From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Apr 11 11:54:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA11818 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:54:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA11810 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA01274; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:54:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: Doug White To: SYSADM cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: version of BIND(named) used and IPFILTER STATUS In-Reply-To: <199704101752.NAA12494@cam6.aqc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 10 Apr 1997, SYSADM wrote: > I want to use Freebsd 2.1.7 for a primary name server > used for internet accesss. Can you tell me what version > of paul vixie's BIND is used on 2.1.7??? The one in 2.2.1 is 4.9.4-P1 and I bet 2.1.7 isn't far behind. > I am very interested in using 2.1.7 as a corporate > firewall. Is there any know problems with ipfilter > and 2.1.7???? Not that I know of. You may also be interested in FWTK, available in ports. > Also any known problems with going to BIND-4.9.5 > on 2.1.7 if its not all ready there? Getting it built may be the sticky part. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major