From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 00:28:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2311065672 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-31.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-31.bluehost.com [69.89.18.151]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD1378FC17 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 1265 invoked by uid 0); 12 Dec 2008 00:28:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by outboundproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2008 00:28:34 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=apotheon.com; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mail-Followup-To:References:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Identified-User; b=LMm38IJZwSMxNzpFTh08Q1xHE5ZjaEh5ucjvEWQ7+eA5IiLSnHeJrLoeQePHvSlnGivFs2judm/EB7RNqkQ4gbJ9Iwp5Qjw6h83xkpswUTcpbQZqNWES1REWXjZMtRRz; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=kokopelli.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LAvtR-0007tN-O6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:28:34 -0700 Received: by kokopelli.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:28:13 -0700 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:28:13 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081212002813.GD32300@kokopelli.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <11167f520812070853i3b6fa6dei6e5c71669416470@mail.gmail.com> <20081207191727.V1610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081207193517.GA20905@laverenz.de> <20081207121431.5dcb37f9@gom.home> <1228733482.4495.14.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20081211103742.21621a6d@gom.home> <20081211190951.GB845@comcast.net> <20081211113257.405a082c@gom.home> <20081211202023.GC845@comcast.net> <20081211134622.15c81ecd@gom.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WChQLJJJfbwij+9x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081211134622.15c81ecd@gom.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.org} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with ren@apotheon.org} Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:28:34 -0000 --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 01:46:22PM -0800, prad wrote: >=20 > looking further we see: > "... As a result, FreeBSD may be found across the Internet, in the > operating > system of core router products, running root name servers, hosting > major web sites, and as the foundation for widely used desktop > operating systems." >=20 > so this would seem to clarify specific uses. the last bit about > desktops is certainly true - freebsd is an excellent foundation for any > desktop use, but that doesn't necessarily mean you get all the goodies > thrown in. Indeed. FreeBSD is, in terms of its architecture and design philosophy, the best desktop system I've ever used. I would like it to continue to improve as a desktop system -- and, as such, I am vehemently opposed to anyone that suggests that for "desktop bells and whistles" everybody should just fuck off to Microsoft-land. I certainly don't want to sacrifice the things that make FreeBSD great, not only for servers but for my laptop as well. We don't have to sacrifice those things to improve support for common desktop task functionality such as better 3D accelerated graphics support. My mind boggles at the protestations I see against improving such support. Refusing to support such things will not make FreeBSD better: it will only make FreeBSD more limited. Can we stop trying to dissuade people from improving FreeBSD, and from advocating for improvements? I don't see any reason we can't try to talk hardware vendors into providing better specs so better drivers can be produced, nor any reason we can't welcome people who want to use Compiz Fusion and run currently popular games on their FreeBSD desktops into the community. We don't have to adopt Ubuntu's sudo-only administrative model, decide bugs aren't important to fix, or adopt a more monolithic approach to system design that would reduce the performance and stability of FreeBSD, in order to work on better driver support and desktop usability. >=20 > in an interview with a german magazine many years ago, bill gates > plainly stated that microsoft wasn't too interested in fixing bugs. > they were far more interested in providing the stuff the customers > want. while that might seem to some like good business sense, it > assumes that the 'customer is always right' (which is really another > way of saying that the customer is always ripe for the picking). >=20 > i don't think that's where we'd want freebsd to go. I certainly don't want FreeBSD to go there -- but that's not the same as wanting FreeBSD to offer better support for common desktop functionality like 3D accelerated graphics. Why does everybody seem so eager to assume that FreeBSD isn't, and shouldn't be, a good desktop system? --=20 Chad Perrin [ content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Paul Graham: "SUVs are gross because they're the solution to a gross problem. (How to make minivans look more masculine.)" --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklBsB0ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXBRwCg7jKHE7twRwmsC5UKFJhN7CK4 BrEAoNIwGtFa5RxZKHhxkZ9EETA9RQiu =o7qH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x--