From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  3 15:50:08 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0F2C0E
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Dec 2012 15:50:08 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org)
Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk
 [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3148FC08
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Dec 2012 15:50:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB3FnnrT045661
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
 Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:50:03 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.7.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk qB3FnnrT045661
Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/qB3FnnrT045661;
 dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy)
X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host
 mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com
Message-ID: <50BCCA1C.7010800@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:49:48 +0000
From: Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: pkg upgrade?
References: <k9gigp$uqo$1@ger.gmane.org> <50BC4790.5010707@FreeBSD.org>
 <k9igqr$1ll$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <k9igqr$1ll$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
 autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on
 lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:50:08 -0000

On 03/12/2012 15:34, Walter Hurry wrote:
> $ sudo pkg info -s -F gcc-4.6.4.20121102.txz
> gcc-4.6.4.20121102 flat size is: 0 B
> gcc-4.6.4.20121102 package size is: 0 B

Ah.  It turns out that querying any pkgng package directly for its
installed size always returns 0 at the moment.  You'ld need to use the
repo catalogue to get some sort of reasonable answer.  I can't remember
off hand if pkgs are meant to know what their installed size is; will
look into that tonight after work.

Recommend to use pkg search for querying repo catalogues rather than
using sqlite directly, but whatever.

Seems there is clearly a bug in calculating the change in disk space
usage -- looks like it's added the 500MB flatsize of both package
versions together rather than subtracting.

	Cheers,

	Matthew