From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 1 7:32:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF0637B479; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 07:32:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id QAA09903; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:32:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA02994; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:32:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:32:43 +0100 (CET) From: Marius Bendiksen To: John Baldwin Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Like to commit my diskprep In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Fair enough. Should we then start changing our other tools to > make the bogus form deprecated and warn the user with the intention > of axeing it altogether in 6.0 or some such? This sounds like a good idea to me, though I'd personally prefer to axe it in -CURRENT straight off (as the people using current are tracking the relevant lists and will see the heads-up), and let it stay for 5.0-R. Just put the warnings about deprecation into -STABLE. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message