From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Sep 5 12:21:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nygate.undp.org (nygate.undp.org [192.124.42.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C2B1543F; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 12:21:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ugen@xonix.com) Received: from umka.undp.org (umka.undp.org [192.124.42.40]) by nygate.undp.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/1.3) with ESMTP id PAA18025; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 15:20:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from xonix.com ([127.0.0.1]) by umka.undp.org (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA39A6; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 15:22:28 -0400 Message-ID: <37D2C371.1835A96B@xonix.com> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 15:24:33 -0400 From: Ugen Antsilevitch X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: PCI modems do not work??? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well.. i just looked through some archives and also on the recent traffic in freebsd-questions. It seems there are great many people that have same problem i do - apparently our beloved system does not support PCI modems? Now if i am wrong here - kick me and ignore the rest of the message. If i am right - this really has to be fixed and soon. There aren't many ISA 56K modems out there that aren't winmodems. On my last search everything that was 56K was divided about 80% winmodems and 20% PCI modems (with UART). I don't think for someone with understanding of low level drivers implementing this should be too hard? After all all the difference AFAIK is in how interrupts are delivered from a device. It still has the same ports, doesn't it? If this is not fixed soon FreeBSD users won't be able to get a modem working at all... and then how the hell is this going to be a network system?:)))) --Ugen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message