From owner-freebsd-security Tue Feb 2 19:12:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA29406 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 19:12:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA29400; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 19:12:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA09578; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 19:12:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" cc: woodford@cc181716-a.hwrd1.md.home.com, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcpdump In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Feb 1999 13:37:28 PST." <199902022137.NAA07900@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 19:12:46 -0800 Message-ID: <9575.918011566@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org OK, time to raise this topic again. What to people think about enabling bpfilter by default in GENERIC? And before everyone screams "That would not be BSD!" let me just note that NetBSD and probably OpenBSD (haven't looked) already do this. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message