From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 10 06:08:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE8E37B401; Sat, 10 May 2003 06:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD2343FCB; Sat, 10 May 2003 06:08:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4AD8ec4005987; Sat, 10 May 2003 15:08:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4AD8Z3H005986; Sat, 10 May 2003 15:08:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 15:08:35 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <20030510150835.M427@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <20030508205123.GD17270@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030508233945.A76300@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030508221900.GA17740@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030509082219.H427@newtrinity.zeist.de> <20030509062805.GB19900@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de on Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:53:22PM +0200 cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: nntpcache broken on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 13:08:44 -0000 On Fri, May 09, 2003 at 09:53:22PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > > Odd. Can anyone else confirm the port compiles on a clean, > > up-to-date, default sparc installation? Since this breakage is new, > > it can only be something very recent, so an out-of-date installation > > or one with old installed files may not see the problem. > > Should there be a target "make cleancruft" to complement "make > installworld" that cleans out obsolete include files, libraries, > commands... -- or do it the Linux way and include the base system in > package management (which may introduce interesting bootstrapping > problems). > As for compiling nntpcache, I wipe out /usr/include, /usr/lib* (except libc, libgnuregexp, libm, libmd, libbz2 and ld-elf which are required for an installworld) and /usr/share with every upgrade. So there shouldn't be any old cruft that causes nntpcache to accidentally build on my box.