From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 10:37:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5262A16A4CE for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:37:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B66C43D6D for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:37:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 6935 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2004 17:37:11 -0000 Received: from dsl027-160-063.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender ) encrypted SMTP for ; 27 Apr 2004 17:37:11 -0000 Received: from 10.50.40.205 (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3RHb8R1008406; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:37:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:21:05 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040425171142.GA23825@teardrop.org> <200404271002.02680.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <408E705C.7060104@chereda.net> In-Reply-To: <408E705C.7060104@chereda.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404271321.06052.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on server.baldwin.cx Subject: Re: XFree86 & ACPI don't like each other? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:37:13 -0000 On Tuesday 27 April 2004 10:38 am, Sergey Solyanik wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > >>>Did you remove 'device apic' as well? > >> > >>FWIW, X under 5.2.1-RELEASE would freeze on me. Creating a non-SMP > >> kernel solved the problem for me. I'm still using ACPI but only just > >> started using sleep/resume. I did not remove apic. > > > > So just removing SMP, but not removing apic? What if you boot the SMP > > kernel with 'kern.smp.disabled=1' set from the loader? > > Is removing apic necessary when removing SMP? > > I have a lot of boxes without SMP and with apic, notebooks and desktops, > and everything is working ok, using APIC interrupts routing. No, it is not necessary. However, knowing whether or not apic alone causes the problem allows us to narrow it down into either the apic code or the SMP code. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org