From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Apr 21 12:47:40 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1EA2CC0B8 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:47:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonameless@ukr.net) Received: from frv191.fwdcdn.com (frv191.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.191]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.ukr.net", Issuer "Thawte RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4963Ht71Wyz4G2W for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nonameless@ukr.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=ffe; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-Id: References:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:Subject:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=cBBRT6PCj0rTRWOowR4nRiOl0MqmrCc61bjS9x8xU1c=; b=Q0g/JczlxL/0AVcAxHlFKzFctn R4nnEpwwuD+vr9wdV5lI0Mu8DlhksxrKXmQIsTfjFHAxerbpcouF0oOoWw9CYdrlGA5zpUGtqGalJ gmfaG6MK42aQsceoxaaMMvroimfKla29rHlg+rT4YcERkTz8nPv0+C8b44L29qM++8Lc=; Received: from [10.10.80.24] (helo=frv55.fwdcdn.com) by frv191.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1jQsJG-000A3A-F4 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:47:30 +0300 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:47:30 +0300 From: nonameless@ukr.net Subject: Re[2]: Outdated jemalloc in CURRENT To: Li-Wen Hsu Cc: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, Gordon Bergling , freebsd-current , Jason Evans Received: from nonameless@ukr.net by frv55.fwdcdn.com; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 15:47:30 +0300 In-Reply-To: References: <1587211096.573263000.1z45j66i@frv55.fwdcdn.com> <20200418142003.GA64067@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20200418150108.GA14089@lion.0xfce3.net> <20200418152152.GA64335@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-Reply-Action: reply Message-Id: <1587473050.313210000.k0ssh4f6@frv55.fwdcdn.com> X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4963Ht71Wyz4G2W X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=ukr.net header.s=ffe header.b=Q0g/Jczl; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=ukr.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of nonameless@ukr.net designates 212.42.77.191 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=nonameless@ukr.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[ukr.net:s=ffe]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ipnet: 212.42.77.0/24(-4.87), asn: 8856(-3.90), country: UA(0.07)]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:212.42.77.0/24]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[ukr.net]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[ukr.net.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[ukr.net:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[ukr.net,none]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[ukr.net]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8856, ipnet:212.42.77.0/24, country:UA]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:47:40 -0000 > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 11:22 PM Steve Kargl > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 05:01:08PM +0200, Gordon Bergling wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 07:20:03AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:05:25PM +0300, nonameless@ukr.net wrote: > > >>> Hi everyone! > > >>> > > >>> As I see, CURRENT still uses outdated jemalloc 5.1.0 with some > > >>> performance regressions that was fixed in 5.2.1. > > >>> > > >>> Are there some issues that blocking update jemalloc to recent version? > > >>> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> r354606 | jasone | 2019-11-10 21:06:49 -0800 (Sun, 10 Nov 2019) | 4 lines > > >> > > >> Revert r354605: Update jemalloc to version 5.2.1. > > >> > > >> Compilation fails for non-llvm-based platforms. > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > >> r354605 | jasone | 2019-11-10 19:27:14 -0800 (Sun, 10 Nov 2019) | 2 lines > > >> > > >> Update jemalloc to version 5.2.1. > > >> > > > > > > I am not sure, that this info is correct. As far as I remember the > > > update for jemalloc was reverted due to build problems, on some > > > architecture. An updated revision has still to be commited to -CURRENT. > > > > > > > Those two commits confirm your memory. 5.2.1 was committed > > in r354605. 5.2.1 was reverted with r354606 where the reason > > for reverting is stated. As 5.2.1 has not been re-committed > > and there is nothing in reviews.freebsd.org for review, one > > may expect the reason in r354606 still stands. > > > > PS: Please, do not top-post. > > PPS: Please, wrap your messages to something less than 80 characters. > > I think it's fine to (and hope we can) update it again as the previous > error was on outdated gcc which is not existing anymore: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2020-March/195013.html > > Li-Wen Thanks to all for the information. I will wait for the update.