From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 21:19:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD0616A420 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7659343D46 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518E61A3C1D; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:19:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4FA0C528D4; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:19:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:19:41 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Paul Eggert Message-ID: <20060120211940.GA43031@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200601131825.SAA21164@sopwith.solgatos.com> <87r772obn8.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r772obn8.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com, bug-bison@gnu.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portability fix for bison-1.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:19:42 -0000 --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 01:03:07PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote: > Dieter writes: >=20 > > A fix for portability between ILP32 and LP64. >=20 > Thanks, but that bug was fixed in a different way some time ago; see > . >=20 > Bison 1.75 is pretty old and has several known bugs. I'm not sure I'd > recommend it for widespread use these days. Unfortunately there is a lot of software that cannot be used as-is with the newer version. This seems to be because the newer versions of bison are not backwards-compatible, which is irritating to say the least. In a practical sense it means that despite your recommendation, bison 1.75 is likely to be here to stay for the indefinite future. Kris --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD0VPsWry0BWjoQKURAg6CAJ9nQuSGnswApHDFEeR809wkLT5oUQCdF7ni Z2wzv3585AqqfvY/LZQa3cY= =Y1+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--