Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:36:38 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au> Cc: danny@hilink.com.au, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Y2K compliance question Message-ID: <199901150536.WAA20649@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 15 Jan 1999 13:46:39 %2B1100." <99Jan15.134603est.40357@border.alcanet.com.au> References: <99Jan15.134603est.40357@border.alcanet.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <99Jan15.134603est.40357@border.alcanet.com.au> Peter Jeremy writes: : src/usr.sbin/tcpdump/tcpslice/tcpslice.c I've not been able to find a Y2K bug here. There is one place that uses 1900 correctly, and it always assumes that two digit years are in the 1900's. Or is that what you are talking about... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901150536.WAA20649>