From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 5 17:47:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E674A16A41F for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 17:47:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from zig.murex.com (mail.murex.com [194.98.239.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E90543D46 for ; Fri, 5 May 2006 17:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from interscan.fr.murex.com (interscan.fr.murex.com [172.21.17.207] (may be forged)) by zig.murex.com with ESMTP id k45Hndl9019519; Fri, 5 May 2006 19:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mxmail.murex.com (interscan.murex.fr [127.0.0.1]) by interscan.fr.murex.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k45IOBa04205; Fri, 5 May 2006 20:24:12 +0200 Received: from [172.21.130.86] ([172.21.130.86]) by mxmail.murex.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 5 May 2006 19:46:40 +0200 From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Kris Kennaway Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 13:46:39 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200605041507.08581.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <200605042300.59364@aldan> <20060505034504.GA76618@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060505034504.GA76618@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200605051346.39823.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 May 2006 17:46:41.0390 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDEF58E0:01C6706B] Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mark Linimon Subject: Re: X.Org 7.0 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 17:47:18 -0000 четвер 04 травень 2006 23:45, Kris Kennaway написав: > On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:00:58PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > On Thursday 04 May 2006 21:19, Mark Linimon wrote: > > = What would you suggest to solve this problem? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > [...] > > Currently, if Eric responds at all, the response can be summarized as: > > "Yeah, we know, it sucks. [...]" > Remind me again what obligation Eric has to fix your problem? Put your grouchiness down and re-read the question underlined above for your convenience. Damn it. -mi