From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 17:14:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD07EC0; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 17:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask.apl.washington.edu", Issuer "troutmask.apl.washington.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DE3927A8; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 17:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s72HEHGC032746 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:14:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s72HEGWJ032745; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:14:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2014 10:14:16 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: William Grzybowski Subject: Re: math/lapack broken Message-ID: <20140802171416.GA32725@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20140802004717.GA29541@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140802045438.GA30183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140802162122.GA32459@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 17:14:17 -0000 On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 01:50:55PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:49:03PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > >> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Steve Kargl > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > >> >> I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been. > >> >> Its not the first message ranting about something broken. > >> >> > >> > I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made > >> > within the ports community, and no, this isn't the nearly > >> > the first poor decision. > >> > > >> > If the port has an option to build the profiled libraries > >> > and that option is selected, then I expect the port to > >> > build the profiled library. > >> > >> You're welcome to help the ports committers to maintain over 20k ports > >> and raise the quality. > >> Are you looking for mentors for your ports@ commit bit? > > > > Check your history. I was a port maintainer many years > > ago. Dropped maintainership of all my ports after several > > unreviewed changes by others to those ports were made. > > These unreviewed changes broke those ports and I was > > forced to clean up the mess. > > So, you gave up? > Interesing spin. Repeating an action that always ends in a negative result? Brilliance, stupidity, insanity, you choose. I chose to contribute to other project (see your response about volunteers). If you use Fortran on FreeBSD, you're welcome. -- Steve