From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 6 13:50:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.dyn.ml.org (spain-37.ppp.hooked.net [206.169.228.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAE614DB9 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:50:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Received: from localhost (garbanzo@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.dyn.ml.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA02188; Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from garbanzo@hooked.net) Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 13:48:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Zepeda To: Matthew Dillon Cc: paul@originative.co.uk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RE: EGCS optimizations In-Reply-To: <199904062001.NAA10310@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 6 Apr 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > It's no big deal, really. I think the EGCS bandwagon is going to continue > to move forward and PGCS runs on top of it, so moving to EGCS puts FreeBSD > in a better position in the long term. Well what would be the chances of getting the pgcc patches committed? It seems like this wouldn't have a negative impact on other non x86 hardware, but might be a win for us stuck with Pentiums or PIIs. - alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message