From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Wed Dec 23 11:05:22 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33F8A507B9
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:05:22 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B461B86
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:05:22 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBNB5MjJ095563
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:05:22 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205490] java/wildfly80 : uncontrolled wildfly proliferation
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:05:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: yerenkow@gmail.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-205490-13-XHxurNRLF4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205490-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205490-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 11:05:22 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205490

--- Comment #2 from yerenkow@gmail.com ---
Seems reasonable, can we deprecate 8.0 and 8.1 now, and set some date of
deprecation for 8.2, say 2016-07-23 (1 year from release).

The reason behind many wildflies, is that I started support of jboss7, and
7.1.1 was latest release with source tarball; 7.1.3 contained critical fix, and
was built only from github tag; and 7.2 was significantly different from 7.1.x.

When they rebranded to wildflies, I created ports for every major branches
then, just to be safe.
Seems now that these numbers only marketing, and all of them show high level of
compatibility.
I agree that we should stick now to 9 and 10, and in future, next will be named
as widfly-devel, and will substitute 10.

I believe that's seems reasonable, but I think I'll post this bug to mail list
for wider discussion.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.