From owner-freebsd-smp Wed Jan 15 09:36:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id JAA12737 for smp-outgoing; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA12714 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id JAA28664 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 09:35:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id KAA04604; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:33:11 -0700 Message-Id: <199701151733.KAA04604@clem.systemsix.com> X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 From: Steve Passe To: Kory Hamzeh cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3.0-970114-SNAP as starting point for SMP kernel In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Jan 1997 23:15:14 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 10:33:11 -0700 Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, >Is it possible to setup a system with two releases? I would like to try >out the 3.0-SNAP for SMP support, but I would like to be able to boot my >2.1.5-RELEASE incase of trouble. I think that the differences are great enough that you would have to handle them as two different OSes, ie. different partitions, etc. -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | FreeBSD