Date: Fri, 7 Jan 100 07:41:40 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> To: steve@virtual-voodoo.com (Steve Ames) Cc: committers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Message-ID: <200001062041.HAA04552@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20000106152026.A98222@virtual-voodoo.com> from "Steve Ames" at Jan 6, 0 03:20:26 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some email I received from Steve Ames, sie wrote: > > *shudder* I really, really dislike the idea of -RELEASE actually being a > wide beta so that some code can get a workout. LAbel it beta and more people > will use it than currently do anyway. Any reason not to release and ship a > 4.0-beta? -CURRENT = development which scares people. Beta means most bugs > already ironed out and looking for test by larger audience. -RELEASE should > not be a beta, ever. What do you think 3.0-RELEASE was ? This seems to be how FreeBSD works now. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001062041.HAA04552>