From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 22 19:02:13 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95AB16A4CF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:02:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-222-86-182.jan.bellsouth.net
	[68.222.86.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D7B43D3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:02:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net)
Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id A46AF21012; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:02:11 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:02:11 -0600
From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Message-ID: <20050122190211.GA2081@over-yonder.net>
References: <20050122120810.05b8a0e3@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050122120810.05b8a0e3@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
X-Editor: vi
X-OS: FreeBSD <http://www.freebsd.org/>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i-fullermd.2
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of "top"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 19:02:14 -0000

On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 12:08:10PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Alexander Leidinger, and lo! it spake thus:
> 
> It tells me that 23% of CPU are used by userland processes. But I
> only see 1.5% used in the process listing. The galeon-bin process
> shows alot of used CPU time (for this small uptime), and I wouldn't
> be surprised if it is the galeon process which is eating the
> majority of the CPU resources (I have ~85 tabs open with content),
> but I object to the 0% CPU display then.

Aren't threaded processes still not showing CPU usage stats?


-- 
Matthew Fuller     (MF4839)   |  fullermd@over-yonder.net
Systems/Network Administrator |  http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/

"The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I
      haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"