically sorted. > > Neither are yours :-) Corrected shar archive attached. > Also incorporated Ted's enhancements to pkg-descr. > Looks like a winner to me. I also think that pkg-descr should use FreeBSD manpage section numbers for tic(8), toe(8), and infocmp(8). Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message