From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jan 5 2: 9:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from pogo.caustic.org (pogo.caustic.org [208.44.193.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094BD14CC4 for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 02:09:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jan@caustic.org) Received: from localhost (jan@localhost) by pogo.caustic.org (8.9.3/ignatz) with ESMTP id CAA38346; Wed, 5 Jan 2000 02:09:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2000 02:09:57 -0800 (PST) From: "f.johan.beisser" To: William Woods Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: SSH recomendations - Re: OpenSSH protocol 1.6 proposal In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, William Woods wrote: > Please dont flame me for this, but I would like to know which is reccomened, > > ssh1 > ssh2 > openssh out of the three, i'd recommend ssh1. why? 1. tested, proven, stable. 2. no licensing issues, and the code doesn't change much 3. no major licensing restrictions. (read the licensing info in the source distribution first.) 4. Cross Platform Compatibility! > I do a lot of remote work and clients dont like haveint Telnet open and would > like to use ssh, I would like to reccomend the best solution...which, in your > opinion is the best. there ya go. my opinion on the ssh's. -- jan +-----// f. johan beisser //------------------------------+ email: jan[at]caustic.org web: http://www.caustic.org/~jan "knowledge is power. power corrupts. study hard, be evil." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message