From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jun 2 10:41: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750BF37B42C for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 10:41:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rabat@web.de) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 156FOW-0001c2-07; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 19:41:00 +0200 Received: from spotteswoode.yi.org (520082050842-0001@[217.80.22.59]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 156FOK-0HASJsC; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:40:48 +0200 Received: (qmail 3411 invoked by uid 0); 2 Jun 2001 17:41:10 -0000 Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 19:41:09 +0200 From: clemensF To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is OpenBSD safer than other BSDs ? Message-ID: <20010602194109.C2630@spotteswoode.yi.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20010601195419.3283ef01.joel.carnat@noos.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from freebsd@bolingbroke.com on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:05:44PM -0700 Organization: private X-PGP-ID: 0x214190AF X-Stamper-To: post@stamper.itconsult.co.uk X-Sender: 520082050842-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Ken Bolingbroke: > If I wanted an absolutely secure gateway just for security, I would > probably go with OpenBSD, because that's the focus. But for general > usage, FreeBSD has more features, and still has enough of an effort on > security concerns that I'm reasonably content with FreeBSD's security for > general applications. i'd like to know which features there are in freebsd in addition to openbsd's. is it the vm structure? kame? clemens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message