From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 20 23:31:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616DC16A41F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:31:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU) Received: from kiwi.cs.ucla.edu (Kiwi.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.128.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FE143D45 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:31:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU) Received: from penguin.cs.ucla.edu (Penguin.CS.UCLA.EDU [131.179.64.200]) by kiwi.cs.ucla.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7/UCLACS-5.2) with ESMTP id k0KNVEH21838; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:31:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from eggert by penguin.cs.ucla.edu with local (Exim 4.50) id 1F05is-0008Ni-Jy; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:31:14 -0800 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200601131825.SAA21164@sopwith.solgatos.com> <87r772obn8.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <20060120211940.GA43031@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Paul Eggert Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:31:14 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20060120211940.GA43031@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:19:41 -0500") Message-ID: <87u0bymq7x.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com, bug-bison@gnu.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portability fix for bison-1.75 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:31:50 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > Unfortunately there is a lot of software that cannot be used as-is > with the newer version. This seems to be because the newer versions > of bison are not backwards-compatible, which is irritating to say the > least. That's news to me. Has anyone filed a bug report about these irritating backward-compatibility issues to ? Possibly the backward-compatibility problems, whatever they were, have already been fixed. In that case I'd still recommend that people not use 1.75, as it has some real bugs.