From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 11 19:44:36 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA22670 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acromail.ml.org (acroal.vip.best.com [206.86.222.181]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA22665 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:44:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by acromail.ml.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA16865 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 19:45:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "J. Weatherbee - Chief Systems Engineer" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Stupid Routing Situation Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have a ascend pipeline 50 w/o firewall connected by a crossover cable to a freebsd machine the rest of the network is connected to a second ethernet interface. I want to firewall the machines on the second interface. This would be easy if I two networks, but I dont have enough IP's for that. It is kind of like I just want the machine to act as a bridge but I also want that bridge to be firewalled. Any suggestions, something I am missing. I have done this before with two ethernet segments but like I said these aren't 192.168 addresses and I don't have enough for two networks.