From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 2 8:27:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E90737BF08; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:27:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from almanac.yi.org (pm016-046.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.82.254]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA14185; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:27:29 -0400 Received: by almanac.yi.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18C3F19B4; Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:26:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 11:26:50 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Ade Lovett , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Extra in the bento's logs Message-ID: <20000602112650.R32212@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <39376BD4.A6B07119@FreeBSD.org> <20000602101355.O99369@FreeBSD.org> <3937D070.EFBC1E4C@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <3937D070.EFBC1E4C@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 06:19:12PM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 06:19:12PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > What would be more useful, imho, would be a way to have an opt-in > > method of having port failure logs mailed to the maintainer. Similar > > to the GNATS reminders we already get. > > Accept my vote as well. And mine as well. IMO, this should not be opt-in (i.e. be mandatory) for FreeBSD committers. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message