From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 20 03:09:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A66C16A4DA for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mh983@yahoo.com) Received: from web82114.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web82114.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.84.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C56743D5F for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:09:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mh983@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 15658 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jul 2006 03:09:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6FYvC7euWaSeQTeqE3s2rpxfjpMTK0uIDFu1ZFYizLEorB/t6TpTTwylNuesEMD0LT0Tg6ruhtZUvJf32PoxgeSnuWpUbB50Tg5kb2nWM6+LEQ+xOinjzuT0H+hC1zSPTCLaUE2/Uqu9hDDq9g7cs7EEcs5mIldwWURco1qbH20= ; Message-ID: <20060720030946.15656.qmail@web82114.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.208.162.156] by web82114.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:09:46 PDT Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:09:46 -0700 (PDT) From: mh983 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060719171430.704B616A4F8@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: defining dependencies for ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mh983 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:09:48 -0000 RW wrote: > I already answered this in the main thread - this one is a second thread > created when Owen G answered a list digest (I do wish people wouln't do > that). > > I was only guessing at the time, but my guess looks right: ... > I think the problem is that as time goes by more and more GTK ports are > becoming increasingly Gnomified. Terribly sorry about missing your other post. I use digest mode too, but as of today I stopped because it's evil. Thanks for the response. I think the output from that webbased dependency list is misleading as many of those dependencies are gone once you exclude gnome, but the output makes it look like they are direct dependents of eclipse. Thanks for taking the time to explain this. Hope my response ends up on the right thread. mike