From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 11 05:40:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082A21065674 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11738FC19 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m2B5e2RD086805 for ; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m2B5e2Pc086804; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:02 GMT Message-Id: <200803110540.m2B5e2Pc086804@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org From: RC Cc: Subject: Re: kern/121575: ACPI regression from 6.2 to 7.0 -- S3 resume fails with VIA VT8235 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: RC List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:40:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/121575; it has been noted by GNATS. From: RC To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/121575: ACPI regression from 6.2 to 7.0 -- S3 resume fails with VIA VT8235 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:33:32 -0700 On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 02:52:54 +0100 Volker wrote: > Please post `sysctl hw.acpi', `sysctl debug.acpi' and `apm' Looking at the output of sysctl, it immediately became obvious that reset_video was 0, whereas it should have been 1, as it is on my 6.2 installation. I was sure it was enabled (in the BIOS) but it's been a long time now... And I look like an idiot for not first checking something so simple. Thanks for the pointer. You can discard this bug.