From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 21:29:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DC416A4E1; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:29:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 036C643D54; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:29:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAALSWR4085512; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:28:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)iAALSWdW085509; Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:28:32 GMT (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:28:32 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1100120495.36242.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 6-CURRENT unbelievably slow? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:29:44 -0000 On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > [NON-Text Body part not included] If you diff the dmesg "before" and "after", are there any signs of substantial interrupt or device configuration changes? Paying particular attention, perhaps, to assignment of interrupt numbers, etc. Do settings like ACPI make a difference? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research