From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 18:06:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D578316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:06:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A8843D46 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBSI3cJr023389; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:03:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)iBSI3c8o023386; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:03:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 13:03:38 -0500 (EST) From: doug To: "Michael C. Shultz" In-Reply-To: <200412251013.26800.reso3w83@verizon.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 18:07:00 -0000 Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would be happy to help with testing. On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > Portupgrade has one serious flaw in my opinion and that is running > > > something like pkgdb -F damages the port installation database as > > > far as I'm concerned. It causes the data base to say ports were > > > built with dependency ports that they were never really built > > > with. Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the > > > forseeable future that is where all the focus will be, only on > > > correctly updating ports. > >