From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 2 06:56:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 94D9316A4C8; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:56:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@freebsd.org Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5773B16A496 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:56:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from mail48.e.nsc.no (mail48.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD7143D48 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 06:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from Unknown-00-c0-9f-49-78-d8.lan (ti131310a080-10195.bb.online.no [85.165.231.211]) by mail48.nsc.no (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k526u7wU014958 for ; Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:56:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Hans Petter Selasky To: "Perforce Change Reviews" Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:56:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200605301926.k4UJQkgt055284@repoman.freebsd.org> <200605311657.44921.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606020856.11054.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 98153 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:56:10 -0000 On Friday 02 June 2006 02:26, Kip Macy wrote: > > I'd rather avoid this for now as it will have to be backed out for > > interrupt filters. > > I don't know anything about interrupt filters, so please let me know > what you have in mind. The whole of interrupt handling is far too > heavyweight at the moment. > As long as your code is not Giant locked, the standard interrupt handlers should not be that slow? --HPS