Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 14:58:42 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Intel SE7500WV2 not working with ACPI Message-ID: <20031202225841.GA32641@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20031202175027.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <20031125175102.GA23623@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <XFMail.20031202175027.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:50:27PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: >=20 > On 25-Nov-2003 Brooks Davis wrote: > > Since the interrupt changes, my dual Xeons based on the SE7500WV2 board > > don't work with ACPI. Specificly, the onboard nics (em0 and em1) > > appear to not be recieving interupts. Instead, they continiously get > > watchdog timeouts. In a stock current, this is an instant panic. With > > a minor fix to the watchdog function, the system sees to be more or less > > funcitonal other then not having a network. Disabling ACPI makes the > > nics work. I have updated the BIOS to the latest version[0]. > >=20 > > I've included ACPI and non-ACPI dmesg output below. What else is needed > > to diagnose this problem? Any patches I should try? >=20 > Since acpi0 failed to probe, ACPI isn't used to route interrupts. Howeve= r, > the apic code expects ACPI to do that since it enumerated CPUs and I/O > APICs. You are just going to have to disable ACPI for now. >=20 > > acpi0: <INTEL SWV20 > on motherboard > > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC0= _._REG] (Node 0xc29b4660), > > AE_NOT_EXIST > > acpi0: Could not initialise SystemIO handler: AE_NOT_EXIST > > device_probe_and_attach: acpi0 attach returned 6 >=20 > If you can get this fixed, then you can re-enable ACPI again. What I can't figure out is why this is failing since acpi was at least partialy working before. For instance, soft power was definalty working. Doesn't that depend on acpi attaching? -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/zRkgXY6L6fI4GtQRAv7DAKCUEGarfwfwS3NxxqBB1jY4fRvn4wCgiA2X evqS4pIKwC5uIZsZ1lUdCww= =quZJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031202225841.GA32641>