From owner-cvs-ports Tue Jun 3 11:23:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA14150 for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 11:23:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp [203.178.139.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA14140; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 11:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp (8.8.5/3.5Wpl104/21/97) with ESMTP id DAA29918; Wed, 4 Jun 1997 03:22:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199706031822.DAA29918@bourbon.sfc.wide.ad.jp> To: pst@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: max@wide.ad.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/imap-uw Makefile ports/mail/imap-uw/filesmd5 ports/mail/imap-uw/patches patch-ab patch-aaports/mail/imap-uw/pkg PLIST ports/mail/imap-uw/scripts configure From: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 2 Jun 1997 23:27:19 -0700 (PDT)" References: <199706030627.XAA16729@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.54 on Emacs 19.28.1, Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 03:22:55 +0900 Sender: owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I'm really really really unhappy about these shared library > patches. This code changes WAY too fast to screw with shared > libraries. If they cause massive breakage again, they're > history. Up until this commit, we were adding a target to Makefile ``fbd'' for FreeBSD although there *was* a target for FreeBSD already as ``bsf''. I guess this was making it difficult for the original developers to integrate the changes we've been making (if they've ever tried to do that). What we should do, I think, is to submit our changes to the original developer at UW once we patch up the DISTFILES and enable building the shared libraries with ``make bsf''. Cheers, Max